We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18
Chapter-4
Property Rights, Land Tenure and Tenure
Security Property Right and Natural Resource Management The Four Strands in the “Rights Bundle” various strands in a bundle of rights related to a unit of land and associated natural resources may include: Right to use, Right to manage, Right to transfer (assign or reassign) Use and management rights, and Right to “own”. Property Right and Natural Resource Management 1.Use rights The most observable types of property rights are use rights, either to non-consumptive use of a resource or withdrawal of the resource such as: • gathering deadwood in a forest, • grazing livestock in a pasture, • producing crops on agricultural lands, or • fishing in a pond Use rights are as varied as are uses of a unit of land and the natural resources it contains. For example, use rights to a parcel of land may include: – the right to farm, – to pasture, – to plant trees, – to cut trees, – to build a house, – to establish a non-agricultural enterprise, – to exploit the land as a quarry, or – any combination of such rights Use rights to trees may include • fruit or leaf gathering, • honey collection, • removal of bark or branches, or • removal of the tree itself Use rights to a body of water may include – drinking, – bathing, – washing clothes, – watering livestock, – fishing or – diversion for irrigation 2. Management rights Management rights are an order higher than use rights, and are intermediate between use and full ownership (including transfer) rights. Management rights consist of the right to organize and assign use rights. The manager of a unit of land or a stock of natural resources typically has authority to makeland use and production decisions that have implications for the various use rights holders. Just as management rights can be distinct from use rights, management rights are also often distinct from transfer (or ownership) rights. For instance, a wetland may be legally owned by the state, but management of the wetland, that is, rules of when and where people can fish or how much fish can be withdrawn may be decided upon by a village council. Typically, in such cases, the village council will manage the wetland within the overarching regulations imposed by the state—as for instance, a state imposition of ban on fishing during specific times of the year. 3. Transfer right Transfer rights exist at a still higher order than use and management rights. Transfer rights refer to the authority to assign or reassign both management and use rights. A transfer of rights may be definitive and absolute, that is, the transfer may include all rights included in the property rights bundle. The ability to definitively transfer the entire property rights bundle is a typical feature of property rights systems predominant in the West, and may be referred to as alienation right. However, a transfer of property rights may also apply to something less than the entire property rights bundle. For example, it is common in non-Western societies for a family or a community to transfer management and use rights attached to a specific parcel to a new arrival. The transferred rights include the right to exclude all others, including community members, from certain uses of the transferred parcel such as crop cultivation. Rights granted to the new arrival are often quite secure, and may even be considered permanent. But the right to transfer the use and management rights is typically withheld from a new arrival within a given community 4. Ownership In contrast to the rights categories presented above, definition of the term ownership, as applied to land and natural resources, is neither precise nor rigorous. It is a useful term, and unavoidable within a discussion of property rights. The term is used here simply to indicate priority claims to the property rights bundle made on the part of an individual, a private entity or a state. Priority rights can be thought of as a claim of authority to manage and administer the property rights bundle. The concept of ownership may vary depending upon the socio-political context. For example, alienation rights, taken for granted in Western property rights systems, may be entirely absent from the property rights bundle claimed by the customary owners of land and natural resources. Types of Tenure Land tenure is often categorized into four types:- I. Private: Rights are assigned to a private party that may be an individual, a married couple, a group, a corporate body (commercial enterprise or non- profit organization). II. Communal: A right of commons may exist whereby each member of the community may use the land and resources of the community. Grazing cattle on a common pasture is one example. Non-community members, however, may be excluded. III. Open access /Terra nullius- Land belongs to no one. Does it exist? Specific rights are not assigned to any individual or group and no one can be excluded. IV. State Rights are assigned to a public sector entity. State land is divided into State Public Land, which can be used for public purposes, and State Private Land, which may be leased to earn an income. Core tenure processes There are four core tenure processes that are common in many nations. 1. Formally titling land 2. Transferring the land through agreements (selling, buying, mortgaging and leasing) 3. Transferring land by social events (birth, death, marriage, divorce, exclusion and inclusion among the managing groups) 4. Forming new interest in the cadaster, generally new land parcel or properties (subdivision and consolidation) What are some basic features of tenures? 1. Tenures are characterized in terms of: Type of right: ownership (freehold), tenancy (leasehold), usufruct (use right), concession, license Holder: individual (private), state (public), community (common)
2. Tenures are not made in Heaven but are created
by law Impact of Tenure Security In many countries of the developing world, insecure land tenure prevents large parts of the population from realizing the economic and noneconomic benefits like:- greater investment incentives, transferability of land, improved credit market access, more sustainable management of resources, independence from discretionary interference by bureaucrats, that are normally associated with secure property rights to land. Benefits of Increased Tenure Security Increase in land users’ investment incentives; Reduce the time and resources individuals have to spend trying to secure their land rights; Ability to make decisions about the allocation of land; Help groups that were traditionally discriminated against. Greater equity;