Scribd
Upload
4 views2 pages

Debate Script

Uploaded by

aljannasalcedo0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views2 pages

Debate Script

Uploaded by

aljannasalcedo0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Gen Z Under Pressure: Debunking the Stress Myth

YouTube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3OiR4CfYtM

Moderator:

Welcome to today’s debate on whether Gen Z is less capable of handling stress compared to previous
generations. Our speakers will present their arguments using various rhetorical strategies and fallacies. Let’s
begin with the opening statements.

Proponent (Speaker 1):

Ladies and gentlemen, it’s undeniable that younger Gen Z individuals struggle more with stress than those
who came before them. Look at how quickly they jump from job to job, avoiding confrontation and difficult
work environments. This isn’t about adaptability—it’s a clear sign that they lack the resilience needed to face
challenges head-on.

Do we really want a generation that can’t stay in a job for more than a few months without running for the
exit? If we keep excusing this behavior, we’ll end up with a workforce that can’t handle even the slightest
discomfort. This sets a dangerous precedent for a society where no one can deal with adversity.

Moreover, the expectation for immediate raises and recognition, despite having little experience, is nothing
short of entitlement. Why should we bend over backward to accommodate these demands? If they can’t
handle the stress of earning their place, they’re simply not cut out for the pressures of the real world.

Opponent (Speaker 2):

Ladies and gentlemen, the argument that Gen Z is inherently weaker is not only unfounded but also an
oversimplification. The job market has changed drastically, and what you call “job-hopping” is often a strategic
move to find a better fit. Accusing them of lacking resilience because they prioritize mental health over toxic
work environments is a personal attack rather than a fair critique.

Framing the situation as if Gen Z must either handle stress like previous generations or be considered weak
is a false choice. The truth is, they’re navigating a world that’s more complex and less forgiving. Isn’t it more
reasonable to support their desire for work-life balance, rather than framing it as a weakness?

Social media has indeed shaped Gen Z, but writing off their concerns as just another instance of herd
behavior overlooks the real issues they face. Just because many people share this opinion doesn’t make it
true. We should be asking ourselves why they feel the need to challenge outdated norms, not simply labeling
them as fragile.

Proponent (Speaker 1):

It’s easy to defend Gen Z by calling their critics outdated, but that doesn’t change the facts. When you see a
generation that’s more concerned with “quiet quitting” and doing the bare minimum, you have to wonder
about their commitment. This trend, popularized on social media, reflects a broader attitude problem. Are we
really supposed to believe that this lack of effort won’t harm their career prospects?

And let’s not forget, employers are hesitant to hire someone with a resumẽ full of short-term jobs. These
candidates are seen as high-risk hires for a reason—they haven’t proven they can handle tough situations.
It’s not just an assumption; it’s a reality that could have long-term implications for their careers.
Opponent (Speaker 2):

Labeling Gen Z’s approach as an “attitude problem” is simply a way of avoiding the need to adapt to new
workplace dynamics. The world has changed, and so have expectations. Quiet quitting isn’t about doing the
bare minimum; it’s about resisting exploitation. To claim otherwise is to load the question with assumptions
that overlook the valid reasons behind their choices.
Regarding the notion that frequent job changes indicate weakness—this is a misleading generalization. If we
discourage people from pursuing better opportunities, we risk stifling innovation and growth. Isn’t it possible
that this generation is simply redefining what resilience truly means?

Moderator:

Thank you to our final speaker for her insightful closing statement. We’ve had a robust discussion today,
exploring various facets of the topic and hearing diverse perspectives.

As we wrap up, it’s important to reflect on the key takeaways from our debate. Whether we agree or disagree,
our conversation has shed light on the complexities surrounding Gen Z and their approach to stress and work
dynamics. Understanding these perspectives is essential as we strive to adapt and evolve in our ever-
changing world.

I’d like to extend my gratitude to all our speakers for their thoughtful contributions and to you, our audience,
for your active engagement and attention throughout the debate.

Let’s carry forward the insights we’ve gained today and continue to engage in meaningful dialogue on these
important issues.

Thank you all once again, and have a wonderful evening.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy