0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

CE-116L Computer Programming LAB Rubrics

The document outlines the rubric guidelines for evaluating students in the CE-116L Computer Programming Lab at Sir Syed University. It includes criteria for software handling, programming, results, and laboratory manual quality, with a scoring system for performance assessment. Additionally, it details the evaluation for lab exams, focusing on knowledge presentation, preparedness, and communication skills.

Uploaded by

Mehar Ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

CE-116L Computer Programming LAB Rubrics

The document outlines the rubric guidelines for evaluating students in the CE-116L Computer Programming Lab at Sir Syed University. It includes criteria for software handling, programming, results, and laboratory manual quality, with a scoring system for performance assessment. Additionally, it details the evaluation for lab exams, focusing on knowledge presentation, preparedness, and communication skills.

Uploaded by

Mehar Ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

SSUET/QR/118

(Form IIa)

Sir Syed University of Engineering s Technology, Karachi


Computer Engineering Department

Rubric Guideline for Software Based Lab

CE-116L Computer Programming Lab, 2nd Semester, Batch

Name of Student: Roll No.

Exceeds Meets
Developing Unsatisfactory
Criteria Expectation Expectation
(50% - 69%) (< 50%)
(>= 90%) (70% - 89%)

Able to use Able to use


software with its software with its Able to use
Software standard and standard and software with its Unable to use the
Handling advanced features advanced features standard features software.
without with minimal with assistance.
assistance. assistance.

Able to program/ Able to program/


Able to program/
Programming/ simulate the lab simulate the lab Unable to
simulate lab tasks
Simulation tasks with tasks without program/simulate.
with errors.
simplification. errors.

Able to achieve
Able to achieve all Able to achieve all Unable to achieve
most of the
Results the desired results the desired the desired
desired results
in alternate ways. results. results.
with errors.

Laboratory manual
Laboratory manual Laboratory manual
has no
has very few has multiple Laboratory manual
grammatical and/
grammatical/ grammatical/ has several
or spelling errors.
spelling errors. spelling errors. grammatical/
Laboratory
spelling errors and
Manual All sections of the
All sections of the Few sections of sentence
report are very well
report are the report construction is
written and
technically contains technical poor.
technically
accurate. errors.
accurate.
SSUET/QR/118
(Form IIb)

Sir Syed University of Engineering s Technology, Karachi


Computer Engineering Department
Rubric – Laboratory Manual

CE-116L Computer Programming Lab, 2nd Semester, Batch

Name of Student: Roll No.

Lab Description s Score


Obj:
1. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
2. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
3. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
4. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
5. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
6. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
7. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
8. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
9. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
10. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
11. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
12. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
13. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
Obj:
14. Software Handling Programming/Simulations Results Lab Report Score
( )/2 ( )/5 ( )/2 ( )/1 ( ) / 10
TOTAL SCORE
Overall Score: / 15 Examined by:
(Total Score / 140) x 15 (Name and Signature of the concerned lab instructor)
SSUET/QR/118
(Form IIb)

Sir Syed University of Engineering s Technology, Karachi


Computer Engineering Department
Rubric for Lab Exam

CE-116L Computer Programming Lab, 2nd Semester, Batch

Name of Student: Roll No.

Exceeds Meets
Developing Unsatisfactory Score
Criteria Expectation Expectation
(50%-69%) (<50%) Obtained
(>=90%) (70%-89%)

   
Performance Able to present Able to present Able to present No or very little
full knowledge adequate sufficient knowledge of
(16 Marks) of both problem knowledge of knowledge of both problem
and solution. both problem both problem and solution.
and solution. and solution.

   
Viva Able to answer Able to answer Able to answer Unable to
the questions the questions the questions answer the
(04 Marks) easily and related to the but with questions.
correctly across project. mistakes.
the project.

TOTAL SCORE

Final Lab Assessment


Criteria Score Obtained
Laboratory Manual
(15 Marks)
Subject Project
(15 Marks)
Lab Exam
(20 Marks)
Total
(50 Marks)

Examined By:
(Name and Signature of the concerned lab instructor)
SSUET/QR/118
(Form IIIc)

Sir Syed University of Engineering s Technology, Karachi


Computer Engineering Department

Rubric for Lab Exam


(Affective Domain)

CE-116L Computer Programming Lab, 2nd Semester, Batch

Name of Student: Roll No.

Excellent Good Fair Poor


Category
(100% - 85%) (84% - 75%) (74% - 60%) (< 60%)
Speaks clearly and
Speaks clearly and
distinctly most of the Often mumbles or
distinctly most of the
Speaks clearly and time, but seems not cannot be understood
Speaks time, but is confused
distinctly all the time, confident about what and clearly lacks
Clearly and confidently.
for a brief period of
has been delivered. confidence in
time, however,
Shows lack of delivering the content
recovers.
confidence.
Points
Student seems pretty The student is
Student is completely Student does not
prepared but might somewhat prepared,
Preparedness prepared and has
have needed a couple but it is clear that
seem at all prepared
obviously rehearsed. to present.
more rehearsals. rehearsal was lacking.
Points
Student shows anxiety
Student calmly listens
Student calmly listens while listening to the Student shows anxiety
to the questions,
to the questions and questions, and gives while listening to the
responds confidently
Answer Back responds to the
but some of the
some correct questions, and most
question confidently responses, but some of the responses are
responses are
and correctly. of the responses are incorrect.
incorrect.
incorrect.
Points
Stands up straight,
looks relaxed and
Stands up straight and
confident. Establishes Sometimes stands up
establishes eye
eye contact with straight and Lazy and informal
Posture, Eye contact with everyone
everyone in the room establishes eye posture. Does not look
in the room during the
Contact s during the contact. Volume is at people during the
presentation. Volume
Speaking presentation. Volume loud enough to be presentation. Volume
is loud enough to be
Volume is loud enough to be heard by the audience, is also too soft to be
heard by the audience,
heard by all members but many sentences heard by the audience.
but is sometimes not
in the audience spoken are not clear.
audible.
throughout the
presentation.
Points

(Name and Signature of the concerned lab instructor)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy