0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views20 pages

ATLAS H ZZ Polarization Fits

Uploaded by

Oliver Baker
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views20 pages

ATLAS H ZZ Polarization Fits

Uploaded by

Oliver Baker
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Quantum Entanglement in Higgs

Boson Decays to 4 Leptons:


Status-Overview
• OKB (Yale), Daniel Qenani (Yale), Kamal Benslama (LUM),
Christian Weber (BNL), Theodota Lagouri (UTA), Ryan Leong (Yale)
• 11-April-2022
• H/ASàZX/XX à 4l meeting

1
Overview
• Proposed Higgs boson decay to four leptons (electrons and muons)

𝐻 → 𝑍𝑍 ∗ → 4𝑙

Reminder - spin and parity assignments

0" → 1# + 1# → 4 × $%
make use of all final states:

2e2µ, 4e, 4µ
2
Possible states of vector bosons emitted in decay

L1 L2

R1 R2

Three possible polarization states for the two vector bosons:


right-handed longitudinal and left-handed longitudinal (60%; shown)
and transverse (40%; not shown)
3
Consider the case of RR and LL handedness

𝟏
𝝍= (𝑹𝟏 )(𝑹𝟐 ) + (𝑳𝟏 )(𝑳𝟐 )
𝟐

Ø Both vector bosons linearly polarized


Ø Two separately distinct possibilities
Ø This correlation used to test Bell’s Inequality
Ø Their total angular momentum sum to zero, as they must

4
in good agreement with refs. [26, 28]. The co
of the constant one and about four times lar
Vector boson polarizations in Thethe decayof of
presence the Standard
a large contribution proport
Model Higgs +- E Maina while the smaller term proportional to cos wen
PLB,
ribution of the invariant mass of the ` ` pairs. The curves 818,
on the 136360
right are (2021)
component accounts for about 60% of the parti
it integral. • Angular distribution of the positively
right• Invariant
components mass distribution
contribute 20%. of
charged lepton in the Z CoM.
the e+μ+ pairs. No lepton cut
applied

RR
RR LL
LL

2. Angular distribution of the positively charged lepton in 3. Invariant mass distribution of the e+ µ+
the Z CoM.
Figure
the right are normalized to unit integral.
Figure 3. Invariant mass distribution of the e µ pairs. No lepton cut is applie
the right are normalized to unit integral.

re 2.Vector boson
Angular polarizations
distribution in the charged lepton in the Z CoM.
of the positively
1.e-6
decay of the Standard Model
Higgs - E Maina PLB, 818, 136360
(2021)
! ZZ ! 4 ` channel
Azimuthal separation, 2 = 0.23, ↵ = 1
125.25 GeV, M = 91.19
in the Higgs center of
Z GeV, Z = 2.50 GeV, sin(✓ W ) 127 the
ecaymass
widthsystem,
with respect
betweento in H ! ZZ is
d e+ and 2μ+ for ZZ 2 2 2
= 4.216
events f
in + 1.376 (f
0the absence L + f R ) 7.8 ⇥ 10 f0 (fL + fR ) cos
d
of cuts. (3.1)
7 MeV
+0.688 fL fR cos(2 )) ⇥ 10 .
degree

0 = fL = fR = 1 it becomes
d MeV7
= (6.968 0.156 cos + 0.688 cos(2 )) ⇥ 10 , (3.2)
d degree
Figure 4. Azimuthal separation, in the Higgs center of mass system, 6between e+
events in the absence of cuts.
Z1 and Z2 angles in lab frame vs angles in
Higgs COM frame
Z1: theta
Z2: thetavs theta0
vs theta0 Z2: theta vsvstheta
Z2: theta theta0 0
theta-Z2

theta-Z2
theta-Z1

theta-Z2
25 25

20 20

15 15

10 10

5 5

0 0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
theta-Z2-0 theta-Z2-0
theta-Z10 theta-Z2
7 0
Current Analysis Method: examples
Use Monte Carlo mc16_13TeV.345060.PowhegPythia8EvtGen_NNLOPS_nnlo_30_ggH125_ZZ4l.root

root [1] ((TTreePlayer*)(tree_incl_all->GetPlayer()))->SetScanFileName("Z1x.txt"); tree_incl_all-


>Scan("event", "(abs(m4l_fsr -125.25)<0.8) & (abs(mZ1_fsr-91.19)<0.8) & (abs(mZ2_fsr-
30.06)<0.8)&lepton_id[0]!=lepton_id[2]")

root [1] ((TTreePlayer*)(tree_incl_all->GetPlayer()))->SetScanFileName("Z1x.txt"); tree_incl_all-


>Scan("6.968*1.e-7 - (0.156*cos((lepton_phi[0]-lepton_phi[2])%3.1415928)*1.e-6)+
(0.688*(cos(2.*((lepton_phi[0]-lepton_phi[2])%3.1415928))))*1.e-6", "(abs(m4l_fsr -125.25)<0.8) &
(abs(mZ1_fsr-91.19)<0.8) & (abs(mZ2_fsr-30.06)<0.8)&lepton_id[0]!=lepton_id[2]")

root [1] ((TTreePlayer*)(tree_incl_all->GetPlayer()))->SetScanFileName("Z1x.txt"); tree_incl_all-


>Scan("lepton_phi[2]*180./3.1415928", "(abs(m4l_fsr -125.25)<0.8) & (abs(mZ1_fsr-91.19)<0.8) &
(abs(mZ2_fsr-30.06)<0.8)&lepton_id[0]!=lepton_id[2]")

root [1] ((TTreePlayer*)(tree_incl_all->GetPlayer()))->SetScanFileName("Z1x.txt"); tree_incl_all-


>Scan("2.*(TMath::ATan(pow(2.7182818,-lepton_eta[2]))*180./3.1415928)", "(abs(m4l_fsr -125.25)<1) &
(abs(mZ1_fsr-91.19)<1.) & (abs(mZ2_fsr-30.06)<1.)") 8
2419613 -1.130423 144.20981 56.095771 125.07685 91.752288 29.882614 3.11861E-07

Current Analysis Results: examples

Event dG/dDf 0.688cos2Df 0.156cos(Df) lep-id[0] lep-id[2]. Df(lep[0]-[2]) Df{lep[2]-[0])


2004531 2.924e-7 -4.66e-7. --6.25e-8 0 10 66.365 113.635
2419613 3.119e-7 -3.02e-7 -8.25e-8 10 0 121.970 58.030
2111150 2.946e-7 -3.21e-7 8.05e-8 0 10 121.064 58.936
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

9
ormalized to unit integral.

1e-6 HàZZ nocuts

MC Data
cut-1
cut-2

10

muthal separation, in the Higgs center of mass system, between e+ an


HàZZ*à4l MC analysis A. Aspect results
E

0.5

−0.5

−1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
θ (deg)
11
Summary
• Testing Bell’s Inequality with Higgs decays
• Polarization analysis initial results
• Bell’s inequality initial results
• Applications (future presentation)

• Application
• H -à Z*Zd--> 4l for Z1-mass = Z2-mass (60.0-65.0 GeV)
• H à Za
• Di-Higgs à 8 leptons?
•...
12
Backup

13
MC16
mZ2_fsr
htemp
Entries 736605

mZ1 and mZ2 104


Mean
Std Dev
28.42
9.543

overlap region
103

102
combined
mass 10

119 < m < 131 1


GeV 0 20 40 60 80 100
mZ2_fsr overlap mZ1_fsr
14
Run2 actual collision data
m4l_fsr
Higgs boson mass Entries
htemp
5556
Mean 181.2
region excluded Std Dev 38
3
10

signal region excluded 102

“blind analysis”
10

60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 15


m4l_fsr
Alain Aspect experiment for comparison

Atomic physics

16
sa m e. Th er efor e, t h ey m u st h a ve t h e sa m e pola r iza t ion : bot h r igh t - or bot h
left -cir cu la r ly pola r ized (F igu r e 6-2).
E it h er will do. Of cr it ica l im por t a n ce for ou r con sider a t ion s is t h e degen -
er a cy of t h e in t er m edia t e p -st a t e. Th is st a t e h a s t h r ee su blevels, wh ich a r e

Energy levels in Calcium showing states used


t h e pr oject ion s of J on t o it s qu a n t iza t ion a xis, u su a lly la beled by m = 1,0, -1.
Beca u se t h ese t h r ee st a t es a r e degen er a t e, we h a ve t h e a m bigu it y n eeded for
in production of entangled pairs of photons
t h e cr ea t ion of a n en t a n glem en t bet ween t h e t wo possibilit ies dia gr a m m ed

-J =0

651 n m

J =l m = 1 or -1
423 n m

-J =0

17

F igu r e 6-1 E n er gy Level Dia gr a m of Ca lciu m sh owin g t h e st a t es u sed in t h e pr o-


du ct ion of en t a n gled pa ir s of ph ot on s.
Aspect paper

18
Th e t wo deca y pa t h s per t in en t for ou r pu r poses pa ss t h r ou gh eit h er m = 1
or m = -1 on t h e wa y t o t h e J = 0 gr ou n d st a t e. Th ey a r e illu st r a t ed in
F igu r e 6-3a . In on e ca se, t h e t wo em it t ed ph ot on s a r e bot h r igh t -cir cu la r ly

.7=0

P h ot on 1
m =^ -l m =0
J =l a)

P h ot on 2

J =0

Sin gle P h ot on Sou r ce

decay can pass through either of the two


intermediate J= 1 states, as illustrated. b)
Slit 1 Slit 2

Det ect in g
Taken from The Quantum Challenge, Greenstein and Zajonc, JonesScr
and Bartlett Publishers (2006)19
een

F igu r e 6-3 P r odu ct ion of a n E n t a n gled St a t e in t h e t wo-ph ot on deca y of ca lciu m .


Th e deca y ca n pa ss t h r ou gh eit h er of t h e t wo in t er m edia t e c7= 1 st a t es, a s illu st r a t ed
in (a ). N ot e t h e st r on g sim ila r it y bet ween t h is a n d t h e cla ssic t wo-slit in t er fer en ce
See also papers by Barbara hiesmayer!

20

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy