Status of Teaching Profession Published
Status of Teaching Profession Published
Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioural Studies, Madda Walabu University,
Bale Robe, Ethiopia
Subject Areas
Education
Keywords
Status, Teachers, Professional Development, Code of Ethics
1. Introduction
Teachers are identified as the most important for determining students’ achieve-
ment and learning. Updating teacher’s knowledge and skills through professional
development is one of the factors for effective quality of education [1] [2]. Ac-
cording to [3] teacher development programs should not be of a one-size-fits-all
nature, but rather the design and content of the program must take into account
the context in which the program is to take. On the other hand [4] states, teacher
education must adopt a bottom-up approach where the starting point is an in-
ternal view, arising from the teachers themselves, rather than the external. Ac-
cording to him top-down approach would leave the teachers feeling that they
have no real personal investment in the program and that makes the teachers
should be less committed.
Well planned and continual personal initiated professional development
yields more effective professional learning than one-shot workshops and confe-
rences. If teachers are whole heatedly intrinsically initiated the development ac-
tivities could be enhanced. Teacher’s self-initiated professional development en-
hances teachers’ self-reflection whereby teachers control their professional expe-
riences and teachers should be engaged in problem solving activities [5]. More-
over [6] argues supporting academic staff in the area of new and improved ways
of teaching and to deepen their understanding of how students learn is a chal-
lenge for educational developers. According to him, educational developers
should rely more to facilitate the intellectual and professional growth of teachers.
Teaching is a profession that is a mother of all occupations. A teacher is like a
potter who delicately shapes our impressionable minds and molds it into a ves-
sel. Teacher’s personalities should include the satisfaction of helping others, ga-
thering and sharing information, pertinent command over written and oral
communication skills, team skills and positive attitude to bring valuable change
in the society. Teaching profession has always been one of the most respected in
the world. A real teacher should possess professional pedagogical skills and in-
novative technologies.
Similar to this notion [7] argues, teaching is not just about teaching some-
thing, it is about teaching someone. Teaching is thoughtful, considerate and
kindly, not just technical and cognitive. Lecturers in higher education have the
potential to enhance the quality of education by bringing updating the curricu-
lum and inspiring students to curiosity and self-directed learning. Further he
pointed out some of the key principles that are pertinent to teaching in higher
education like the following:
• Provide opportunities for professional dialogue
• Acknowledging the complexity of learning and teaching
• Seeking improvements in the classroom
• Promoting collaboration among the university communities
• Creating an environment of trust and mutual respect
• Developing a culture of inquiry
close ended questions limit respondents’ answers to the survey. The participants
are allowed to choose from pre-existing set of dichotomy answers such as
Yes/No, True/False, Agree/Disagree. The most common of the ranking scale
questions is called the Likert scale. Closed questions and its question types are
critical for collecting survey responses within a limited frame of option close
ended questions are the foundation of all statistical analysis. When considering
the content of questionnaire, the most important consideration is whether the
content of the questions will elicit the kinds of questions necessary to answer in-
itial research questions:
• The type of answers we would like to get from respondents
• To avoid superfluous/not relevant questions
• Enough prior information/context for the set of questions
• Bing relevant, standardized to the sample
• To put oneself in the place of respondents shoes
In this respect the content of the closed questionnaire in this study mainly
stress, pedagogical knowledge and skills, higher degree of teachers professional-
ism, how to build student discipline, to exercise code of ethics in the university
community, the university teachers towards building the students with good
moral character and future lives, academic openness, trust, integrity and honesty
of teachers towards the students.
Basic principles of designing good questionnaire should meet the research ob-
jectives, prevalence of accurate information, organization of the flow, simple,
short and precise, logically ordered and drafted with simple language [20]. The
researcher has collected questionnaire from 196 of the university teachers (Males
176 and Females 20) and this is based on the five item Likert scale. In this study
the target population is 595 to which the researcher wishes to generalize the
study. However, the accessible population 385 is used as a subset of the target
population in which the researcher has a reasonable access. To determine the
sample size, the following statistical Formula [21] is used in line with the context
of this study
N
n=
1 + Ne 2
n = Sample Size
N = Population Size (385)
e = Margin Error e = 0.05 based on the research condition
385
n=
1 + 385 × 0.052
385
n=
1 + 0.9625
385
n=
1.9625
n = 196
colleges. To validate the instrument the researcher submitted the question to the
concerned teacher education experts. Based on this, pilot analysis of items total
correlation below 0.25 and above 0.8 were discarded.
Age Chi
No Items P value
20 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 and Above Square
For this item the result from the interview and document analysis supports the
idea of those teachers with the age from 41 - 50 and 51 and above. Most of the
teachers in the university don’t have the skills of teacher education.
Table 1 item No 2 depicts that the majorities (84.50%, 90.10% and 100%) of
the f teachers definitely disagree or disagree somewhat with the idea that the
university teachers are attributed to attractive salary and financial incentives.
Most of them confirm that the salary and the monetary incentives are not attrac-
tive. As it is shown in Table 1 item No 3 the majority (89.10) of the teachers
agree somewhat or definitely agree with the idea that there is strong bond and
link between the university teachers and the students. For the same item
(91.70%, 100%) of teachers having the age 41 - 50 and 51 and above confirmed
there is no strong link or bond between the teachers and the students. As it is
shown in Table 1 item No 4 the majority 50% of the teachers with the age 20 -
30 definitely disagree or disagree somewhat that the university teachers with
high academic qualification demonstrate higher degree of teacher’s professional-
ism. On the other hand (33% 0%) 0f the teachers of the age 51 and above con-
firm the idea that higher degree of teaching professionalism is reflected both for
the senior and the new teachers.
The Pearson chi-square for Table 1 item No 5 130.36 is by far greater than the
critical value (1, 0.05) = 3.84. The result from the teachers outshine that the uni-
versity teachers are less skilled and less motivated towards supporting the stu-
dents in the university. Table 1 item No 6 depicts that the majority (80.90%) of
teachers replied that the university teachers are cultivated with deep knowledge
of education and innovative teaching skills. However (83.30% and 66.70%) of
the teachers having the age from 41 - 50 and 51 and above reject this idea by
responding that most of the teachers are not cultivated with deep knowledge of
teaching and innovative skills. The result from the qualitative data is in line with
the idea that most of the teachers luck higher professional teaching skills.
The Pearson chi-square for Table 1 item No 7 is 140.62 which is by far greater
than the critical value (1.0.05) = 3.84, indicating that there is less feedback and
support of teachers towards the students. Similarly in Table 1 item No 8 the
majority (100%) of the teachers age 41 - 50 and 51 and above replied there is less
follow up of the department leaders in the university towards supporting the
teachers to professionally update their knowledge and skills. The result of the
interview from the 8 academic leaders clearly outshine that most of the teachers
are not adopted with the proper training skills and the bond between the teach-
ers and the students is not satisfactory. The document analysis from semester,
annual reports and the strategic plan outshine that there is less practice of teach-
er education that call for high attention and technical attribute.
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2
95% Confidence Interval
No Items Sig.
t df Mean SD of the Difference
(2-tailed)
Lower Upper
adopted with the required teaching professional skills and pedagogical know-
ledge. Moreover the result clearly depicts, there is no strong bond between the
university teachers and the students.
Age
No Items Chi Square P value
20 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 and Above
The teachers in the university are DD/DS 11.80% 94.40% 100.00% 100.00%
endowed with great trust to prepare
2 UD 0.00% 5.60% 0.00% 0.00% 152.4396 0.000
students for good moral character and
future lives. AS/DA 88.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
The teachers are following such stand DD/DS 2.70% 5.60% 33.30% 33.30%
that the role of the teachers is greatly
5 UD 16.40% 64.80% 66.70% 66.70% 80.01012 0.000
connected with pedagogy skills that the
student’s ability to learn effectively. AS/DA 80.90% 29.60% 0.00% 0.00%
the students. Some teachers are also reflecting unpleasant emotions, anger, fru-
strations towards their students. The overall p. value 0.002 is less than the con-
ventionally accepted significance level of 0.05 which is (p < 0.05) elucidating
there is association between the age of the respondents and the implementation
of code of ethics. For Table 3 item No 1 the Pearson chi-square 164.6536 is by
far greater than the critical value (1, 0.05) = 3.84. The majority (88.20%) of
teachers from age 20 - 30 replied that most of the teachers are concerned with
the students discipline. On the other hand the majority (100% and 66.7%) of
teachers from age 41 - 50 and 51 and above responded that most of the universi-
ty teachers are not highly concerned with the discipline of the students. The re-
sult of the interview from the academic leaders is in line with the idea that the
most of the university academic leaders are not concerned with the discipline of
the students. Table 3 Item No 2 depicts there is opinion difference between the
different age groups. The item indicates the majority (100%) of teachers from
the age 41 - 50 and 51 and above have replied that there is less concern of the
university teachers towards building the students with good moral character and
future lives. Similarly Table 3 item No 3 depicts the majority (100%) of the
teachers age 41 - 51 and 51 and above replied that there is less concern of the
teachers towards the community and the students. From Table 3 item No 4, the
descriptive result of the majority (80.90%) of teachers from the age 20 - 30 either
agree somewhat or definitely agree that most of the university teachers are ready
for academic openness, trust, integrity and honesty. For the same item the ma-
jorities (91.50, 66.70%, and 66.70%) of the teachers from age 31 - 40, 41 - 50 and
51 and above definitely disagree or disagree somewhat with the idea that teach-
ers are ready for academic openness and integrity.
As shown in Table 3 No 5 the answers from the teachers are controversial.
The majority (80.90%) of teachers from the age 20 - 30 replied that the universi-
ty teachers are acquainted with pedagogy skills. However 33.3% of the teachers
age 41 - 50 and 51 and above replied that most of the teachers luck pedagogical
skills. However the result from the interview confirmed that most of the teachers
luck skills of teaching methods and pedagogy. Table 3 item No 6 reveals that the
Pearson chi-square 141.867 is greater than the critical value (1, 0.05) = 3.84. The
item indicates most of the teachers luck responsibility and risk taking towards
the students. From Table 3 item No 7 the majority (100%) of teachers age 41 -
50 and 51 and above responded that, teachers don’t observe the classes of other
teachers and no experience exchange among them. Similarly Table 3 item No 8
reveals that the majority (81.70%, 100%, 100%) of the teachers age 31 - 40, 41 -
50 and 51 and above confirmed that, minimum concern is given by the univer-
sity for understanding students behavior and class room organization. The data
achieved from the interview indicates that less concern is given for the systemat-
ic implementation of code of ethics and most teachers don’t give higher concern
for the discipline of the students. No adequate strategy towards building stu-
dents moral character and future lives. The data further reveals, there is no
strong bond between the students, the teachers and the community.
3.5. Discussion
The purpose of this study is to investigate the status of Teachers Professional
Development and Code of Ethics in Madda Walabu University. Academic lead-
ers in the university should select teachers with particular sensitivity. They
should select teachers with having special scientific, ethical and personal charac-
teristics. This approach coincides with the study by [30] that teachers must pos-
sess good qualities and be free from unethical behaviors. Teachers need to
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2
95% Confidence Interval
No Items Sig.
t df Mean SD of the Difference
(2-tailed)
Lower Upper
Most of the teachers in the university are highly
1 0.363 195 0.717 2.0255 0.98416 −0.1131 0.1642
concerned with student discipline.
The teachers in the university are endowed with great
2 trust to prepare students for good moral character and 0.144 195 0.886 2.0102 0.99223 −0.1296 0.1500
future lives.
The teachers in the university are with high moral
3 0.508 195 0.612 2.0357 0.98384 −0.1029 0.1743
standard towards the community and the students.
Most of the teachers in the university are ready for
4 1.122 195 0.263 2.0765 0.95502 −0.0580 0.2111
academic openness, trust, integrity and honesty.
The teachers are following such stand that the role of
5 the teachers is greatly connected with pedagogy skills 11.441 195 0.000 2.5000 0.61185 0.4138 0.5862
that the student’s ability to learn effectively.
The university teachers are strictly following
6 −2.958 195 0.003 1.8163 0.86939 −0.3061 −0.0612
responsibility and risk taking towards the students.
The university has arranged such a mechanism that
7 teachers observe other teachers classes and provide −16.690 195 0.000 1.2857 0.59914 −0.7987 −0.6299
feedback.
Great concern is exercised in the university for
8 understanding student’s behavior and classroom 0.589 195 0.557 2.0408 0.97052 −0.0959 0.1775
organization.
Overall Average −0.68 195 0.379 1.973 0.870 −0.148 0.096
establish strong relationships with the learners and give them comprehensive
recognition in order to educate and purify them.
In Madda Walabu University most of the teachers luck professional skills of
teaching and pedagogy. The teachers should strive for better teacher education
skills. In line with this, the study by [31] states qualified and prospective teachers
are patient and loving against their students, not make any discrimination
among students and being a role model for them. The majority of the teachers
confirmed that they are not attributed to attractive salary and various financial
incentives. There is loose bond between the teachers and the students, failure of
implementing the teaching activity at classroom level, luck of adequate skill to
implement student centered methodology, large class size, shortage of instruc-
tional materials and miss match between the course content and the time allot-
ted were the critical challenges observed in the teaching learning of the universi-
ty.
The majority of the teachers reflected less concern towards building the stu-
dents good moral character and future lives. Most of the teachers are not ready
for academic openness and integrity. The teachers should give respect and moral
to the students. In line with this the study by [32] states that universities should
focus on the issues such as respect for colleagues, avoid ethnic, racial and demo-
graphic discrimination towards the students. Attention should be given that
students can build moral, scientific and professional capabilities. Moreover the
study reveals that some teachers reflect unpleasant emotion, anger and frustra-
tions towards the students. Most of the teachers are not concerned with building
the student discipline. The majority are far from sharing responsibility and risk
taking. The result of the data reveals, the university is with poor infrastructure
and scarcity of resources.
4. Conclusion
In the university the majority of the teachers luck the skills of teacher education
and not adequately cultivated with deep knowledge of pedagogy. The teachers
are not involved with motivating and supporting their students. Most com-
plaints are not attributed to attractive salary and other monetary incentives.
Some teachers are regularly absent from the classes. In general, the university
has not given the necessary concern to develop teachers’ code of ethics. Poor in-
frastructure and scarcity of resources are few of the many challenges.
5. Recommendation
On the basis of the foregoing findings from the empirical study, the following
recommendations are forwarded:
• The professional competence of the teachers has to be improved in order to
upgrade the quality of the teaching learning.
• The professional competence of the teachers has to be improved by providing
capacity building and upgrading the quality of the teaching learning.
Acknowledgments
Above all I would like to thank Allah (God), the Sovereign, the Great for the
guidance in the work of this article. I would like to express my gratitude to all
those who gave their time and assistance to the completion of this article.
Conflicts of Interest
I here declare “The status of teachers professional development and code of eth-
ics in Madda Walabu University” is my original work and that all the sources
that I used have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete refer-
ences. The author is with full responsibility that could be raised and conflict of
interest of ownership, ethical and financial issues.
References
[1] Sandholtz, J.H. and Scribner, S.P. (2006) The Paradox of Administrative Control in
Fostering Teacher Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22,
1104-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.006
[2] Borko, H. (2004) Professional Development and Teacher Learning Mapping Ter-
rain. Educational Research, 33, 3-15.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
[3] Mohammed, W. (2006) An Explorative Study of the Inter Play between Teachers
Beliefs. Instructional Practice and Professional Development. Doctoral Thesis, The
University of Auckland, Auckland.
[4] Schmoker, M. (2006) Results Now: How We Can Achieve Unprecedented Im-
provements in Teaching and Learning. The Association for Super Vision and Cur-
riculum Development, Alexandria.
[5] Numan, D. and Lamb, C. (1996) The Self Directed Teacher. Managing the Learning
Process. Cambridge University Process, Cambridge, UK.
[26] Galletta, A.M. (2013) Mastering the Semi Structured Interview and Beyond. NYU
Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001
[27] Warren, C.A.B. and Karner, T.X. (2005) Discovery Qualitative Methods. Field Re-
search Interviews and Analysis. Roxbury Publishing Company, Los Angeles.
[28] Bowen, G.A. (2009) Document Analysis as Qualitative Research Method. Qualita-
tive Research Journal, 9, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
[29] Mundry, R. and Fischer, J. (1998) Use of Statistical Program for Non Parametric
tests of Small Samples Often Leading to Incorrect P-Values: Examples from Animal
Behavior. Animal Behavior, 56, 256-259. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0756
[30] Ali, E., Saeed, R. and Mohammed, J. (2005) Educational Schools and Tropism in Is-
lamic Civilization. Saint Publications, Tehran.
[31] Shanan, G. (2007) Teacher Ethical Oath XVI. National Educational Science Con-
gress-Tokat, April 2018, 161-170.
[32] Akar, H. and Ylidirim, A. (2004) Learners Metaphorical Images about Classroom
Management in a Social Constructivist Learning Environment. The AERA Confe-
rence, San Diego, August 2009, 401-415.
[33] American Psychological Association (1992) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
Code of Conducts. http://www.asanet.org/
[34] Adams, S.R. (2013) The Dilbert Principle. How to Fail at Almost Everything and
Still Win Big. Kind of Strong of My Life. Penguin Books Limited, New York.
[35] Agugins, H. and Edwards, J.R. (2014) Methodological Wishes for the Next Decade
and How to Make Wishes Come True. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 143-174.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12058