Response Spectrum Theory
Response Spectrum Theory
THEORY
Dr.Sachin.B.Kadam
Professor and Head Applied Mechanics Deptt.
Walchand College of Engineering Sangli
1
Outline of Presentation
Characterization of earthquake ground
motion
Design Spectrum
2
Strong Motion
• Seismograms:
• Not useful for Civil Engineering analysis
• Velocity/Displacement Plots
• Objective different
• Used for estimation of time, epicentral distance,
magnitude and other seismological investigations
3
Strong motion …
• Equation of motion
Chile Earthquake
5
Strong Motion
Taiwan Earthquake 6
Strong Motion
7
Kobe Earthquake
Strong Motion
Kobe Earthquake
8
Strong Motion
Kobe Earthquake
9
Typical Strong Motion
Record
10
Some Acceleration Records
Uttarkashi Earthquake
11
Some Acceleration Records
12
Earthquake Ground Motion
• Typical values: 1 Hz to 33 Hz
15
Typical Fourier Spectra
16
Concept of Response
Spectrum
• Engineers interested in maximum
response
• Different Structures have different
period and damping
• Response spectrum is maximum
response for given time period and
damping
17
Displacement Response
Spectrum
18
Pseudo-Velocity Response
Spectrum
• Taking the derivative of displacement
response we get velocity response
• Making some approximations we get the
approximate maximum velocity spectrum
which is not the actual velocity & is called
Pseudo-velocity spectrum – Sv(ξ, ω)
19
Pseudo-Acceleration
Spectra
• Similarly we have pseudo-acceleration
spectra – Sa (ξ, ω)
20
Response Time History
• Northridge Earthquake
• T = 0.5 Seconds, Stiff System
• Damping ratio = 0.05
• Absolute umax = 0.110 m
21
Response Time History
• Northridge Earthquake
• T = 1.0 Seconds, Moderately flexible
• Damping ratio = 0.05
• Absolute umax = 0.450 m
22
Response Time History
• Northridge Earthquake
• T = 2.0 Seconds, Very Flexible
• Damping ratio = 0.05
• Absolute umax = 0.563 m
23
Response Spectrum Concept
• Northridge Earthquake
24
Pseudo-Acceleration Response Spectrum
Equivalent Force = Mass x Spectral Acceleration
Time Period 25
Relation Between Spectra
• Sv (ξ, ω) = ω SD(ξ, ω)
• Sa (ξ, ω) = ω Sv(ξ, ω) = ω2 SD (ξ, ω)
27
Response Spectrum…
• Approximate for design purposes due to the
peaks and troughs
• Most of the times records are not available
• Even if available may not repeat in future
• Smooth deign spectra has to be developed
28
Design Spectra
• Design spectra at a site depends on
29
Design Spectra
Construction
TWO STAGES
30
Estimation of PG
Parameters
• Establish active faults (100 Km radius)
• Estimate maximum magnitude
earthquake from each fault based on
return period
• Use attenuation relation to estimate PG
parameters at site from each fault
• Select the maximum out of all
31
Shape of Spectra
Range of Range of time
Nature of Spectra
Time Period period (s)
33
Site Design Spectrum
34
Actual vs Design Spectra
(PGA matched)
35
Actual vs Design Spectra
(All PG parameters matched)
36
Actual vs Design Spectra
• Conceptually two are different
• Response spectrum is a description of a
particular ground motion
• Design spectrum is the level of design
force/deformation to be considered in
design
37
Tripartite Spectra(El-Centro)
38
Code Spectrum
• Not possible/feasible to develop site specific
spectra for all sites
• Developed only for very important structures
(Dams, NPPs)
• Design spectrum given in IS:1893-2002
serves the purpose of general design and
construction
• Incorporate other facors like importance of
structure and type of foundation.
39
Response Spectrum - Summary