7f1b1-2341 Mains Approach-Answer e 2024
7f1b1-2341 Mains Approach-Answer e 2024
www.visionias.in
Answer all the questions in NOT MORE THAN 200 WORDS each. Content of the answers is more important
than its length. All questions carry equal marks. 12.5X20=250
1. Highlighting the significance of the Preamble to the Indian Constitution, discuss whether it is a
part of the Constitution.
Approach:
• Give a brief introduction about the Preamble of the Constitution.
• Mention the importance of the Preamble to the Indian Constitution.
• Discuss whether the Preamble is a part of the Constitution.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
The term ‘Preamble’ refers to the introduction or preface to the Constitution. It contains the summary
or essence of the Constitution. It is based on the ‘Objectives Resolution’, drafted and moved by Pandit
Nehru, and adopted on 22nd January, 1947 by the Constituent Assembly.
Significance of the Preamble to the Indian Constitution:
• It embodies the basic philosophy and fundamental values – political, moral and religious- on
which the Constitution is based.
• It reveals the source of authority of the Constitution i.e., the people of India.
• The terms sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic, republic in the Preamble suggests the nature
of the Indian state.
• It reveals the objectives of the Constitution as the ideals of justice, liberty, equality and
fraternity.
• It stipulates November 26, 1949 as the date of adoption of the Constitution.
• It contains the grand and noble vision of the Constituent Assembly, and acts as a guiding
source for the judges to understand the minds of founding fathers during interpretation of
the Constitution and review of the laws.
After independence, a controversy arose whether the Preamble is part of the Constitution or not. The
Supreme Court in different cases has dealt with this question as follows:
• In the Berubari Union case (1960), the Supreme Court said that the Preamble shows general
purposes behind several provisions in the Constitution, however, the Court didn’t consider it
as a part of the Constitution. It is also neither justiciable nor it indicates a source of power or
prohibition upon the powers of legislature.
• In the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), the Supreme Court rejected the earlier opinion and
held that Preamble is a part of the constitution. It observed that Preamble is an essential part
of Constitutional Law. It provided following facts which were not noticed in Berubari Union
case:
o It has been adopted by the Constituent Assembly in the same manner as other parts.
o The motion by which the Preamble was adopted said: “The question is that Preamble stands
part of the Constitution”.
• In S. R. Bommai case (1994), the Supreme Court again held that the Preamble is an integral part
of the Constitution.
Thus, the Preamble stands as an important part of the Constitution, which in the words of an eminent
jurist is ‘identity card of the Constitution’.
1 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
2. What are Parliamentary privileges? Discuss the need for codifying them.
Approach:
• Give a brief introduction about Parliamentary privileges.
• Write about various Parliamentary privileges.
• Bring out the need to codify Parliamentary privileges.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
Parliamentary privileges are special rights, immunities and exemptions enjoyed by members of
the Parliament, individually and collectively, so that they can “effectively discharge their
functions”. These also extend to individuals such as the Attorney General and Ministers who speak
and participate in Parliamentary proceedings. When any of these rights or immunities is disregarded,
the offence is called a breach of privilege and is punishable under law of Parliament. These
special privileges are enshrined under Article 105 (for Parliament) and Article 194 (for state
legislature) of the Constitution. These privileges are of two types, which are as follows:
Collective Privileges
• Exclude strangers from proceedings and hold a secret sitting of the legislature.
• Prohibit press to publish true reports of Parliamentary proceedings in case of secret sittings.
• Only Parliament can make rules to regulate its own proceedings.
• Courts are prohibited from making inquiry into the validity of any proceedings of the house on
ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
Individual privileges
• No arrest during session and 40 days before and 40 days after the session in civil cases.
• No member shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said in the
)
m
Parliament.
co
l.
• The members are exempted to appear as a witness before a court when the Parliament is in
ai
gm
session.
@
09
It has been pointed out that Parliamentary privileges can be used as a tool against critics – the civil
al
itt
society and the media endangering the fundamental right to speech and expression.
rm
ha
• Article 105(3) is transitional in character and the Constituent Assembly contemplated that a
rM
• The privileges of the House of Commons that have largely defined the rules in India are
hi
rS
• Countries such as Australia, USA, New Zealand and Canada have also codified privileges.
• These Privileges may be misused to hide misdeeds like corruption and may have far-reaching
implications for a clean public life. For example, in 1998, a constitutional bench of the Supreme
Court in P.V. Narasimha Rao vs. CBI held that bribe takers who had taken bribes and voted against
the no confidence motion were immune from prosecution.
• The absolute power of freedom of speech and expression for the parliamentarians vis-à-vis
imposition of restrictions for the public is against the ideals of a democracy.
However, codification of privileges can also be problematic as it would make the privileges subject to
fundamental rights and hence, judicial scrutiny and evolution of new privileges would become
difficult. In this context, there is a need to balance the rights of citizens vis-à-vis parliamentary
privileges. The privileges should no longer be allowed to remain uncertain and vague and must be
invoked in rare circumstances to prevent real obstruction in legislative functioning and not in a way
that sets lawmakers above ordinary comment and criticism.
)
m
• As per the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, the Commission has all the powers of a Civil Court. It
co
l.
can call witnesses, ask to produce a public document or record from any office or court.
ai
gm
• Any other matters referred to the Commission by the President in the interests of sound finance.
@
09
However, there are certain challenges that the Finance Commission faces:
al
itt
rm
• Term of reference: The terms referred to for the consideration of the 15th Finance Commission
ha
have raised doubts over the cooperative spirit of the Centre. It is argued by some that the use of
ik
h
2011 census as the basis for resources allocation between states by the 15th Finance Commission
(s
al
would disadvantage states that performed better in controlling their population over the decades.
itt
rM
• Nature of funds: The nature of transfers to states has also changed with the recommendations
a
of the 14th finance commission. A larger share of transfers has been in the form of unconditional
kh
hi
devolution to states. The share of statutory grants paid to the states has correspondingly
rS
declined. While this has allowed greater discretion to states, it has also made them more
Fo
4. Identifying the issues associated with judicial accountability in India, suggest measures to
address these issues.
Approach:
• Give a brief introduction about judicial accountability and provisions to ensure it in India.
• Identify the issues associated with judicial accountability.
3 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
• Suggest measures to address these issues.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
The term judicial accountability means that the judges are responsible for the decisions they deliver.
It also means that judges be held accountable for their conduct. Following are the provisions that
ensure accountability in the Judicial System in India:
• Article 124 (4): It provides for removal of the judges of higher courts only on the grounds of
proved misbehaviour and incapacity through a resolution to be passed in each House of the
Parliament by a special majority.
• Article 235: Under this, the control of the subordinate and district courts has been vested in
the High Courts.
• Judicial Charter: In 1997, the Supreme Court of India adopted a 16-point charter called the
Restatement of Values to serve as a guide and a complete code of the canons of judicial ethics.
• RTI Act, 2005: After the SC judgement in 2019, the office of the CJI has been brought under the
ambit of RTI.
However, judiciary in India is not subjected to the same level of accountability as the executive or the
legislative wings of the government leading to various issues associated with judicial accountability
in India:
• Appointment of judges of SC and HCs: The existing collegium system where judges appoint
judges leads to concentration of power in the hands of a few, making the higher judiciary
susceptible to become a self-perpetuating oligarchy.
• Opacity in the day-to-day functioning: There are several shortcomings in the in-house
procedure as there is no statutory backing for the procedures related to allocation of cases,
judicial appointments, disciplinary actions etc.
)
m
• Conduct of judges: There is constitutional restriction (Article 121) on discussion of the conduct
co
of judges in the Parliament. Judiciary scrutinizes itself in cases of misconduct by judges,
l.
ai
• Information asymmetry: The right to know under the RTI Act is not absolute and has to be
09
In this regard, following steps can be taken to enhance judicial accountability in India:
ha
ik
• The Parliament must bring a Bill to amend the Collegium system and bring more
h
(s
• Bringing a statutory law for Judicial Standards and Accountability, which can fix and plug gaps
rM
• Setting up a permanent secretariat in the Supreme Court for maintaining records of high
hi
rS
court judges and finetuning the memorandum of procedure to bring more transparency in
Fo
judicial appointments.
• Enhanced usage of technology so that the legal process of an entire life cycle of cases can be
digitized as well as monitored.
• A more formal and comprehensive code of conduct for judges should be put in place, which is
enforceable by law.
• Also, an annual report on functioning and efficiency should be published to foster
accountability as recently done by Orissa High court.
A balanced approach is the need of the hour where judicial independence should not be marred in
the name of judicial accountability; however, it should also be ensured that one of the pillars of
democracy should not go unanswerable.
)
m
amendments require only a simple majority.
•
co
l.
Federal Vs. Unitary: India has provincial autonomy, where powers and functions have been
ai
gm
allocated to States through a separate State list. In the UK, all legislative powers vest in the British
@
Parliament. England, Scotland, Wales etc. are all administrative units and not politically
09
al
autonomous.
itt
rm
supreme, as the powers of legislature are checked through a written constitution via judicial
ik
h
review, whereas in the UK, the courts generally cannot question the validity of the law
(s
al
○ Members of either House of the Parliament can become a PM in India, whereas the PM of
kh
hi
○ In India, a person who is not a member of Parliament can also be appointed as minister
Fo
(maximum period of six months). In the UK, only MPs can become ministers.
○ UK has the system of legal responsibility of the ministers, while Indian ministers are not
required to countersign the official acts of the Head of the State
○ Opposition party creates a Shadow Cabinet in the UK to balance the ruling cabinet and to
prepare its members for future ministerial office, whereas no such system exists in India.
• Speaker: In the UK, the Speaker’s constituency remains unchallenged. Once appointed,
the Speaker gives formal resignation from his political party. Whereas in India, it is neither
necessary for the Speaker to resign from his party, nor is there any provision that he will be
elected uncontested.
While both India and the UK are representative democracies, there are basic differences between
the ideals of these nations. For instance, the Indian Constitution is republic in nature and it strictly
adheres to the principles of democracy, secularism and socialism, whereas in UK, there still exists
Monarchy, the institution of the House of Lords, and Christianity as official state religion.
)
m
on governments in influencing taxes and corporate regulation. For example, the government
co
l.
consults business bodies like FICCI, CII etc. before budget formulation.
ai
gm
• Globalization: Global businesses and NGOs are becoming major actors in influencing the policies
@
in India.
09
al
• Women’s participation: Increasing literacy and subsequent empowerment of women has led to
itt
rm
an increase in their participation in pressure group activity. For example, SEWA has been in the
ha
• Alternative to political parties: Cause groups offer a more promising route for bringing about
(s
al
political change as compared to political parties. For example, the anti-corruption movement by
itt
rM
• Devolution of power: Pressure groups have become more influential at the local/grassroots
kh
hi
However, there are others who argue that the influence of pressure groups has declined in recent
past due to the following reasons:
• Government action due to FCRA violations: Several international and well-known NGOs such
as Compassion International, Greenpeace India, Amnesty International, and Ford Foundation
have come under the government’s scanner for alleged violations of FCRA.
• Serving political interests: In India, some pressure groups have been accused of becoming tools
to sub-serve political and foreign interests. An IB report in 2016 highlighted that 2-3% of
India’s GDP gets compromised each year due to protests by vested interests against projects
integral for economic growth.
Overall, pressure groups have now become an indispensable element of the democratic process. Due
to the highly complex nature of society, individuals cannot pursue their interests on their own. Thus,
it is important for the government to consult these organised groups at the time of policy formulation
and implementation.
)
m
important source of information for the public and for members of the legislature.
co
l.
• Efficient use of resources: The CAG ascertains whether money shown in the accounts as having
ai
gm
been disbursed was legally available for and applicable to the service or the purpose to which
@
they have been applied or charged and whether the expenditure conforms to the authority that
09
al
governs it.
itt
rm
o Additionally, CAG can also look into the ‘wisdom, faithfulness and economy’ of government
ha
• Performance Audit: CAG also conducts Performance Audits of various government schemes and
(s
al
Overall, the CAG acts as a bulwark of the democratic system of government in India, as it serves as a
a
kh
check and balance on the Executive branch of government and ensures financial transparency in their
hi
rS
functioning.
Fo
8. Tracing the evolution of the local government in India, highlight the changes brought about by
the 73rd Amendment Act to the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs).
Approach:
• Give a brief introduction about the importance of local government.
• Give the evolution of local government in India.
• Highlight the changes brought about by the 73rd amendment in Panchayati Raj institutions.
• Give a brief conclusion.
Answer:
Self-governing village communities existed in India from the earliest times in the form of ‘Sabhas’
(village assemblies). These village bodies took the shape of Panchayats, which resolved issues at the
village level. Their role and functions kept on changing at different points of time.
)
m
levels.
• co
Transfer of Subjects: The 11th Schedule of Indian Constitution was added in 1992 by the 73rd
l.
ai
gm
Constitution Amendment Act. This schedule contains 29 subjects. These subjects are to be
@
transferred to the Panchayati Raj institutions. However, the actual transfer of these functions
09
• State Election Commissioners: The State government is required to appoint a State Election
rm
ha
Commissioner who would be responsible for conducting elections to the Panchayati Raj
ik
institutions.
h
(s
• State Finance Commission: The State government is also required to appoint a State Finance
al
itt
Commission once in five years which would examine the financial position of the local
rM
governments and review the distribution of revenues between the State and local governments.
a
kh
hi
In nutshell, the amendment has led to the presence of these local institutions across India, which is a
rS
Fo
significant achievement and has created an atmosphere and platform for people’s participation in
governance.
9. Bringing out the salient features of the Gram Nyayalyas Act, 2008, discuss its significance for
India.
Approach:
• Start with the concept of Gram Nyayalyas.
• Mention the salient features of the Gram Nyayalyas Act.
• Highlight the significance of Gram Nayayalas for India.
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
The Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008 has been enacted to provide for the establishment of the Gram
Nyayalayas at the grassroots level. According to this Act, the Gram Nyayalaya shall be the court
of Judicial Magistrate of the first class and its presiding officer (Nyayadhikari) shall be appointed
by the State Government in consultation with the High Court.
8 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
Major features of the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008
• Setup: The Gram Nyayalaya shall be established for every Panchayat at intermediate level
or a group of contiguous Panchayats at intermediate level in a district or where there is no
Panchayat at intermediate level in any State, for a group of contiguous Panchayats.
• Judicial Powers: The Gram Nyayalaya shall be a mobile court and shall exercise the powers
of both Criminal and Civil Courts.
• Seat: The seat of the Gram Nyayalaya will be located at the headquarters of the
intermediate Panchayat, they will go to villages, work there and dispose of the cases.
• Jurisdiction: The Gram Nyayalaya shall try criminal cases, civil suits, claims or disputes which
are specified in the First Schedule and the Second Schedule to the Act.
• Procedural aspects: The Gram Nyayalaya shall not be bound by the rules of evidence provided
in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 but shall be guided by the principles of natural justice and
subject to any rule made by the High Court.
Significance of the Gram Nyayalayas
• Access to Justice: Article 39A of the Constitution directs the State to ensure that the operation
of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity and shall provide free legal
aid to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of
economic or other disabilities.
• Procedural Simplification: In the recent past, the Government has taken various measures to
strengthen the judicial system, inter alia, by simplifying the procedural laws; incorporating
various alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as arbitration, conciliation and
mediation. Gram Nyayalayas are a step in this direction.
• Speedy Justice: The 114 Report of Law Commission of India on Gram Nyayalaya suggested
establishment of Gram Nyayalayas so that speedy, inexpensive and substantial justice could be
provided to the common man. The Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008 is broadly based on the
)
m
recommendations of the Law Commission.
• co
Affordable Justice: Justice to the poor at their doorstep is a dream of the poor. Setting up of Gram
l.
ai
gm
Nyayalayas would bring to the people of rural areas speedy, affordable and substantial justice.
@
Gram Nyayalayas have a positive role in providing access to justice to the poor and reaching out to
09
al
10. Explaining the meaning of the term 'secularism', discuss how the provisions of the Constitution
(s
al
Approach:
a
kh
hi
• Conclude accordingly.
Answer:
Secularism, as it emerged in the West, is understood as the separation of religion from civil affairs
and the state, involving diminishing role of religion in the public sphere. There are distinct traditions
of secularism in the world. Indian secularism refers to equal treatment of all religions and no
discrimination on the basis of religion. There is no clear-cut demarcation between state and
religion in India. Also, positive intervention of the state in religious matters is not prohibited. Hence,
it is also known as a positive model of secularism. On the other hand, Western secularism
involving complete separation of the state and religion, can be termed as a negative model of
secularism.
Although the term ‘secular’ was not incorporated in the Indian Constitution upon its inception,
it was included in 1976 through the 42nd Amendment. However, in spirit, the values of secular
character were interwoven in the constitutional fabric of India from the very beginning.
)
m
Supreme Court in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati Case.
co
l.
ai
gm
@
11. Timely disposal of court cases is essential for maintaining the rule of law and providing access
09
to justice. In this context, discuss the reasons behind judicial pendency and mention the steps
al
itt
Approach:
ik
h
(s
• Discuss why timely disposal of cases is imperative for ensuring rule of law.
al
itt
• Conclude accordingly.
hi
rS
Answer:
Fo
Access to justice is a basic right that guarantees protection of law to all. It also includes the right to
timely justice as “justice delayed is justice denied”. Moreover, it is integral to rule of law as judicial
delay hampers public trust in the Judiciary, which in turn, weakens the democratic institutions.
Further, it is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
However, according to data by the Department of Justice, over 4.70 crore cases are pending in
various courts in the country. Of them, 87.4% are pending in subordinate courts, 12.4% in High
Courts, while nearly 1,82,000 cases have been pending for over 30 years.
Reasons for judicial pendency in India are:
• Poor state of subordinate Judiciary: District courts across the country suffer from inadequate
infrastructure and poor working conditions.
• Disruptions due to the coronavirus pandemic: It further clogged the overburdened Indian
judicial system. Though the courts eventually went digital with the initial lockdown restrictions
in place, a slower disposal rate resulted in more pending cases. For instance, the National Judicial
Data Grid shows that courts saw an increase of over 27% in pendency between December 2019
and April 2022.
10 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
• Shortage of judges: There are merely 20 judges per lakh population in the country, which is
alarmingly low. The sanctioned strength of judicial officers in the subordinate and High Courts
saw a gradual increase, however, by April 2021, 411 of 1,080 positions (38%) were vacant in High
Courts.
• The government being the biggest litigant: The former Chief Justice of India (CJI) N.V. Ramana
termed the governments as the biggest litigants, accounting for nearly 50% of pending cases. Also,
many of these are actually cases of one department of the government suing another.
• Vague drafting of laws: There are obsolete laws that are part of the statute books. Further, faulty
or vague drafting of laws, and their multiple interpretations by several courts are the reasons
behind prolonged litigation.
Steps taken to address judicial pendency of cases include:
• Reduce litigation by the government: Various steps have been taken to reduce litigation by the
government, such as:
o Legal Information Management & Briefing System (LIMBS): A web-platform for the
purpose of monitoring litigation of the Union of India.
o Administrative Mechanism for Resolution of Disputes (AMRD): For the resolution of
inter-ministerial/ departmental disputes.
• Establishment of fast track courts: The government has established fast track courts to provide
speedy justice and dispose a large number of pending cases in a specified time.
• Promoting Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms: The government and the
Judiciary are promoting ADR mechanisms like arbitration, mediation, etc., which have the
potential to change the judicial landscape and settle grievances without protracted legal
proceedings.
• Use of technology: The e-Courts Mission Mode Project was launched with the objective of
improving access to justice using technology by streamlining the district and subordinate courts.
o Further, SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court Efficiency) was launched for
)
m
co
improving efficiency by encapsulating judicial processes that can be automated through
l.
ai
Artificial Intelligence.
gm
@
Apart from these, a better court management system, reliable data collection with regard to cases,
09
improving infrastructure of subordinate courts and establishing the All India Judicial Services is
al
itt
12. Throw some light on the significance and limitations of the 'doctrine of basic structure' in the
al
itt
Indian Constitution.
rM
a
Approach:
kh
hi
rS
)
m
The ‘basic structure doctrine’ proves its essentiality as a protective shield between the power-
co
l.
ridden Parliament, the citizenry and the application of judicial mind and should be applied
ai
gm
judiciously.
@
09
al
itt
rm
13. While a wide range of powers have been conferred on the Governors of states in India, there are
ha
Approach:
al
itt
rM
• State the wide range of powers that have been conferred on the Governors of states in India.
kh
hi
• Conclude accordingly.
Fo
Answer:
Articles 153 to 167 of the Constitution deal with the role and powers of the Governor. It is an
independent office, which functions as a vital link between the Union government and the state
governments.
A wide range of powers - executive, legislative, financial and judicial – has been conferred on the
Governors of states in India, which include the following:
• Executive powers: All Executive actions of the state government are formally taken in the name
of the Governor.
o His/her Executive powers include appointments and determination of conditions of the
offices of various important posts including that of the Chief Minister, the State Election
Commissioner, etc.
• Legislative powers: He/she ensures that the Annual Financial Statement (State Budget) is
laid before the State Legislature. The Governor also has the power to promulgate Ordinances.
o Money Bills can be introduced in the State Legislature only with the prior recommendation
of the Governor and no demand for a grant can be made except on his/her recommendation.
12 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
• Judicial powers: He/she can grant pardons, reprieve, respites and remissions of
punishments or suspend, remit and commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence
against any law relating to a matter to which the Executive power of the state extends.
o He/she is consulted by the President while appointing the judges of the concerned state
High Court and makes appointments, postings and promotions of the district judges in
consultation with the state High Court.
• Discretionary powers: He/she has constitutional discretion, which include the reservation of
a Bill for the consideration of the President, recommendation for the imposition of the President’s
Rule (under Article 356) in a state, etc.
o He/she has situational discretion as well such as the power to appoint the Chief Minister
(CM) when no party has a clear-cut majority, the CM in office dies suddenly with no obvious
successor, etc.
However, the open confrontation between the Governors and state Ministers, misuse of Article
356 of the Constitution, the Governors not acting timely upon Bills passed in the Assemblies,
mindless re-promulgation of Ordinances, misuse of discretionary powers, etc. have been issues
of contention. In this light, certain limitations on the powers of the Governor have also been
specified, which are:
• Article 154(2)(a) of the Constitution prohibits the Governor from exercising any function
“conferred by existing law on any other Authority”.
• Article 163 of the Constitution categorically provides that “there shall be a Council of Ministers
with the Chief Minister at the head to aid and advise the Governor.
• The S. R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994) case limited the Governor’s powers in dismissing
a state government under Article 356 of the Constitution. The floor of the Assembly is the only
forum that should test the majority of the government of the day, and not the subjective opinion
of the Governor.
• In the Rameshwar Prasad case (2006), it was held that the Governor cannot decide based on
)
m
his subjective assessments on the proclamation of President’s Rule and the dissolution of the
co
l.
Assembly.
ai
gm
• In D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar (1986), the Governor’s power on re-promulgating
@
Ordinances for an indefinite period of time was limited. It was held that the Governor cannot take
09
al
The office of the Governor is important in the Indian federal system. The Governor's office should
ha
ik
facilitate maintenance of internal security, ensure communal harmony and welfare of Scheduled
h
(s
Castes and Scheduled Tribes and rise above partisan politics while discharging the Constitutional
al
itt
obligations.
rM
a
kh
hi
rS
14. Discuss the effectiveness of Parliamentary oversight to ensure Executive accountability in India.
Fo
)
m
• Power to the Parliament to convene itself: Currently, the Parliament is convened at the behest
co
of the President (on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers). A constitutional amendment
l.
ai
gm
to allow the Parliament to convene at the request of a requisite number of Members of Parliament
@
• Strengthening the Committee system: It can be done by making the appearance of the
al
itt
Strengthened Parliamentary oversight over the Executive not only holds the government accountable
(s
al
but also ensures that the policies are efficient and serve the needs of the citizens. Further, it leads to
itt
rM
15. Giving an account of composition of the Competition Commission of India, discuss its role in
Fo
)
m
innovations like the ‘Green Channel’ provision for speedy and automated approval on
co
combinations/transactions. However, the Competition Law Review Committee headed by Mr.
l.
ai
gm
Injeti Srinivas submitted its report in 2019 and identified various issues in the effective functioning
@
of the CCI relating to the Appellate Authority, investigation, powers, penalties, settlements and
09
commitments, etc.
al
itt
rm
The major recommendations of the Committee were incorporated in the Competition (Amendment)
ha
Bill, 2022. The Bill should be passed at the earliest to promote and sustain an enabling competition
ik
h
culture through engagement and enforcement that would inspire businesses to be fair, competitive
(s
al
16. Discuss the significance of the Representation of The People Act (RPA), 1951, in the smooth
rS
Approach:
• Briefly introduce the Representation of The People Act (RPA), 1951.
• With the help of its key provisions, explain how it helps in the smooth functioning of the Indian
democracy.
• Conclude with a way forward.
Answer:
Under Article 327, the Constitution of India empowers the Parliament to make provisions regarding
matters related to elections to either House of the Parliament and the State Legislatures, preparation
of electoral rolls and delimitation of constituencies. The government therefore introduced the
Representation of The People Act (RPA), 1950 (concerned with delimitation and electoral rolls)
and the Representation of The People Act (RPA), 1951 (concerned with the smooth conduct of
elections) in this context.
)
m
• Other provisions: It explains the general procedures to be followed after the death of a
co
candidate of a recognised political party before elections, the process of vacation of seats when
l.
ai
gm
Fair elections are the essential tenet of a robust democracy. In this regard, certain recommendations
09
al
have been provided by the Umesh Sinha Committee in 2019, such as changes in the Model Code of
itt
rm
Conduct and taking help of social media platforms to evolve mechanisms for violation of electoral
ha
offences. The Election Commission of India has also asked the Parliament to introduce Section 58B
ik
h
in the RPA, 1951 to deal with ‘voter bribery’ in lines of Section 58A, that deals with booth
(s
al
capturing. Adequate measures need to be adopted to further strengthen the RPA, 1951.
itt
rM
a
kh
hi
17. The 42nd Amendment Act brought forth a number of significant changes in the Indian
rS
Constitution. Discuss.
Fo
Approach:
• Briefly introduce the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (CAA).
• Discuss the major changes introduced through the 42nd CAA.
• Conclude appropriately.
Answer:
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 (CAA) is known as the “Mini Constitution” because
of the large number of revisions it made to the Constitution of India. It also sought to change the basic
structure of the Indian Constitution through broad amendments that impacted many aspects of the
Constitution.
Some major changes brought to the Constitution by this Act are the following:
• Changes in the Preamble: Firstly, it changed the characterization of India to "sovereign,
socialist secular democratic republic" from "sovereign democratic republic." Secondly, the
words ‘unity of the nation' was changed to ‘unity and integrity of the nation'. Though various
)
m
co
President’s Rule and empowered the Centre to deploy armed forces in any state to deal with the
l.
ai
law and order situation.
gm
@
Thus, the 42nd CAA sought to introduce significant changes in the Indian Constitution. Many of its
09
provisions were challenged in the Supreme Court, and resulted in further evolution of the ‘basic
al
itt
structure’ doctrine. In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the issue of Article 31C and that of judicial
rm
review was widely discussed. Later, through the 43rd and 44th CAA, the powers of the Judiciary were
ha
ik
restored and the original terms of the Lok Sabha and Legislative Assemblies were restored. However,
h
(s
most of the changes introduced by the 42nd CAA have been retained reflecting the fact that the
al
itt
18. Compare the judicial system of India with that of the United States of America (U.S.A.) and the
Fo
)
m
• co
In India, there are specific and extensive provisions of judicial review covered in the
l.
ai
Constitution of India such as Articles 13,32,131,136,143,226, etc. whereas in the U.K., there is an
gm
unwritten Constitution, and there is no express provision for judicial review. It is dependent
@
The U.S.A, U.K. and India are liberal democratic states wherein the Judiciary in each of these states
rm
enjoys a very important and powerful position. All three have an independent, unbiased, honest and
ha
ik
efficient Judiciary. The principle of separation of powers is followed in these nation states where the
h
(s
19. Discuss how the Indian Constitution ensures the independence of the Election Commission of
hi
rS
India.
Fo
Approach:
• Briefly mention the constitutional role of the Election Commission of India.
• Mention the constitutional provisions that ensure its independence.
• Discuss some concerns pertaining to its independence and conclude on a positive note.
Answer:
The Election Commission of India (ECI) is an autonomous constitutional authority responsible for
administering Union and state elections in India. The body administers elections to the Lok Sabha,
Rajya Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies, and the offices of the President and Vice-President in the
country.
The Indian Constitution has ensured the independence of the Election Commission of India through
the following provisions:
• Constitutional status: The Indian Constitution under Article 324 provides for the establishment
of the Election Commission of India. This provision ensures a constitutional status for the
)
m
and strengthened the roots of democracy in the country.
co
l.
ai
gm
@
20. Though there exists separation of powers between the Legislature and Judiciary, judicial
09
Approach:
ha
ik
• Briefly introduce the concept of separation of powers and state the provisions in the Indian
h
(s
•
rM
Discuss how judicial activism has blurred the concept of separation of powers.
a
• Conclude accordingly.
kh
hi
rS
Answer:
Fo
The doctrine of separation of powers envisages that one organ of the government should not perform
the functions of other organs and should not interfere with the jurisdiction of other organs of the
government. The functions of various organs of the government have been sufficiently differentiated
in the Constitution, so that one organ does not usurp the function of another.
Provisions for separation of powers between the Legislature and Judiciary under the
Constitution of India are:
• Articles 122 and 212: Under these Articles, the Indian Constitution prohibits the courts to
inquire into the proceedings of Parliament/State legislatures.
• Articles 121 and 211: These Articles provide that the Parliament/State Legislatures cannot
discuss the conduct of a judge of the Supreme Court or High Court. They can do so only in the case
of impeachment.
However, with the evolution of judicial activism in India, there have been times when the Judiciary
has usurped the powers of the Parliament. The Judiciary has been criticized for blurring the
principle of separation of powers in the following manners:
)
m
co
l.
ai
gm
@
09
al
itt
rm
ha
ik
h
(s
al
itt
rM
a
kh
hi
rS
Fo