Behavioral Finance
Behavioral Finance
Behavioural finance is the study of the influence of psychology on the behaviour of financial
practitioners and the subsequent effect on market. According to behavioural finance, investors’
market behaviour derives from psychological principles of decision-making to explain why
people buy or sell stock. Behavioural finance focuses upon how investor interprets and acts on
information to take various investment decisions.
For many financial advisors Behavioural finance is still an unfamiliar and unused subject. There
are some financial advisors, however, who have taken the time to read and learn about BF and
use it in practice with good results. These advisors realize that being successful is just as much
about building great relationships with clients as it is about delivering investment performance.
E.g. John own share of XYZ Inc & wants to hold on to then despite the company’s declining
performance. He only read articles & analysts reports that confirm his belief that company will
turnaround, ignoring negative news.
CHARACTERISTICS OF BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE
Four Key Themes- Heuristics, Framing, Emotions and Market Impact characterized the Field.
These themes are integrated into review and application of investments, corporations, markets,
regulations, and educations-research.
1. HEURISTICS: Heuristics are referred as rule of thumb, which applies in decision
making to reduce the cognitive resources to solve a problem. These are mental shortcuts
that simplify the complex methods to make a judgment. Investor as decision maker
confronts a set of choices within certainty and limited ability to quantify results. This
leads
identification and understanding of all heuristics that affect financial decision making.
Some of heuristics are representativeness, anchoring & adjustments, familiarity,
overconfidence, regret aversion, conservatism, mental accounting, availability, ambiguity
aversion and effect. Heuristics help to make decision.
2. FRAMING: The perceptions of choices that people have are strongly influenced by
how these choices are framed. It means choices depend on how question is framed,
even
though the objective facts remain constant. Psychologists refer this behaviour as a’ frame
dependence’.
3. EMOTIONS: Emotions and associated human unconscious needs, fantasies, and fears
drive much decision of human beings.
4. MARKET IMPACT: Do the Cognitive errors and biases of individuals and groups of
people affect market and market prices? Indeed, main attraction of behavioural
finance field was that market prices did not appear to be fair. How market anomalies
fed an
interest in the possibility that they could be explained by psychology? Standard finance
argues that investors’ mistakes would not affect market prices because when prices
deviate from fundamental value, rational investor would exploit the mispricing for their
own profit. But who are those who keep the market efficient? Even institutional investor
exhibits the inefficiency. And other limit to this is arbitrage. This prevents rational
investor from correcting price deviations from fundamental value. This leaves open the
possibility that correlated cognitive errors of investor could affect market prices.
E.g. Consider an investor who avoids investing in particular stock because they remember a
past loss, even when the stocks fundamentals suggest it is a good opportunity. This
emotional response includes or driven by loss aversion.
2. Macro Behavioural Finance: examines market wide phenomena & aggregate investor
behaviour. EMH is one of model in conventional finance that helps us understand the
trend of financial markets.
Includes:
Market sentiments & mood
Social influence & holding
Market bubbles & crashes
Aggregate risk premium
Market efficiency & anomalies
E.g. During market downturn widespread panic can lead to herd behaviour where investor
sell off assets encase, causing prices to plummet further. Thus, collective anxiety can create
a feedback loop, worsening the downturn & effecting overall economic stability.
BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE AS SCIENCE AS WELL AS AN ART
Behavioural Finance as a Science:
Science is a systematic and scientific way of observing, recording, analyzing and
interpreting any event.
Behavioural Finance has got its inputs from traditional finance which is a systematic
and well-designed subject based on various theories.
On this basis behavioural finance can be said to be a science.
The theories of standard finance also help in justifying the price movements and trends
of stocks (Fundamental Analysis), the direction of market (Technical Analysis),
construction, revision and evaluation of investors’ portfolios (Markowitz Model,
Sharpe’s Performance Index.
• To understand the Reasons of Market Anomalies: though standard finance theories are
able to justify the stock markets to a great extent, still there are many market anomalies that
takes place in the stock market, like creation of bubbles, the effect of any event, calendar
effect on stock market and trade etc. these market anomalies remain unanswered in
standard
finance but behavioural finance provides explanations and remedial actions to various market
anomalies.
• Helps to identify the risks and their hedging strategies: because of various anomalies in
the stock market, investments these days are not only exposed to the identified risks, but also
to the uncertainty of the returns.
• Provides an explanation to various corporate activities: behavioural Finance
provides explanations on the behaviour of the investors towards a stock once the dividend
has been declared or Effect of good or bad news, stock split, dividend decision etc.
• To enhance the skill set of investment advisors: It can be done by better understanding
of investor’s goal, maintaining a systematic approach to advice, earn the expected return and
maintain win-win situation for both the client and the advisors.
2. Define Investor Biases: It means that investor biases lead to systematic errors in
judgement that affect decision making, stemming from psychological factors. In
behavioural finance these biases such as overconfidence, loss aversion & herd
behaviour can lead to irrational investment choices & market inefficiencies.
Understanding these biases is significant is significant because it helps investors &
advisors recognize & mitigate their impact leading to more informed decisions.
5. Helps for financial advisors and fund managers: Behaviour finance is essential for
financial advisor and fund managers as it provides insights into investors psychology
and behaviour. By understanding biases that affect client decisions such as loss
aversion and herd behaviour advisors can tailor their communication and strategies to
better align with client need and emotions.
In Fig - above shows an approximation of the emotional states that accompany a typical market
cycle. The dashed line are representation of asset prices through an economic expansion and
ensuing recession.
Reluctance
It is worth starting with the word that occurs at both the start and end of the chart: reluctance.
This is the default state of most investors. In normal circumstances we fear taking a risk and
getting it wrong, more than we fear missing out. This reluctance to get involved is compounded
by another strong behavioural effect: loss aversion.
Optimism to Exuberance
Reluctance starts diminishing when markets pick up and the economy enters a positive phase.
Fear of loss quickly turns into a fear of missing out. Our natural aversion to loss may now cause
us to take action to increase short-term emotional comfort, this time by entering the market.
Denial to panic
Investors always try to compute gains and losses from the point at which they enter the market.
Only those investors who are in immediate need of liquidity try to sell the holdings, but
remaining investors hesitate to sell the stocks in loss (i.e. prefer to hold loss making securities).
But further fall in the market price leads them to panic situation. Few of the investors may be
found to sell their investments for reasons other than liquidity needs. Thus, we see fall in price a
common phenomenon in all these points, only difference is volume. Volume which is dried up at
denial stages bursts at panic stage.
Capitulation to reluctance
On the way down, loss aversion and denial tend to cause investors to hold on to their
investments. As their portfolio plummets, the emotional pain of selling at a loss increases too, but
at a diminishing rate. Losing 5% hurts, but the first 5% hurts the most. Once you‘ve already lost
30%, the difference between -35% and -30% feels less significant than the difference between -
5% and no loss at all. The point of despondence can be explained as a point of maximum safety.
Hence buying process starts due to emotional safety assumed by investors. When volume of
buying gradually increases, there will be phases like depression, apathy and indifference.
d. Loss Aversion: The risk-taking ability of each investor is different. Some are
conservative in their approach while others believe in taking calculated risks.
However, among the conservative investors are few who fear losses like anything.
They may be
aware about the potential gains from an asset class but are intimidated by the prospects of
incurring even a short-term loss. In short, their excitement for gains is much less than
their aversion towards losses. Needless to say these investors miss out on quite a few
fruitful investments.
g. Anchoring: Many a time investors hold on to a particular belief and refuse to part ways
with it. They "anchor" their beliefs to that notions and have difficulty in accepting any
new piece of information related to the subject. This is true in cases wherein a real estate
or pharmaceutical company is involved in a legal battle or bank has been involved in a
scam. This negative information is received with greater intensity, so much so that no
other piece of positive information can neutralize its effect.
APPROACHES TO DECISION-MAKING IN BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE
MENTAL ACCOUNTING
It is the process by which people organize, evaluate and keep track of their financial
activities (Thaler, 1999). This happens when people segregate their money into separate
accounts based on some subjective criteria.
Mental accounting is a habit which is frequently practiced by many individuals on a daily
basis. Thus, mental accounting is considered to be irrational. Tversky and Kahneman (1981)
throw more light on this bias with the help of following illustration.
Situation 1: Imagine that you have decided to see a play where admission is Rs.10 per ticket.
As you enter the theatre, you discover that you have lost a Rs.10 bill. Would you still pay
Rs.10 for a ticket for the play? Answer yes or no.
Situation 2: Imagine that you have decided to see a play and paid the admission price of
Rs.10 per ticket. As you enter the theatre, you discover that you have lost the ticket. The seat
was not marked and the ticket cannot be recovered. Would you pay Rs.10 for another ticket?
Answer yes or no.
It is clear that in both the situations Rs.10 is lost and cannot be recovered. The only
difference is that, in the first situation, it is lost in the form of cash and in the second it
happened in the form of a ticket. However, the results of the survey were strikingly different.
It was observed that in Situation 1, 88 per cent people said yes for buying another ticket
while in Situation 2, the majority said no (54%). Tversky and Kahneman (1981) call this a
psychological accounting that is happening in respondents' minds.
HYPERBOLIC DISCOUNTING
It states that most people discount larger rewards to be received in future in favour
of smaller or sooner to be received at present.
Hyperbolic discounting is a particular form of temporal discounting. Temporal
discounting measures differences in relative valuation place on rewards (usually money
or goods) at different points in time by comparing it valuation at an earlier date with one
for a later date.
Immediate gratification of rewards is a human tendency and it is termed as hyperbolic
discounting.
For e.g. If an individual is given a choice to receive Rs.1000 in two weeks & Rs. 2000 in
six weeks he will engage in time discounting & choose the soon to be received reward.
Samuel McClure, a neuroscientist from Princeton University, conducted an experiment
with his colleagues where he gave several decision pairs to them and asked to assert
their preferences. He finds that nearly all the subjects engaged in time discounting.
2. True probabilities: People due to their familiarity or otherwise tends to overestimate the
probability or underestimate it even though numerically they have equal chances of occurrence.
3. Big numbers and small numbers: Another irrational attitude is identified in choosing between
numbers is the tendency of choosing the bigger number and ignoring smaller numbers. For
example, in taking capital budgeting decisions, generally higher number NPV are compared
for making the choice and Profitability index which is mostly a two digit number is ignored. In
the study of financial statements, only the total net earnings are observed by EPS is ignored.
4. Base rate v/s case rate : To understand the fundamental strength of an entity at the time
of investment, base rate cannot be ignored. But the limited cerebral capabilities in processing
vast information for the purpose of understanding the base rate automatically avoids such
cumbersome calculations and searches for a shortcut route of considering the case rate as a
substitute for it. Case rate means processing currently available small amount of information.