Shortest Crease Problem
Shortest Crease Problem
Aspect ratio: Here aspect ratio is the ratio between the length and
width of the paper.
INTRODUCTION:
In the project we will be using calculus as the main mathematical tool to find
a solution for this problem.
One of the applications of differential calculus is finding the maximum and
minimum points of the function.
DEFINITION:
For a given function, at its extreme values the tangent to the curve at that
point is parallel to x-axis, i.e. its slope is equal to zero. Thus if the function is
maximum or minimum at some point, then dy/dx at that point is equal to
zero.
f(x) is maximum at any point x=a if f'(a)=0 and f”(a) is -'ve .[i.e. f'(a)
changes sign from +'ve to -'ve]
f(x) is minimum at any point x=a if f'(a)=0 and f”(a) is +'ve.[i.e. f'(a)
changes sign from -'ve to +'ve]
DISCUSSION:
We pick up one corner of the paper and fold it over so the corner touches somewhere on the opposite
edge. The fold is flattened to a crease. The question is to determine the minimum possible crease
length.
The question that we face is how we fold the paper to make the shortest
crease. Here, we came up with three cases, as shown below, case i,ii and iii.
Another way to think of these cases is that, for case i, the crease connects the bottom of the paper to
the edge of the paper. For case ii, the crease connects the top of the paper with the bottom of the
paper. For case iii, the crease connects opposite sides of the paper.
Depending on the geometry of the paper, not all solutions are possible (for instance if the paper is not
'tall' and has an aspect ratio less than making it a square, then solution iii is not possible.
There are also a couple of edge case configurations. The first is a 45° fold, and the second is folding
directly in half but, with care, these should be handled as we deal with the generic cases.
Now, let’s look through each of the cases in order.
Case i
Looking at triangle AEG, and noting the EG is the same as DG (it's just the paper folded over), we can
apply Pythagoras:
X2¿ y2 +¿(b-x) 2
2 2
y =x – ¿b −2 xb+¿ x ¿
2 2
2 2
Y =2 xb−b equation 1
There are similar triangles in the diagram, and we can use these to create another set of equations:
FH GA
=
EH EA
z ( b− x )
=
b y
yz=b(b−x) Equation 2
b(b−x)
Z=
y
2 2
2 b (b−x )
z= using equation 1
(2 xb−b2 )
We now have the equations necessary to perform Pythagoras of the triangle to obtain the length of the
crease L.
2 2 2
L =x + ( y + z )
2 2 2 2
L =x + y + 2 yz + z
We have equations for all these variables in terms of x so it's just a little algebra and simplification from
this point onwards.
This is an equation to the length of the crease (squared), based on x. We can see it's undefined
when x ≤ 0.5b as this would make the solution imaginary. This makes sense as, to make the corner meet
the other edge; we need to fold at least past halfway!
You can see there is a minimum, and we could solve graphically, but let's fire up the Calculus hounds
and get an exact answer. We can differentiate the crease length with respect to x, and find out the
turning points where this is zero. To simplify the Calculus, we can continue to work with L 2.
2
d (L ) 3
=0 for x= b
dx 4
d 2 ( L2 )
2
≡ positive
dx
We can see this is zero when the numerator is zero (and confirming the second differential is positive,
indicating a minimum turning point). There are two answers. The first is the (trivial) answer when x=0
(when we don't fold at all!), and the useful answer is when x=3/4.
For case i, the minimum length of crease is obtained when we fold the paper 3/4 of the way from the
edge.
3 2 2
when x= b L =1.6875 b
4
¿ , L=1.299 b
The other point of note is that, for case i, the minimum crease length is independent of the height of the
paper.
Well, that's not strictly true. If the paper is not tall (R is very small), then there reaches a point at which,
when the 3/4 is folded over that the crease does not go all the way to the far edge.
There's actually another case, if the aspect ratio gets even more extreme, and this is if there is not
enough height to bend the 3/4 point over to the edge.
As will see below, for these cases, it's pretty obvious that a shorter crease could be obtained by simply
folding the paper in half.
The threshold at which case i stops applying is when the 3/4b, crease passes through the opposite
corner. As we know that x=3/4b, we can use the equations above to above to calculate y+z and the
threshold for this is when this is equal to R (the crease just touches the corner). This occurs
when R ≤ 3/(2√2) b ≈ 1.0607
Case ii
We can simplify case ii without having to break out any complex algebra or Calculus. For this case of
solution, the crease connects the top edge of the paper with the bottom edge of the paper. The crease is
a straight line, and the edges of the paper are parallel. The shortest distance between parallel lines is
orthogonal to them.
The way to make this happen is to simply fold the paper in half! The minimum length for this case is
simply R. It does not matter what the aspect ratio of the paper is for case ii, the shortest crease length
will always be R.
For case ii, the minimum length of crease is obtained by folding the paper in half!
Case iii
We can leverage the geometric principle above to simplify the solution to case iii too. Look closely at the
diagrams below. As we move to the right, each diagram depicts the corner being fold up higher, and
higher, on the edge.
The higher up the corner goes, the closer the crease line gets to being perpendicular to the edges. The
closer the crease gets to 90° to the edges, the closer it gets to the minimum length. The way to minimize
the length of the crease is to get the angle between the crease and the edge as close to perpendicular as
possible. They way to achieve this is to fold the paper from corner to corner.
For case iii, the minimum length of crease is obtained by folding the paper from one corner to the
other.
Here is what the crease looks like folded out. Because of symmetry you can see how the line connecting
the corners and the crease cross at 90°
Labeling this:
From Pythagoras, the distance from one corner of paper to the other is simple:
2 2 2
d =b + R
d= √ b 2+ R 2
L
b 2
=
R d
2
db
L=
R
Combining:
b √ b2 + R2
L=
R
The crease length L is entirely dependent on the aspect ratio of the paper R, but is only valid for R ≥ b
(where the paper is at least square. If the paper is less than square, case iii is not defined).
We now have formulae for the shortest length of crease for each of the cases i-iii
Here they are plotted on a graph. The y-axis shows the Length L and how this varies with the aspect
ratio R of the paper.
We can see that case i is never the shortest possible crease! All those calculus text books are wrong
(unless they were carefully worded to talk just about specifically case i).
case ii (simply folding the paper in half) is the shortest crease possible up until some critical aspect ratio,
and taller than this aspect ratio, case iii is the mechanism to to get the shortest crease. Let's calculate
this cross over point.
The cross over point occurs when the length of the crease for case iii is the case as case ii, which is
simply the aspect ratio R. We can represent this as a quadratic in terms of R2.
b √ b 2+ R 2
R=
R
4
2 2 R
b +R = 2
b
4 4 2 2
R −b −b R =0
2 2 2 2 4
( R ) −b R −b =0
b 2 ± √ b4 + 4 b 4
R 2=
2
b (1± √ 5)
2
R 2= =φ
2
Something surprising falls out. This threshold is where R2 is the Golden Ratio!
CONCLUSION:
Case i (that described in most calculus text books), is never the shortest crease.
If the aspect ratio of the paper squared is less than the Golden Ratio, the shortest crease is
obtained by simply folding the paper in half.
If the aspect ratio of the paper squared is greater than the Golden ratio, the shortest crease is
obtained by folding described by case iii.
If the aspect ratio squared is exactly the Golden ratio, there are two possible shortest creases,
both the same length, corresponding to case ii and case iii.