BASIC COMPUTATION & PRINCIPLES OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING

LAB. (CS - 291)RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable

Below
Unacceptable
Assigned Expectations
Marks
4 3 1 0
Content
Some of algorithms
Capability of writing Most of algorithms Few of algorithms No algorithms or
or procedures are
Algorithm/Drawing or procedures are or procedures are procedures are
written
Flow Chart written clearly. written clearly. written.
undoubtedly.
All programs are
written precisely Major errors in Programs are not
Capability of writing Some programs are
based on the program writing. written/wrong
Program written accurately.
question. program written.

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are
Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output Finding of results found.
output not found. output found.
are clear.

Completion of target 100% target has 75% target has 50% target has 25% target has
in Lab been completed. been completed. been completed. been completed.

Submission of Lab
Proper Time i.e. in
Fair Copy in proper
Attention to Lab Fair next day of lab., Very poor
time but not with Late Submission.
Copy with proper presentation.
proper
documentation.
documentation.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O
Between 15 – 11 ----> E
Marks Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ----> A
Between 05 – 00 ----> B

Signature with Date

Experiment No. Experiment Date

Experiment Name

NETWORK LAB ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC FOR STUDENT

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Expectations Unacceptable
Assigned
Marks
4 3 1 0
Content
Attended but came
Attendance in Lab on Attended in proper Attended in proper
very late and with /
the Day of Experiment time & day with time & day without Absent.
without Rough
with Rough Copy Rough Copy. Rough Copy.
Copy.

Major
All steps/programs
steps/programs
Experimental are completely
are completely Some major errors. Wrong attempt.
procedure correct and
correct and minor
accurate.
mistake.
Represent all data Represent some Represent some
appropriately. data appropriately. data appropriately.
No result
Result Analysis Finding of results Finding of results Finding of results
analysis.
are clear. are clear. are unclear.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

Submission of Lab Fair Proper Time i.e. in next day Lab but Fair Copy in proper
Late Submission.
Copy next day Lab. without Index or time for missed
Chanel File. Lab Experiment.

Page No., Exp.

Page No(s). and
Marking Page No., Date, Exp. No. are
Exp. Date(s) are
Exp. Date, Exp. No. Only Page No(s). is not available on
Attention to Lab Copy missing in other
properly in every / are missing. first Page of Lab
pages after first
page. Report and other
Page of Lab Report.
pages also.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> Z (5)

Between 15 – 11 ----> Y (4)
Marks Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ----> X (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> W(0)

Signature of the Examiner with Date

 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
DATA STRUCTURE & ALGORITHM LAB (ES-CS - 391)
NAME………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………
YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...
UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX
DATE OF
EXP. DATE OF GRADE TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. EXP. /Marks SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION
 RUBRIC FOR DATA STRUCTURE & ALGORITHM LAB.

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Outstanding Excellent Average Below Average

Assigned
Marks
4 3 2 1
Parameters
All the steps are Most of the steps Few steps are None of the
Capability of writing implemented are implemented implemented steps are
Algorithm/Procedure correctly of an correctly of an correctly of an implemented of
algorithm algorithm algorithm an algorithm
Completeness of
Completeness of Completeness of
code, consistent
Capability of writing code, Inconsistent code, consistent Program not
variable naming
Program variable naming and variable naming completed
and well
well formatted and unformatted
formatted

Completion in target 100% target has

75% target has been 50% target has 25% target has
in Lab been completed
completed been completed been completed
Most of the Some of the outputs Few outputs have None of the
outputs are are correct and well been found outputs are
Output
correct and well formatted. correctly correct
formatted.
Proper Time i.e. in
Late Submission Late Submission
Submission of Lab next day Lab., with Late Submission by
Fair Copy proper one day by two days (after two days)
documentation

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O
Between 15 – 11 ----> E
Marks Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ----> A
Between 05 – 00 ----> B

Signature with Date

 PROJECT GROUP NUMBER: IT_PROJ_2020_
Project Title:

Name of the Supervisor:

Project II (CS 892) Assesment Rubric

Performance Excellent Good Fair Poor
Indicator (PI) 4 pts 3 pts 2 pts 1 pt
Excellent Good Fair Poor
The project is The project is not
Job
The project is completed but The project is completed as per
Completion
completed as per tasks required minor completed but requered tasks described in
described in synopsis. modifications. several modifications. synopsis.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Requirement
Analysis Effectively Partially Contributed Attempted to contribute No contribution in
& contributed in in requirement in requirement analysis requirement analysis
Designing requirement analysis analysis and designing. and designing and designing.
and designing.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Developing a Developed the critical Developed some Attempted to develope No contribution in
Solution modules with modules with higher few developing a solution
with proper test optimized coding and complexity in coding modules (case specific) as well as testing.
cases designed most test and designed few test and test cases.
cases. cases.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Teamwork Worked very well with Worked well with the Worked with the team. No contribution as a
the team. team. member in the team.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Worked very well to Worked well to submit Tried to submit the No contribution in
Project Report submit an excellent the project report with project report but project report
Writing project report. covering all the standard of report was writing.
aspects of a standard not satisfactory.
report.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Project
Presentation Presented the project Presented the project Presented the project Presentation skill is
work flawlessly. work very nice. work not so good. not up to the mark.
Project Group Members
ROLL NUMBER

NAME
PI1
PI2
PI3
PI4
PI5
PI6
Comments (if any)
 OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING LAB.
(CS-594D )RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Assignment No.

Assignment Details

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable

Below
Unacceptable
Assigned Expectations
Marks
5 3 1 0
Content

Attended the Lab

Attendance in Attended in proper Attended the lab.,
but half an hour Absent.
Lab time. but extreme late.
late.

All programs are

Capability of written precisely
writing based on the Major errors in
Some programs are Programs are
Programs with algorithm/proced program writing.
written accurately. not written.
proper ure, which have
explanations been written.

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are Wrong
Major part of
Result Finding of results found. output/no
output not found.
are clear. output found.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

All experiments
next day Lab., with Fair Copy in proper
Submission of that have been Late
properly written time but not found
Lab Fair Copy completed last day Submission.
Exp. Date, Exp. No. Exp. Date, Exp. No.
lab. , not found.
and Exp. Name. and Exp. Name.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O (5)

Between 15 – 11 ----> E (4)
Marks Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ----> A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> B(0)

Signature with Date

 Numerical Methods LAB. (MCS 491)RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable

Below
Unacceptable
Assigned Expectations
Marks
4* 3* 2* 1*
Content

Improper Improper
Discussion of the Proper discussion Proper discussion
discussion with discussion
problem with example. without example.
example. without example.

Proper algorithms
Capability of writing Algorithm with Algorithms with Improper / no
without any
Algorithm minor mistakes. major mistakes. algorithms
mistake.

All programs are

written precisely Programs with Programs with Improper
Capability of writing
based on the minor mistakes major mistakes programs (no
Program
proper algorithm. (syntax error). (logical error). match with algo.)

Represent all data

appropriately and Partly outputs are
Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output finding the results found.
output not found. output found.
clearly.

Total Marks

Signature with Date

*NB: Submission of lab copy on proper date will carry additional one (1) mark in
each field.
 Assessment Rubrics for Seminar

Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score

Performance Indicators
1 2 3 4
(PI)
Material not clearly related Material sufficient for Material sufficient for Material sufficient for
Background
to topic OR background clear understanding clear understanding AND clear understanding AND
PI 1 Knowledge and
dominated seminar but not clearly effectively presented exceptionally presented
content
presented
The report was poorly The report was structured The report was structured
structured, and the and formatted (e.g: font, in an orderly manner, and
formatting (e.g: font, spacing, labelling of the formatting (e.g: font,
Documentation There was no structure of
PI 2 and Report report and the formatting
labelling of figures and figures and tables, spacing, labelling of
tables, equations equations numbered and figures and tables,
numbered etc) include etc) in a satisfactory equations numbered and
very substantial and manner etc) was done properly.
consistent error.
Contents of presentations
Contents of Contents of presentations
Hard to follow; sequence of are appropriate and well
Organization of information jumpy, Very Poor presentations are not are not appropriate, Eye
delivered, Proper eye
PI 3 presentation delivery of presentation
appropriate and not well contact with few people
contact with audience and
delivered, Poor delivery and clear voice with good
clear voice with good
of presentation spoken language
spoken language

Acceptable but does not

Attracts attention and
Body language, Starting well but make impact on the
makes the presentation
Confidence & Unimpressive reflecting frequently faltering and audience, good linguistic
lively, applies the art of
PI 4 Communicatio lack of confidence, low losing confidence, skill but often fails to
effective communication,
n Skill voice, poor linguistic skills. medium voice, and communicate effectively
strong voice and linguistic
limited linguistic skill. and the voice is
skill.
acceptable.

Sketchy explanation, Clear explanation with

Q&A and Good explanation at examples, volunteers
interaction, Wrong response or skips complicated
PI 5 Manners explanation, ill-mannered parts, needs support,
some Questions, answering
good manners. hard/critical Qs, Well
lacking manners. mannered.
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LAB. (EE-691)
NAME………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………
YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...
UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX
DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

INDEX (Continue…)
 DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

INDEX (Continue…)
 DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

....……………………………… FOR FINAL LAB EXAMINER USE ONLY …………………………………

OVERALL
DATE OF FINAL TOTAL LAB ATTENDED
GRADE IN
LAB EXAM. (OUT OF LAB CLASSES- )
LAB COPY
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT IN FINAL
LAB EXAMINATION
WHETHER THE STUDENT COULD
COMPLETE THE LAB EXPERIMENT YES NO
DURING LAB EXAM – (PUT TICK)

SIGNATURE OF THE EXAMINER IN FINAL LAB

EXAM. WITH DATE

Experiment
Experiment Date
No.

Experiment
Name
 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LAB. RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Date
Experiment No.

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable

Below
Unacceptable
Assigned Expectations
Marks
4 3 1 0
Content

Attended the Lab

Attended in proper Attended the lab.,
Attendance in Lab but half an hour Absent.
time. but extreme late.
late.

Capability of writing
Observation Accurate & perfect Almost Accurate Partially Accurate Inaccurate
table/program

Very good & Correct poor

DRAWING(UML Correct average
correct drawing drawing using Drawing using
Diagram/Gantt drawing using
using pencil with pencil and without Pen/Incorrect
chart/PERT pencil with proper
proper notation(s) proper notation(s) Drawing
chart/CFG) notation(s)

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are
Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output Finding of results found.
output not found. output found.
are clear.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

All experiments
next day Lab., with Fair Copy in proper
Submission of Lab that have been
properly written time but not found Late Submission.
Fair Copy completed last day
Exp. Date, Exp. No. Exp. Date, Exp. No.
lab. , not found.
and Exp. Name. and Exp. Name.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O (5)

Between 15 – 11 ----> E (4)
Marks Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ----> A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> B(0)

Signature with Date

 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SOFTWARE TOOLS LAB (CS - 492)

NAME………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………

YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...

UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX

....……………………………… FOR FINAL LAB EXAMINER USE ONLY …………………………………

OVERALL
DATE OF FINAL TOTAL LAB ATTENDED
GRADE IN
LAB EXAM. (OUT OF LAB CLASSES- )
LAB COPY
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT IN
FINAL LAB EXAMINATION
WHETHER THE STUDENT COULD
COMPLETE THE LAB EXPERIMENT YES NO
DURING LAB EXAM – (PUT TICK)
SIGNATURE OF THE EXAMINER IN FINAL LAB
EXAM. WITH DATE

Experiment No. Experiment Date

Experiment
Name
 SOFTWARE TOOLS RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Criteria & Acceptable Considerable

Below Unacceptabl
Point Expectations e
Assigned Marks
5 3 1 0
Content

Attended the Attended the

Attendance in Attended in
Lab but half an lab., but extreme Absent.
Lab proper time.
hour late. late.

Capability of All programs are

written precisely
writing based on the Some programs Major errors in Programs
Programs with algorithm/proced are written program writing. are not
proper ure, which have accurately. written.
been written.
explanations

Represent all data

Wrong
appropriately. Partly outputs Major part of
output/no
Result Finding of results are found. output not
output
are clear. found.
found.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of

All experiments
next day Lab., Lab Fair Copy in
that have been
Submission of with properly proper time but Late
completed last
Lab Fair Copy written Exp. Date, not found Exp. Submission.
day lab. , not
Exp. No. and Exp. Date, Exp. No.
found.
Name. and Exp. Name.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ---->O (5)

Marks Between 15 – 11 ---->E (4)
Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ---->A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ---->B(0)

Signature with Date