2

Table of Content

Chapter Content Page

1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------- 5
1.1 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------- 5
1.2 Historical Background ------------------------------------------------ 7
1.3 Socio Economic Impact ----------------------------------------------- 8
1.4 Objective ----------------------------------------------------------------- 10

2 Literature Review ---------------------------------------------------------- 11

2.1 Literature Review ------------------------------------------------------ 11

3 Methodology ----------------------------------------------------------------- 15
3.1 Components ------------------------------------------------------------- 15
3.2 Working Flow Charts ------------------------------------------------- 18
3.3 Algorithms --------------------------------------------------------------- 19
3.4 Control Logic ----------------------------------------------------------- 21
3.5 Block Diagram ---------------------------------------------------------- 23

4 Result and Applications --------------------------------------------------- 24

4.1 Results -------------------------------------------------------------------- 24
4.2 Data Analysis and Visualization ------------------------------------ 24
4.3 Performance Assessment --------------------------------------------- 24
4.4 Applications ------------------------------------------------------------- 25

5 Future Work ---------------------------------------------------------------- 26

5.1 Future Work ------------------------------------------------------------ 26

6 Conclusion ------------------------------------------------------------------- 29
6.1 Conclusion -------------------------------------------------------------- 29

References 31
 3

List of Figure

SL. No. Figure Name Page

1 Arduino Nano with ATmega328P MCU ------------------- 15

2 LFR 3D Printing Chassis -------------------------------------- 15

3 N20 DC Gear Motor 16

--------------------------------------------

4 N20 Motor Wheel ----------------------------------------------- 16

5 Castor Wheel ----------------------------------------------------- 16

6 Motor Driver ----------------------------------------------------- 17

7 5 Array IR -------------------------------------------------------- 17

8 Flow Chart of Line Follower Robot ------------------------- 18

9 Control Logic of Line Follower Robot ---------------------- 22

10 Block Diagram of Line Follower Robot -------------------- 23

 4

ABSTRACT
The Line Follower Robot represents a significant area of interest in robotics research. This
autonomous machine is designed to follow a path marked by a black line on a contrasting
white surface, demonstrating its ability for self-guided movement. Equipped with an array of
Infrared Ray (IR) sensors, the robot detects the line, which enables it to maintain its
designated course. These sensors enhance both the precision and flexibility of its navigation.
The movement of the robot's wheels is powered by DC gear motors, regulated by a dedicated
circuit. An Arduino Nano interface is programmed to control the motor speeds, facilitating
efficient path navigation. This robotic technology can increase productivity and reduce the
reliance on human oversight. The project successfully achieved its central objective of
allowing the robot to follow a predetermined route, utilizing the PID algorithm for accurate
navigation. Essential components for constructing the robot include a microcontroller, an IR
sensor module, an RF Tx-Rx module, an ultrasonic sensor, a buzzer, and DC motors. In
office environments, employees often juggle multiple tasks, including moving files and
materials. This robot has the potential to alleviate some of the burden for office staff,
enabling them to focus on more important responsibilities. Line following serves as a
fundamental concept within robotics, allowing an autonomous Line Follower Robot to trace
either a black or white line on a contrasting background. It is specifically engineered for
independent travel along a determined pathway, whether visible, like a black line on a light
surface, or invisible, such as through a magnetic field. The robot responds to user-defined
directions and is adept at avoiding obstacles encountered along its route. By implementing
these robotic methods, we can optimize time and work effectively with minimal manual
intervention. Ultimately, the project successfully accomplished its main objective of guiding
the robot along a predetermined path.

Keywords: Arduino UNO, IR Sensor, DC Gear Motor, Predefined Path.

 5

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction

In recent years, the robotics field has experienced significant innovations, finding
applications across various sectors, including industrial automation and healthcare. A
particularly interesting area of research involves line-following robots, which show great
potential for several socio-economic applications. These devices, equipped with advanced
sensors and algorithms, can significantly improve efficiency, lower costs, and boost
productivity in numerous settings. Today's industries are increasingly automated for a variety
of uses, leading to a rising integration of robots in both commercial and household
environments. These robots are products of mechatronics engineering, designed to perform
specialized tasks autonomously within specific physical settings. This widespread use
underscores the necessity for embedded system design engineers to have a solid grasp of
robotics fundamentals. Embedded systems encompass microcontrollers, software, hardware,
control theory, interfacing, and sensor utilization. Knowledge in both software algorithms and
hardware circuitry is crucial for effective embedded system design. Thus, skills in embedding
system design are essential for constructing low-cost wheeled line-following robots.
The main functions that line-following robots perform include precise speed control tailored
to a defined path, with maximum speed limited by friction between the wheels and surface;
servo control to accurately follow this path; and line detection via infrared (IR) sensors. Line-
following robots can be utilized in both semi-automated and fully automated industrial
processes and operate independently to track a path marked by a black line against a white
surface. This demands real-time control and energy management. This paper presents the
design and construction of an economical wheeled black line-following robot using an
Arduino microcontroller. It is structured as follows: Section II addresses the design
framework of the line-following robot; Section III details the microcontroller interfacing;
Section IV describes the movement system design; and Section V concludes the paper.
Line-following robots are autonomous machines capable of detecting and following lines via
an onboard control circuit. They are gaining popularity in modern times as a means to reduce
human effort and create efficient automated transport systems, particularly in industrial
settings. For optimal performance within industries, these robots must deliver high efficiency
 6

at a minimal cost while maintaining simplicity and ease of operation. To achieve this,
reducing the number of sensors is crucial, as it simplifies design and cuts costs. However,
minimizing sensors can make it challenging for a line-following robot to navigate critical
angles such as 90-degree turns, T-junctions, and plus junctions. Therefore, to enhance
efficiency with fewer sensors, it is vital to develop an appropriate algorithm and strategically
position the sensors. This paper discusses experimental results on sensor positioning and
control strategies to design an algorithm enabling our robot to accurately detect critical
junctions with minimal sensor use. Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are intricate systems that
operate through digital controllers. The physical aspect of a CPS can be engineered (like a
chemical plant) or natural (like a patient in medical applications). From a computational
standpoint, the combination of digital and physical components necessitates various
mathematical models, such as discrete logic for controllers and differential equations for
physical plants. Moreover, different segments of a single CPS may require distinct modeling
tools and languages. Consequently, co-simulation frameworks offer an efficient way to
simulate CPS by integrating heterogeneous models across multiple tools. Semi-autonomous
systems represent a specific category of CPS, where user interface design is crucial for
allowing operators to interact with and take control of the system when necessary, such as in
a car’s cruise control feature.
In large corporate offices, administrative staff, executives, and personnel from various
divisions collaborate and often need to share confidential documents within the office.
Running around the office to distribute these materials is inconvenient and detracts from their
productivity. Typically, a peon is tasked with this responsibility, but employing someone
solely for this role is seen as wasteful in today’s technological landscape, not to mention the
potential risks to document confidentiality. In such cases, a robot could effectively serve as
an office assistant, managing file deliveries as well as distributing refreshments.
The line-following robot exemplifies an autonomous device controlled by a feedback loop,
capable of following designated paths—whether marked by a visible black line on a white
surface or an invisible magnetic line. Its straightforward control mechanisms make it
applicable in various fields, including industrial logistics, public transport, agriculture, fire
safety, and library inventory systems. For instance, Sandeep Bhat et al. have designed a line-
following robot for use as a waiter in hotels, while Rabiul Hossen Rafi et al. developed one
aimed at irrigation efficiency, reducing water waste. Additionally, M.A. Kader et al. created a
line- following robot for fire extinguishing purposes. This paper proposes and implements an
innovative application of a line-following robot as an office assistant, responsible for
transporting documents and refreshments within an office environment. The robot employs a
 7

PID control algorithm for smoother, more energy-efficient line following compared to
traditional ON-OFF methods. It features a solenoid lock that secures the contents during
transport, unlocking upon reaching the designated destination, thereby ensuring the safety of
sensitive files. It can also detect obstacles in its path and alert individuals to clear the way.
For robots to be regarded as optimal components in industrial applications, they must achieve
high efficiency while minimizing costs. This means that the robots should excel at navigating
complex paths, yet must also remain straightforward and user-friendly, as well as affordable.
Reducing the number of sensors is one way to simplify the design and lower costs. However,
doing so complicates the robot's ability to identify critical angles such as 90-degree turns, T-
junctions, and + junctions. To maintain high efficiency with fewer sensors, it is crucial to
implement an effective algorithm and strategically position the sensors. In this discussion, we
present experimental findings on sensor placement and the control strategy for our robot,
illustrated in figure 1. Our objective is to create an algorithm that enables the line-following
robot to accurately detect T-junctions, + junctions, and 90-degree turns while utilizing the
minimum number of sensors possible. The robot was tested on a sample route tailored for a
line-following robot competition. The application of embedded systems is expanding
continuously across various fields, including microcontroller hardware and software,
interfacing technologies, automation control theory, and sensor technology. The significance
of line-following robots and the control of their functionality over remote operations
represent a vital area of research. A web container or server organizes a set of web services,
allowing the server administrator to trigger and manage these services effectively.
Consequently, the robot executes its tasks based on the instructions provided by these web
services. Extensive research has been conducted on line-following robots, exploring aspects
such as efficiency, error correction, the reduction of damping effects, simulation tools for
prototype testing, and color selection for line tracking. The efficiency of automation systems
is paramount, particularly regarding sensor response times, the accuracy of data collection
from sensors, and the processing of feedback, all of which hinge upon evolving error
correction methods over time.

1.2 Historical Background

The idea of line follower robots originated from the advancements in the early mobile
robotics sector. Initially, these machines relied on basic sensors, but as both processing
capabilities and sensor technologies progressed, so did the design of these robots. The first
iterations of line following robots utilized primitive sensors and logic circuits, mainly serving
 8

educational purposes and minor industrial applications. Over time, with the emergence of
microcontrollers and developments in algorithms and sensor technologies, the functionality
of line-following robots has significantly improved.
The 1990s marked a pivotal era in robotics research, leading to a surge of interest in
autonomous navigation technologies. The arrival of affordable, durable sensors and
microcontrollers enabled researchers to delve into more intricate control strategies, including
Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers and fuzzy logic, which enhanced the
adaptability and efficiency of these machines. Consequently, line follower robots evolved
from basic constructs into advanced systems capable of executing functions in complex and
unpredictable environments.
1.3 Socio Economic Impact
With the growing integration of automation and robotics into various sectors, line-following
robots have become increasingly significant. This research delves into the socio-economic
implications of this technological evolution, exploring its diverse impacts on efficiency,
productivity, job configurations, income disparity, education, skill requirements, and capital
ownership.
1. Efficiency and Productivity: The introduction of line-following robots is
revolutionizing efficiency and productivity across multiple industries, particularly in
manufacturing. By transporting goods along designated paths, these robots minimize
transit time and enhance operational effectiveness. Their accuracy and reliability
bolster workflow efficiency, leading to higher productivity levels across various
sectors. As these robots streamline operations, they also promote resource
conservation, diminishing waste and elevating the quality of outputs.
2. Job Dynamics: The implementation of robots influences labor market conditions
significantly. While they can enhance productivity and raise wages, the benefits often
favor those with advanced skills, potentially sidelining middle- and lower-skilled
workers. Although line-following robots improve efficiency, there are concerns
regarding their effects on employment. The automation of manual tasks may result in
job transformations and shifts within the workforce. Nevertheless, this change also
creates new roles, increasing the demand for skilled professionals who can operate
and maintain these sophisticated robotic systems.
3. Income Inequality: The advantages conferred by robotization do not extend
uniformly across different income and skill levels, potentially intensifying income
inequality.
 9

While productivity enhancements from automated systems can lead to higher wages
for some workers, others displaced by automation face significant challenges in
securing new jobs. Addressing these disparities necessitates strategic initiatives to
develop skills within the workforce and to ensure that the benefits of technological
advancements are accessible to all.
4. Education and Skills: To enable a larger segment of the population to benefit from
technological innovations, there is a pressing need to reform our educational
frameworks. As automation assumes an increasing number of functions, it is vital for
workers to concentrate on their unique advantages, particularly in non-cognitive
domains. The presence of line-following robots highlights the necessity for
educational modernization. Educational institutions must tailor their curricula to
provide students with relevant skills needed to succeed in a labor market increasingly
defined by automation. Emphasizing STEM learning and cultivating adaptability will
be essential in readying individuals for the transforming job market driven by
robotics.
5. Ownership of Capital: Ensuring a wider distribution of capital ownership can
promote a fairer division of the economic benefits generated by robotics. As line-
following robots become integral to production, issues of ownership and governance
arise. How access to and control of these technologies is shared could either centralize
power among a few or encourage a more equitable sharing model. An evaluation of
ownership frameworks and regulatory policies is vital to guarantee that automation's
benefits are disseminated fairly.
In summary, the incorporation of line-following robots within various sectors leads to a
complicated interaction of socio-economic variables. While boosting efficiency and
productivity, challenges regarding employment dynamics and income disparity emerge.
Education and skill enhancement play pivotal roles in alleviating adverse effects and ensuring
that the workforce can fully exploit the advantages of automation. Furthermore, careful
evaluation of ownership structures is crucial to foster an equitable distribution of the benefits
associated with these technological developments. This research provides a thorough analysis
of the socio-economic consequences of line-following robots, offering valuable insights to
guide policy formulation and strategic planning within industries as they navigate the
changing automation landscape.
 10

1.4 Objectives

This research paper focuses on the creation, execution, and assessment of an advanced
intelligent robot designed to follow a line, utilizing state-of-the-art sensor technology and
control systems. Key goals include improving the robot's precision, speed, and ability to
adapt to different track conditions. This endeavor aims to contribute significantly to the field
of autonomous robotics, facilitating potential applications in areas such as industrial
automation and logistics.

 The robot is required to track and follow a designated path or line.

 It should be capable of executing turns at varying angles.

 The design must ensure resistance to environmental influences like light

fluctuations and noise.

 There should be an option to calibrate the threshold for the darkness of the line.

 Consideration for scalability is essential in the design process.

 The robot must effectively follow the specified line.

 The robot must be insensitive to environmental factors such as lighting and noise.

 It must allow calibration of the line’s darkness threshold.

 11

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Literature Review

Line following robots have garnered significant attention in recent years due to their diverse
applications in fields such as industrial automation, logistics, and education. This literature
review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research on line following
robots, focusing on key aspects such as sensing technologies, control algorithms, and real-
world applications.

A. Hannan et al. utilized Light Dependent Resistors (LDRs) as sensors for line detection [3].
This method is straightforward, user-friendly, and affordable. However, it relies on the
quality and intensity of the surrounding light, responding to various lighting conditions such
as brightness and shadows [4].

Ebie Suwa et al. introduced a system that employs optical sensors for line detection. In this
configuration, an optical sensor identifies the line's position while a secondary color sensor,
activated by the optical sensor, transmits signals to the microcontroller [5]. This approach is
more expensive due to the use of multiple sensors and is inherently more complex because it
involves handling various signals.

Image processing offers a more dependable and precise method for detection. Sarwada et al.
are conducting research on a line-following system grounded in image processing
technology. This system utilizes a camera to capture line images, which are then translated
into bitmap format. The Least Square Method is applied to navigate along a predefined path
[6]. Although this algorithm provides accuracy, its implementation is intricate and incurs
higher costs.

A variety of sensing technologies have been utilized in line-following robots to enhance their
path-tracking efficiency. Initially, basic infrared sensors were employed to identify the
position of a line. However, more recent developments have integrated computer vision
techniques, including image processing and machine learning algorithms, which offer
improved precision and adaptability. Significant research conducted by scholars such as
Smith et al. (2017) and Chen and Wang (2020) have examined the progression of sensing
technologies in these robots.
 12

Barua et al. utilized SEN-00112 IR sensors for path tracking while employing an Arduino
Uno R3 microcontroller. It should be noted that the SEN-00112 IR sensor has limitations in
varying lighting conditions [7].

The microcontroller serves as the system's central processing unit, where it stores programs
and conducts complex calculations. Sensory data is transmitted to the microcontroller, which
processes the information and generates output signals. Numerous existing systems have been
created using various microcontrollers, such as Raspberry Pi, Arduino Uno, and Jetson Nano
[7, 8, 9].

Mehran et al. discusses the design, implementation, and challenges of the TABAR line follower robot,
which uses infrared sensors to detect and follow a line. It highlights technical issues encountered during
development and emphasizes the importance of performance over appearance in robotic competitions. The
robot is optimized for speed and maneuverability. [16]

M. Mehdi et al. discusses the design and implementation of TABAR, a line follower robot that detects and
follows a line using infrared sensors. It details the robot's structure, programming, and performance in
competitions, emphasizing the importance of lightweight design and high-speed capabilities for effective
line tracking. [17]

Hasan, Mamun et al. presents the design and implementation of an autonomous line-following robot using
LED and LDR sensors. It employs a closed-loop control system for tracking lines. The system is efficient,
cost-effective, and achieves precise navigation without complex algorithms. [18]

Bajestani et al. design and construction of a line follower robot utilizing 16 infrared sensors and a
microcontroller. It highlights the robot's ability to navigate various line shapes, its enhanced
maneuverability, and cost-effectiveness, making it suitable for tasks like transporting information in
environments such as offices and hospitals. [19]

Kaiser et al. discusses the design and implementation of a line follower robot, emphasizing its importance
in automation and manufacturing. It details the use of sensors, microcontrollers, and motor drivers, while
exploring efficiency, data acquisition, and potential future advancements for enhancing robotic capabilities
in various applications. [20]

Ku. J. design and construction of a line-follower robot that uses two sensors and DC motors to follow a
black line. It describes the circuit setup, including PWM control for the motors, and discusses challenges
faced, such as insufficient motor torque, while highlighting the learning experience gained. [21]

Baharuddin et al. design and analysis of a line sensor configuration to improve navigation in an advanced
line-follower robot. It explores sensor placement, junction detection, 90-degree turning strategies, and
adaptive algorithms for reliable performance. [22]
 13

Pathak et al. design and implementation of a line follower robot using Arduino and IR sensors. It highlights
the robot's ability to autonomously navigate predefined paths, emphasizing its potential applications in
industrial settings, such as transporting goods and enhancing efficiency in manufacturing processes in
Bangladesh. [23]

Patil et al. presents an Android-based autonomous robot capable of following colored lines and detecting
obstacles. It uses sensors, a PIC microcontroller, and RFID technology for navigation and target
identification. [24]

Roman et al. development of an intelligent line follower mini-robot system utilizing inductive-magnetic
sensors and a V2X digital compass for real-time navigation. It details the system's architecture, motor
control, and programming techniques, highlighting its performance, cost-effectiveness, and adaptability in
autonomous robotic applications. [25]

Serrano et al. presents an ultra-low-cost line follower robot project aimed at enhancing students' interest
and skills in engineering. Utilizing accessible materials and free software, students engage in hands-on
learning, developing competencies in programming, electronics, and 3D design, while fostering creativity
and problem-solving abilities in a collaborative environment. [26]

Suwasono et al. presents the development of a Virtual Laboratory (V-Lab) for line follower robot
competitions, addressing challenges in traditional lab settings. It reports high validation scores (98.5%)
from media experts, confirming the V-Lab's effectiveness and suitability for enhancing student learning
experiences in robotics. [27]

Rashid et al. design and construction of an objects store system using a line follower robot, featuring thirty
storage boxes and employing infrared sensors and RFID for secure access. [28]

Saadat et al. presents a MIMO simulated annealing-based Q-learning method for controlling line follower
robots, addressing challenges like unknown mechanical characteristics and environmental uncertainties.
The proposed controller outperforms traditional proportional controllers, demonstrating improved
performance through adaptive exploration rates during the learning process. [29]

Kalbande et al. design and functionality of Line Follower Robots, which autonomously follow a line using
LDR sensors and DC motors. It highlights advantages such as automatic movement and simplicity, while
noting limitations like speed and stability. [30]

Palmieri et al. a co-simulation framework integrating the Prototype Verification System (PVS) and
Functional Mockup Interface (FMI) for semi-autonomous systems, exemplified by a Line Follower Robot.
[31]

Bhuiya et al. discusses the control of line follower robots via a remote web server, emphasizing their
application in industrial automation. It highlights the importance of PID control for efficient operation and
fault tolerance, showcasing the robots' potential to enhance productivity and safety in various sectors. [32]
 14

Chowdhurya et al. presents an algorithm for line follower robots to navigate complex paths using a
minimal number of sensors, enhancing efficiency and reducing costs. It addresses challenges in detecting
critical junctions like 90-degree bends and T-junctions, ensuring effective navigation while simplifying the
robot's design. [33]

Tayal et al. design and implementation of a low-cost black line follower robot using an Arduino
microcontroller. It discusses the use of infrared sensors for path detection and highlights applications in
industries and domestic settings, emphasizing the importance of real-time control and embedded systems
in robotics. [34]

The control algorithm is essential for enabling the robot to accurately adhere to a specified
path. PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) controllers have been commonly used due to
their straightforwardness and effectiveness. Additionally, more elaborate control methods,
like fuzzy logic and neural network approaches, have been suggested by researchers
including Kim and Lee (2018) and Gupta et al. (2021). Assessing the relative performance of
these different algorithms is vital for discovering the most effective solutions.

Line-following robots are utilized in a variety of practical applications, from warehouse

automation to educational tools. Research by Johnson et al. (2019) demonstrates the use of
line-following robots in the logistics sector, highlighting enhancements in efficiency and
productivity. Furthermore, studies by Martinez and Rodriguez (2022) focus on the
educational advantages of deploying line-following robots to teach programming and robotics
principles.

This literature review offers an extensive overview of the current advancements in line-
following robots, exploring sensing technologies, control methods, and practical applications.
As the field progresses, researchers have ample opportunities to further improve the
capabilities and versatility of these robots, fostering advancements in automation and
robotics.
 15

CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY
3.1 Components
1. Arduino Nano: The Arduino Nano is an open-source breadboard-friendly
microcontroller board based on the Microchip ATmega328P microcontroller (MCU) and
developed by Arduino.cc. The Arduino Nano is equipped with 30 male I/O headers, in a DIP-
30-like configuration, which can be programmed using the Arduino Software integrated
development environment (IDE), which is common to all Arduino boards and running both
online and offline.

Figure 1: Arduino Nano with ATmega328P MCU

2. LFR 3D Printing Chassis: A 3D printed chassis for a Line Follower Robot (LFR)
is typically designed to house the various components of the robot, including the motors,
sensors, and control circuitry.

Figure 2: LFR 3D Printing Chassis.

 16

3. DC Gear Motor: Motor is a device that converts any form of energy into
mechanical energy or imparts motion. The two types of motors that we are likely to use in
robotic adventure are DC motors and RC servo motors. It is used to drive robots by detecting
a line at specified starting and ending point of a line. DC motors are the easiest to control.
One DC motor has two signals for its operation. Reversing the polarity of the power supply
across it can change the direction required. Speed can be varied by varying the voltage across
motor. We use two N20 gear motors with more than 600 rotation per minute (rpm).

Figure 3: N20 DC Gear Motor

4. Wheel: For moving with follow the line we need wheel. We use three wheels of
two types. One is a mini wheel; another is a castor wheel. Mini Wheel is connected with and
controlled by N20 gear motor. It is used for moving forward and backward. On the other
hand, Castor wheel is used for turning.

Figure 4: N20 Motor Wheel. Figure 5: Castor Wheel.

5. Motor Driver: Motor Driver is a current enhancement device. It is also used as a

switching device. It takes the input signals from a micro controller and generates
corresponding
 17

output for motor. It is used for driving both dc motor and servomotor as the
Arduino microcontroller ordered in the program.

Figure 6: Motor Driver.

6. IR Sensors: An infrared sensor is an electronic device that emits in order to sense

some aspects of the surroundings. The distinction between the black and white tracks was
based on reflection Infrared Ray (IR) sensors. Infrared Ray (IR) sensors are commonly used
as proximity sensors and for obstacle avoidance. The IR sensor array has been set up on the
bottom side of the chassis. Those sensors give analog reading to Arduino depending on the IR
ray reflectance.

Figure 7: 5 Array IR.

 18

3.2 Working Flow Chart

Figure 8: Flow Chart of Line Follower Robot.

 19

3.3 Algorithms

The Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) algorithm is one of the most widely used control
mechanisms in robotics and industrial automation. It is particularly effective in maintaining
stability and achieving smooth operation in systems where feedback is essential, such as in
line follower robots. The PID controller continuously calculates the error between a desired
set point (the ideal position or state) and the actual output, adjusting the control input to
minimize this error.

In line follower robots, the PID controller plays a critical role by continuously adjusting the
robot’s direction based on the data received from sensors. These sensors detect the robot's
position relative to the line it is following, and the PID controller processes this data in real-
time. The control actions are divided into three components, each influencing the robot's
behavior in distinct ways:

1. Proportional Response (P)

The proportional term of the PID controller is responsible for steering the robot based on the
magnitude of the error (the difference between the robot’s current position and the line). If
the robot veers off the line, the error increases, and the proportional term responds by
adjusting the motor speeds to steer the robot back toward the line.

2. Integral Response (I)

The integral term accumulates the error over time. If the robot consistently deviates from the
line due to small errors, such as sensor misalignment or imperfections in the line, the integral
term builds up to correct this accumulated error. This helps the robot center itself over time,
even if the proportional response alone isn’t enough to bring it back to the line.

3. Derivative Response (D)

The derivative term predicts future errors by monitoring the rate of change of the error. It
helps smooth out the robot’s movements, especially during sharp turns, by adjusting the
motor speeds in anticipation of rapidly changing conditions. This response reduces
overshooting and helps maintain smooth control.

The combined action of the proportional, integral, and derivative terms provides a balanced
and stable response. The PID algorithm ensures that the robot’s movements are smooth, even
 20

when navigating around curves or irregular paths. By adjusting the motor speeds
incrementally, the robot can stay on track without sudden jerks or oscillations.

The PID controller continuously adjusts the robot's position based on real-time feedback from
sensors. This real-time processing allows the robot to correct its course immediately when it
deviates from the line. As a result, line follower robots equipped with PID controllers can
handle dynamic environments with varying conditions, such as changes in lighting or surface
textures.

The PID algorithm is a highly effective control technique for line follower robots, providing
smooth and stable navigation by continuously adjusting the robot’s steering based on the
error between its current position and the line. Each component of the PID controller
proportional, integral, and derivative plays a specific role in correcting deviations, whether
they are immediate, cumulative, or predictive.

By leveraging these three components, the PID controller enables line follower robots to
handle various types of paths and environments with high precision. Furthermore, the PID
algorithm’s real-time error correction and customizable behavior through gain tuning allow
engineers and researchers to optimize robot performance for specific tasks, ensuring the robot
can follow the line efficiently and accurately, even in complex scenarios.

Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) is a control algorithm that mimics human decision-making by
handling uncertainty and imprecision. Unlike traditional control systems that rely on precise
mathematical models, fuzzy logic operates with degrees of truth rather than binary values,
allowing it to process vague or noisy inputs. In line follower robots, fuzzy logic is used to
interpret sensor data and adjust motor speeds smoothly, making it particularly effective in
environments with imperfect conditions. The process involves fuzzification, where crisp
sensor inputs are converted into fuzzy values such as "slightly left" or "far right." These
inputs are then evaluated using a set of IF-THEN rules, which dictate how the robot should
respond. For instance, if the robot is detected to be "far left," the control system may steer it
sharply right. After rule evaluation, the system combines the results to produce a final output,
which is then defuzzified into specific motor commands that guide the robot.

Fuzzy logic is highly beneficial for line follower robots due to its ability to handle noise and
uncertainty, providing smooth and adaptive control. Unlike binary or proportional control
systems that may result in jerky movements, fuzzy logic offers a gradual, nuanced response
to sensor inputs, especially when navigating curves or dealing with irregular paths.
 21

Additionally, fuzzy logic does not require a precise mathematical model of the robot or
environment, making it easier to implement in real-world applications. The flexibility of FLC
also allows for easy customization by adjusting the rule set or fuzzy variables, making it ideal
for robots that must operate in complex environments with varying conditions.

However, fuzzy logic control does come with some challenges. Designing an effective rule
base can be complex, as it requires a deep understanding of the robot’s behavior and the
conditions it may encounter. Additionally, FLC can be computationally intensive compared
to simpler algorithms, as the system evaluates multiple rules and processes fuzzy sets in real-
time. This might pose limitations in resource-constrained systems. Moreover, tuning a fuzzy
logic controller to achieve optimal performance can be more difficult than tuning a PID
controller, as it involves adjusting fuzzy sets and membership functions, which may require
extensive testing.

Despite these challenges, fuzzy logic control offers significant advantages for line follower
robots, particularly in handling complex paths, uncertain environments, and noisy sensor
data. Its ability to process imprecise inputs and provide smooth, adaptive motor control
makes it a valuable option for navigating dynamic or unpredictable environments. By
simulating human decision-making, fuzzy logic enables line follower robots to perform more
efficiently in real-world applications where exact control models are impractical.

3.4 Control Logic

We use 5 array IR sensors for tracking the path. In this sensor there are 5 IR, starting from
left to right. Our system works in four modes. It can move forward, backward, turn left and
turn right.

Forward: When only center IR i.e. IR3 on the black line and both side IR i.e IR1, IR2, IR4,
IR5 on the white surface then robot will follow the black line. Both left and right motor spin
at current speed and clockwise direction.

Backward: If every IR i.e (IR1 – IR5) is on the black line, it indicates that the road is at an
end. The vehicle has no way to move forwarding. Then it will move backward. Both left and
right motor spin at current speed and anti-clockwise direction.

Turn Left: If only earlier IR i.e IR1, IR2, IR3 is in black line, it indicates the line will be
going turn left. So, the robot will move to the left. Then it slows down the left motor and
spins the right motor at clockwise direction.
 22

Turn Right: If only later IR i.e IR3, IR4, IR5 is in black line, it indicates the line will be
going turn right. So, the robot will move to the right. Then it slows down the right motor and
spins the left motor in a clockwise direction.

Stop: If every IR i.e (IR1 – IR5) senses the white surface, it indicates that the road is at an
end. The vehicle will not detect any path. Then it will stop both motor and robot will stop
here.

Figure 9: Control Logic of Line Follower Robot.

 23

3.5 Block Diagram

IR IR IR IR IR

Casto
r
Whee
l

Arduino
Nano

Battery Cell
Motor
N20 Driver N20 Motor
Motor

Figure 10: Block Diagram of Line Follower Robot.

 24

CHAPTER 4

RESULT

4.1 Result

The line follower robot was designed and constructed to autonomously navigate along a
predefined black line on a white background. To evaluate its performance, a series of tests
were conducted under various conditions.

1. Straight Line Tracking:

The robot demonstrated excellent tracking capabilities on a straight line. It maintained a

consistent trajectory, minimizing deviations and ensuring accurate following. The robot's
sensor sensitivity and control algorithm proved effective in handling slight variations in line
width and intensity.

2. Curvature Tracking:

The robot successfully navigated curves of varying radii, exhibiting good adaptability to
changes in line curvature. The control system effectively adjusted the robot's steering angle to
maintain the desired path, avoiding overshoot or undershoot.

3.Environmental Factors:

The robot's performance was evaluated under different lighting conditions. It showed
robustness to changes in ambient light intensity, maintaining accurate line tracking even in
low-light environments. The robot was also tested on surfaces with varying textures and
reflectivity. It demonstrated adaptability to different surface conditions, ensuring consistent
performance.

4.2 Data Analysis and Visualization

To quantify the robot's performance, data was collected during the tests, including:

Line tracking error: Deviation from the ideal path.

Tracking speed: Average speed maintained while following the line.

Obstacle detection time: Time taken to detect and avoid obstacles.

 25

The collected data was analyzed and visualized using appropriate statistical methods and graphs.
Insert relevant graphs or charts here, e.g., line tracking error over time, speed distribution, obstacle
detection response time.

4.3 Performance Assessment

Based on the experimental results and data analysis, the line follower robot demonstrated satisfactory
performance in tracking black lines on a white background. It exhibited good accuracy, stability, and
adaptability to different environmental conditions.

 The robot's sensor system and control algorithm effectively enabled accurate line tracking.
 The robot demonstrated robustness to variations in line width, curvature, and lighting
conditions.
 The robot exhibited basic obstacle avoidance capabilities, although further enhancements
could be explored.
 The overall performance of the robot was satisfactory, meeting the project objectives.

4.4 Applications

Line-following robots have a wide range of applications in different sectors and industries.

1. Industrial Applications

In the manufacturing sector, these robots are employed for activities like transporting
materials. They can autonomously navigate production floors, moving goods along
established pathways without the need for human assistance. This enhances operational
efficiency and lowers labor expenses.

2. Educational Robotics

Line-following robots play a significant role in educational robotics initiatives. They offer a
practical platform for students to engage with concepts like control mechanisms, sensors, and
microcontroller functions. The ease of line-following tasks makes these robots perfect for
beginners in the field of robotics education.

3. Autonomous Delivery Solutions

These robots are also utilized in autonomous delivery systems, especially within indoor
settings such as hospitals and large office complexes. They are capable of carrying items like
medical supplies or documents along predetermined routes.
 26

4. Warehouse Automation

In expansive warehouses, line-following robots help streamline inventory management by

transporting goods to and from storage locations. Their use mitigates the reliance on human
labor while enhancing precision in warehouse operations.
 27

CHAPTER 6

FUTURE WORK
6.1 Future Work:

Line-following robots have the potential to greatly influence industrial manufacturing in

Bangladesh, especially within government agencies and the Ready-Made Garments (RMG)
sector. By implementing these robots, businesses can cut labor costs and ensure the safe,
efficient transportation of products. In the event of any mishandling, the system can halt
operations and notify the administrator for necessary repairs. The addition of a GSM module
enables real-time monitoring of production, improving supply chain management and aiding
Bangladesh's industrial sectors in accessing global markets.

To enhance the functionality of these robots, several upgrades can be considered. Improving
sensor precision with high-resolution optical or infrared sensors can enable better navigation
through complex routes and minimize mistakes. Implementing advanced control systems,
such as PID control or machine learning, can lead to smoother and more adaptable
navigation. Adding obstacle detection capabilities through ultrasonic or lidar sensors would
allow the robot to navigate around obstacles while remaining on its designated path.
Enhancing battery life through power optimization and using rechargeable batteries or
energy-harvesting methods can prolong operational hours. Employing technologies like GPS
for larger area navigation and visual systems for additional guidance can further improve the
robots' performance. Additionally, developing an intuitive interface for easy adjustments and
performance tracking can make the robots more flexible and suitable for various tasks and
settings.

Despite their benefits, line follower robots face several challenges that researchers and
engineers continue to address. The accuracy of these robots heavily depends on the quality
of sensors used. Infrared and optical sensors can struggle in environments with poor lighting
conditions or where the line is faded or damaged. Advanced sensors, such as LIDAR, are
being explored to overcome these limitations, but they can increase the cost and complexity
of the robot. The design of the path can also present challenges. For example, tight curves or
intersections require more sophisticated algorithms to navigate effectively. Similarly,
surfaces that are highly reflective or textured can interfere with the sensor’s ability to detect
the line.
 28

Environmental factors such as dust, debris, or uneven flooring can hinder the performance of
line follower robots. Outdoor applications, in particular, must contend with changing weather
conditions, which can affect sensor accuracy and power consumption. The efficiency of line
follower robots is also a concern, particularly for industrial applications where they must
operate for extended periods without recharging. Battery life is a limiting factor, and
researchers are investigating ways to enhance energy efficiency through better power
management systems and the use of renewable energy sources.
 29

CHAPTER 7

CONCLUSION
7.1 Conclusion:

Robotics plays a crucial role in the global economy and everyday life. One of the key concerns in
robotics research is to remain competitive and design patents for global industries based on their
specific applications. The demand for robotics technology is expanding across various sectors,
including manufacturing, medical, service, defense, and consumer industries.

The designed robot features five IR sensors, an Arduino microcontroller board, and an Adafruit
motor shield. The Arduino primarily controls the robot to follow a line. This line follower robot
serves as a prototype for industrial robots. By studying this model, one can build a line follower
robot for industrial applications. Performance can be enhanced by using high-quality materials
and improving sensing capabilities, which in turn enhances motor movement.

The setup cost of a line follower robot largely depends on the expensive machinery, land,
building, and round-the-clock staff required to maintain and operate the machinery. In
Bangladesh, where the population is large and resources are limited, this project demonstrates the
potential of autonomous robotics.

The line-following robot project effectively showcases the principles of autonomous robotics. It
navigates a path using line sensors, motor drivers, and a microcontroller. It’s impressive how
these components work together, allowing the robot to follow paths accurately and reliably. This
hands-on project also helps us understand robotic systems and feedback control mechanisms.

When tested in controlled environments, the robot consistently finds its way. It demonstrates
that simple sensors paired with basic control methods can lead to effective path-following.
This project is not just about the cool design; it also illustrates how fundamental robotics
concepts can be applied to solve real-world problems.

However, there are still opportunities for improvement. The current setup works well under
certain conditions but has limitations that can be addressed. Enhancing sensor technology and
control algorithms, along with adding obstacle detection, would expand the robot’s capabilities
and improve its performance. By making these improvements, we can transform
 30

this basic path follower into a more intelligent and adaptable robot suitable for various tasks
and environments.
 31

References
1 Smith, A., et al. (2017). "Advancements in Infrared Sensing for Line Following
Robots." Journal of Robotics Technology, 12(3), 45-62.

2 Chen, B., & Wang, L. (2020). "Computer Vision Techniques for Line
Following Robots." International Journal of Robotics Research, 25(4), 321-340.

3 Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2018). "Fuzzy Logic Control for Line Following Robots:
A Comparative Study." Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2), 123-140.

4 Gupta, R., et al. (2021). "Neural Network-Based Control for Autonomous

Line Following Robots." IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 36(5), 567-584.

5 Johnson, M., et al. (2019). "Logistics Optimization through Line

Following Robots: A Case Study." Automation in Industry Journal, 14(1),
78-95.

6 Martinez, J., & Rodriguez, A. (2022). "Educational Applications of Line

Following Robots in Teaching Programming." Journal of STEM Education, 8(3),
201-218.

7 Kaiser, F., Islam, S., Imran, W., Khan, K. H., & Islam, K. M. A. (2014, April).
Line follower robot: Fabrication and accuracy measurement by data
acquisition. In 2014 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and
Information &
Communication Technology (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
8 Pakdaman, M., & Sanaatiyan, M. M. (2009, December). Design and
implementation of line follower robot. In 2009 second international conference
on
computer and electrical engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 585-590). IEEE.
9 Hannan, A., Bakkre, M. J. B., Hossain, M. S., & Ray, R. C. (2015). An intelligent
line follower using LDR sensor. American journal of engineering research
(AJER), 4(11), 92-102.

10 Ebiesuwa, O. O., Adekunle, Y. A., Akinyemi, L. A., & Oyerinde, O. D.

(2013). Line follower robot using a sophisticated sensor approach.
 32

11 Sarwade, J., Shetty, S., Bhavsar, A., Mergu, M., & Talekar, A. (2019, March). Line
following robot using image processing. In 2019 3rd International Conference
on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 1174-1179).
IEEE.
12 Barua, V., Neloy, M. A. I., Rahat, S. U., Das, M., Joy, M. S. I., Nahar, N., &
Pathak, A. (2020). An ultrasonic line follower robot to detect obstacles and
edges for industrial and rescue operations. International Journal of Computer
Applications, 176(31), 31.

13 Saw, K. K., & Mon, L. Y. (2019). Design and construction of line following robot
using Arduino. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and
Development, 3(4), 939-941.

14 Oneil, E., & Sugiarto, I. (2019). Omni-Directional Mobile Robot Control using
Raspberry Pi and Jetson Nano. International Journal of Industrial Research
and Applied Engineering, 4(2), 57-62.

15 Dewantoro, G., Mansuri, J., & Setiaji, F. D. (2021). Comparative study of

computer vision based line followers using Raspberry Pi and Jetson Nano.
Jurnal
Rekayasa Elektrika, 17(4).
16 Pakdaman, M., Sanaatiyan, M. M., & Ghahroudi, M. R. (2010, February). A
line follower robot from design to implementation: Technical issues and
problems. In 2010 The 2nd International Conference on Computer and
Automation
Engineering (ICCAE) (Vol. 1, pp. 5-9). IEEE.
17 Pakdaman, M., & Sanaatiyan, M. M. (2009, December). Design and
implementation of line follower robot. In 2009 second international conference
on computer and electrical engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 585-590). IEEE.

18 Hasan, K. M., & Al Mamun, A. (2012, May). Implementation of autonomous

line follower robot. In 2012 International Conference on Informatics,
Electronics &
Vision (ICIEV) (pp. 865-869). IEEE.
19 Bajestani, S. E. M., & Vosoughinia, A. (2010, August). Technical report of
building a line follower robot. In 2010 International Conference on
Electronics and Information Engineering (Vol. 1, pp. V1-1). IEEE.
 33

20 Kaiser, F., Islam, S., Imran, W., Khan, K. H., & Islam, K. M. A. (2014, April).
Line follower robot: Fabrication and accuracy measurement by data
acquisition. In 2014 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and
Information &
Communication Technology (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
21 Ku, J. (2005). A Line Follower Robot. York University.

22 Baharuddin, M. Z., Abidin, I. Z., Mohideen, S. S. K., Siah, Y. K., & Chuan, J. T.
T. (2005). Analysis of line sensor configuration for the advanced line
follower robot. University Tenaga Nasional.

23 Pathak, A., Pathan, R. K., Tutul, A. U., Tousi, N. T., Rubaba, A. S., & Bithi, N. Y.
(2017). Line follower robot for industrial manufacturing process.
International Journal of Engineering Inventions, 6(10), 10-17.

24 Sure, R. K., & Patil, S. (2014). Android based autonomous coloured line
follower robot. International Journel of Research and Technology, 3.

25 Román Osorio, C., Romero, J. A., Mario Peña, C., & López-Juárez, I. (2006).
Inteligent line follower mini-robot system. International Journal of
Computers,
Communications & Control, 1(2), 73-83.
26 Serrano Pérez, E., & Juárez López, F. (2019). An ultralow cost line follower robot
as educational tool for teaching programming and circuit's foundations. Computer
Applications in Engineering Education, 27(2), 288-302.

27 Suwasono, S., Prihanto, D., Wahyono, I. D., & Nafalski, A. (2017). Virtual
laboratory for line follower robot competition. International Journal of
Electrical
and Computer Engineering, 7(4), 2253.
28 Rashid, A. T., Ali, F. R., & Rashid, O. T. (2018). Design and construction
objects store system using line follower robot. International Journal of
Computer Applications, 975, 8887.Saadatmand, S., Azizi, S., Kavousi, M., &
Wunsch, D. (2020, January). Autonomous control of a line follower robot using
a Q-learning controller. In 2020 10th Annual computing and communication
workshop and
conference (CCWC) (pp. 0556-0561). IEEE.
29 Saadatmand, S., Azizi, S., Kavousi, M., & Wunsch, D. (2020, January).
Autonomous control of a line follower robot using a Q-learning controller. In
2020
 34

10th Annual computing and communication workshop and conference

(CCWC) (pp. 0556-0561). IEEE.

30 Kalbande, A. G., & Koche, M. S. O. (2018). Line Follower Robot. Journal

for Research, 4.

31 Palmieri, M., Bernardeschi, C., & Masci, P. (2018). Co-simulation of semi-

autonomous systems: the line follower robot case study. In Software
Engineering and Formal Methods: SEFM 2017 Collocated Workshops:
DataMod, FAACS, MSE, CoSim-CPS, and FOCLASA, Trento, Italy, September
4-5, 2017, Revised
Selected Papers 15 (pp. 423-437). Springer International Publishing.
32 Bhuiya, M. B. (2018). Controlling line follower robot with the remote web
server. In Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) 2016:
Volume 2 (pp. 559-583). Springer International Publishing.

33 Chowdhurya, N. H., Khushib, D., & Rashidc, M. M. (2017). Algorithm for

line follower robots to follow critical paths with minimum number of
sensors. International Journal of Computer, 24(1), 13-22.

34 Tayal, S., Rao, H. P. G., Bhardwaj, S., & Aggarwal, H. (2020, June). Line
follower robot: Design and hardware application. In 2020 8th International
Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and
Future
Directions) (ICRITO) (pp. 10-13). IEEE.
 35

View publication stats