26 September 2024

Ravi DHAKA
WARD NO 45 BEHIND RAILWAY MAL GODAM
SUJANGARH
CHURU RAJASTHAN 331507
INDIA

In reply quote:
Client name Ravi DHAKA
Date of birth 11 September 1985
Date of visa application 11 September 2024
Application ID 490690500
Transaction reference number EGP45SCG1H
File number BCC2024/4959583
Visa application charge receipt number 9034003292

Transmission method Email sent to perfectvisaservices@gmail.com

Dear Ravi DHAKA

Notification of refusal of application for a Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600) visa

Refused applicant
I wish to advise you that the application for this visa has been refused on 26 September 2024
for the following applicant:

Client name Ravi DHAKA

Date of birth 11 September 1985

The applicant did not satisfy the provisions of the Migration Regulations 1994.

The attached decision record provides detailed information about this decision as it applies to
this applicant.

Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.

Receiving this letter

As this letter was sent by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day it was
transmitted.

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -2-

Questions about this decision

We cannot consider your visa application any further.

Visa application charge

The visa application charge which has already been paid can only be refunded in limited
circumstances, regardless of the application outcome.

A receipt for your payment is available through your ImmiAccount.

Yours sincerely

Kajal
Position number: 60168130
Department of Home Affairs

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 DECISION RECORD

Application details
Visa class Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600)
Stream (main applicant only) Tourist
Date of visa application 11 September 2024
Transaction reference number EGP45SCG1H
Application ID 490690500
File number BCC2024/4959583
Visa application charge receipt number 9034003292

Client name Ravi DHAKA

Date of birth 11 September 1985
Client ID 67898978026
Visa subclass stream Tourist

The applicant's claims

The applicant has applied for the grant of a Visitor visa (subclass 600) to visit Australia for a
temporary stay.

Information and evidence considered

I am a delegated decision maker under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958. In reaching my
decision, I have considered the following:
● relevant legislation contained in the Migration Act and Migration Regulations 1994
● information contained in the Department's Procedural Instructions
● documents and information provided by the applicant(s)
● relevant information held on Departmental files.

Findings
On the basis of all the information available to me, including the documents and information
the applicant provided, I find that the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the
Tourist stream are not satisfied.

Reasons
I have assessed the application and the reasons for my decision are detailed below.

An application for a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream has been made by the
applicant.

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -2-

A visa cannot be granted unless the relevant criteria specified in the Migration Act and the
Migration Regulations are satisfied.

In this case, I am not satisfied that clause 600.211 in Schedule 2 of the Migration
Regulations is satisfied. This clause provides that:

600.211
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is
granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.

In assessing whether or not the applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia,
I have taken into account information provided in the application, the applicant's immigration
history and compliance with previous visas. I have also taken into consideration any
supporting documents as well as the applicant's personal circumstances, commitments, and
incentive to return to their country of residence.

My decision is based on the following factors

The applicant claims that their purpose for travelling to Australia is to attend a music video
project and intends to travel with their friends.

I have assessed the application based on the documentation and evidence provided by the
applicant. The applicant is an Indian national, currently living in their home country. Before
a visa can be issued, applicants must demonstrate strong financial, employment and/or
personal ties which would demonstrate their incentive to abide by the conditions of that visa
and depart Australia at the end of their authorised temporary stay.

The applicant has claimed to be self-employed with Rajkumar Anuj Film Production. I have
considered the circumstances of the applicant and find that their claimed employment and
income cannot be considered significant in the context of the current economic/employment
conditions in India. As such, I do not consider it a strong incentive for them to abide by the
conditions of the visa or to stay temporarily in Australia and return to India.

I further note that the applicant has provided evidence of financial support from their inviter
and company. While I have taken the offer of support into consideration, I have attached less
weight to this evidence as this is not in itself sufficient evidence of a genuine visit. The onus
is on the applicant themselves to provide evidence of their circumstances in India that would
demonstrate that intention.

After considering the information provided, I am not satisfied that the applicant genuinely
intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purposes set out above.

Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant meets the relevant criteria in clause 600.211
in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations.

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -3-

Decision
As clause 600.211 is not satisfied, I find the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in
the Tourist stream are not satisfied. Therefore, I refuse the application by the applicant for a
Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream.

Yours sincerely

Kajal
Position Number: 60168130
Department of Home Affairs

26 September 2024

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -4-

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au