Module Assessment
Module Assessment
OVERVIEW
In the previous module, you analyzed objectives and test items their matching to the
learning outcomes and conditions. This module introduces you to the planning phase of
test development where the purpose of the test is identified, learning outcomes to be
assessed are clearly specified and lastly a table of specifications is prepared to guide
item construction phase.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
LET US EXPLORE
Activity 1
curriculum
instruction assessment
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
CONTENT FOCUS
Identifying the Purpose of the Test
Testing as an assessment mechanism aims to gather valid and reliable information useful to
both learners and teachers for formative as well as summative purposes. Classroom formative
assessments seek to uncover what students know and can do to get feedback on what they
need to alter or work on farther to improve their learning. Teachers on the other hand, can use
the results to map out their pedagogical moves to improve teaching-learning for appropriate
mentoring. Feedback provided is used primarily to address specific student learning problems
while instruction is still in progress.
The test considers the planned competencies to be developed in the unit of work.
Consequently, the learners spend enormous time reviewing, recalling or re-learning their past
lessons prior to testing. Their test motivation is contingent on the stake they put on testing, to
“pass the test”, “pass the course”, “get high grades”. Many teachers conveniently use testing as
their sole means to arrive at objective measures for evaluating students’ performance. Rigor in
the selection of learning competencies to be tested is determined by the teacher’s purpose in
giving the test.
Specifying the Learning Outcomes
Assessment has changed considerably as advances occur in the field of educational and
cognitive psychology particularly in defining learning and its domains. Consequently, this has
influenced curriculum designing for various educational levels. Defining learning has progressed
from being able to allow the learner to interpret and apply such facts to create new knowledge.
In the past decades, developments in the assessment of learning focused on multiple measures
of student performance reflecting different levels of outcomes that spell out what learners should
know and able to do along established hierarchical levels of cognition (Anderson, et. al, 2004).
The learning outcomes communicate both specific content and nature of tasks to be
performed. Assessment then becomes a quality assurance tool for tracking student progress in
attaining the curriculum standards in terms of content and performance.
Processes for assessment recognize and address different learning targets defined by
the intended outcomes from knowledge of facts and information covered by the curriculum at
every level to various facets of showing understanding of them: what operative processes or
skills they can demonstrate, what bigger and newer ideas they can form and derive, the
innovative processes and products they can create including their authentic application
in real-life.
Classroom test need to be carefully planned to ensure that they truthfully and
reliably quantify what are intended to be measured. Does it intend to assess amount of
student learning at the end of an instructional period, e.g. week’s lesson, a unit or
quarter or semester or at the end of a course? This type of test is post instructional
assessment tool .
Test can also be used as pre-instructional assessment tool which can diagnose
what the learners know of the new lesson for instructional adjustment on the part of the
teacher. As important as these two assessment purposes is utilizing the test as a means
to inform the learners how they are learning and how they are progressing.
The wide choice for multiple choice format in classroom testing is mainly due to
its versatility to assess various levels of understanding from knowledge and simple
understanding to deep understanding. McMillan (2007) asserts that multiple choice can
assess whether students can use reasoning as a skill similar to binary-choice items and
to use students’ knowledge and skills in performing problem-solving, decision-making or
other reasoning task. Cognitively demanding outcomes involving analysis and
evaluation lend themselves to the use of multiple-choice items.
Although its construction may not be as easy as binary-choice, its advantages far
exceed what true/false questions can offer. Aside from being able to assess various
outcomes levels, they are easy to score, less susceptible to guessing than alternate-
choice and more familiar to students as they often encounter them in different testing
events (Musial, et. al 2009).
Stimulus Response
STEM
a. An interrogative Option to be selected is the
statement or direct correct answer or best answer.
question that ends in
question mark Letter or numeral of the
b. Incomplete statement selected option or the chosen
distracter.
OPTIONS – 3 to 5 plausible
alternatives from which to
select the correct option.
Illustrative Items
1. Direct-question form (best answer version)
What form of government is ruled by a Prime Minister?
a. Monarchy
b. Parliamentary
c. Presidential
d. Federal
2. Incomplete-statement form (correct answer version)
Among the Asian countries, one which has a government with three branches is __________.
a. Japan
b. China
c. Philippines
d. Thailand
low level outcomes. The more important the learning outcome is, the more likely will
there be more points allotted to it.
McMillan (2007) suggests some rules of thumb in determining how many items are
sufficient for good sampling. A minimum of ten (10) items is needed to assess each
knowledge learning target in a unit but which should represent a good cross-
section of difficulty items. However, if there are more specific learning targets to
be tested, at least five (5) items would be enough for each one to allow for
criterion-referenced interpretation for mastery. Eighty percent (80%) correct of
items for a competency is an acceptable mastery criterion.
Clarity and specificity of the test blueprint in terms of what to test (i.e.
instructional content and cognitive ability or behavior) serve as primary
evidences of the content validity of a teacher-made test.
Several educators presented different versions/format of table of specifications.
The table of specifications, I have presented on the next page, is an expanded one. It
shows the subject matter, learning outcomes or specific objectives, instructional time,
test format/item format, levels of skills to be developed in the cognitive domain, total
items and percentage per subject matter. Using this TOS format, adequate sampling
of items per subject matter taught is assured. Consequently, content validity of the
test is assured.
Now, study the sample table of specifications (TOS) on the next page.
The TOS has 7 columns: Subject matter; Intended learning outcomes/specific
objectives; instructional time; test format or item type; the revised Bloom’s taxonomy of
cognitive skills (remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and
creating); total no. of items and percentage.
Intended learning outcomes 1 & 2 call for the application of rules in the use of
verbs. Although the term “identify” is used in outcome 1, it goes beyond just knowing
and recalling of the rule. The learners will identify the statements with erroneous
application of a rule. Outcome 2 is more direct in applying the rule as the learner has to
“supply” the correct verb forms in a stimulus material like a paragraph. That is why,
test items fall under “applying” when classified according to the levels of skills in the
revised taxonomy of cognitive skills. Outcome 3 demands higher level of cognition (i.e
creating) as it requires the integration of different skills (verb usage, vocabulary,
organization, mechanics, etc) to produce a news article.
Specific item format to be used in framing the test items for each subject matter
is also indicated. Outcomes 1 & 2 call for objective types like selection type and supply
type. Intended learning outcome 3 is a performance task calling for an authentic writing
task of producing a real product or output. It is non-objective because the teacher will
have to use a scoring scale (rubric) to rate the final product.
Now, can you make your own table of specifications? Study the example below.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Skills Percent-
Intended Learning Instruct- Test Total age
Subject Outcomes (specific ional format/ Remem- Under- Apply- Analyz- Evalua- Creat no. of (%)
matter objectives) Time Item type -bering standing ing ing ting -ing items
Verb 1. Identify the Selection
usage statements with type
3 15 15 30%
errors in verb use. (binary
choice)
2. Supply the Supply
correct verb forms type
2 10 10 20%
in a paragraph. (completio
n)
Commu- 3. Prepare a news Performan
nicative article reporting a ce type
5 25 25 50%
writing past school (Work
activity. sample)
25/ 25/
Total 10 hours 50 100%
50% 50%
Activity 2
Read the case below and write your observation on the space provided.
Joan was nervous. She knew she had to do very well on the comprehensive final
in order to pass American History: 1945-2002. To make matters worse, her teacher was
new and no one knew what his final exams were like.
“Well”, she told herself. “There’s really no point in worrying. Even if I don’t do
well on this test, I have learned to analyze information and think critically, the
discussions were great. I’ve studied the text and lessons very hard and managed to cover
every topic very thoroughly beginning with the end of World War II in 1945 through the
events following September 11, 2002. I realize I missed the class dealing with the late
1960’s and early 1970’s, but that stuff only covered a few pages in the text anyway, and
we only spent one class on it!”
Feeling more relaxed and confident, Joan felt even better when she saw that the
entire exam was only one-page long. After receiving her copy, Joan began shaking. Her
test is reproduced below.
It has been a long year and you have been good students. This short test is your
reward.
1. On what date did the American soldiers first begin to fight in Vietnam?
____________
2. How many years did Americans fight in Vietnam? _____________
3. What was the capital of South Vietnam? ____________
4. On what date did Richard Nixon become president? ______________
5. Who was Richard Nixon’s vice president during his second administration?
____________
6. What is Vietnam’s largest seaport?
7. Who was the president of South Vietnam? ____________
8. On what date did the American began to leave Vietnam? ____________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
4. What suggestion/s could you offer to the teacher to avoid this situation to happen
again?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Generally, there are three important observations in the case of Joan: the test is
not a comprehensive assessment of American History: 1945-2002 instead it focuses on
events that occurred in the Vietnam war; it fails to representatively sample content
about American History from 1945 to 2002; and it fails to tap any higher level thinking
processes, each questions requires rote memorization at the knowledge level.
LET US WRAP UP
Ed 9 Assessment of Learning 1, First Semester 2021-2022 75
Module 5: Planning the Test
Activity 3
To sum up what you have learned in this module, describe how you can identify
the number of items per topic, the test format or item type, and how to classify the items
in terms of the levels of cognitive skills when preparing a table of specifications.
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
PROPERTIES OF PRONOUNS
The pronoun has the properties of the noun to which it refers, namely: number (singular of plural); gender
(masculine, feminine, common and neuter); person (first person, second person and third person); case
(subjective, possessive and objective)
Number refers to whether the antecedent is plural or singular. The pronoun “They” is used as substitute
for the noun “men” because the noun “men” is plural. But the pronoun “He” is used to substitute for the
noun “man” because the noun “man” is singular.
Ex. First Person: We, I Second Person: You Third Person: He, She, It, They
The gender of a pronoun should be the same as that of its antecedent. Gender maybe masculine (for
males); feminine (for females); common (for males and females) and neuter (for things)
Ex. He (masculine)
She (feminine)
They (common)
It (neuter)
The three cases of pronoun are: subjective, objective and possessive.
Subjective Objective Possessive
I me my, mine
He him his
She her her, hers
It it its
We us our, ours
You you your, yours
They them their, theirs
Activity 4
Total 5 10
LET US ASSESS
Directions: Read each question carefully. Choose the correct answer from the given
choices. Encircle the letter of your answer.
ANSWER KEY
1. A
2. D
3. A
4. B
5. A
6. B
7. B
8. B
9. A
10. D
REFERENCES