IC Design With BJT.
IC Design With BJT.
Integrated Circuit
Design with the BJT
As mentioned in Chapter 8, design of electronic circuits on a chip can be considerably 10.1 Integrated Circuit
Biasing with Current
different from discrete circuit design. Some analog circuits do not require high component
Mirrors
densities, whereas others may pack a great deal of circuitry into a small chip space. For
10.2 High-Gain Stages Using
low-density circuits, more resistors and small capacitors may be used, but for high-density Active Loads
circuits, these elements must be minimized. 10.3 Amplifier Configurations
This chapter will consider circuits that replace resistors and capacitors with additional In BJT Integrated
BJTs, just as Chapter 9 considered replacing these elements with additional MOSFETs. Circuits
The organization of this chapter is similar to that of Chapter 9. The BJT current mirror,
which is quite popular in biasing of IC amplifiers, will be discussed first. The chapter
will then proceed to active load amplifier stages and other single-stage amplifier config-
urations in order to lay a foundation for the important op amp chip to be discussed in
Chapter 11.
DEMONSTRATION PROBLEM
A typical problem that uses the principles appearing in this chapter is shown in the amplifier
circuit. For all devices β = 80, |VBE(on) | = 0.7 V, and |V A | = 62 V (Early voltage). Assume that
Cµ = 2 pF, Cπ = 20 pF, and Ccs = 2 pF for all devices. The dc voltage at the output is 4 V.
Calculate the overall midband voltage gain and upper corner frequency of the amplifier.
Q4 Q3
Q2
1 kΩ
12 kΩ Q1 vout
Rg
vin 10 kΩ
V1
307
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
I M P O R T A N T Concepts
1. The simple current mirror is often used on integrated circuit chips to provide bias
current for amplifier stages.
2. The output impedance of current mirrors can be increased by certain
modifications. A higher output impedance leads to a better approximation of a
true current source.
The popular emitter-bias scheme of Fig. 7.16 for discrete BJT stages often uses a large
emitter bypass capacitor to achieve high ac gain. Discrete amplifier stages may also use
relatively large interstage coupling capacitors. The unavailability of large capacitors and
inductors in IC designs requires that special techniques be used to establish bias currents for
integrated amplifiers. Differential stages and complex feedback circuits are often used to
obtain the correct bias in the IC amplifier. Although differential amplifiers will be discussed
in the next chapter, a significant bias scheme used in differential BJT and other IC amplifier
stages will be considered in the following paragraphs.
In Out
Sink Source
In Out
equals the input current multiplied by a scale factor K . The output current can be expressed
as a function of input current as
Io = K Iin (10.1)
where K can be equal to, less than, or greater than unity. This constant can be established IC A
accurately and will not vary with temperature.
A VB Q1
Current Source Operating Voltage Range Figure 10.3(a) shows an ideal or
theoretical current sink with a practical sink indicated in Fig. 10.3(b). The voltage at node A VE
I
in the theoretical sink can be tied to any voltage above or below ground without affecting the R
value of I . On the other hand, the practical circuit of Fig. 10.3(b) requires that the transistor B
B
remain in the active region to provide an output current of
VE VB − VBE
I = IC = α I E = α =α (10.2) (a) (b)
R R
Figure 10.3
The collector voltage must exceed the voltage VB at all times for active region operation. Current sink circuits:
The upper limit on collector voltage is determined by the breakdown voltage of the transistor. (a) ideal sink, (b) practical sink.
The output voltage must then satisfy
where BVCE is the breakdown voltage from collector to emitter of the transistor. The voltage
range over which the current source operates within a prescribed accuracy is called the output
voltage compliance range or the output compliance.
Current Mirror Analysis The current mirror is again shown in Fig. 10.4. If devices
Q1 and Q2 are assumed to be matched devices, we can write
Q1 Q2
IB1 IB2
VBE
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
where VT = kT /q, IEO = A JEO , A is the emitter area of the two devices, and JEO is the
current density of the emitters. The base currents of the two devices will also be identical
and can be expressed as
Device Q1 operates in the active region, but near saturation by virtue of the collector-
base connection. This configuration is called a diode-connected transistor. The collector
current of Q1 is β times the base current or
β
IC1 = β I B1 = IEO e VBE /VT (10.6)
β +1
Whereas device Q1 is constrained so that VCE = VB E(on) by the connection between base
and collector, device Q2 does not have this constraint. The collector voltage for Q2 will be
determined by the external circuit that connects to this collector.
If we limit the voltage VC2 to small values relative to the Early voltage, IC2 is approxi-
mately equal to IC1 . For integrated circuit designs, the voltage required at the output of the
current mirror is generally small, often making this approximation valid.
The input current to the mirror is slightly larger than the collector current and is expressed
as
β
Io = Iin (10.9)
β +2
For typical values of β these two currents are essentially equal. Thus, a desired bias current,
Io , is generated by creating the desired value for Iin .
The current Iin is normally established by connecting a resistance, R1 , between a voltage
source VCC and the collector of Q1 to set Iin to
VCC − VBE
Iin = (10.10)
R1
Control of collector current for Q2 is then accomplished by choosing proper values of VCC
and R1 .
If VC2 becomes larger, the Early effect of Eq. (7.11) must be considered. This equation is
VCE
IC = β I B 1+ (10.11)
VA
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
Q1 QN+1
Q2 Q3
Figure 10.5
Multiple output current mirror.
where VA is the Early voltage. This equation can be used to find the voltage compliance
range of the current mirror.
Figure 10.5 shows a multiple output current mirror. It can be shown that the output
current for each identical device in Fig. 10.5 is
β
Io = Iin (10.13)
β + N +1
where N is the number of output devices.
The preceding analysis of the current mirror has assumed equal transistor sizes. The
output currents can be scaled by changing the relative areas of the output BJTs compared
to the diode-connected BJT. The ratio of output current to input current scales directly with
the ratio of emitter-base junction area of the output device to that of the input device.
The current sinks can be turned into current sources by using pnp transistors and a power
supply of opposite polarity. The output devices can also be scaled in area to make Io larger
or smaller than Iin . The schematic of Fig. 10.6 indicates a multiple output current mirror
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Io2 Io3
R1 Iin
Io4 Io5
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
—VEE
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
+VCC
Iin
Q0
IC1 (N +1) IB1
+1 Io1 Io2 IoN
P R A C T I C E Problems Q1 QN+1
IB1 NIB1 Q2 Q3
10.1 In the current mirror of
Fig. 10.1, VCC = 10 V, β = Figure 10.7
120, V A = 60 V, and I E1 = Improved multiple output
I E2 = 10−12 e VBE /0.026 mA current mirror.
for the matched pair. Select
R to create an output current
of 0.9 mA at VC2 = 6 V. that includes both sources and sinks. Although parallel transistors are shown to indicate
Calculate VBE to three-place higher current output devices, single devices with larger areas would be implemented on
accuracy. Ans: R = 11.03 k ,
the chip.
VBE = 0.713 V.
10.2 Both transistors of a
simple current mirror have
values of β = 120,
10.1.2 A CURRENT MIRROR WITH REDUCED ERROR
VB E(on) = 0.68 V, and The difference between output current in a multiple output current mirror and the input
V A = 62 V. If the output current can become quite large if N is large. One simple method of avoiding this problem
current is to be within 5% of is to use an emitter follower to drive the bases of all devices in the mirror, as shown in
the input current, what is the Fig. 10.7. The emitter follower, Q0, has a current gain from base to collector of β + 1,
output voltage compliance? which reduces the difference between Io and Iin to
Ans: VC2 max = 4.92 V.
10.3 If the mirror of N +1
Practice Problem 10.2 is to Iin − Io = IB (10.14)
have a maximum output
β +1
voltage of 10 V, what must
the tolerance on output The output current for each device is
current be, compared to
input current? Ans: 13%. Iin
Io = N +1
(10.15)
1+ β(β+1)
P R A C T I C A L Considerations
The following chapter introduces the significant IC op amp. The op amp is a very
high gain amplifier that requires several amplifying stages. Each amplifying stage
requires a bias current. This chip then requires multiple bias current sources. In
practice, these sources can be implemented by a current mirror with multiple output
stages having properly scaled emitter areas. A single resistor along with multiple
mirror stages require far less chip real estate than would the use of separate bias
circuits for each amplifying element.
I M P O R T A N T Concepts
In order to achieve high voltage gains and eliminate load resistors, active loads are used
in BJT IC amplifiers just as they are in MOSFET stages. In a conventional common-emitter
stage, the gain is limited by the size of the collector resistance. The midband voltage gain
of a common-emitter stage is given by
α RC
AMB = −
(re + R E )
+VCC the collector load of a transistor is another transistor. This device present a low dc and high
incremental impedance, and it is a simple element to implement on a chip.
RE 2
−β1rce1
AMB = (10.16)
Figure 10.9 Rg + rπ 1
A transistor stage with an active
load.
where rce1 is the output impedance of Q1. If the generator resistance, Rg is negligible, this
equation reduces to
E X A M P L E 10.1
r
Assume that the active load in the circuit of Fig. 10.10 has an infinite output impedance,
VCQ1 = 4 V, and VEB2 = 0.7 V. The Early voltage of the amplifying device is 68 V and
β = 150. Calculate the midband voltage gain of this stage.
SOLUTION In order to apply Eq. (10.16), the output impedance and rπ for Q1 must be
found. The quiescent emitter current of Q2 is determined by the base-emitter circuit of Q2.
The emitter voltage of Q2 is 0.7 V higher than the base voltage or 8.7 V. The emitter current
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
2 kΩ
+8 V Q2
vout
600 Ω
Q1 RL
100 kΩ
vin
V1
is then
12 − 8.7
I E2 = = 1.65 mA
2
The emitter current of Q1 will be very near to that of Q2. Since IC1 ≈ I E1 , the output
impedance can be found from Eq. (7.13) to be
V A + VCQ1 68 + 4
rout1 = rce1 = = = 43.6 k
IC1 1.65
The value of rπ 1 is
26
rπ1 = (β + 1)re = 151 × = 2.38 k
1.65
The load impedance consists of rce1 in parallel with 100 k or Rout = 30.4 k . The voltage
gain is
−β Rout 150 × 30.4
AMB = =− = − 1530 V/V
Rg + rπ1 0.6 + 2.38
r
P R A C T I C E Problems
10.4 Assume that the active
P R A C T I C A L Considerations load in the circuit of
Fig. 10.10 is replaced by a
simple current mirror with
Another component that can be used to create a collector load with high incremental
an output current of
or ac impedance and low dc impedance is a transformer. This element generally has 1.65 mA. The output stage
only a few ohms of dc primary resistance while presenting an ac primary resistance of the current mirror has an
of n 2 RL , where n is the turns ratio from primary to secondary and RL is the resistive Early voltage of V A = 60 V.
load connected across the secondary terminals. Calculate the midband
For example, if n = 5 and RL = 8 , the ac primary resistance is 25 × 8 = 200 . voltage gain of the amplifier.
The dc resistance of the primary may be 3 ; thus, the ac resistance is much greater Approximate rce2 as V A /IC .
than the dc resistance. Ans: −833 V/V.
Although transformers are used in high-power amplifiers, they cannot be fabri- 10.5 Repeat Practice
cated by standard IC processes. Thus the active load developed by a biased tran- Problem 10.4 if the 100-k
load is removed from the
sistor remains the most popular load device for IC processes.
circuit. Ans: −999 V/V.
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
I M P O R T A N T Concepts
1. A simple pnp current mirror (source) can act as the active load for an npn
common-emitter stage. The load resistance equals the parallel combination of
output resistances of the mirror stage and the gain stage.
2. An npn current mirror stage (sink) can also act as a load for an npn emitter
follower stage.
3. The cascode stage minimizes Miller effect capacitance at the input terminal,
thereby improving frequency response.
The current mirror serves as an active load for several important BJT IC amplifier stages
to be considered in the following paragraphs.
In this equation, Cµ1 and Cµ2 are the collector-to-base junction capacitances, and Ccs1
and Ccs2 are the collector-to-substrate capacitances of the respective transistors. If no gen-
erator resistance is present, Cµ1 will also appear in parallel with the output terminal and
ground. When Rg is present, we will still approximate the output capacitance with the same
rx1 c1
Figure 10.12 b b’ c
Equivalent circuit of the vout
amplifier in Fig. 10.11. v1
vin r1 C1 Rout Cout
gm1v1
e
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
−β1 Rout
AMB = (10.20)
r x1 + rπ 1
The upper corner frequency is now more difficult to evaluate than that of the discrete
circuit, which often has a low value of collector load resistance. In the discrete circuit, the
input loop generally determines the overall upper corner frequency of the circuit. Although
the Miller effect will be much larger in the IC stage, lowering the upper corner frequency
of the input loop, the corner frequency of the output loop will also be smaller due to the
large value of Rout . Both frequencies may influence the overall upper corner frequency of
the amplifier.
The calculation of upper corner frequency begins by reflecting the bridging capacitance,
Cµ , to both the input and the output. The value reflected to the input side, across terminals
b and e, is
(1 − Ab c1 )Cµ1 (10.21)
as in the discrete circuit amplifier. Thus, the total input capacitance in parallel with rπ 1 is
The upper corner frequency resulting from the input circuit of this stage is
1
f in−high = (10.23)
2πCin Req
where Req = r x1 rπ 1 .
The upper corner frequency resulting from the output side of the stage is
1
f out−high = (10.24)
2πCout Rout
The actual overall upper corner frequency, f 2o , must be found using the method of
Chapter 3 for a two-pole response. An example will demonstrate these points.
E X A M P L E 10.2
r
Assume that the circuit of Fig. 10.11 is biased so that the collector currents of Q1 and Q2
have a magnitude of 1.14 mA. The parameters for Q1 are β = 160, r x1 = 10 , rce1 =
68 k , Cπ 1 = 20 pF, and Cµ1 = 2.1 pF. For device Q2, the necessary parameters are
rce2 = 21 k and Cµ2 = 3.1 pF. Each device has a value of Ccs1 = Ccs2 = 2.5 pF. In this
circuit, the power supply is 10 V and R1 = 10 k .
Calculate the midband voltage gain and the upper corner frequency for this amplifier
stage. Do a Spice simulation using 2N3904 (npn) and 2N3905 (pnp) transistors.
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
10 V V3 4
Q3 Q2
R1 vout
10 kΩ
2
Q1
SOLUTION The midband voltage gain can be calculated from Eq. (10.20) after evaluating
rπ 1 and Rout . These resistances are
26
rπ1 = (β + 1)re1 = 161 × = 3672
1.14
and
CL , pF Rg, kΩ AMB cal , V/V AMB sim , V/V f2o−cal , kHz f2o−sim , kHz
In order to evaluate the effects of a signal generator resistance and a larger capacitive
load, a 10-k resistance was inserted in the base lead of Q1, which led to a simulated
midband gain of −186 V/V and an upper corner frequency of 39 kHz. If a 10-pF capacitor
is placed across the output and no generator resistance is used, the voltage gain returns
to the value of −685 V/V, but the upper corner frequency is lowered to 480 kHz. Adding
the generator resistance while the capacitor loads the output gives AMB = −186 V/V and
P R A C T I C E Problem
f 2o = 37.8 kHz. The comparison of calculated and simulated values for the different loading
conditions is given in Table 10.2. 10.6 Calculate the value of
The calculated results are designated A M Bcal and f 2o−cal , and the simulated values are Rg that lowers the upper
designated AMBsim and f 2o−sim . The task of calculating values for Table 10.2 is left to the corner frequency of the
student. Note that adding a 10-k generator resistance lowers the upper corner frequency by circuit in Example 10.2 to
a large factor, approximately 25, whereas adding 10 pF to the output lowers this frequency 100 kHz. Assume a 10-pF
load capacitance. Calculate
by a factor of about two.
the midband voltage gain.
Ans: Rg = 1.43 k ,
P R A C T I C A L Considerations AMB = −501 V/V.
For a BJT with a high value of current gain-bandwidth product, f t , the current source
load stage has a relatively low upper corner frequency. In Example 10.2, the value of
f t for these BJTs is 300–400 MHz. The resulting upper corner frequency is just 975
kHz. It should be recognized that this type of stage is used in op amp chips that will 5V
ultimately have a very low upper corner frequency. When used in an amplifier, the op
amp chip will use feedback to improve the overall upper corner frequency. Thus, the
low value of f 2o for an individual gain stage is not significant in these applications. Q1
4 kΩ R1
vin
1 vout
10.3.2 THE EMITTER FOLLOWER
V1
A stage that can be used to minimize the adverse effect on frequency response caused by a
generator resistance is the emitter follower. Although this stage has a voltage gain near unity,
it can be driven by a higher voltage gain stage while the emitter follower can drive a low Q3 Q2
impedance load. A typical stage is shown in Fig. 10.14. The output stage of the npn current
mirror, Q2, serves as a high impedance load for the emitter follower, Q1. An equivalent
circuit that represents the emitter follower of Fig. 10.14 is indicated in Fig. 10.15. For this Figure 10.14
circuit, gm1 = α1 /re ≈ 1/re . An emitter follower.
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
Rg rx c1
b1 b’1
vin C
r v C1 gm v
e1, c2
vout
rout2 Cout2
Figure 10.15
Equivalent circuit for the emitter
follower.
where
and
Rg + r x1 + rπ 1 + rce2 (gm1rπ 1 + 1)
d= (10.28)
C(Rg + r x1 )rπ 1rce2
Note that the output capacitance of Q2 can be approximated as the sum of Cµ2 and Ccs2 .
The midband voltage gain is found from Eq. (10.25) by letting ω → 0. This value is
(1 + gm1rπ 1 )rce2
AMB = (10.29)
Rg + r x1 + rπ 1 + (1 + gm1rπ 1 )rce2
E X A M P L E 10.3
r
The emitter-follower circuit of Fig. 10.14 is biased so that IC1 = 1.08 mA. The value of β1
is 155, and the ohmic base resistance is 10 . The collector-base depletion capacitance for
both Q1 and Q2 is 2.5 pF as also is the collector-to-substrate capacitance. The value of f t
is approximately 300 MHz, and the Early voltage is 75 V for the transistors.
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
Using iterative methods, the upper corner frequency is found to be 1.67 GHz. Although the
Table 10.3
voltage gain is only unity, the upper corner frequency is much higher than the common-
Spice Netlist File for
emitter amplifier with a current mirror load.
Example 10.3
The schematic for simulation is shown in Fig. 10.16 with node and element numbers
added. The Spice netlist file is shown in Table 10.3. EX10-3.CIR
Figure 10.16
5 R1 5 4 4K
Schematic for simulation of
the emitter follower. V1 1 0 3.2 V
V3 2 V2 2 1 AC 1V
5V Q1
sin t V3 5 0 5V
vin V2 Q1 5 2 3 0 Q2N3904
4 kΩ R1 3 Q2 3 4 0 0 Q2N3904
1
vout Q3 4 4 0 0 Q2N3904
3.2 V
4 .AC DEC 100 100 10G
V1
.OP
Q3 Q2 .PROBE
.LIB BIPOLAR.LIB
.END
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
The results of the simulation are A MBsim = 0.9993 V/V and f 2o−sim = 2.56 GHz.
Whereas the midband voltage gain compares well to the calculated value, the simulated
upper corner frequency is somewhat higher than the calculated value.
r
Table 10.4 Summary of Results for the Emitter-Follower Stage
It is again useful to consider the effects of adding a large generator resistance or a load
capacitance to the emitter-follower stage. Table 10.4 summarizes the results of simulations
for different combinations of source resistance and load capacitance.
Note that the insertion of a 10-k generator resistance lowers the upper corner frequency
P R A C T I C E Problem more than the addition of the 10-pF load capacitance. Note also that the addition of the 10-pF
capacitance to the circuit that includes a 10-k generator resistor leads to a higher upper
10.7 An emitter follower
has a midband voltage gain corner frequency rather than a lower value. This result is from a shift in the lower pole
of 0.99. The voltage gain frequency to a value that exceeds that of the zero frequency when the load capacitance is
has a zero at 500 MHz, one added. The added value of C L when no generator resistance is present does not have the
pole at 200 MHz, and same effect.
another pole at 1.6 MHz. Surprisingly, it is possible for the two poles to become complex, depending on element
Find the upper corner values. When this occurs, the frequency response can exhibit a peak and the step response
frequency of the voltage can exhibit ringing.
gain. Ans: 236 MHz.
P R A C T I C A L Considerations
The emitter follower, like the source follower, is often used as a buffer to interface
between a high voltage gain stage and a low impedance load. The emitter follower
+VCC
loads the preceding stage only slightly, but provides a high current to the load with
an accompanying high upper corner frequency.
I
10.3.3 THE CASCODE AMPLIFIER STAGE
vout One of the problems with the common-emitter stage using an active load is the Miller effect.
Q2 This stage has a high voltage gain from base to collector. The circuit of Fig. 10.11 with
the values of Example 10.2 has an inverting voltage gain, AMB , that approaches −700 V/V.
VB2 The base-collector junction capacitance is multiplied by (1 + |AMB |) and reflected to the
input loop. This capacitance adds to the diffusion capacitance from point b to point e and
decreases the upper corner frequency to a relatively small value.
Q1
The cascode amplifier stage of Fig. 10.17 minimizes the capacitance reflected to the
vin input. In this circuit, the input capacitance is primarily composed of the diffusion capacitance
of Q1. The gain from base to collector of Q1 is quite low since the collector load of
this device consists of the impedance looking into the emitter of Q2. This impedance is
VB1
approximately equal to the base-emitter diode resistance of Q2, which is
26
Figure 10.17 re2 =
A cascode stage. I E2
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
c2
vout
The upper device passes the incremental signal current of Q1 to its collector and develops
a large voltage across the current source impedance. There is no Miller multiplication of
capacitance from the input of Q2 (emitter) to the output (collector), since the gain is
noninverting and negligible capacitance exists between emitter and collector. Thus, the
cascode stage essentially eliminates Miller effect capacitance and its resulting effect on
upper corner frequency.
A high-frequency equivalent circuit of this stage is shown in Fig. 10.18. The resistance
R includes any generator resistance and the base resistance, r x1 of Q1. The resistance rcs is
the output resistance of the current source. The output capacitance is the sum of Cµ2 , Ccs2 ,
and any capacitance at the current source output. The resistance rout2 can be quite large,
since Q2 sees a large emitter resistance looking into the collector of Q1. This emitter load
leads to negative feedback that increases the output resistance of Q2.
The midband voltage gain is calculated from the equivalent circuit of Fig. 10.18 after
eliminating the capacitors. This gain is found rather easily by noting that the input current
to Q1 is
vin
i b1 = (10.30)
R + rπ 1
This current will be multiplied by β1 to become collector current in Q1. This current also
equals the emitter current of Q2. The emitter current of Q2 is multiplied by α2 to become
collector current of Q2. The output voltage is then
vout = i c2 × R3 (10.31)
where R3 = rout2 rcs . This resistance could be very large if the current source resistance,
rcs , is large. The value of rout2 will be high since the emitter of Q2 sees a resistance of rce1 .
Combining this information results in a midband voltage gain of
−β1 α2 R3
AMB = (10.32)
R + rπ 1
If no generator resistance is present and if R3 = 100 k , this midband voltage gain might
exceed 5000 V/V.
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
1 1 1
A = AMB (10.33)
1 + jωCπ 1 (rπ 1 R) 1 + jωre2 Cπ 2 1 + jω R3 Cout
Typically, the corner frequency of the second frequency term in Eq. (10.33), that is,
1
f2 =
2πre2 Cπ2
1
f in−high =
2π(rπ1 R)Cπ 1
especially if R is large compared to rπ 1 . In this case, since re1 ≈ re2 as a result of equal
emitter currents, then re2 (β + 1)re1 . For hand analysis of the cascode circuit, the second
term in the expression for gain is often neglected.
The gain can then be written as
1 1
A = AMB (10.34)
1+ j f
f in−high
1+ j f
f out−high
where
1
f out−high = (10.35)
2πCout R3
If a current mirror with output stage Q3 generates the collector bias current for Q1 and
Q2, the output capacitance is
E X A M P L E 10.4
r
The cascode circuit of Fig. 10.19 is driven by a current mirror with an output current of
0.38 mA. Devices Q1 and Q2 have values of β = 140 and r x = 10 . The capacitor values
are Cπ 1 = Cπ 2 = 10.8 pF, Cµ1 = Cµ2 = Ccs2 = 2.5 pF, and Cµ3 = Ccs3 = 5 pF. The output
impedance of the current mirror is 52.2 k .
Calculate the midband voltage gain and the upper corner frequency of the circuit. Do a
Spice simulation and compare the measured to the simulated results.
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
V3 3V
4
2
Q1
vin = 0.001 sin t
V2
1
Assuming that rout2 is very large, the value of R3 is approximated by rcs = 52.2 k .
From Eq. (10.32), the midband voltage gain is
EX10-3.CIR
R1 6 0 20K
V1 1 0 0.66V
V2 2 1 AC 0.001V
V3 5 0 3V
V4 7 0 8V
Q1 4 2 0 0 Q2N3904
Q2 3 5 4 0 Q2N3904
Q3 3 6 7 7 Q2N3905
Q4 6 6 7 7 Q2N3905
.AC DEC 100 100 100Meg
.OP
.PROBE
.LIB BIPOLAR.LIB
.END
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
1 1
f in−high = = = 1.47 GHz
2π(rπ1 R)Cπ1 2π × 10 × 10.8 × 10−12
1 1
f out−high = = = 203 kHz
2π R3 Cout 2π × 52,200 × 15 × 10−12
CL , pF Rg, kΩ AMB cal , V/V AMB sim , V/V f2o−cal , kHz f2o−sim , kHz
P R A C T I C E Problem Additional calculations and simulations were done using a 10-pF load capacitor and/or
a 10-k generator resistance. These results are summarized in Table 10.6.
10.8 If a very large We observe that the insertion of a 10-k generator resistance has little effect on the
generator resistance is upper corner frequency. This is to be expected as a result of the minimization of the Miller
inserted in the circuit of
effect. The input capacitance is small enough that it has little effect on the overall upper
Example 10.4, what is the
corner frequency even with the larger generator resistance in the input loop. In the active
lower limit on f in−high ?
Ans: 1.53 MHz. load stage of Fig. 10.13 considered earlier, insertion of a 10-k generator resistance lowered
the upper corner frequency by a factor of about 25.
β 80 8 − 0.7
Io = Iin = × = 0.59 mA
β +2 82 12
This current is the collector current of Q1 and approximates the emitter current of this device.
P1: FCH/SPH P2: FCH/SPH QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH
PB139B-10 ZP042-Sam.cls March 12, 2002 22:35
Q4 Q3
Q2
Rg
12 kΩ Q1 vout
1 kΩ
vin 10 kΩ
V1
Because the upper corner frequency of the emitter follower is much greater than that of the
common-source stage, the overall upper corner frequency will be equal to that of the common-
source stage. This stage will have an upper corner frequency due to the input loop and another
due to the output loop.
The output capacitance is calculated by Eq. (10.19) to be
The output resistance has previously been found as 49.3 k , giving an upper corner frequency
of
1
f out−high = = 404 kHz
2πCout Rout
1
f in−high = = 91.3 kHz
2πCin Req
The two upper corner frequencies cause an overall upper corner frequency of 87 kHz.
SUMMARY
➤ Current mirrors are used to provide bias current for ➤ The emitter follower with an active load provides a
some IC amplifier stages and can also be used as active voltage gain of approximately unity and a very high
loads. upper 3-dB frequency. This stage can drive a large
capacitive load.
➤ Many IC amplifier stages use active loads to achieve
high voltage gains. The high incremental resistance of ➤ The cascode stage minimizes the Miller effect
an active load stage results in a high voltage gain but capacitance at the input and provides a high voltage
may limit the upper 3-dB frequency of the circuit. gain.
PROBLEMS
SECTION 10.1.1 THE SIMPLE CURRENT MIRROR
D 10.1 For the simple current mirror of Fig. 10.1, assume 10.3 If Io can vary by ±5% in the mirror of Prob-
that β1 = β2 = 100, VBE1 = VBE2 = 0.6 V, VCC = 5 V, lem 10.2, determine the voltage compliance of the output
and V A = ∞. Select R to result in Io = 1.00 mA. circuit.
D 10.2 If V A = 50 V in Problem 10.1, select R to result 10.4 What is the percentage variation in output current in
in Io = 1.00 mA when VC2 = 4 V. the mirror of Problem 10.2 as VC2 varies from 2 V to
6 V? What is the incremental output resistance of the
mirror?
PROBLEMS 329
SECTION 10.1.3 THE WILSON CURRENT MIRROR
10.8 A simple current mirror sinks 1.00 mA with an output 10.9 In the Wilson current mirror of Fig. 10.8, derive an
voltage of 4 V. The current increases by 10% at an output expression for incremental resistance seen looking into
voltage of 9 V, resulting in a voltage compliance of 5 V. the collector/base of Q2.
This current mirror is now replaced by a Wilson current
10.10 In the Wilson current mirror of Fig. 10.8, derive
mirror designed to sink 1.00 mA with an output voltage
an expression for output impedance of the circuit in terms
of 4 V. The Wilson circuit has a voltage compliance of
of β, re0 , re2 , rce0 , and any other necessary parameters.
64 V. Calculate the output impedance of both circuits.
VC2 , V 3 4 5 6 7
+10 V Q2
IC2 , mA 0.792 0.796 0.800 0.804 0.808
vout
vin
If VCQ1 = 5 V in the circuit of (c), calculate the
Q1
midband voltage gain.
VB
Figure P10.14
+10 V
+10 V
10.12 Repeat Problem 10.11 if a 10-k resistor is inserted
in the base lead of Q1. 100 Ω
+10 V
Q2
10.13 In the circuit of Problem 10.11, V A2 = 56 V. Calcu-
late the output resistance, rout2 , looking into the collec- I Q2
100 Ω
tor of Q2. Compare this to the output resistance of Q1, vout
rout1 = 35 k . Is it reasonable to assume that rout2 = ∞ I
vout
in calculating the voltage gain? Q1 Q2
vin I IC 2 Q1
vin
V1 VC2
V1
10.15 Derive an expression for the incremental output D 10.16 Select the emitter resistance of Q1 in Fig.
impedance for circuit (b) in Problem 10.14. 10.10 to lead to a midband gain of −1200 V/V. Assume
that β and VEB2 remain at the values given in Example
10.1 and V1 can be changed to any appropriate value to
maintain VCQ1 = 4 V.
Figure P10.17
+10 V
Q3 Q2
vin vout
10 kΩ
8 kΩ R Q1
VB
PROBLEMS 331
S E C T I O N 1 0 . 3 . 3 T H E C A S C O D E A M P L I F I E R S TA G E
10.25 In Fig. 10.19, the resistor R1 is changed from 20 k
to 10 k . Calculate the new midband voltage gain. As-
sume that the output resistance of the current source, rcs ,
changes from 52.2 k to 70 k .