Unit 2
Unit 2
The Romans
The sway of the Greeks was a flowering time for mathematic but that of the
Romans of sterility. As a Teaching of Mathematics consequence not only the
higher geometry of Archimedas and Apollonius but even the Element of Eaclid
was neglected. It is thought that even 'Roman Notation' was borrwed from some
outside sources.
Romans had for long been concerned with payments of interest and problems of
interest. The Roman laws of inheritence gave rise to numerous arthmetical
problems.
The Chinese
There are some old publication of Chinese:-
(a) chou-pei
(b) Arithmetic in Nine Section
(c) Arithmetical classic of Sun-Tsu
(d) Sea-Island Arithmetical Classic
(e) Arithmetical classic of change Ch'iuchien
(1) Nine sections of mathematics
(g) Introduction to mathematical studies
(h) The precious mirror of the four elements
(i) The systematized treatise on Arithmetic
The Japanese
In about 552AD prince Sho'takn Taishi engaged his attention to mathematics to
such a degree that he came to be called the father of Japanese mathematics. A
little later, Chinese science was imported.
The Seventeenth century was a period of great mathematical activity. It started
with mo'ri Kambei Shigeyoshi who popularized the use of 'suroban'. His pubil
y.s ko`yu wrote a book Jinko-ki in 1627 which is the oldest Japanese
mathematical work now available. Another works are follows: -
(a) Jugairoku (1639) by Imamura Chi Sho
(b) Ketsugisho (1660) by Isomura Kittoku
(c) Kongedki (1666) ‘Sato' 'Seiko'
(d) Hatsubi Sampo 1674 by Seki Ko'wa
The Hindus
Hindus had scaled great heights in mathematics and that was mainly to serve
astronomy. Indian mind are arithmetical. The Hindu dealt with number, Hindu
geometry was merely mensuration, unaccompared by demonstration. Hindu
trigonometry is meritorious, but rest on Arithmetic more than on geometry.
Some works in Hindu period are given below:-
• Aryabhatiyą by Aryabhata (476AD)
• Brahma-sphuta sidhanta by Brahmagupta (628 AD)
• Ganit sara Sangraha by Mahavira
• Ganit -Sara-Sridhara
• Algebra – Padmanabha
• Sidhanta Siromani (Bhaskara 1150)
• Lilavali (Bhaskara)
• Vij Ganita
At the beginning of the twentieth century, mathematical activity along modern
lines sprang up in India. In the year 1907 there was founded the "Indian
Mathematical Society” and in 1909 the “Journal of the Indian Mathematical
Society” was started at Madras.
The Arabs
The Arabs had the good fortune of possess rulers who furthered scientific
research. At the courts of the caliphers. Scientists were supplied with libraries
and observatories. They have to their credit several substantial accomplishment.
They solved cubic equation by geometric construction perfected trigonometry to
a marked degree and made numerous smaller advances all along the line of
mathematics, Physics and astronomy.
They adopted the learning of Greece and India and kept what they received with
care. When love for mathematics began to grow in the west they transmitted
with to the europeans the valuable treasures of mathematics.
Beauty and Precision in Mathematics
1. Beauty in Mathematics
Beauty being a subjective quality is difficult to be quantified by conversion into
measurable parameters or factors. In the same manner, as a common person has
greater appreciation and thus predilection for some art forms more than others,
mathematicians appreciate mathematical beauty differently in different aspects
of mathematics such as theorems, equations, proofs, geometric figures and
process of solving. Despite personal parameters and affinity towards different
aspects of mathematics, there is a broad consensus among mathematicians as to
what imparts beauty to mathematics.
Weyl (1952) connected beauty with symmetry. Chandrasekhar (1979)
considered ‘a proper conformity of the parts to one another and to the whole'
while still showing 'some strangeness in their proportion' as an aesthetic criteria.
Davis and Hersh (1981) derived aesthetic delight from the power of
mathematics to provide order out of chaos. Heisenberg (1985) considered
mathematical structure as a factor, found in the mathematical relationships that
bring together independent parts to form a unitary whole. Dreyfus and
Eisenberg (1986) stated that simplicity, conciseness and clarity of an argument
are the principle factors along with structure, power, cleverness and surprise.
Whitcombe (1988) lists concepts, such as structure, form, relations,
visualization, economy, simplicity, elegance, order, as aesthetic elements.
Stewart (1998) considered imperfect symmetry to be even more beautiful than
exact mathematical symmetry, as our mind loves surprise much like an abstract
art.
Let us discuss few criteria of mathematical beauty:
(a) Beauty in mathematical methods
An elegant proof unravels deep truths, simply and concisely. Euclid's Proof of
the Infinitude of Primes is a classic example that for over 2300 years has been
considered elegant for its simplicity. The elegance of a method or proof can be
ascribed to a number of features such as novelty of approach or the argument,
conciseness, minimum assumptions, independence from existing results, easy
generalization and intuitiveness. A theorem may already have been proven but
the mathematicians still strive to prove it through different methods, not to
validate the earlier proofs but in search of more elegant and creative proofs. The
Pythagorean theorem has been the favourite with over 800 different proofs,
while the theorem of quadratic reciprocity has around 250 published proofs with
Gauss alone publishing eight different proofs of this theorem.
(b) Beauty in mathematical results
The ability of mathematics to weave connections together and establish
relationship by unifying the numbers, different ideas and areas of mathematics
that seemingly appear unconnected at first, is fascinating and hugely appealing
perhaps because of the element of surprise. The realization of an unfathomable
result is what provides the beauty to mathematical results. Euler's formula is one
such classic example and the other is the Gauss's theorem.
(c) Beauty in mathematical principles
Some mathematicians consider mathematical principles to be beautiful because
of their universal application and ability to be applied and convert everything in
the universe to mathematical structures connected through relations. The whole
universe can be regarded as a huge matrix of numbers.
(d) Beauty in mathematical applications
Mathematics allows us to define and describe everything around us with
numbers including the invisible things like sound. A sound is nothing but a
wave with a numerical frequency and amplitude. It is reducible to mathematical
equations. A sound may be a pleasant or a cacophonic noise simply because of
its numerical attributes. Different musical instruments churn out different kinds
of sound simply because they have different attributes.
The most extensive and intensive application of mathematics is probably in
modern day engineering in consumer products, constructing of wondrous
buildings and spaceships. It is indeed the beauty of mathematics that makes it
all possible.
2. Precision in Mathematics
Precision means the state or quality of being precise. Precision is a property of
measurement related to the unit of measure used; the smaller the unit of
measure used, the more exact the measurement is. Measurements must be very
precise to put a satellite in orbit or to determine the amount of x-rays to
administer.
In measuring one's height, it is usually reported in inches. But to say that one is
60 inches tall involves an error as do all measurements. If the person is more
than 60 and 1/2 inches in height, his height is usually reported as 61 inches or if
his height is less than 59 and 1/2 inches, his height is reported as 59 inches.
In reporting a measurement as 60 inches, the greatest possible error is ±1/2 inch.
The measurement is said to be precise to the nearest inch. Had the person's
height been measured with a ruler marked off in tenths of an inch and his height
reported to the nearest tenth of an inch, the measurement would have been
precise to tenths of an inch, and the greatest possible error would have been one
half of one tenth, reported as ±1/20. Precision thus refers to the unit of measure-
in the first example an inch, in the second, tenths of an inch.
Since precision in measurement is very important in science and industry, the
greatest possible error involved in the measurement must be stated.
(a) Precision in whole numbers
Note that in measurement all non-zero numerals are significant. However, a
zero may or may not be significant. For example, a measure such as 3.261 is
said to have four significant digits. Each digit in this measure is significant
because each digit was read from the measuring instrument. Sound is reported
to travel at a speed of 1100 feet per second. A measure reported as 1100 means
that it is precise to the nearest hundred. The greatest possible error then is ±50.
To say that the speed of sound is 1100 feet per second means (1100±50) feet per
second or somewhere between 1050 and 1150 feet per second. The non-zero
numeral farthest to the right indicates the precision, 1100. It is as if this measure
had been with a very large ruler marked off in 100 feet segments. Using such a
ruler the measure would be 11. The unit of measure is 100 feet per second. The
measurement would be reported as 1100 feet per second; the two zeros are used
as place holders and are not significant (not part of the measure). Since the unit
of measure is 100 feet per second, the greatest possible error is ±50 feet per
second. If the zeros had been part of the actual measurements, the measure
should be reported as 1100, indicating a precision to the nearest foot per second.
The greatest possible error in such a measurement is ±.5 feet per second.
(b) Precision in decimal fractions
Note that in decimal fractions as in whole numbers, all non-zero digits are
significant as are all zero digits between non-zero digits. Whereas, terminal
zeros in whole numbers are not considered significant, terminal zeros are
considered significant in decimal fractions.
The measure 2600 has two significant digits, but .2600 has four significant
digits. Also note that the zeros in the numeral 2600 determine only place value
for the numeral 26, but in the measure .2600, the zeros do not affect the place
value of the fraction .26.
In reporting a measure as .2600, the zeros are considered significant; if they
were not, the measure would be reported simply as .26. The measure .2600 is
considered to be precise to ten thousandths or to the place value of the numeral
farthest to the right in the measure. The measure .26 is precise only to
hundredths. The measure .2600 is made with an instrument calibrated to ten
thousandths of a unit and with such an instrument the measure is found to be
2600 of these calibrations. The decimal point in the measure 2600 indicates the
precision of the measuring instrument. In such a measure it is known that the
zero numerals are zero rather than some other number. The zeros are thus
significant. It is not a 'rounding off' or place-holder situation. The greatest
possible error for the measure .2600 is ±.00005.
In contrast, the measure .26 is made with an instrument calibrated to hundredths
of a unit and with such an instrument the measure is found to be 26 of these
calibrations. The measure .26, being precise to hundredths, has a greatest
possible error of ±.005.
In decimal fractions, zeros preceding non-zero digits are place holders only, as
are the terminal zeros in whole numbers, and therefore are not significant. The
measure .026 has two significant digits and is precise to thousandths.