Scribd
Upload
44 views6 pages

IMMI Refusal Notification With Decision Record

Uploaded by

sun264850
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
44 views6 pages

IMMI Refusal Notification With Decision Record

Uploaded by

sun264850
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

4 November 2024

RAJESH
VPO JAHANGIRPUR (265)
JAJJAR HARYANA 124103
INDIA

In reply quote:
Client name RAJESH
Date of birth 26 May 1997
Date of visa application 22 October 2024
Application ID 1690693002
Transaction reference number EGP4TQ819Q
File number BCC2024/5814645
Visa application charge receipt number 9034772300

Transmission method Email sent to rajesh0yu@gmail.com

Dear RAJESH

Notification of refusal of application for a Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600) visa

Refused applicant
I wish to advise you that the application for this visa has been refused on 04 November 2024
for the following applicant:

Client name RAJESH


Date of birth 26 May 1997

The applicant did not satisfy the provisions of the Migration Regulations 1994.

The attached decision record provides detailed information about this decision as it applies to
this applicant.

Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.

Receiving this letter


As this letter was sent to you by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day
it was transmitted.

Questions about this decision


We cannot consider your visa application any further.

Department of Home Affairs


WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
-2-

Visa application charge


The visa application charge which has already been paid can only be refunded in limited
circumstances, regardless of the application outcome.

A receipt for your payment is available through your ImmiAccount.

Yours sincerely

Nishita
Position number: 60198280
Department of Home Affairs

Department of Home Affairs


WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
DECISION RECORD

Application details
Visa class Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600)
Stream (main applicant only) Tourist
Date of visa application 22 October 2024
Transaction reference number EGP4TQ819Q
Application ID 1690693002
File number BCC2024/5814645
Visa application charge receipt number 9034772300

Client name RAJESH


Date of birth 26 May 1997
Client ID 24844940604
Visa subclass stream Tourist

The applicant's claims


The applicant has applied for the grant of a Visitor visa (subclass 600) to visit Australia for a
temporary stay.

Information and evidence considered


I am a delegated decision maker under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958. In reaching my
decision, I have considered the following:
● relevant legislation contained in the Migration Act and Migration Regulations 1994
● information contained in the Department's Procedural Instructions
● documents and information provided by the applicant(s)
● relevant information held on Departmental files.

Findings
On the basis of all the information available to me, including the documents and information
the applicant provided, I find that the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the
Tourist stream are not satisfied.

Reasons
I have assessed the application and the reasons for my decision are detailed below.

An application for a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream has been made by the
applicant.

Department of Home Affairs


WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
-2-

A visa cannot be granted unless the relevant criteria specified in the Migration Act and the
Migration Regulations are satisfied.

In this case, I am not satisfied that clause 600.211 in Schedule 2 of the Migration
Regulations is satisfied. This clause provides that:

600.211
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is
granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.

In assessing whether or not the applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia,
I have taken into account information provided in the application, the applicant's immigration
history and compliance with previous visas. I have also taken into consideration any
supporting documents as well as the applicant's personal circumstances, commitments, and
incentive to return to their country of residence.

My decision is based on the following factors


The applicant claims that their purpose for travelling to Australia is for tourism.

I have assessed the application based on the documentation and evidence provided by
the applicant. The applicant is an Indian national, residing in India. The applicant intends
to travel alone. Before a visa can be issued, applicants must demonstrate strong financial,
employment and/or personal ties which would demonstrate their incentive to abide by the
conditions of that visa and depart Australia at the end of their authorised temporary stay.

I find that the information the applicant has provided is not sufficient to satisfy me of their
genuine temporary stay intention, and they have not demonstrated that they have sufficiently
strong commitments in India that would be an incentive for them to return to India.

More specifically, I have considered their economic circumstances and find that their
personal circumstances in their home country cannot be considered significant in the context
of overall economic conditions and cost of living in India. As such, it cannot be considered a
strong incentive to return to India at the end of their proposed stay in Australia.

After considering the information provided, I am not satisfied that the applicant genuinely
intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purposes set out above.

Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant meets the relevant criteria in clause 600.211
in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations.

Decision
As clause 600.211 is not satisfied, I find the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in
the Tourist stream are not satisfied. Therefore, I refuse the application by the applicant for a
Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream.

Department of Home Affairs


WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
-3-

Yours sincerely

Nishita
Position Number: 60198280
Department of Home Affairs

04 November 2024

Department of Home Affairs


WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
-4-

Department of Home Affairs


WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy