0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views7 pages

A-3 Solved

Uploaded by

fa20-bsm-035
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views7 pages

A-3 Solved

Uploaded by

fa20-bsm-035
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Assignment: Ideals and factor rings

Submitted to Dr. Adeel Farooq

Fahad Shoaib
Registration Number: SP21-BSM-007
October 23, 2024

Question 1: In Z[x], prove that ⟨x, 3⟩ = ⟨2x, 3⟩.


To show that ⟨2x, 3⟩ = ⟨x, 3⟩, we need to show that ⟨x, 3⟩ ⊆ ⟨2x, 3⟩ and
⟨2x, 3⟩ ⊆ ⟨x, 3⟩.
First inclusion: We need to show that x ∈ ⟨2x, 3⟩. This is indeed true since:

3x = 0 · (2x) + x · 3 so 3x ∈ ⟨2x, 3⟩.

Also, we have:
4x = 2 · (2x) + 0 · 3 so 4x ∈ ⟨2x, 3⟩.
Now, since x = 4x − 3x, and both 4x and 3x are in ⟨2x, 3⟩, it follows that:

x ∈ ⟨2x, 3⟩.

Thus, ⟨x, 3⟩ ⊆ ⟨2x, 3⟩.


Second inclusion: Clearly, 2x ∈ ⟨x, 3⟩ since:

2x = 2 · x + 0 · 3 ∈ ⟨x, 3⟩.

Since both inclusions hold, we conclude that ⟨x, 3⟩ = ⟨2x, 3⟩.

Question 2: Prove that the intersection of any set of ideals of a ring is an


ideal. T
Let R be a ring and {Iα }α∈A be a set of ideals of R. Let I = α∈A Iα . We
need to show that I is an ideal of R.
1) Show 0 ∈ I: ∀α, 0 ∈ Iα =⇒ 0 ∈ I
2) Show if x, y ∈ I, then x − y ∈ I: x, y ∈ I =⇒ ∀α, x, y ∈ Iα =⇒
∀α, x − y ∈ Iα (since each Iα is an ideal) =⇒ x − y ∈ I
3) Show if x ∈ I and r ∈ R, then rx ∈ I: x ∈ I =⇒ ∀α, x ∈ Iα
=⇒ ∀α, rx ∈ Iα (since each Iα is an ideal) =⇒ rx ∈ I
Therefore, I satisfies all properties of an ideal.

Question 3: If n is an integer greater than 1, show that ⟨n⟩ = nZ is a prime


ideal of Z if and only if n is prime.

1
Let nZ be a prime ideal of Z. (To show: n is prime)
Assume, for contradiction, that n is not a prime number. This means that n is
composite, so we can write n = c · t for some integers c and t, where 1 < c < n
and 1 < t < n.
Since n ∈ nZ, it follows that c · t ∈ nZ.
However, since nZ is a prime ideal, it implies either c ∈ nZ or t ∈ nZ.
This contradicts the assumption that c, t < n. Thus, the assumption that n is
composite must be false, and hence n is prime.

∴ n is prime.
Conversely: Let n be a prime number. We want to show that nZ is a
prime ideal.

Let a, b ∈ Z and ab ∈ nZ. (To show: a ∈ nZ or b ∈ nZ)


This implies n | ab. Since n is prime, it follows that n | a or n | b.
Thus, a = nk1 or b = nk2 for some k1 , k2 ∈ Z, which implies a ∈ nZ or
b ∈ nZ.
Therefore, nZ is a prime ideal of Z.

∴ nZ is a prime ideal of Z.

Question 4 If A and B are ideals of a ring, show that the product of A and B,

AB = {a1 b1 + a2 b2 + . . . + an bn : ai ∈ A, bi ∈ B, n is a positive integer},

is an ideal.
1. **Show the set is non-empty**:
Since both A and B are ideals, they contain the zero element of the ring R.
Therefore, we can take n = 1 and choose a1 = 0 ∈ A and b1 = 0 ∈ B. This
gives us:

0 = 0 · 0 ∈ AB.
Thus, AB is non-empty.
2. **Show it is closed under subtraction**:
Let x = a1 b1 + a2 b2 + ... + an bn ∈ AB and y = a′1 b′1 + a′2 b′2 + ... + a′m b′m ∈ AB,
where ai , a′j ∈ A and bi , b′j ∈ B.
We want to show that x − y ∈ AB. We can express the subtraction as
follows:

x − y = (a1 b1 + a2 b2 + ... + an bn ) − (a′1 b′1 + a′2 b′2 + ... + a′m b′m ).

Rearranging gives us:

2
x − y = (a1 b1 − a′1 b′1 ) + (a2 b2 − a′2 b′2 ) + ... + (an bn − a′m b′m ).
Each term can be expressed as:

ai bi − a′j b′j = ai bi + (−a′j b′j ),


where −a′j b′j is also in AB since it can be written as the product of an
element from A and an element from B. Therefore, each term is in the form of
elements in AB, which implies that:

x − y ∈ AB.
3. **Show the absorption property holds**:
Let r ∈ R and x = a1 b1 + a2 b2 + ... + an bn be an element of AB. We need
to show that both rx and xr are in AB.
- For the first case, consider:

rx = r(a1 b1 + a2 b2 + ... + an bn ) = ra1 b1 + ra2 b2 + ... + ran bn .


Since A is an ideal, each term of the form rai is in A, and since each term
involves products of elements from ideals, we conclude that:

rx ∈ AB.
- For the second case, consider:

xr = (a1 b1 + a2 b2 + ... + an bn )r = a1 (b1 r) + a2 (b2 r) + ... + an (bn r).

Similarly, since each term involves multiplication by elements from ideals,


we have:
- Each term bi r ∈ B.
Thus,

xr ∈ AB.
In conclusion, since we have shown that the product set is non-empty, closed
under subtraction, and satisfies the absorption property, we conclude that AB
is indeed an ideal of the ring R.

Question 5: Let R be a commutative ring with |R| = 30. If I is an ideal


of R with |I| = 10, prove that I is a maximal ideal.
For a commutative ring R with unity, an ideal I is maximal if and only if
R/I is a field. Consider the quotient ring R/I. By the Lagrange theorem, we
have:

|R| 30
|R/I| = = =3
|I| 10

3
Since 3 is prime, there exists exactly one ring of order 3 up to isomorphism.
Therefore, R/I ∼= Z3 , which is a field. Hence, I is a maximal ideal.

Question 6 Prove that I = {f (x) ∈ Z[x] : f (1) is even} is an ideal of Z[x].

To prove that I = {f (x) ∈ Z[x] : f (1) is even} is an ideal of Z[x], we need


to show that it satisfies the properties of an ideal. Let’s go through this step-
by-step.

1. I is non-empty:
The constant polynomial f (x) = 0 is in I because f (1) = 0, which is even.
Therefore, I is non-empty.
2. I is closed under subtraction:
Let f (x) and g(x) be any two polynomials in I. We need to show that
(f − g)(x) is also in I.
Since f (x) and g(x) are in I, we know that f (1) and g(1) are even. Let
f (1) = 2m and g(1) = 2n for some integers m and n.
(f − g)(1) = f (1) − g(1) = 2m − 2n = 2(m − n)
Since m − n is an integer, 2(m − n) is even. Therefore, (f − g)(x) is in I.

3. Absorption property:
Let f (x) be any polynomial in I and h(x) be any polynomial in Z[x]. We
need to show that both (h · f )(x) and (f · h)(x) are in I.
Since f (x) is in I, f (1) is even. Let f (1) = 2m for some integer m. Let
h(1) = k for some integer k (since h(x) is in Z[x], h(1) is an integer).
(h · f )(1) = (f · h)(1) = h(1) · f (1) = k · 2m = 2(km)
Since km is an integer, 2(km) is even. Therefore, both (h · f )(x) and
(f · h)(x) are in I.

Since I satisfies all the properties of an ideal (non-empty, closed under sub-
traction, and satisfies the absorption property), we have proven that I is an
ideal of Z[x].

Question 7: Determine the order of Z[i]/⟨i⟩.


To determine the order of Z[i]/⟨i⟩, observe that i = 0 =⇒ i2 = 0 =⇒ −1 =
0 or 1 = 0. Since the elements of the factor ring have the form a + bi + ⟨i⟩, this
reduces to a + ⟨i⟩. Therefore, the only element is 0 + ⟨i⟩. Hence, |Z[i]/⟨i⟩| = 1.
     
a b 0 x
Question 8: Let R = : a, b, c ∈ R and I = : x, y ∈ R .
0 c 0 y
Prove that I is an ideal of R and R/I is a field.

4
 
2 0
What is the multiplicative inverse of + I?
0 0

Solution:

That I satisfies the ideal test follows directly from the definitions of matrix
addition and multiplication. To see that R/I is a field, first observe that
       
a b a 0 0 b a 0
+I = + +I = + I.
0 c 0 0 0 c 0 0
 
a 0
Thus, we need to only show that + I has an inverse in R/I when
0 0
a ̸= 0.
    −1    
a 0 a 0 1 0
+I +I = + I = I,
0 0 0 0 0 0
and
  −1  1 
2 0 0
+I = 2 + I.
0 0 0 0

Question 10 Give an example of a commutative ring that has a maximal


ideal that is not a prime ideal.

Solution:
Let R = {0, 2, 4, 6} be the ring under addition and multiplication modulo 8.
Then the set {0, 4} is a maximal ideal but not a prime ideal.

Question 11: Let F be a field. Then the only ideals of F are {0} and F
itself.
Let I be an ideal of F. If I = {0}, we are done. Suppose I contains a non-zero
element a. Since F is a field, there exists a−1 ∈ F such that aa−1 = 1.
Since I is an ideal and a ∈ I, we have a−1 a = 1 ∈ I. Now for any x ∈ F ,
since 1 ∈ I and I is an ideal:
x·1=x∈I
Therefore, I = F.
Thus, any non-zero ideal I must equal F, and since {0} is always an ideal,
the only ideals of F are {0} and F itself.

Question 12: How many elements are in Z[i]/⟨3 + i⟩? Give reasons for your
answer.
We need to determine how many elements are in the quotient ring Z[i]/⟨3+i⟩.

5
First, observe that 10 ∈ ⟨3 + i⟩ because we can write:

(3 + i)(3 − i) = 10.

This shows that 10 is a multiple of 3 + i, meaning 10 ∈ ⟨3 + i⟩. We can also


express this as 10 − 0 ∈ ⟨3 + i⟩, or equivalently:

10 ≡ 0 (mod ⟨3 + i⟩).

Since 10 ≡ 0 mod ⟨3 + i⟩, we know that every element a + bi ∈ Z[i] can be


written in the form k + ⟨3 + i⟩ since i = −3, where k ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . . , 9}. This
is because 10 behaves like 0 in the quotient ring, and all other elements are
reduced modulo 10.
Thus, there are exactly 10 distinct cosets in Z[i]/⟨3 + i⟩. Therefore, the
quotient ring Z[i]/⟨3 + i⟩ has 10 elements.

Question 13: In the ring of Gaussian integers, Z[i] = {a + bi : a, b ∈ Z},


let I = {a + bi : a, b are even}. Prove that I is an ideal. How many elements
are in Z[i]/I? Is Z[i]/I a field? Is Z[i]/I an integral domain?
To show that I is an ideal, observe that I ⊆ Z[i] and is closed under addition
and multiplication by any element of Z[i]. Since a, b ∈ Z are even, any product
or sum of elements in I will still yield elements with even integer coefficients,
so I is an ideal.
Given the factor ring Z[i]/I = {a + ib + I | a, b ∈ Z} we consider cases based
on the parity of a and b:
- If a = 2k and b = 2m, then 2k + i(2m) + I = 0, since a, b are even.
- If a = 2k + 1 and b = 2m + 1, then 2k + 1 + i(2m + 1) + I = 1 + i.
- If a = 2k + 1 and b = 2m, then 2k + 1 + i(2m) + I = 1.
- If a = 2k and b = 2m + 1, then 2k + i(2m + 1) + I = i.

Thus, the elements of Z[i]/I are {0, 1 + i, 1, i}, so |Z[i]/I| = 4.


Since 1 + i is a zero divisor, Z[i]/I is not a field. Therefore, Z[i]/I is also
not an integral domain.

Question 14: Show that Z3 [x]/⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ is not a field.


We will demonstrate that there exists a zero divisor in Z3 [x]/⟨x2 + x + 1⟩.
Consider (x + 2) + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ ∈ Z3 [x]/⟨x2 + x + 1⟩. We compute:

(x + 2) + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ · (x + 2) + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩
   

= x2 + 4x + 4 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ = x2 + x + 1 + 3x + 3 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩
= 3x + 3 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ = 0x + 0 + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ = ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩.
Thus, (x + 2) + ⟨x2 + x + 1⟩ is a zero divisor. Therefore, Z3 [x]/⟨x2 + x + 1⟩
is not a field.

Question 15. How many elements are in Z5 [i]/⟨1 + i⟩?

6
Z5 [i] has elements of the form a + bi, where a, b ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}.
First, 2 ∈ ⟨1 + i⟩ since (1 + i)(1 − i) = 2.
Next, since 3 · 2 ≡ 1 (mod 5), we have 1 ∈ ⟨1 + i⟩.
Therefore, 1 + 1 = 2, 2 + 1 = 3, 3 + 1 = 4, ... , and 0 (by definition of ideal)
all belong to ⟨1 + i⟩.

Question 17: Show that Z[i]/⟨1 − i⟩ is a field. How many elements does
this field have?
Solution: The elements of Z[i]/⟨1 − i⟩ are of the form a + ib + ⟨1 − i⟩.
Since i = 1, this can be reduced to k + ⟨1 − i⟩ where k ∈ Z.
Next, observe that:

(1 − i)(1 + i) = 2 ∈ ⟨1 − i⟩ =⇒ 2 ≡ 0 (mod ⟨1 − i⟩).

Thus, 2 ≡ 0 modulo ⟨1 − i⟩, implying that the only possible elements in the
factor ring are 0 + ⟨1 − i⟩ and 1 + ⟨1 − i⟩.
Therefore, the field Z[i]/⟨1 − i⟩ has exactly two elements: 0 + ⟨1 − i⟩ and
1 + ⟨1 − i⟩. Since there are no zero divisors, it is a field.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy