Plato Ideal State
Plato Ideal State
Plato is widely recognized as one of the most significant political philosophers of the Greek
period. He was a disciple of Socrates and the teacher of Aristotle and founder of the Academy,
one of the most popular institutions of learning in ancient Greece. He lived during 427 BC to 347
BC. He was born in a noble family in Greece. Plato produced several important works which
dealt with different subjects.His most important philosophical contributions remain to be
Republic, Laws and Statesman.
Plato's Ideal State, as presented in his work The Republic, is a philosophical vision of a
perfectly just society. At the heart of this ideal is the concept of a highly structured, harmonious
state, where each individual performs the role best suited to their abilities. The state is governed
by philosopher-kings—wise and virtuous rulers who possess knowledge of the truth and are
thus able to guide the society towards justice. In this utopia, Plato advocates for communal
living among the ruling and warrior classes, rejecting private property and traditional family
structures to ensure loyalty and unity.
KALLIPOLIS
According to Plato, the ideal city-state, also known as Kallipolis, is a theoretical political city-
state that aims to achieve maximum justice and eventually happiness. In the Republic, Plato
constructs the state in three successive stages: The healthy state ,the luxurious state, the just
state or the ideal state. The first city is the city of the money lovers or appetitive souls. But the
problem of this city is that there is no one to regulate indiscriminate desires of the appetitive
souls. It is required that there should be a class of people who can do the job of regulating the
unnecessary appetites of the appetitive souls. They are the guardians or the spirited souls. They
will perform the duty of guarding the city-state from outside as well as inside. This leads to the
formation of a city number 2. But again this city faces the problem of uncontrollable love of
honour. This requires that philosopher kings regulate the uncontrolled love of honour. This city
must also have some institutions – institutions of education system, communism of property and
family and poetry censorship and appropriate myths for proper functioning.
The salient features of Plato's ideal state, as outlined in The Republic, can be expanded as
follows:
5. Communism of Wives and Property: In Plato’s ideal state, the guardian class (rulers
and soldiers) lives a communal life, meaning they do not own private property, have
traditional families, or engage in permanent marriages. Instead, they share everything in
common to ensure loyalty and prevent personal attachments from interfering with their
duties. The guardian class is expected to serve the state without any personal
possessions or family ties. In contrast, the lower class (producers) is allowed to have
private property and family life but is excluded from political roles. This structure is
intended to prevent conflicts of interest and maintain focus on the common good.
6. Control of Art and Literature: In Plato’s state, the state exercises control over art,
literature, and all forms of cultural expression. The goal is to prevent the spread of
harmful or immoral ideas that might corrupt the citizens’ morals and disrupt the social
order. Only works that promote virtue, wisdom, and the ideals of justice are allowed,
while those that depict negative behaviors (such as violence, deception, or dishonesty)
are censored. This strict control over art and literature is designed to protect the citizens
from harmful influences and help them maintain a virtuous character.
CRITICISM
1. Utopian and Unrealistic: Plato's vision is seen as unattainable, with its strict class
divisions and the role of philosopher-kings being impractical in reality.
2. Authoritarian: The concentration of power in the hands of philosopher-kings and the
control over education, art, and personal lives is criticized as totalitarian.
3. Lack of Individual Freedom: The state limits personal liberty, forcing individuals into
predetermined roles, especially in the guardian class, which restricts personal choice
and autonomy.
4. Class Inequality: Plato’s rigid class system excludes the majority from political
participation, perpetuating social stratification and inequality.
5. Disregard for Human Nature: Plato’s idea of molding people into specific roles
overlooks the complexity and unpredictability of human nature.
6. Misunderstanding of Justice: Critics argue that true justice involves recognizing
individual rights, not forcing people into fixed roles based on abilities.
7. Communism of Property and Family: Plato's communal approach to property and
family is seen as dehumanizing and unnatural, stripping away personal bonds.
8. Overemphasis on Rationality: The focus on philosopher-kings and reason neglects
emotional and social aspects of human life, which are important in governance.
Overall, Plato's ideal state is criticized for being authoritarian, impractical, and dismissive of
basic human rights.
CONCLUSION
Despite the objections mentioned above, it is obvious that Plato's political views had a profound
influence on the political thinking of his followers in later ages. Without a doubt, Plato has been
chastised for articulating some utopian views. However, his utopian tendencies do not negate
his contributions to political thinking. Plato desired to establish an ideal society ruled by a
philosopher monarch who, according to Plato, was the epitome of justice, virtue, and sacrifice.
His political thought is marked by his emphasis on justice, functional specialisation, feminism,
and eugenics. " His views on justice, functional specialization., the rule of the wise and the
virtuous, women's emancipation, the significance of education, and other topics reflect Plato's
eternal aspect