Tech My
Tech My
Submitted by
M. YOHINI
Register Number : 952324413009
MASTER OF ENGINEERING
IN
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
MAY 2024
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
SIGNATURE SUPERVISOR
MELATHEDIYOOR MELATHEDIYOOR
TIRUNELVELI TIRUNELVELI
Submitted for the Technical Seminar Viva-Voce held at PSN Engineering College,
Melathediyoor on
I would like to thank and express my gratitude to our Vice-Principal Dr.N.PRABHU, M.E.,
Ph.D., PSN Engineering College, Melathediyoor, Tirunelveli for providing me the kindly
Advice
I express my sincere thanks to Mrs. S. MISPA BROWN M.E., Assistant Professor &
Head of the Department, Department of Civil Engineering, PSN Engineering College,
Melathediyoor, Tirunelveli for allowing me to use the facilities in the college
I extend my heartfelt tanks to all my Staff Members and friends those who are contributed
moral support and encouragement to do this work, I also thank all those who have directly
or indirectly helped for the successful completion of this practical training.
3
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
4
3.6. Design Considerations
4.2. Cost-Effectiveness
6. Conclusion
6.2. Recommendations
5
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
Ground improvement techniques are essential in civil engineering to increase the load-
bearing capacity and reduce settlement in weak or compressible soils. This report explores
two common ground improvement methods: Stone Columns and Pressure Grouting.
Both techniques enhance the strength and stability of soil, making them ideal for
foundation support, road stabilization, and various other civil engineering applications.
Ground improvement involves methods that improve the physical properties of soil,
including its strength, stability, and load-bearing capacity. Stone column and pressure
grouting are two of the most widely used techniques. While stone columns are used for
soil densification and improved drainage, pressure grouting is employed to fill voids in
This report provides a detailed technical analysis of stone column and pressure grouting
6
2. Stone Column Technique
The stone column technique, also known as vibro-replacement, involves the insertion of
columns of compacted granular material (such as crushed stone or gravel) into soft or
weak soils. The technique has been in use since the early 20th century and gained
popularity due to its ability to increase soil strength, reduce settlement, and enhance
drainage properties.
Stone columns improve the soil’s load-bearing capacity by replacing weak soil with high-
strength granular materials. The columns distribute the load applied to the ground over a
wider area, reducing settlement and preventing failure. Additionally, the technique
improves the drainage characteristics of the soil, allowing for quicker consolidation.
7
2.3 Types of Stone Columns
• Bored Stone Columns: Suitable for areas with high groundwater levels where
investigations are required to gather essential data on the soil characteristics and
8
groundwater conditions. This helps in determining the design parameters for stone
column installation.
2. Soil Investigation:
• Boreholes or test pits are drilled at strategic locations to determine soil composition,
• Laboratory testing is carried out on soil samples to determine parameters like shear
challenges.
3. Vibroflotation: A vibrating probe is used to displace the soil and create space for
4. Stone Insertion: The probe is withdrawn, and stone or gravel is added to form the
column.
create compacted columns of stone within the soil. The general installation process
• Vibroflotation Equipment:
vibrator, is inserted into the ground. The vibrator produces intense vertical
9
vibrations to displace the surrounding soil while creating a cavity into which
o The vibroflotation probe is lowered to the required depth in the soil, where
the vibrations cause soil particles to rearrange and compact. The compaction
• Stone Insertion:
o Once the probe reaches the required depth, it is withdrawn, and crushed
reinserted to compact the stone as it fills the cavity, forming a stone column.
• Compaction:
the stone column is dense and stable. This process is repeated at various
o Once the stone columns are formed, their quality is checked using
o In some cases, the columns may be tested by applying a test load to verify
that they meet the design requirements for settlement reduction and load
distribution.
10
• Final Compaction and Finishing:
o After the column installation, the area is compacted further to ensure uniform
load distribution across all columns. The surface level is adjusted and leveled
• During and after installation, the site undergoes thorough monitoring. Vibration
• Regular site inspections and post-installation tests ensure the effectiveness of the
• Foundation Support for Buildings: Used for structures on soft, compressible soils.
• Seismic Liquefaction Mitigation: Stone columns are used to reduce the risk of
11
2.6 Design Considerations
groundwater conditions.
Advantages:
Limitations:
Pressure grouting involves injecting a grout material under high pressure into the ground
to fill voids, improve soil cohesion, and increase the soil's overall strength. The technique
has been used for several decades, especially in areas with loose or granular soils, to
13
3.2 Mechanism of Pressure Grouting
Pressure grouting works by injecting grout materials, typically a mixture of cement, water,
and sometimes additives, into the soil. The grout fills voids and fractures, increasing the
strength and density of the surrounding soil. This process can also reduce permeability,
• Cementitious Grout: Most common, used for soil stabilization and consolidation.
corrosion protection.
• Polymer Grout: Used in cases where more flexibility is required in the soil.
14
3.4 Grouting Process
the soil properties and decide the appropriate grouting material and injection process.
• Soil Investigation:
o Similar to stone columns, boreholes are drilled to gather data about soil type,
strength, and permeability. These results help determine the need for grouting
o Based on the soil investigation results, engineers identify the locations where
grout injection is most effective. This includes areas with loose sands,
• Grout Selection:
o Depending on the soil type and the required strength, various grout materials
cohesive soils.
• Borehole Drilling:
15
o Boreholes are drilled at predefined locations based on the design, which
depth depending on the soil layer and the intended depth of grout injection.
o The drill hole diameter is typically small (10-20 cm) to minimize soil
o Injection pipes or tubes are installed at the drilling site. These pipes are
connected to a grouting machine that will pump grout into the soil at high
pressure.
Grout Injection
• Injection Procedure:
into the soil through the injection pipes. The pressure level is determined by
o The grout fills voids, fissures, and cracks in the soil, which helps in
zones.
• Continuous Monitoring:
o During injection, the pressure and volume of grout being injected are
used to measure pressure levels and detect any unexpected variations in flow
rates.
16
• Layer-by-Layer Injection:
soil layers. This allows for more effective penetration and filling of voids and
fractures.
• Curing:
o After grout injection, the material is left to harden and cure. This process can
take a few hours to several days, depending on the grout material used and
environmental conditions.
• Post-Injection Testing:
o After curing, the effectiveness of the grouting is tested using penetration tests
or core sampling. These tests determine whether the grout has sufficiently
• Quality Control:
o Regular checks are performed to ensure the grout is evenly distributed, and
• Final Inspection:
17
o Once the grouting process is complete and the material has cured, engineers
Environmental Considerations
pollution if not managed properly, while chemical grouts may pose risks to
• Sustainability:
soil structure.
18
3.6 Design Considerations
• Soil Type: Different grouting materials are used based on soil composition (e.g.,
• Injection Pressure: Adjusted based on soil conditions and grout material used.
• Grout Volume: Determined by the size of the voids and required soil improvement.
Advantages:
19
Limitations:
• Limited to specific soil types (less effective in cohesive or very dense soils).
• Potential issues with grout flow and uneven distribution in heterogeneous soils.
2. Sinkhole Repair: Grouting used to fill and stabilize a sinkhole in a residential area,
20
4. Comparative Analysis of Stone Column and Pressure
Grouting
• Stone Columns: More suitable for granular soils or soft clays with moderate depth.
• Pressure Grouting: Effective in loose sands, fractured rocks, and areas with voids.
4.2 Cost-Effectiveness
• Stone Columns: More economical for large-scale projects with deep foundations.
• Pressure Grouting: More cost-effective for localized soil stabilization but less so
traditional excavation, but pressure grouting can introduce chemicals into the
levels.
21
5. Future Trends and Innovations
friendly equipment.
6. Conclusion
Stone columns and pressure grouting are both effective ground improvement techniques,
each with its strengths and limitations. Stone columns are ideal for large-scale
22
6.2 Recommendations
For large construction projects on soft or weak soils, stone columns are generally
23