MOTIVATION (Part 1&2 )- Class Notes
MOTIVATION (Part 1&2 )- Class Notes
MOTIVATION (Part 1)
Topics covered
● What Is Motivation?
● Classification Of Theories Of Motivation
● Content Theories Of Motivation
○ Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy
○ Alderfer’s ERG Theory
○ Mcclelland’s Achievement Motivation
○ Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory
What is Motivation?
● Content Theories deal with “what” motivates people and it is concerned with
individual needs and goals.
● The main content theories are:
○ Maslow’s needs hierarchy
○ Alderfer’s ERG theory
○ McClelland’s achievement motivation
○ Herzberg’s two-factor theory
● Process Theories deal with the “process” of motivation and are concerned with “how”
motivation occurs.
● The main process theories are:
○ Skinner’s reinforcement theory
○ Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory
○ Adam’s equity theory
○ Locke’s goal setting theory
● According to this theory, an individual strives to seek a higher need when lower
needs are fulfilled. Once a lower-level need is satisfied, it no longer serves as a
source of motivation.
t
pu
aj
.R
G
● In the first level, physiological needs exist which include the most basic needs for
humans to survive, such as air, water and food.
● In the second level, safety needs exist which include personal security, health,
well-being and safety against accidents remain.
● In the third level, belonging needs exit. This is where people need to feel a sense of
belonging and acceptance. It is about relationships, families and friendship.
Organizations fulfill this need for people.
● In the fourth level, self-esteem needs remain. This is where people look to be
respected and to have self-respect. Achievement needs, respect of others are at this
level.
● Alderfer also agreed that individuals generally move up the hierarchy in satisfying
.R
their needs; that is, they satisfy lower-order before higher-order needs.
● As lower-order needs are satisfied, they become less important, but Alderfer also
G
said: as higher-order needs are satisfied they become more important. And it is also
said that under some circumstances individuals might return to a lower need.
● Alderfer thought that individuals multiply the efforts invested in a lower category need
when higher categorized needs are not consequent.
● ERG theory of motivation is very flexible: it explains needs as a range rather than as
a hierarchy.
● Implication of this theory: Managers must understand that an employee has various
needs that must be satisfied at the same time. ERG theory says, if the manager
concentrates only on one need at a time, he or she won’t be able to motivate the
employee effectively and efficiently.
● Prioritization and sequence of these three categories, classes can be different for
each individual.
Frustration-Regression Process
● For example there is a student, who has excellent grades, friends, and high standard
of living, maybe also working at the university.
● This event is known and called the Frustration-Regression Process. This is a more
realistic approach as it recognises that, because when a need is met, it does not
mean it will always remain met.
In the early 1960s McClelland – built on Maslow’s work – described three human motivators.
McClelland (Arnold et al., 2005) claimed that humans acquire, learn their motivators over
t
time that is the reason why this theory is sometimes called the ‘Learned Needs Theory
pu
● He affirms that we all have three motivating drivers, and it does not depend on our
aj
gender or age. One of these drives or needs will be dominant in our behaviour.
● McClelland’s theory differs from Maslow’s and Alderfer’s, which focus on satisfying
.R
● This dominant motivator depends on our culture and life experiences, of course (but
G
○ Power: a need for control over one’s own work or the work of others
● These learned needs could lead to diversity and variety between employees. More
precisely, prioritization and importance of these motivational needs characterises a
person’s behaviour.
● As we wrote, although each person has all of these needs to some extent, only one
of them tends to motivate an individual at any given time.
Achievement motivation
● This need is influenced by internal drivers for action (intrinsic motivation), and the
pressure used by the prospects of others (extrinsic motivation).
● Low need for achievement could mean that individuals want to minimise risk of
failure, and for this reason people may choose very easy or too difficult tasks, when
they cannot avoid failure.
● In contrast, high need for achievement means that humans try to choose optimal,
sufficiently difficult tasks, because they want to get the chance to reach their goals,
but they have to work for it, they need to develop themselves.
● Sources of high need for achievement can be: praise for success, goal setting skills,
one’s own competence and effort to achieve something, and it does not depend only
on luck; of course positive feelings and also independence in childhood.
t
pu
● McClelland said that training, teaching can increase an individual’s need for
achievement. For this reason, some have argued that the need for achievement is
not a need but a value.
aj
Affiliation motivation
.R
● These people have a strong need for friendships and want to belong within a social
G
● They are team players, and they may be less effective in leadership positions.
● High-need-for-affiliation persons have support from those with whom they have
regular contact and mostly are involved in warm interpersonal relationships.
● There are times when individuals want to be with others and at other times to be
alone – affiliation motivation can become increased or decreased.
Authority/power motivation
● McClelland argues that, with a strong need for achievement, people can become the
best leaders – as we wrote above. But at the same time there can be a tendency to
request too much of their employees, because they think that these people are also
highly achievement-focused and results-driven, as they are. Think about your
teachers and professors! I am sure they all want the best for you, they would like to
develop you, but I do not think you feel the same every time. McClelland said that
most people have and show a combination of these characteristics.
t
pu
Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory
Frederick Herzberg, introduced his Two Factor Theory in 1959. It is also called
aj
motivation-hygiene theory.
● This theory says that there are some factors (motivating factors) that cause job
.R
satisfaction, and motivation and some other also separated factors (hygiene factors)
cause dissatisfaction. That means that these feelings are not opposite of each other,
as it has always previously been believed.
G
● He suggested that there are two kinds of factors affect motivation, and they do it in
different ways:
Only these factors can motivate us. But at the same time we need the lack of dissatisfaction
(we need hygiene factors, “workpeace”) to achieve more efficient work.
● Herzberg addressed salary not as a motivator in the way that the primary motivators
are, just like achievement and recognition.
.R
● Salary can be a motivator, if you always get higher and higher salary, but we cannot
say that it is an incentive.
● Maslow said, money or salary is needed to buy food to eat, to have some place to
G
● However, Herzberg tried to bring more humanity and caring into companies’ life. His
intention was not to develop a theory that is used as a ‘motivational tool’, but to
provide guidance to improve organisational performance.
Criticism
● Universality: they do not care about gender, age, culture, religion or other factor
differences.
MOTIVATION (Part 2)
What is Motivation?
t
pu
● Motivation is the answer to the question “Why do we do what we do?”.
● The motivation theories try to figure out what the “M” is in the equation: “M motivates
aj
● Content Theories deal with “what” motivates people and it is concerned with
individual needs and goals.
● Process Theories deal with the “process” of motivation and are concerned with “how”
motivation occurs.
t
pu
aj
.R
● The Reinforcement theory, based on Skinner’s operant conditioning theory, says that
behaviour can be formed by its consequences (Gordon, 1987).
G
● good grade for his test, this reinforcement encourages the performance of the
behaviour to recur. If the teacher doesn’t tell precisely what he expects, then the
positive reinforcements can drive the behaviour closer to the preferred.
● For example, if a student is always late to class and thus he gets negative verbal
feedback and also always has to tidy up the classroom at the end of the day, in this
case the undesirable behaviour is reinforced with an undesirable reinforcer. The
punishment declines the tendency to be late.
● The reinforcement theory is included in many other motivation theories. Reward must
meet someone’s needs, expectations, must be applied equitably, and must be
t
consistent. The desired behaviour must be clear and realistic, but the issue remains:
pu
which reinforcements are suitable and for which person?
Incentive Theory:
aj
● Incentive theory suggests that an employee will increase her/his effort to obtain a
.R
desired reward.
● This is based on the general principle of reinforcement.
● The desired outcome is usually “money”.
G
● This theory is coherent with the early economic theories where man is supposed to
be rational and forecasts are based on the principle of “economic man”.
● Victor Vroom’s (1964) expectancy theory aims to explain how people choose from
the available actions. Vroom defines motivation as a process that governs our
choices among alternative forms of voluntary behaviour. The basic rationale of this
○ Expectancy – a person’s belief that more effort will result in success. If you
work harder, it will result in better performance.
t
pu
○ Instrumentality – the person’s belief that there is a connection between
activity and goal. If you perform well, you will get a reward.
○ Valence – the degree to which a person values the reward, the results of
aj
success.
● Vroom supposes that expectancy, instrumentality and valence are multiplied together
.R
to determine motivation. This means that if any of these is zero, then the motivation
to do something will be zero as well.
● A person who doesn’t see the connection between effort and performance will have
G
zero expectancy. A person who can’t perceive the link between performance and
reward will have zero instrumentality. For a person who doesn’t value the anticipated
outcome, reward will have zero valence.
t
pu
● Edwin Locke proposed Goal Theory in 1968, which proposes that motivation and
performance will be high if individuals are set specific goals which are challenging,
but accepted, and where feedback is given on performance.
aj
○ Setting specific goals (e.g. I want to earn a million before I am 30) generates
higher levels of performance than setting general goals (e.g. I want to earn a
lot of money).
G
○ The goals that are hard to achieve are linearly and positively connected to
performance. The harder the goal, the more a person will work to reach it.
● Set challenging but attainable goals. Too easy or too difficult/unrealistic goals don’t
motivate us.
● Set specific and measurable goals. These can focus toward what you want, and can
measure the progress toward the goal.
● Goal commitment should be obtained. If people don’t commit to the goals, then they
will not put effort toward reaching the goals, even specific, or challenging ones.
Strategies to achieve this could include participation in the goal setting process, use
of extrinsic rewards (bonuses), and encouraging intrinsic motivation through
providing workers with feedback about goal attainment. Pressure to achieve goals is
not useful because it can result in dishonesty and superficial performance.
t
pu
aj
.R
G
The equity theory states that people are motivated if they are treated equitably, and receive
t
what they consider fair for their effort and costs.
pu
● The theory was suggested by Adams (1965) and is based on Social Exchange
theory.
● According to this theory, people compare their contribution to work, costs of their
aj
actions and the benefits that will result from the contribution and benefits of the
reference person. If people perceive that the ratio of their inputs-outputs to the ratio
.R
● The equity theory works not just in the workplace, but at school as well.
● The greater the inequity the greater the distress an individual feels, which will
motivate the endeavour to make the outcomes and the inputs equal compared to the
reference person.
t
pu
aj
.R
G
● Try to increase his/her outputs (ask for better mark, or pay raising)
● The problem with equity theory is that it does not take into account differences in
individual needs, values, and personalities. For example, one person may perceive a
certain situation as inequitable while another does not. Nevertheless ensuring equity
is essential to motivation.