Digital divide
Digital divide
Society
ABSTRACT
As time progresses, information and communication technologies (ICT) are
becoming increasingly essential to the functioning of any society. The social
changes brought about by digitization and the growing importance of ICT in social
interactions highlight the need to explore digital divides to better understand social
inequalities in the digital era. India, with its diverse population, exemplifies this
issue. In developing countries, the "digital gap" poses a significant challenge,
especially during the "Covid-19" period. Students from lower-income families have
limited access to technology both in and out of the classroom. This disparity arises
because some students have access to modern computers, mobile phones, reliable
internet connections, digital content, and technical skills, while others do not. Digital
education is generally beneficial for India's student population, as it allows them to
access course materials at any time. Students can learn from highly qualified
instructors through online classes at their convenience. Fully online education is
widely seen as the future of education globally, including in India. The percentage of
the population with internet access is linked to a nation's socioeconomic
development. Consequently, the digital gap hinders a country's socioeconomic
progress. In rural India, information poverty is prevalent due to the lack of access to
digital technology. Children from socially disadvantaged groups face the risk of
being unable to complete their education or, worse, dropping out entirely due to
insufficient access to ICT. This paper aims to investigate the digital divide and its
impact on India's educational system. The findings suggest that students' ease of
using technology is related to their socioeconomic status and academic
performance. The digital divide threatens to widen the gap between affluent and
poor students.
Keywords: Digital Divide, Education, Social Disparity, Information Technology, new
digital inequalities.
Introduction:
The “Digital Divide” is defined as the gap between the students (School, College,
Universities) who have access to digital technology and those who do not. ere
“Information Technology” refers to the use of computer, internet and Smart Phone.
“Social Disparity” refers to disparity of Social and Economic status.
Digital technologies have played a pivotal role in the social changes that have
occurred since the 1990s, shaping what is known as the Information and Knowledge
Society. Changes in various social subsystems have produced new inequalities that
are intertwined with traditional inequalities [2,3]. Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs) have led to an intense process of internet mediation in all social
relationships [4] with ICT-related skills becoming a necessity due to their extensive
use in daily life [5], especially among young populations [6]. However, the reach of
ICTs has significantly diverged among individuals and territories, with structural
sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors influencing this divergence [7]. The
concept used to refer to these inequalities is the digital divide [8]. While the idea of
a technological gap is older [9], the concept of the digital divide emerged in the
1990s, identifying a significant disparity in access to ICTs between rural and urban
areas in the United States [10].
Schools and other educational facilities in various countries have been shut down
because of the fast spread of Covid-19. India is one of these nations. Since the
problem occurs in the context of school education, it is crucial to be mindful of the
impact that COVID-19 will have on children who lack access to digital technology. In
the context of online education the digital divide has magnified and perpetuated
existing inequalities in the education system and in the society.
Social Implications of Digital Divide.
The digital divide can impact individuals, communities, and entire societies. The
concept of a knowledge society highlights the role of human capital in
differentiating societies based on their level of expertise. Sociologists argue that the
digital divide stems from structural social and economic inequalities rather than
being a technical issue. Therefore, the digital gap is fundamentally a social problem.
"Equality of condition" is absent because not all groups have equal access to
information resources. The technocratic-meritocratic perspective is reinforced by
the ease of accessing and sharing knowledge. This viewpoint suggests that success
is largely dependent on one's access to relevant information and opportunities to
demonstrate their abilities (Dr. Manzoor Hussain, Feb 2014).
According to the World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database by the
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), only 43% of India's population has
internet access. The IAMAI-Kantar Report ICUBE 2020 indicates that only 42% of
Indian women use the internet, compared to 58% of Indian men. The National
Family Health Survey (NFHS) for 2019–21 shows an even more significant gender
gap in digital inclusion. Only 33.3% of women have accessed the internet, while
57.1% of men have. Figure 1 illustrates that this gender gap is prevalent across the
nation.
Source: Data from NFHS 2019-21
The NFHS also offers information separated by urban and rural areas. While 72.5%
of urban men and 51.8% of urban women have used the internet before, just 48.7%
of rural men and 24.6% of rural women meet these criteria. As can be seen in
Figures 2 and 3, the largest percentages are held by urban men throughout all
states, while rural females hold the lowest percentages. (Blackwell, 2015)
Reference:
1. Maria T. Corkin, Kane Meissel, Elizabeth R. Peterson, Kerry Lee, Nasser Giacaman,
Stéphane Janicot, Susan M.B. Morton, Are distinct modes of using digital
technologies evident by age eight? Implications for digital divides., Computers &
Education, Volume 191,2022,
2. Castells, M. La Era de la Información: Economía, Sociedad y Cultura, Volumen 1,
6th ed.; Siglo XXI editores: Mexico City, Mexico, 2005.
3. Kruger, K. El concepto de sociedad del conocimiento. Rev. Bibliográfica de Geogr.
y Cienc. Soc. 2006, 11, 1–14.
4. Castells, M. Redes de Indignación y Esperanza, 2nd ed.; Alianza editorial: Madrid,
Spain, 2015.
5. Livingstone, S.; Blum-Ross, A. Parenting for a Digital Future: How Hopes and Fears
about Technology Shape Children’s Lives, 1st ed.;
Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2020. [CrossRef]
6. Lemus, M. Jóvenes frente al mundo: Las tecnologías digitales como soporte de la
vida cotidiana. Rev. Latinoam. Cienc. Soc. Niñez
Juv. 2017, 15, 161–172. Available online:
https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.7732/pr.7732.pdf (accessed
on
16 November 2023).
7. Norris, P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet
Worldwide; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,
MA, USA, 2001.
8. van Dijk, J. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society, 1st ed.;
SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2005.
[CrossRef]
9. Warschauer, M. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, 1st
ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
[CrossRef]
10. DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.; Celeste, C.; Shafer, S. From Unequal Access to
Differentiated Use: A Literature Review and Agenda
for Research on Digital Inequality. Soc. Inequal. 2004, 1, 355–400. Available online:
https://www.webuse.org/pdf/DiMaggioEtAlDigitalInequality2004.pdf (accessed on 16
November 2023).
11. van Deursen, A.; van Dijk, J. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New
Media Soc. 2014, 16, 507–526. [CrossRef]
12. Ragnedda, M. The Digital Divide. The Internet and Social Inequality in
International Perspective, 1st ed.; Routledge: Abingdon,
UK, 2013.
13. Digital Divide In India’s Education: A Sociological Study by Dr. Ajay Kumar
Ranjan, Assistant Professor, Vol. 13 Issue 05 May- 2023