MV ACT Notes
MV ACT Notes
Need of MV Act
MV act is a central act that came into force from 1 July 1989. It replaced Motor
Vehicles Act, 1939 which earlier replaced the first such enactment MV act, 1914.
The Act was enacted to give effect to the suggestions made by Supreme Court in
MK Kunhii Mohammed v. PA Ahmedkutty 1987
the act was amended several times especially in 1994, 2000, 2015 and 2019
India is a signatory to Brasillia Declaration (Road Safety) and it has committed to
reduce the number of road accidents by 50 percent in 2020.
Features and Need of MV Act
Improve road safety: The Act aims to promote road safety by establishing a
framework for addressing accidents and enforcing traffic laws.
Regulate vehicles: The Act regulates the registration and licensing of vehicles,
as well as the maintenance and operation of vehicles.
Track down traffic offenders: The Act provides for stricter protocols for
granting driving licenses and more deterrent punishment for certain traffic
offenses.
Legislative Provisions
MV Act, 1988 1
1. Licensing of Drivers (s 3-28)
3. Insurance (s 145-164)
transport vehicle cannot be driven unless driving licence specifically entitles him
to do so.
Section 4- Age limit in connection with the driving of motor vehicles
MV Act, 1988 2
no person while having a DL hold any other DL except a LL or a DL issued under
section 18(DL for driving vehicles belonging to Central Gov).
no person holding a DL permit it to be used by any other person
Section 8 - Grant of LL
Application to licensing authority having jurisdiction in
applicant previously held a DL and period between date of expiry and date of
application does not exceed 5 years
MV Act, 1988 3
for transport vehicle minimum educational qualification as prescribed by central
govt and a Driving certificate by a school or establishment is required
If applicant fails test - reappear after 7 days
if fails after 3 appearances, not qualified to re-appear before 60 days of last test.
Test of competence to drive shall be carried out in the vehicle of the type to which
application refers.
classes of MV-
transport vehicle
road roller
motor vehicle of a specified description
Section 11 - Additions to DL
any person holding DL to drive any class can apply for any other class and section
9 would be followed to grant licence
Central govt may make rules for purpose of licensing and regulating by state
governments schools or establishments
the rules do licensing, granting renewal or revocation of licence of schools and
establishment
MV Act, 1988 4
LL issued valid for 6 months from the date of issue of the licence
on application made to renew DL would be done with effect from date of expiry
if past 30 days after date of expiry then from effect the date of its renewal
for renewal of transport vehicle DL and if applicant has attained 40 years then
medical cetificate is required and other provisions as they apply in learner’s
licence would be applied.
fee required for application
DL under this section would need to specify class or description of vehicle and
also time period
Cannot drive any other motor vehicle except a motor vehicle he is entitled to
MV Act, 1988 5
using motor vehicle in commission of cognizable offence
previous conduct shows he is danger to public
act that would cause nuisance or danger to the public as prescribed by central
govt
being a person under 18 years who was granted LL or a DL with consent in writing
of person having the care of the holder of the licence and has ceased to be in
care
when a person is convicted under this Act or any offence which motor vehicle was
used, the court may declare disqualification of driving licence to drive all classes
or description of vehicles, or any particular description as specified in such
licence
if acquitted court shall cancel the endorsement on such DL with regard to the
suspension thereof.
if committed offence under section 184 then the person is convicted then the
court can suspend DL for a period it may think fit
MV Act, 1988 6
if DL is suspended or cancelled then the court shall take the driving licence in its
custody, endorse the cancellation or, as the case may be suspension send DL so
endorsed to authority by which licence was issued or last renewed and on
receiving keep the licence in safe custody
MV Act, 1988 7
there would be fee for registration
(s 41).
certificate of registration with special registration mark would be given to
diplomatic officer or consular officer.
When a MV is registered in one state has been kept in another state for more than
12 months, the owner can apply to change the registration mark, NOC is required
or if noc not obtained then receipt obtained or postal acknowledgement received
by owner if he has sent an application (s 47)
MV Act, 1988 8
Within 14 days of transfer transferor to report the fact of transfer to the central
government in prescribed manner, for within the state. For outside the state it is
45 days along with NOC, if no NOC then receipt or postal acknowledgement
transferee within 30 days report the transfer to the registering auhtority where he
has residence or place of business where vehicle is normally kept
if transferor or transferee fails to report, action under 177 and fine of 100 rupee (s
50)
ownership of vehicle transferred and the transferee enters into said agreement,
central govt may prescribe parties to the said agreement, to make an entry as to
existence of the said agreement in the certificate of registration.
No transfer without the consent of the person whose name has been specified in
the certificate of registration
for renewal or issue of duplicate certificate or assignment of new registration
mark or NOC or change in residence or place of business or alteration of vehicle
shall apply to appropriate authority.
Within 7 days of receipt of an application, the financier may issue or refuse for
reasons which shall be recorded in writing and communicated to the applicant. (s
51)
no owner to alter the vehicle that makes variance with those originally specified
by manufacturer to that contained in certificate of registration.
central govt may prescribe specifications, conditions for approval, retrofitment
and other related matters for conversion kits
MV Act, 1988 9
no person holding a vehicle under hire-purchase agreement shall make any
alteration to vehicle except with the written consent of the registered owner. (s52)
if any vehicle in such a condition that its use in public place would constitute a
danger to the public, or it fails to comply with requirements of this Act, or used for
hire without valid permit, the authority may after giving the owner an opportunity
of making any representation suspend the certificate of registration of that vehicle
(a) until the defects are rectified to its satisfaction (b) for period not exceeding 4
months.
any authority other than registering authority when making suspension order
intimate in writing the fact of such suspension and the reasons therefore
when registration suspended for continuous period of not less than one month,
inform original registering authority.
MV Act, 1988 10
Insurance (145 - 153)
Definitions - s 145
Authorised insurer - insurer for the time being carrying on general insurance
business under the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972.
No person shall use or allow any other to use motor vehicle in a public place,
unless a policy of insurance complying within the requirements of this chapter.
Shall not apply to vehicle owned by central govt or state govt and used for govt
purposes unconnected with any commercial enterprise.
insures against any liability which may be incurred by him in respect of the
death of or bodily injury or damage to any property of a third party caused by
or arising out of the use of the vehicle in a public place, against the death of or
bodily injury to any passenger of a public service vehicle caused by or arising
out of the use of vehicle in public place.
MV Act, 1988 11
1. by employer in order to cover liability in respect of the death or in bodily injury,
arising out of his employee, out of and in course of employment,
policy shall be of no effect until issued by the insurer in favour of the person by
whom the policy is effected a certificate of insurance in the prescribed form and
containing the prescribed particulars.
where cover note issued by insurer made under provisions of this chapter or rules
is not followed by policy of insurance within prescribed time, the insurer shall,
within 7 days of expiry of the period of the validity of the cover note, notify the
fact to the registering authority.
insurer issuing policy of insurance is supposed indemnify the person or classes of
persons specified in policy in respect of any liability which the policy purports to
cover in the case of that person or classes of person.
Validity of policies of insurance issued in reciprocating countries - s 148
when vehicle operates on any route within any common area between India and
reciprocating country, a policy of insurance complying with the requirements of
the law of the insurance in force in that country, such policy of insurance shall be
effective throughout the route or area in respect of which, arrangement has been
made.
Duty of insurers to satisfy judgments and awards against persons insured in
respect of third party risks - s 149
the insurer shall subject to the provisions of this section, pay to the person entitled
to the benefit of the decree any sum not exceeding the sum assured payable in
respect of the liability, together with any amount payable in respect of costs and
any sum payable in respect of interest on that sum by virtue of any enactment
relating to interest on judgements.
No sum shall be payable by an insurer before the commencement of the
proceedings in which the judgement or award is given the insurer had notice
through the court or claims tribunal.
An insurer to whom notice of the bringing of any such proceedings is so given
shall be entitled to be made a party thereto and to defend the action on following
grounds
MV Act, 1988 12
that there has been breach of a specified condition of the policy
condition excluding use of vehicle , for hire or reward, when the vehicle on
date of contract is not covered by permit to ply for hire or reward, for
organised racing or speed testing, for purpose not allowed by permit
under which the vehicle is used.
that the policy is void on the ground that it was obtained by the non-disclosure
of a material fact or by a representation of fact which was false in some
material particular.
where any such judgement is obtained from a court in a reciprocating country and
in the case of a foreign judgment is, by virtue of Section 13 of CPC 1908
conclusive as to any matter adjudicated upon by it, the insurer shall be entitled to
benefit of the decree in the manner and to the extent, as if the judgment were
given by a court in India
if the amount which an insurer becomes liable under this section to pay in respect
of a liability incurred by a person insured by a policy exceeds the amount, the
insurer shall be entitled to recover the excess from that person.
no insurer shall be entitled to avoid his liability to any person entitled to the benefit
of any such judgment or award.
Rights of Third parties against insurers on insolvency of the insured -
s 150
A person is insured against liabilities which he may incur to third parties, then
in the event of the person becoming insolvent or making a composition or
arrangement with his creditors, or
where insured person is a company, in the event of winding up order being made
or a resolution for a voluntary winding up being passed
MV Act, 1988 13
either before or after the event, any such liability is incurred by the insured person,
his rights against the insurer under the contract in respect of the liability shall, be
transferred to and vest in the third party to whom the liability was so incurred.
Where an order for the administration of the estate of a deceased debtor is made
according to law of insolvency, then, if any debt provable in insolvency is owing
by the deceased in respect of a liability to a third party against which he was
insured under a contract of insurance, the deceased debtor’s rights against the
insurer in respect of that liability shall, be transferred to and vest in the person to
whom the debt is owing.
upon transfer the insurer shall be under the same liability to the third party as he
would have been to the insured person, but if liability of insurer exceeds the
liability of the insured person to the third party, nothing will affect the rights of the
insured person against the insurer in respect of the excess, if the liability of the
insurer to the insured person is less than the liability of the insured person to the
third party, nothing shall affect the rights of the third party against the insured in
respect of the balance.
Duty to give information as to insurance- s 151
no person against whom a claim is made in respect of any liability shall on
demand by or on behalf of the person making the claim refuse to state whether or
not he was insured in respect of that liability by any policy, or would have been
insured if the insurer had not avoided or cancelled the policy, nor shall he refuse,
if he was or would have been so insured, to give particulars with respect to that
policy as were specified in the certificate of insurance issued.
the duty to give information by this section shall include a duty to allow all
contracts of insurance, receipts for premiums, and other relevant documents in
the possession or power of the person on whom the duty is so imposed to be
inspected and copies thereof to be taken.
Settlement between insurers and insured persons - s 152
no settlement made by insurer in respect of any claim which might be made by a
third party in respect of any liability shall be valid unless the third party is a party
to the settlement.
where a person insured under a policy has become insolvent, or where such
insured person is a company, a winding up order has been made or resolution for
MV Act, 1988 14
a voluntary winding up has been passed with respect to the company, no
agreement made between insurer and insured person after the liability has been
incurred to a third party.
(better to rely on act for sections 150 - 153…complicated)
MV Act, 1988 15
person liable to pay compensation under section 140 is also liable to pay
compensation in accordance with the right on the principle of fault.
Permanent Disablement - s 142
permanent privation of the sight of either eye or the hearing of either ear, or
privation of any member or joint
Parukutty v. K.S.R.T.C
Where negligence of owner-cum-driver of autorickshaw was found to
be 70% who had died in accident. His
L.Rs. were claimants and could be
impleaded. Insurance Company could be made liable to pay compensation by
Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal on behalf of insured. Insurance Company was not
liable to pay 70% of compensation and Insurance Company was directed to
deposit the same.
if no penalty provided for offence then fine 100 rupees, if second or subsequent
offence with fine of 300 rupees.
s 178 - penalty for travelling without pass or ticket and for dereliction of duty on
the part of conductor and refusal to ply contract carriage
fine to extend to 500 rupees
conductor, if fails or refuses to accept the fare when tendered, fails or refuses to
supply a ticket, or supplies an invalid ticker, or supplies a ticket of lesser value, or
wilfully or negligently fails to check pass punishable with fine upto 500 rupees
if driver refuses to carry passengers
in case of 2 or 3 wheelers - 50 rupees
in any other case - 200 rupees
MV Act, 1988 16
S 179 - disobedience of orders, obstruction and refusal of information
disobeys, obstructs any person in discharge of his functions - 500 rupees
in contravention of the speed limits - 400 rupees and if again convicted, with fine
which may extent to 1k
whoever causes any person employed by him or subject to his control in driving
MV in contravention of speed limits - 300 rupees and if again convicted - 500
rupees
evidence to be obtained by use of some mechanical device solely one witness
wont be sufficient.
MV Act, 1988 17
for second or subsequent within 3 years - imprisonment for 2 years or fine 3k or
both.
whoever without written consent of state govt permits or takes part in race or trial
of speed in public place - imprisonment 6 months or finr 500 rupees or both
s 190 - Using vehicle in unsafe condition
any person who drives or causes or allows to be driven in any public place a MV
or trailer, which has defect- 250 rupees if it causes accident imprisonment 3
months - or fine which may extent to 1k rupees or both.
MV Act, 1988 18
first offence with fine upto 5k not less than 2k for second or subsequent offences
imprisonment upto 1 year but not less than 3 months or with fine which may
extend to 10k not less 5k.
S 193 - Punishment of agents and canvassers without proper authority-
whoever engages himself as an agent or canvasser in contravention of the
provisions of section 93, first offence 1k and for subsequent imprisonment upto 6
months, or fine upto 2k or both.
MV Act, 1988 19
when offence committed by a company, every person who at time the offence
was committed, was in charge of, or was responsible to, the company, for conduct
of business of company, as well as the company shall be deemed to be guilty of
contravention and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished
accordingly
s 200 - composition of certain offences
any offence committed before or after the commencement of this Act may either
before or after institution of the prosecution, be compounded by such officers or
authorities and for such amount as the State govt may, by notification in the
official gazette, specify in this behalf.
MV Act, 1988 20
no person shall drive a MV or cause or allow a MV to be driven in any public place
at a speed exceeding the maximum speed or below the minimum speech fixed for
a vehicle under this Act
state govt on behalf of central govt fix maximum speed limits or minimum speed
limits as it thinks fir for MVs or any specified class or description of MVs
s 113- Limits of weight and limitations on use
State govt may prescribe the conditions for issue of permits for transport vehicles
by state or regional transport authorities and may prohibit or restrict the use of
such vehicles in any area or route.
no personal shall driven or allow to be driven any MV which exceeds the unladen
weight specified in the certificate of registration.
s 114 - power to have vehicle weighed
traffic signs placed or erected shall be of size and colour and type as mentioned
in schedule and shall have meanings.
state govt may empower any police officer not below rank of SP to remove or
cause to remove any sign or advertisement which is so placed to obscure any
traffic sign
no person shall wilfully, alter, deface or in any way tamper, any traffic sings placed
or erected under this section
MV Act, 1988 21
s 117- Parking places and halting stations
State govt or authority authorised in behalf of state govt may, in consultation with
local authority, determine places at which MV may stand for specified time or
indefinitely, and may determine places at which public service vehicles may stop
for a longer time than is necessary for taking up and settling down of passengers
the driver of a motor vehicle shall make such signals and on such occasions as
may be prescribed the Central govt
s 122 - Leaving vehicle in dangerous position
No person in charge of motor vehicle shall cause or allow the vehicle or any trailer
to be abandoned or to remain at rest on any public place in such a position or in
such a condition or in such circumstances as to cause or likely to cause danger or
obstruction or undue inconvenience
s 123- riding on running board, etc
no person driving or in charge of a motor vehicle shall carry any person to be
carried on the running board or otherwise than within the body of vehicle, no
person shall travel on running board or on top or on the bonnet of a motor vehicle.
New India Ass. Co. Ltd. v. Samundri Roadways Co
MV Act, 1988 22
allowed to be carried by the conductor of a bus on the roof of the bus in violation
of the above-mentioned statutory provision and in contravention of the terms of
insurance policy, and such a person dies in an accident, the insurance company is
not liable to pay any compensation in respect of the same.
Where any motor vehicle is abandoned or left unattended, on a public place for 10
hours or more or is parked in a place where parking is legally prohibited, its
removal by a towing service or its immobilisations may be authorised by a police
officer in uniform having jurisdiction.
s 128- Safety measures for drivers and pillion riders - no driver of a 2 wheeled
motor cycle shall carry more than one person in addition to himself on motor cycle
and no such person shall be carried otherwise than sitting on a proper seat
securely fixed to the motor cycle with appropriate security measures.
s 129 - Wearing of protective headgear-
every person driving or riding shall while in public place, wear protective
headgear conforming to the standards of Bureau of Indian Standards, provision
shall not apply to a person who is sikh, if he is while driving or riding on MC
wearing turban
MV Act, 1988 23
s 130 - Duty to produce licence and certificate of registration
The driver of a MV in any public place , shall on demand by any police officer in
uniform, produce his licence for examination, provided he also gets a receipt if the
licence has been submitted
s 131- Duty of the Driver to take certain precautions at unguarded railway level
crossing
every driver of MV at the approach of any unguarded railway level crossing shall
cause the vehicle to stop and the driver of the vehicle shall cause the conductor
or cleaner or attendant or any other person to walk to the level crossing and
ensure no train or trolley is approaching
MV Act, 1988 24
insurance policy number and period of its validity
case laws
Insurer’s liability for third party risks-Liability for injury to certain person or
classes of persons
The Act policy covering only Third Party Risks as mentioned in
Section 95 (1939 Act) or section 147 (1988 Act) does not make the insurer liable
for the harm suffered by a passenger travelling in a private car, neither for hire nor
reward. Similarly, it also does not cover the injury to a pillion rider on a scooter. If
MV Act, 1988 25
the owner of the vehicle so likes, he may
take such a policy which covers risks not otherwise covered under the
provisions of the Act
In Subhash Chander v. State of Haryana, it has been held that risk to a gratuitous
passenger in a private car is not required to be covered by Section 95(l)(b) (1939
Act), and, therefore, if a gratuitous passenger travelling in a jeep dies, the
insurance company cannot be made liable for the same.
In Prabhu Dayal Agarwal v. Saraswati Bai, the insurer had issued a
comprehensive policy to the owner of a car, which stipulated that the insurer shall
indemnify the insurer in the event of an accident caused by or arising out of the
use of the motor car against all sums, including claimant’s cost and expenses,
which the insured shall become legally liable to pay in respect of death of, or
bodily injury to, any person. In this case a gratuitous passenger travelling in the
car was killed. In an action by the mother of the deceased, Saraswati Bai, it was
held that since the insurer had undertaken liability wide enough to cover such a
situation, he was liable for the same.
Driving without driving licence
In Champa Devi v. Ram Sarup, it has been held by the Punjab and Haryana High
Court that the claimant’s right to compensation would not be affected by the fact
that the driver was driving without a driving licence.
in National Insurance Co. v. Prem Narain Sahu it has been held that the insurer
cannot escape liability merely on the ground that the driver was driving without a
proper licence.
liability for damage to the property of third party
In Kishori v. Chairman, Tribal Services Coop. Society Ltd.,about 125 bags of
urea, belonging to the consignee, being carried in a goods vehicle, were
destroyed having fallen in a Naala. The question was whether the goods of the
consignee were of a third party, so as to make the insurer liable. The M.P. High
Court set aside its single Bench decision and followed the decision of the Madras
High Court in United India Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Janarthiram and held that the consignee
was not a third party and, therefore, the claims Tribunal had no jurisdiction to
entertain the claim.
MV Act, 1988 26
In Raj Chopra v. Sangara Singh, the claimant’s husband, Manohar Lal Chopra,
Project Officer, Haryana Tourism Corporation, who was travelling in a car, got
killed in an accident between his car and a truck. It was found that the accident
had occurred due to the negligence of the drivers of the car and the truck.
Regarding the matter relating to the liability of the insurance company with which
the car was insured, it was admitted that the owner of the car was Padma Rani,
whereas the insured thereof was Ghanshyam Dass Sharma. This being the
position, it was held that since the car was insured in the name of its owner, the
insurance company could not be made liable for the same. The liability in respect
of the negligence of the driver of the car, therefore, was held to be of the driver
and the owner of the car only.
MV Act, 1988 27