De PML Module 3 2024 25ocr
De PML Module 3 2024 25ocr
Deck Elective
Port Management and Logistics
(PRE-FINAL)
Course Description.....................1
Course Guide .............................2
Module Mapping.........................7
Module Timetable.......................7
KUP
7. Study the lessons ahead of time. Utilize all the energy and
imagination effectively. Learn how to use all the learning kits and
references before doing the elements needed on your modules.
Make sure no missing links are found.
16. Finally, you’re the learner; therefore, you’re doing the module
yourself. Your family members and friends at home will help you
but the requisite tasks MUST be performed and undertaken
entirely by you as your performance must be orally checked and
validated. The institution's core principles must be adhered to.
EVALUATION:
In order to meet the appropriate passing grades of this module, you must:
RESULT:
GRADING SYSTEM:
When you earn a score below 60 percent, you are deemed "NOT
YET COMPETENT" and you are subject to a RESIT schedule. Your
required maximum number of RESITS will be granted in accordance
with the Quality Standard System (QSS) to improve your lowest
percentage of assessment and the most important thing is for you to
retake a specific element that you have achieved least in order to meet
the overall passing grade.
I have fully read and agree to
the above statement. I wholly
uphold the academicintegrity. Name & Signature:
MODULE MAPPING
Module Learning a) LO1.7: Explain ISPS code and application of Maritime security level
Outcomes b) LO2.1: Identify and explain the different functions of Bill of lading
c) LO2.2: Discuss the content of the Voyage charter party and explain
the legal implications of some important conditions of the voyage
charter party contract
a) Port Security
a) health safety and environment and security/ISPS
Element Title Port logistic
b) Bill of Lading – procedure and documents for issuance for
bill of lading
c) Voyage charter Party
Time Period Week 9-12
Periodic Term PRE-FINAL
MODULE TIMETABLE
No.
Port Security
9- a) health safety and environment 6
III 10 A
and security/ISPS
Bill of Lading – procedure and 3
III 11 B documents for issuance for bill of lading
Port Security
Module Learning
Week 9-12
- Paper-based
modules
ASSESSMENT DATE: ASSESSMENT TYPE:
1. and ca re o f pe rsons on b oar d at t he O per ational Level
2. REFERENCES:
1. R1 PPA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER No. 13-77
2. R2 Joint CHED MARINA MEMORANDUM Cir. No.1 s.2023 – Policies, Standards and Guidelines for the Bachelor of Science in
Marine Transportation (BSMT)
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The contract of carriage evidenced by a bill of lading is widely used in the
liner trade. It is partly regulated by mandatory international rules. The
importance of this document is evidenced by the internationalization of rules
covering the maximum obligations, liabilities and limitations of liability of the
carriers and the rights and duties of parties to the document. This chapter
deals with the major functions of a bill of lading and the legal implications to
concerned parties of the subject document.
The bill of lading is the owner's or charterer's bills. It means that the shipper
is one principal party to the contract evidenced by the bill of lading. Majority
of the printed bills of lading used in shipping contain the words "for the
Master" at the bottom right-hand corner below the space for a signature.
Therefore, in most cases, the bill of lading is signed and issued by the
ship's captain. The bill of lading is the receipt for the goods stating the terms
on which they are to be carried.
The bill of lading is used for the carriage of cargo in the liner trade where
ships have fixed sailing schedule and ports of call. As mentioned in the
previous chapter of thig textbook, the contract of carriage is initiated
through announcement/publication of the carriers. The sailing schedule can
be concluded when an agreement is reached as evidenced by a booking
In other cases, when goods are placed on board, the mate issues informal
receipt, which is later exchanged for a bill of lading. Still in some cases, the
goods are delivered without any preliminary contract or booking note.
However, contractual relationship between the carrier/liner and the cargo
owner does exist, which needs confirmation specifically with regard to the
terms and conditions of carriage.
Most liner bills of lading are printed on both sides. On the face of the
document (front)are boxes or spaces wherein information on identity of the
particular cargo, the journey, the names and addresses of cargo interests
and other details (including freight) are written. The reverse side (back) of
the Bills of Lading under a charter party contains a reference to the charter
party together with a small number of more important clauses.
The carrier or his agent or master of the ship shall issue a bill of lading on
demand of the shipper. Article 3, paragraph 3 of the Hague-Visby Rules
requires that the documents contain the following information:
Although the Rules require only minimum information to be placed in the bill
of lading, it does not prohibit the shipper from putting additional information,
such as: the nature of the goods, or designation of brand or model of
machines, and type of packaging.
The statement in the bill of lading that the goods are "in apparent order and
condition" is a prima facie proof that the goods are in normal, good
condition. However, the carrier is allowed to make reservations/
qualification or notation if after inspection there are obvious discrepancies
on the description provided by the shipper.
This was provided in Article 3.3 of the Hague-Visby ules, which states that
"no carrier, master or agent of a carrier shall be bound to state or show in
the bill of lading any marks, number, quantity or weight which has a
reasonable ground to suspect does not accurately to represent the goods
actually received or which he has had no reasonable means of checking."
One of the complexities of a transaction is the guarantee for both buyer and
seller to receive the goods and payment, respectively. In most cases, the
buyer and seller do not know each other.
If payment is made earlier before the receipt of goods, the question often
asked is: How can the buyer be protected from damages? The condition is
similar on the part of the seller. He waits for the buyer to receive the goods
and checks if they are received as agreed upon in the sales contract.
There is no guarantee that the seller will reserve the payment. In short the
seller does not surrender the goods before he has received payment and
conversely, the buyer will not pay until he is satisfied that the goods are in
conformity with the contractual specifications (i.e. quantity and quality).
In practice, there are special rules to bridge the gap between the seller and
the buyer in distance sales using the bill of lading. The transport provider
and banks now enter into the picture to facilitate international trade. A bank
issues' Letters of Credit to another bank for the payment of goods, while
the carrier issues the bill of lading. The "Uniform Customs and Practice
for Documentary Credit" requires a bill of lading to be issued by the
carrier.
The bill of lading contains the description of the goods, based on the
condition when received on board. The buyer can check if they conform to
the sales agreement. Through this description, the bill of lading may
expressly name the person demanding delivery as the consignee, instead
of inspecting the goods himself before shipment.
Below is the procedure and documents related to the sale of goods and
issuance of bill of lading and letter of credit:
Step 1
The buyer and seller conclude a purchase/sales contract providing for
payment by documentary credit. · The purchase contract, for example,
involves 10,000 tons of paper products at the price of $1 million (United
States) dollars. The buyer is Philippine Paper Products Corporation, which
is based in Manila and the seller is Swedish Manufacturing Company,
which is based in Stockholm.
Step 2
Step 3
The issuing bank asks the other bank (which refers to a bank in Sweden) to
advise or confirm a credit.
Step 4
The advising or confirming bank informs the seller that the credit has been
issued.
Step 5
When the seller receives the confirmation and is satisfied that the buyer
meets the terms (according to the contract) the seller loads the goods.
Step 6
The carrier issues a bill of lading upon receipt of goods
Step 7
The seller sends the bill of lading to the bank where the credit is available.
Step 8
The bank checks the documents. If the documents meet the requirements
of credit, the bank pays, accepts or negotiates according to the terms of the
credit.
Step 9
The bank sends the documents to the issuing bank.
Step 10
The issuing bank checks the documents. If they meet the requirements of
credit to the bank, the issuing bank either:
a. effects payment in accordance with the terms of the credit (to the seller
if he sent the documents directly to the issuing bank); or to the other
bank which made the funds available in anticipation, or
b. reimburses in the pre-arrange manner the confirming bank that has paid
or accepted the credit.
Step 11
The documents are checked by the issuing bank and if found to have met
the credit terms, these documents are released to the buyer upon payment
of the amount due (or upon the terms agreed between him and the issuing
bank).
Step 14
The goods are delivered to the buyer. Upon receipt of goods, the buyer
finally surrenders
the bill of lading to the carrier.
Clean bill of lading means that there are no clauses inserted on the face
of the document
that would be detrimental to the goods and packages being shipped.
Dirty or claused bill of lading means that the carrier does not agree with
the statements made in the bill of lading by the shipper and put some
clauses or notation in the bill of lading.
A bill of lading, which has no clauses or words inserted on its face, is said to
be "clean" and is prima facie evidence that the goods were in apparent
good order and condition when received and shipped by the carrier. It also
implies that the carrier has conducted a reasonable inspection of the goods
and that no evident defect was found. But, the carrier has also the right to
write clauses or insert words on the bill of lading if he found that the goods
are damaged or there is an evident defect or if the quantity is not correct.
If the carrier has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the particulars
In the above-given examples, the carrier should not specifically write the
100 new washing machines. It should not write also the weight of the
shipment as 50,000 kg in the bill of lading.
Another important issue related to this provision of the law is the extent of
the carrier's obligation to inspect the goods. Reasonable inspection does
not mean that the carrier has to inspect the goods in detail. It simply means
that the carrier or his agent should conduct external inspection of the
packages in which the goods are to be shipped or in cases wherein goods
are not packed like lumber, machinery, cars, etc.
The right to release is transferable, which means that the bill of lading is
negotiable. The carrier has the right to get the bill of lading as proof that
he has performed his duty to carry and deliver the goods. The carrier is
not duty-bound to deliver the goods, if the bill of lading is not presented
since he shall be liable for damages if the goods are delivered to the
wrong person.
Normally, three or four original bills of lading are issued. The shipper
retains one, the other is traveling with the documents and the third is
sent to the consignee. For the holder to claim the goods or for delivery
at the port of destination, one original bill of lading is sufficient.
The carrier can deliver the goods even without presentation of the bill of
lading if there is a guarantee against the risk of liability towards the
holder of the bill of lading for the delivery of the goods to the wrong
person. The amount of guarantee should include the cost of the cargo at
destination, interest and other consequential damages The Protection
and Indemnity (P & I) Club advises that insurance cost for that matter is
twice the invoice value of goods.
The forwarding agent usually acts as carrier when "door to door" service
is offered These forwarding agents are also called the multi-modal
transport operator or the “MTO". The service provider of a multimodal
transport contract usually accepts responsibility for the goods from the
time they are received into his care until the time they are delivered at
destination.
As discussed earlier, charter parties are contracts for the use of the entire
ship while the bill of lading is the evidence of a contract, which serves as a
receipt of goods, contract of transport and the title to the goods. In the first
situation, the charterer contracted the shipowner for the use of ship and as
a shipper. In the second situation, the charterer, acting as a shipper, needs
the bill of lading because it is also an evidence of the receipt of goods and a
document of title to the goods. A charter party and bill of lading share the
same function that is as evidence of the contract of carriage.
The bill of lading issued under charter parties is considered only as receipt,
while it is in the possession of the charterer. It becomes an independent
contract when transferred to a third party. In this case, the Hague-Visby
rules apply.
The main feature of the CMI Rules is the creation of an electronic bill of
lading by the carrier, who acts as depository and central registry for
negotiations under the system. The parties agreed that the carrier does not
have to issue a bill of lading to the shipper.
The important provisions of the CMI rules (CMI Rules for the Electronic
Transfer of
Rights to Goods in Transit, 1990) include, among the others, the following:
1. The rules are applicable to parties who expressly agree to its
application.
In 1999 a multilateral contract called "Bolero" was lunched and this was
participated in by sellers, buyers or carriers. It involved the creation of a
central registry and the transfer of title to goods being effected by electronic
message. However, many participants still regarded the form as a bill of
lading, although the form does not come from COGSA 1971 and the Hague
-Visby Rules. Voluntary incorporation of statutes is an option which the
parties to the electronic system can perform.
Today, with the rapid use of computers and electronic mails, the traditional
paper system is being replaced. The proliferation of electronic fraud
depends on the protocols developed and applied for the use of electronic
transactions. The development of the system is evolving and time can only
tell whether there would be an increase or decrease in the electronic fraud.
The Hague Rules (1924) covers only the contract of carriage using a bill of
lading. It contains uniform regulations, on what the bill of lading should
include in the terms and conditions, as well as the liability associated with
the description of the cargo. It entered into force in 1931.
The Hague-Visby Rules (1968) applies to every bill of lading relating to the
carriage of goods between ports in two states, if the bill of lading is issued
in a contracting State or if the carriage is from a port in a contracting State.
Certain types of carriage are not covered by these rules. These exemptions
are the carriage of live animals and contract of carriage for deck cargo.
SUMMARY
1. A bill of lading is a document signed and issued by a shipowner/carrier
or his agent acknowledging that goods have been received for shipment
or shipped on board a particular vessel, which is bound for a particular
destination on which the goods are to be carried.
2. A bill of lading performs three functions, namely: as evidence of a
contract carriage, as evidence of receipt of goods and as document of
title to the goods.
3. There are several types of bill of lading. These are the shipped bill of
lading received for shipment bill of lading, through bill of lading and
multi-modal transport document.
4. Other shipping documents used in the carriage of goods by sea are
non-negotiable waybills, mate's receipt and booking notes.
5. A bill of lading may be issued also when the ship is on a voyage charter
party. However, in this case, the bill of lading is considered only as a
receipt when in possession of the charterer. When transferred to a third
party, the bill of lading becomes an independent contract.
6. Liabilities for loss and damage in the carriage of goods by sea have
been defined in the international conventions, namely: the Hague Rules
(1924), the Hague-Visby Rules (1968) and the Hamburg Rules (1978).
REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. What is a bill of lading and explain its different functions?
2. Differentiate a shipped bill of lading from received for shipment bill of
lading
3. What are the major weaknesses of the Hague-Visby Rules?
4. Explain a bill of lading under a charter party.
5. What is the most recent form of bill of lading and explain its
advantages?
6. Discuss the differences among Hague rules, Hague-Visby rules and
Hamburg Rules, as far as bill of lading is concerned.
7. What is the importance of a paramount clause?
OBJECTIVES
6.1 Introduction
A shipper has a large quantity of cargo. He wants the cargo to be carried by
a single vessel that is especially suited for the cargo. Oftentimes, this is not
possible to be loaded if a liner trade where other cargoes are also
accommodated. The shipper then becomes the charterer of the vessel
when he decides to make a contract with a shipowner for the carriage of his
cargo.
In many aspects, the voyage charter differs from the time charter in terms of
remuneration, description of ship, conditions for cargo, the expenses for the
transport of goods, etc.
This chapter discusses the meaning of the voyage charter, reasons why a
charterer prefers the voyage charter party and the legal implications of the
various terms or conditions stated in the voyage charter contract.
The owner retains the operational control of the vessel and is responsible
for all the operating expenses such as port charges, bunkers, extra
insurances, taxes, etc. The charter's costs are usually cost and charges
pertaining to the cargo. Loading and discharging charges are divided
between the owner and the charterer, but based on agreement in the
contract. Agreement could be under the term "free in and out" (f.i.o.), which
means that the charterer bears the costs involved in connection with
loading and discharging.
The broker contacts the shipowner and gets the proposal or offer from him.
The shipowner may also have his own broker or agent. If he has, the
charterer's broker deals with the shipowner's agent or broker. The
negotiations could be through telephone, telefax, e-mail or person to
person. It takes some time until an agreement is reached and the contract
is executed.
The most commonly used form in voyage charter is the GENCON charter
form. The documentary committee of the shipping chamber of United
Kingdom approved this form. The GENCON is a code name and an
abbreviation for the words "general conference."
In some contracts, the shipowner does not give the name condition in
the contract may be written in the following way of the vessel. The
vessel is (to be named later) ... This type of contract means that the
name of the vessel to be used in the particular voyage charter shall be
given by the shipowner at a later time.
There will be no legal problem if the kind of the vessel that will be
named later by the shipowner is very clearly described in words.
Problems come out when no further description of the vessel is written
and as the vessel arrives at the port of loading, she turns out to be
unsuitable to the need of the charterer.
The other scenario is when the contract bears the name of the vessel
and the words “or substitute" is added. In this type of contract, the
shipowner gives the particular name of the ship that will perform the
voyage but in case the ship becomes unavailable for unavoidable
circumstances, a substitute vessel shall perform the voyage. Again, the
description of the substitute vessel shall be written clearly in words in
order to avoid any problems with regard to the particular need of the
charterer.
The main difference between the deadweight capacity figure of the ship
and the cargo-carrying capacity figure is that the cargo-carrying capacity
does not include the capacity necessary for fuel, freshwater and stores.
3. Seaworthiness
Seaworthiness is a common clause in all types of charter parties. On
the part of the shipowner, seaworthiness is an implied undertaking in
the contract of the voyage charter. It is not expressly stated in the
contract because the duty to provide a vessel that is seaworthy is an
obligation on his part.
The above definition means that when the voyage charter starts, the
ship is seaworthy for that voyage. Seaworthiness means the vessel is fit
to encounter the perils of the voyage. She is fit to carry her cargo safely.
The shipowner is responsible for a defect of the ship. He must prove
that his ship is not unseaworthy (e.g., unseaworthiness includes lack of
sufficient bunker fuel for the voyage).
If the charterer finds that the ship has a defect and is unseaworthy
If the charterer delivers cargo that is less than the promised quantity,
the charterer shall pay to the shipowner for freight of the cargo not
delivered. This is based on the principle of deadfreight, wherein the
shipper or charterer pays to the shipowner an amount of money for the
charterer's failure to provide the quantity of cargo he promised to load
on the voyage charter party.
Another clause or phrase is included in the contract in cases where the port
designated is
unsafe or dangerous for ships to reach and remain due to weather, season,
and political problems, war, etc. It is the charterer's obligation to nominate a
"safe port" and therefore,
he is liable for damages if the ship is damaged in the nominated port.
The strike clause of Continent Grain Charter Party expresses that "if the
cargo cannot be loaded by reasons of riots, civil commotion or of a strike or
lockout of any class of workmen essential to the loading of the cargo, or by
reason of obstructions of stoppages beyond the control of the charterer
caused by riots... "In case of ang delay by reason of before-mentioned
causes, no claim for damages 'or demurrage shall be made by the
charterers"[Sindicat National Du Commerce Exterieur Des Cereales
(Synacomex),1990].
Another example of strike and force majeure clause is the provision in the
Sugar Charter Party, which states that "strikes or lockouts of men, or any
incidents or stoppages on railway and/or any other force majeure causes
including government's interference's occurring beyond the control of the
shipper or consignee which may present delay the loading and discharging
of the vessel are always excepted" (Synacomex, 1990).
Canceling date is the last date agreed in a voyage charter party or time
charter party by which a ship must be available to the charterer at the
agreed place at the commencement of the contract. If the ship is not
available by that date, the charterer may have the option to cancel the
charter" (Brodie, 1997). In short, it is the last date on which vessel must be
ready to load.
Considering that the charterer might have been fixed while the ship is still
completing another voyage or the vessel is at another port, delay may
occur. What are the remedies available to the charterer if delay does occur?
First, the charterer has the option to cancel the charter/ contract. Second,
he can claim damages for the loss. However, the shipowner should provide
the charterer with information on the ship's position and its prior obligations.
Otherwise, he will be liable for damages.
Most voyage charter party has clauses for the cancellation of the charter.
One example is the BIMCO's general purpose charter-party. It gives the
charterer the option to cancel the voyage contract if the vessel is not ready
to load on or before the date indicated in the agreed schedule, provided that
the option to cancel is declared at least 48 hours before the vessel's
expected arrival at the port of loading.
Delay is unlikely to happen if the ship is fixed spot prompt or the vessel is
already located in the loading port and is ready to take cargo on board.
Another instance which may give rise to claim for damages is when the
vessel is in another port and according to the contract, the ship should
"proceed with due dispatch". If it is the case and the ship, after discharging
at said port, is allowed by the shipowner to perform unrelated voyage, the
shipowner will be liable for any loss incurred by the charterer
To be exempted from liability for claims due to delay, excepted perils should
have occurred while the ship was engaged in the chartered voyage.
Additionally, the charter party should declare that certain perils are always
accepted.
Where the charterer has nominated a berth or dock, the ship must have
arrived at that berth or dock. When a port is nominated, the ship must have
arrived at the port, although various legal decisions have defined differently
a port in this context in cases where there is no berth available and the ship
is obliged to wait.
When the charterer nominated a berth in the charter party, the owner bears
the risk of waiting if the berth is not yet available. He has to bear the cost of
waiting as contrasted when a port is nominated wherein the charterer bears
the risk of waiting.
Many disputes arise from the voyage charter agreements relating to the
calculation of the laytime. This is because of the vague and complicated
statements in the clauses of the charter party. In order to come up with a
uniform interpretation of the laytime clauses, international associations such
as BIMCO, CMI, INTERTANKO and FONASBA joined altogether and
issued the "Voyage Charterparty Laytime Interpretation Clauses" in 1993 It
is popularly called the "VOYLAYRULES 93". The rules can be applied to
any form of contract of carriage or affreightment including contracts
evidenced by the bills of lading. The "VOYLAYRULES 93" has 28 terms and
When the parties agreed that time shall not count during Sundays and
holidays, the expression "Sundays and holidays excluded" (SHEX) is
normally applied. If the parties agreed that Sundays and holidays shall
count, the expression " Sundays and holidays included'(SHINC) is used.
These terms are expressed in the different forms of voyage charter party.
WD Working Days
WHD Working Hatch Per Day
WWD Weather Working Days
WP Weather Permitting
Other terms such as clear days, running days and consecutive days are
also commonly
used.
Laytime and exceptions to laytime are all stipulated in the charter parties.
When the laytime is used up, the ship goes on demurrage
Deviation has been defined in the previous chapter as a departure from the
prescribed ordinary trading route. It could also be defined as the voluntary
substitution of the contracted voyage with another voyage.
The contracted voyage is one which has been expressly agreed, or in the
absence of a specifically prescribed route (which is normally not
prescribed), the ordinary trading route for ships engaged in similar
circumstances.
Geographically, the contracted voyage refers to the most direct route, but
the carrier is entitled to show evidence that the most direct route would be
unreasonable for this particular ship at the particular time, as long as it is
not inconsistent with the express terms of the charter. A particular route
may be reasonable and usual even if it is used only by ships of a particular
line and has only recently been adopted.
Correspondingly, the Hamburg Rules (1978) also provides that "the carrier
is not liable, except in general average, where loss, damage or delay in
delivery resulted from measure to save life from reasonable measures to
save property at sea'" (Art.5.6).
Clearly, under the Hague-Visby Rules, a deviation for the purpose of saving
life at sea is permissible (it is even an obligation for the vessel). The same
is true under the cited provision of the Harmburg Rules.
In case there is urgent need for repair, the vessel does not necessarily have
to go to the nearest port. However, it should go to the nearest port where
repairs can be reasonably carried out. The vessel, however, should
consider the danger, distance, repair facilities expense, total time, etc. in
making the decision to go to the nearest port for repair.
A deviation for repairs is still justifiable when the repair is needed to make
the vessel seaworthy and even if the need for repairs would mean that the
vessel could be liable for any damage or delay.
This is further explained by Ivamy (1989) when he stated that "where there
has been unjustifiable deviation, the shipowner cannot rely on the exception
clauses in the charter party and is then only entitled to the benefit of the
exceptions available to a common carrier, e.g., Act of God, loss by the
Queen's enemies if he can prove that the loss would have occurred even if
no deviation has taken place" (p. 23).
A shipowner, who has deviated from the contracted route, has in effect,
revoked the contract, and therefore, cannot claim to be remunerated. With
regard to the freight, the shipowner cannot claim the contracted rate of
freight under the charter party. He may, however, claim a reasonable sum if
the goods are safely delivered to the destination.
In general average, the shipowner cannot claim contributions from the
charterer on limitation of liabilities, a shipowner cannot rely on any clause in
the charter party entitling him to limit his liability (Ivamy, 1989, p. 24).
2. Delivery
Delivery means the actual passing of possession of cargo to the
consignee. The obligation of the carrier to deliver the goods is not
imposed under the Hague-Visby Rules. There are cases when the
carrier gave information regarding the place and date of the vessel's
arrival where the consignee is ready to receive the cargo immediately
after discharge.
Freight is the main obligation of the charterer. The rate of freight is often
negotiated between the shipowner and the charterer. It can be paid on
the basis of a certain fixed amount for every ton of the cargo, or in lump
sum. In practice, the freight is paid when the goods are discharged at
the port of discharge. Therefore, the shipowner has to wait for the
payment by the charterer of freight until after the ship arrives at the port
where she can discharge the cargo.
Freight is also paid according to the fate of the ship and her cargo. If
something happens to the ship during voyage and the ship is lost
together with the cargo, the shipowner is not entitled to any freight. If the
charterer made advance partial payments, problems usually arise
because the charterer demands the shipowner to return to him
(charterer)'the advance payments. It depends on what has been written
in the contract.
When the ship arrives at the port of discharge and the cargo is found
damaged, problems arise. Normally, it is not always the fault of the
carrier that the cargo is damaged. If the shipowner can prove that
damages are caused by the negligence of the shipper or the charterer in
packing the goods or failure in giving sufficient information to the
shipper for handling the goods, the shipowner cannot be held liable for
The freight shall be payable after the carrier has performed his duty
under the contract of the delivery of the good. Delay in the payment of
hire entitles the owner to withdraw the vessel. Ordinarily, the carrier is
not entitled to freight, if it has not, delivered the goods. However, if he
was prevented from performing his duty, by acts of the shipper,
consignee or other bill of lading holder, the freight becomes payable on
discharge of the cargo.
When the vessel cannot reach the port of destination due to perils of the
sea or other excepted perils, then, the carrier can either forward the
cargo to another convenient port or to bring back the cargo, and he can
claim back the freight.
Even if the goods are damaged but the carrier is ready to deliver, the
freight is still payable in full. Claim for damages should not be deducted
from the freight. If the delivery is short of place of destination, the freight
shall not be payable when it is due to the default of the cargo owner.
Another case is when the goods are carried part of the way only and
continuation o the voyage is impossible. The consignee or cargo owner
should accept the delivery of the goods at ports short of final
destination. Pro rata payment is acceptable if the cargo owner agreed to
pay.
If the shipowners fully or partly fail to fulfill their obligations to carry the
cargo then, they lose their right to collect freight. If the vessel sinks
together with the cargo in case of a maritime accident, the owner is not
entitled to freight. If only part of the cargo is delivered to the agreed
If the loss is due to perils of the sea or act of God, the shipowner is
entitled to the whole freight because he can be exempted from any
liability arising from such natural causes. The provisions on clauses are
usually included in the contract.
3. Advance Freight
Payment is made to the shipowner even if the cargo is not yet delivered
to the shipper or charterer. If freight is paid in advance, it cannot be
recovered anymore even if the voyage is abandoned and if the goods
are lost before and after payment.
4. Pro Rata'Freight
This refers to the payment of freight proportionate to the part of the
voyage accomplished or the part of cargo delivered. The conditions for
paying pro rata occurs when a portion of the total cargo is written to be
discharged at one named port and the rest at another named port.
5. Back Freight
This is the "freight payable to a shipowner for the carriage of goods
back to the port or to another convenient port when" the vessel is
unable to reach the port of destination because of an excepted peril or
because the consignee fails to take delivery of the goods or provide
instructions for their disposal'"(Brodie, 1997).
6. Deadfreight
An amount of money is paid by the shipper or charterer to the
shipowner for the charterer's failure to provide the quantity of cargo he
promised to load on voyage charter party.
6.21 DEMURRAGE
Demurrage is the agreed amount payable to the owner with respect to
delays of the vessel beyond laytime. In short, demurrage is paid when
actual loading/discharging time exceeded laytime. The demurrage rate is
the amount entitled to' the owners when the loading 'or discharging of cargo
is not completed before the agreed time expires Calculation and payment of
demurrage is made after the final discharge and delivery of the cargo.
The rate is usually agreed per 24 hours or "pro rata". The owners do not
have to prove their loss to be entitled to the demurrage because it is a kind
of liquidated damages subjected to a prior agreement. Since 'charter parties
contain demurrage rate, which is agreed upon by the parties, demurrage
shall be paid for the whole day, including Sundays. It is practically so
because if the vessel had not been delayed, she would be at sea day and
night and is supposed to be earning money while carrying cargo. It is often
expressed by saying that "once on demurrage, always on demurrage."
6.22 DESPATCH
If the situation is reversed and actual loading time is shorter than laytime,
then the shipowner will pay the charterer, a bonus "despatch money."
Despatch, therefore, is the reverse of demurrage. It is the amount paid by
the owners as compensation to the charterers for loading or discharging the
vessel in a period of time that is shorter than the allowed laytime.
Despatch rate is always fixed at half the demurrage rate. The provision in
the charter parties sometimes has the phrase "despatch on all time saved
or despatch on loading time saved."
Despatch on all time saved means that dispatch money shall be payable
from the time loading/discharging is completed to the expiry of the laytime
including periods excepted from laytime.
Example:
In our example above, if despatch is loading time save, then, despatch rate
shall be multiplied by 12 hours only. An assumption is also made that
Saturday is not a working day.
For this reason, the freedom of contract prevails in the voyage charter. This
means that the shipowner and the charterer agree to distribute the risks to
both of them. Normally, many voyage contracts insert riders and emphasize
exception clauses to either free the shipowners from many liabilities arising
from gross negligence and unseaworthiness or limit his liabilities on these
claims. All these insertions are allowed as long as both parties agreed and
provided that statutes do not prohibit the contents of the clauses.
The charterer pays the freight but sometimes bears the expenses for the
overtime of crew that is related to cargo handling in port. If the term is "free
in out" (FIO) which is an INCO term, the charterer bears the expenses
related to discharging and loading of cargoes at the named port.
The charterer and shipowner agree to have two or more voyages within a
certain period of time under one document. This happens when in the
contract it is stated that a named ship shall load cargo at Port X and
proceed to Port Y to discharge.
After discharging, the ship will return on ballast voyage (without cargo) to
Port X for
loading again then proceeds to Port Y to discharge. This is within a period
of time.
Normally, there are problems regarding the completion of the voyage for the
last round. This arises when the end of the term is very close and the
vessel has to make another voyage to complete the one-year period. It is
usually accepted that when the vessel arrives at the named port of loading
and tendered the notice of readiness to accept the cargo and the charterer
has the cargo ready to be loaded at the port before the end of the one-year
period, the last voyage continues.
The above practice usually applies in the tanker voyage charter parties.
With regard to payment of freight, which varies for every distance of the
port, this is solved by the adoption of the worldscale rate system. A ship is
normally given a rating number. This rating number has an equivalent scale
in the worldscale rating system, which is correlated to the distances
between ports. The charterer and shipowner simply consult the worldscale
to compute the freight rates for consecutive tanker voyage charter.
SUMMARY
1. Voyage charter party is a document or contract between the shipowner
and the charterer containing the terms and conditions for the use of a
ship's cargo space for one or more than one voyage.
2. The charterer prefers a voyage charter party for a large quantity of
consignments that cannot be accommodated by liner shipping.
Chartering process under the voyage charter is closely similar to time
chartering.
3. In the voyage charter party, the shipowner and charterer have the
freedom of contract. The contract for the voyage charter party contains
conditions for the vessel, freight, cargo, canceling date, cargo damage,
and other exception clauses that are commonly found in the time
charter.
4. Some provisions of the contract include the identification of the vessel,
the cargo, the cargo carrying capacity, the freight rate, and the
expenses to be borne by the charterer.
5. It is important for the shipowner to describe the ship and cargo carrying
capacity of the ship because the voyage charterer's calculation of profit
and expenses depend on it. This disclosure is a condition in the contract
and misrepresentations made by the shipowner would entitle the
charterer to sue in court the shipowner for breach of contract.
REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Explain the meaning of a voyage charter and the reasons why this
contract is concluded.
2. Discuss the meaning of freedom of contract under the voyage charter.
3. What are the legal consequences if the shipowner has committed
misrepresentations of the cargo carrying capacity of the ship to be used
in the voyage charter party?
4. What are the legal effects of unseaworthiness to the shipowner?
5. If the charterer, was not able to deliver the cargo at the named port of
loading, what actions can be taken by the shipowner against the
charterer?
6. Can the charterer recover his prepaid freight when the ship is
abandoned and the goods are lost or undelivered to the destination?
7. Explain the charter parties for consecutive voyages.
8. Explain the importance of laycan clause in the charter contracts.