A-3 Solved
A-3 Solved
Fahad Shoaib
Registration Number: SP21-BSM-007
October 23, 2024
Also, we have:
4x = 2 · (2x) + 0 · 3 so 4x ∈ ⟨2x, 3⟩.
Now, since x = 4x − 3x, and both 4x and 3x are in ⟨2x, 3⟩, it follows that:
x ∈ ⟨2x, 3⟩.
2x = 2 · x + 0 · 3 ∈ ⟨x, 3⟩.
1
Let nZ be a prime ideal of Z. (To show: n is prime)
Assume, for contradiction, that n is not a prime number. This means that n is
composite, so we can write n = c · t for some integers c and t, where 1 < c < n
and 1 < t < n.
Since n ∈ nZ, it follows that c · t ∈ nZ.
However, since nZ is a prime ideal, it implies either c ∈ nZ or t ∈ nZ.
This contradicts the assumption that c, t < n. Thus, the assumption that n is
composite must be false, and hence n is prime.
∴ n is prime.
Conversely: Let n be a prime number. We want to show that nZ is a
prime ideal.
∴ nZ is a prime ideal of Z.
Question 4 If A and B are ideals of a ring, show that the product of A and B,
is an ideal.
1. **Show the set is non-empty**:
Since both A and B are ideals, they contain the zero element of the ring R.
Therefore, we can take n = 1 and choose a1 = 0 ∈ A and b1 = 0 ∈ B. This
gives us:
0 = 0 · 0 ∈ AB.
Thus, AB is non-empty.
2. **Show it is closed under subtraction**:
Let x = a1 b1 + a2 b2 + ... + an bn ∈ AB and y = a′1 b′1 + a′2 b′2 + ... + a′m b′m ∈ AB,
where ai , a′j ∈ A and bi , b′j ∈ B.
We want to show that x − y ∈ AB. We can express the subtraction as
follows:
2
x − y = (a1 b1 − a′1 b′1 ) + (a2 b2 − a′2 b′2 ) + ... + (an bn − a′m b′m ).
Each term can be expressed as:
x − y ∈ AB.
3. **Show the absorption property holds**:
Let r ∈ R and x = a1 b1 + a2 b2 + ... + an bn be an element of AB. We need
to show that both rx and xr are in AB.
- For the first case, consider:
rx ∈ AB.
- For the second case, consider:
xr ∈ AB.
In conclusion, since we have shown that the product set is non-empty, closed
under subtraction, and satisfies the absorption property, we conclude that AB
is indeed an ideal of the ring R.
|R| 30
|R/I| = = =3
|I| 10
3
Since 3 is prime, there exists exactly one ring of order 3 up to isomorphism.
Therefore, R/I ∼= Z3 , which is a field. Hence, I is a maximal ideal.
1. I is non-empty:
The constant polynomial f (x) = 0 is in I because f (1) = 0, which is even.
Therefore, I is non-empty.
2. I is closed under subtraction:
Let f (x) and g(x) be any two polynomials in I. We need to show that
(f − g)(x) is also in I.
Since f (x) and g(x) are in I, we know that f (1) and g(1) are even. Let
f (1) = 2m and g(1) = 2n for some integers m and n.
(f − g)(1) = f (1) − g(1) = 2m − 2n = 2(m − n)
Since m − n is an integer, 2(m − n) is even. Therefore, (f − g)(x) is in I.
3. Absorption property:
Let f (x) be any polynomial in I and h(x) be any polynomial in Z[x]. We
need to show that both (h · f )(x) and (f · h)(x) are in I.
Since f (x) is in I, f (1) is even. Let f (1) = 2m for some integer m. Let
h(1) = k for some integer k (since h(x) is in Z[x], h(1) is an integer).
(h · f )(1) = (f · h)(1) = h(1) · f (1) = k · 2m = 2(km)
Since km is an integer, 2(km) is even. Therefore, both (h · f )(x) and
(f · h)(x) are in I.
Since I satisfies all the properties of an ideal (non-empty, closed under sub-
traction, and satisfies the absorption property), we have proven that I is an
ideal of Z[x].
4
2 0
What is the multiplicative inverse of + I?
0 0
Solution:
That I satisfies the ideal test follows directly from the definitions of matrix
addition and multiplication. To see that R/I is a field, first observe that
a b a 0 0 b a 0
+I = + +I = + I.
0 c 0 0 0 c 0 0
a 0
Thus, we need to only show that + I has an inverse in R/I when
0 0
a ̸= 0.
−1
a 0 a 0 1 0
+I +I = + I = I,
0 0 0 0 0 0
and
−1 1
2 0 0
+I = 2 + I.
0 0 0 0
Solution:
Let R = {0, 2, 4, 6} be the ring under addition and multiplication modulo 8.
Then the set {0, 4} is a maximal ideal but not a prime ideal.
Question 11: Let F be a field. Then the only ideals of F are {0} and F
itself.
Let I be an ideal of F. If I = {0}, we are done. Suppose I contains a non-zero
element a. Since F is a field, there exists a−1 ∈ F such that aa−1 = 1.
Since I is an ideal and a ∈ I, we have a−1 a = 1 ∈ I. Now for any x ∈ F ,
since 1 ∈ I and I is an ideal:
x·1=x∈I
Therefore, I = F.
Thus, any non-zero ideal I must equal F, and since {0} is always an ideal,
the only ideals of F are {0} and F itself.
Question 12: How many elements are in Z[i]/⟨3 + i⟩? Give reasons for your
answer.
We need to determine how many elements are in the quotient ring Z[i]/⟨3+i⟩.
5
First, observe that 10 ∈ ⟨3 + i⟩ because we can write:
(3 + i)(3 − i) = 10.
10 ≡ 0 (mod ⟨3 + i⟩).
(x + 2) + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ · (x + 2) + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩
= x2 + 4x + 4 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ = x2 + x + 1 + 3x + 3 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩
= 3x + 3 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ = 0x + 0 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ = ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩.
Thus, (x + 2) + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ is a zero divisor. Therefore, Z3 [x]/⟨x2 + x + 1⟩
is not a field.
6
Z5 [i] has elements of the form a + bi, where a, b ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}.
First, 2 ∈ ⟨1 + i⟩ since (1 + i)(1 − i) = 2.
Next, since 3 · 2 ≡ 1 (mod 5), we have 1 ∈ ⟨1 + i⟩.
Therefore, 1 + 1 = 2, 2 + 1 = 3, 3 + 1 = 4, ... , and 0 (by definition of ideal)
all belong to ⟨1 + i⟩.
Question 17: Show that Z[i]/⟨1 − i⟩ is a field. How many elements does
this field have?
Solution: The elements of Z[i]/⟨1 − i⟩ are of the form a + ib + ⟨1 − i⟩.
Since i = 1, this can be reduced to k + ⟨1 − i⟩ where k ∈ Z.
Next, observe that:
Thus, 2 ≡ 0 modulo ⟨1 − i⟩, implying that the only possible elements in the
factor ring are 0 + ⟨1 − i⟩ and 1 + ⟨1 − i⟩.
Therefore, the field Z[i]/⟨1 − i⟩ has exactly two elements: 0 + ⟨1 − i⟩ and
1 + ⟨1 − i⟩. Since there are no zero divisors, it is a field.