Yhbb 6 Ub
Yhbb 6 Ub
Jeffrey Carrus
Second Grade Teacher
Barrington Place Elementary School
Abstract
This action research project investigated instructional methods used for teaching vocabulary to
nineteen second grade students. Explicit vocabulary instruction accompanied with student
created definitions and visualizations were used to teach vocabulary to twelve female and seven
male students, including six ESL and one autistic child. Instruction was given for six words per
story and pre and post test data was collected for four stories. Findings proved that students
learned and internalized newly acquired vocabulary when they were given explicit instruction
and created personal visualizations. Student comprehension of words was evident in post test
data, tracking of vocabulary usage, and visualizations created by students.
Background/Context
relevant to the life or interests of the researcher. A main focus in schools has always been
improving reading scores of students. Vocabulary development is crucial to help attain this
reading progress. This research project focuses on how to explicitly teach vocabulary to students.
It also brings to light the importance of how meaningful visualizations can create personal
connections in students’ minds. These two practices can significantly impact student
Students can then apply this new vocabulary into their everyday lives which will help
them grow as learners and as members of society. Improving vocabulary will also improve
students’ test scores and comprehension since they will have more background knowledge and
The research question of this study is to explore how explicit vocabulary instruction and
creating visualizations of new vocabulary terms will impact student comprehension and
1
achievement in reading. The student population to be observed is a class of nineteen second
grade students. In this class, there are twelve females and seven males. Six students are classified
as ESL and one student is autistic. The students will be observed during regular reading
This topic is very meaningful to the researcher because of the lack of vocabulary
observed in students over the years. Students need to have exposure to new vocabulary in order
to develop as readers and speakers in their lives. It is important that teachers find meaningful
ways to teach vocabulary so that these new words become familiar and relevant to students.
Otherwise, they will not be retained and applied into their normal conversations. The researcher
wanted to study the impact that can be made when teaching vocabulary explicitly to students in a
significant manner.
Reading instruction is essential to teach students the skills they will need to apply to all
other subjects as well as their every day lives. Wanzek, Vaughn, Ae-Hwa, and Cavanaugh (2006)
suggested that there may also be benefits to experiencing success in reading, such as improved
self esteem, positive self concept, appropriate social skills, and overall social competence.
Students need to develop a strong foundation in reading to experience success throughout their
educational careers. Teachers need to ensure that their reading instruction includes phonemic and
phonics building, vocabulary building, and fluency practice to lead to the overall goal of reading
comprehension. This research project shows how meaningful vocabulary development correlates
with reading improvement. By providing students with explicit initial vocabulary instruction,
giving them meaningful examples and non examples, and by facilitating them to visualize a
2
personal definition of their new vocabulary words; teachers can foster vocabulary growth in their
students.
In Free Reading (Krashen, 2006), a strategy for building children’s reading skills through
vocabulary development is suggested. The researcher found that students who read for pleasure
do much better than their peers who are forced to silent read for periods of time. Student’s test
scores were tracked by this researcher and he found the prior statement to be true in eight out of
ten cases. He found that students must develop a love for reading. In connection with his work,
this project discusses the importance of helping students develop a love for using new words and
Otaiba, Kosanovich-Grek, Torgesen , Hassler, and Wahl (2005) found that many of the
core reading programs used in schools are evaluated using a rating scale. The main aspects of
reading such as phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension are all
looked at in each program. Vocabulary development is one of the key aspects looked at in
making this rating. They found that vocabulary development needs to be explicit and meaningful
to children’s lives in order to be successful in the classroom. Reading programs that had a strong
vocabulary component incorporated into the other four aspects yielded more educational gains in
Rupley (2005) states the importance of students’ vocabulary acquisition early in their
education (before third grade). Students’ comprehension scores were tested and it was confirmed
that vocabulary development played a major role in improving scores. Reading comprehension is
influenced in many ways by vocabulary knowledge or lack thereof. Teachers can assess students’
vocabulary knowledge and plan intervention accordingly if needed. Students need opportunities
to develop their vocabulary through experience, explicit instruction, and social interactions. This
3
study by Rupley (2005) fits perfectly with this particular action research described in this paper.
Vocabulary development helped raise student’s comprehension scores and enhance student
writing in the classroom observed. This research project focuses on specific vocabulary
instruction to achieve these same goals with this second grade population.
learners. Explicit instruction is one of the proven instructional methods that lead to student
success in vocabulary. This research study will use explicit instruction accompanied with
visualizations and other various instructional methods mentioned within to ensure that children
are provided with the strong vocabulary foundation they need to thrive in their reading. The goal
of this project is to use effective teaching strategies while allowing students to grow a love for
Methodology
Participants
Nineteen second grade students, 12 female and 7 male, participated in our action
research. The children’s reading levels spanned from a first grade level (DRA 12) to a second
grade level (DRA 24). Six of the children in the study were ESL students and one child is
classified as autistic. Three of the children in the class had previously been retained because of
their reading levels, which where at a DRA 12. Five of the students in the class (including the
three previously mentioned) had reading levels of 12, which usually coincides with beginning
first grade readers. Most second graders should enter second grade with a reading level (DRA
level) of 18.
Materials
Some of the vocabulary instruction in this study comes from the Scholastic Text Talk
teacher’s guide (2005). This book provided an assortment of children’s books to be used for this
4
project as well as the vocabulary to be focused on. Various books were used in the study such as,
Ruby the Copy Cat, Amelia’s Road, Mole’s Hill, Alexander and the Wind-Up Mouse, and Strega
Nona. A vocabulary pocket chart with laminated sentence strips was needed to post the
Procedures
Students will participate in explicit vocabulary instruction on a daily basis. They will be
exposed to this explicit instruction on 6 new words for each story we read. Teacher observations
and whole group student discussions will be an indicator of student progress. Students will have
a vocabulary pre-test at the beginning of each week (Day One) and a post-test (Appendix A) at
the end of each week (Day Five) to see if they have a deep understanding of the words. Students
will also be asked to visualize the words and create a representation of what the word means to
them in their vocabulary notebooks throughout the week. This representation will be used to see
if they have created meaning of the new words and this will be tested on each post-test.
On Days three and four, students will develop a deep understanding of three words per
day. The teacher will have the students repeat these words as they look at the spelling.
Repetition and focused attention on the spelling of the words will help them internalize the
concepts. The teacher uses examples of each word to allow students to apply the word into
different contexts. The teacher uses non-examples of each word to reveal to students situations
in which the word would not apply to the context. The words are posted on the wall and left up
for two weeks so students can refer to the chart to use these new words in their writing and
speaking while also noting their use in books they may be reading.
On Day five, students will be given more examples and non-examples of each word to
deepen their understanding of them. Students will also give their own examples and usage of the
words to add meaning to their visualizations (Appendix F). On Day six, students will take their
5
post test (Appendix A). On Days 7-9, students will try to find classroom situations to apply and
use the new words. The class will keep a tally of every time they use one of the words in the
correct context or see it in literature. The teacher will encourage the use of these words
throughout the year and cite some examples of students’ usage in the documentation. On Day
Ten, the students will celebrate the word with the most tallies by sharing their personal
Table 1
Day One Day Two Day Three Day Four Day Five
Students will Words will be Words will be Words will be Students will
take post test written on written on written on celebrate the
small chart and small chart and small chart and “word winner”
each time one is each time one is each time one is or word with
used in writing used in writing used in writing most tallies by
or speaking; it or speaking; it or speaking; it acting it out
will be tallied will be tallied will be tallied together.
on chart. on chart on chart.
6
Data Sources
Several instruments were used to measure the results of this project. All of the data will
be collected to see if explicit instruction and visualizations can lead to students having a
meaningful connection to these words. This allows them to recall them and apply them.
First, student DRA2 scores will be used for formal assessment purposes. The DRA2 is a
formal reading assessment used in the district. It tests student’s oral reading and comprehension.
Secondly, pre and post tests were created by the teacher/researcher on a lesson to lesson
basis to analyze student learning of each set of words. These tests contained true/false questions
and inference type questions as well as a section where students were asked to create a
Another data source was a vocabulary tracking sheet that was posted in the front of the
room to mark every time one of the words was used. The teacher took note of the student usage
Finally, the teacher will give visualization quizzes on a weekly basis. These will consist
of students drawing their sketch and adding words or a sentence to explain the meaning of
various words.
Data Analysis
The researcher will mainly use the pre and post tests for data analysis. The scores will be
charted and analyzed to see if the vocabulary instruction helps them learn the intended words for
each lesson. The mean scores of these quizzes will be presented in graph form to determine the
effectiveness of the teaching strategies. Student DRA2 scores will also be presented in this graph
7
form. DRA scores will be looked at to see if this vocabulary development has a positive impact
on increasing scores.
Another tool that will be used to gather information will be the students’ vocabulary
visualizations. The teacher will look at each student’s work individually to see if they drew a
picture that connected to the meaning of the word and if they added their own words to show that
they had a personal understanding. If the students drew a meaningful and correct illustration for
each word and explained their drawing in their own words, then they will receive full credit.
These papers will allow the researcher to determine whether or not students can create their own
Student writing samples will also be evaluated to conclude if students are applying these
new words to their everyday writing assignments without being prompted to do so. The teacher
will observe the students’ normal writing activities and assignments to determine if students
All parents will be notified of the goal of this instruction so they can be aware of how the
students use these new words outside of school. Parents can help reinforce the usage of these
vocabulary words by praising students for using new and challenging words. No permission is
required for this research and all materials will be gathered and supplied by the administering
teacher.
Analysis/Findings
Pre and Post test findings
This chart shows the students’ scores over four different vocabulary units. The pretests
were issued before students began work with the words and the posttests followed the
8
Mean Pre and Post Test Scores
120
97 95 97 96
100
80
60 45 46 46
43
40
20
0
Pre 1 Post 1 Pre 2 Post 2 Pre 3 Post 3 Pre 4 Post 4
Mean Student Scores
Student scores doubled from every pre test to post test. Before explicit instruction,
students scored less than fifty percent on every pre test. In contrast, students scored over ninety
percent on all of the post tests. Students improved in all three areas of the test including their
visualizations and descriptions, true/false, and multiple choice questions. On the pretest students
were weakest in the area of drawing visualizations because they did not have a fifty-fifty chance
of getting the question correct, as in the other categories of test items. After instruction, students
Student Visualizations
This graph (Appendix F) shows how students scored when they were asked to draw
visualizations for the given words from the vocabulary instructional unit. The before score stands
for their mean scores before they received explicit vocabulary instruction with the words, while
the after score shows the mean score following this instruction.
9
100 92
90
80
70
60
50
40
30 23
20
10
0
Before After
When students were asked to draw visualizations of some of the vocabulary words (found
in Appendix C) before the project began, they only scored twenty-three percent. However, after
the project they could draw correct visualizations for these same words ninety-two percent of the
time. Student visualizations improved drastically because students could now draw on their
classroom experiences and personal connections with the words to guide them in their drawings.
DRA2
The student DRA2 scores are shown in this graph below. The first administration of the
DRA came before the research project began. The second administration fell in the middle of this
research project and the third administration of the DRA came after the conclusion of this
project.
10
Average DRA Scores
35
29
30
25 22
20
16
15
10
5
0
DRA 1st DRA 2nd DRA 3rd
The DRA is administered three times a year in second grade. The average DRA score of
the students entering second grade was below grade level prior to this study. After the third
administration, the researcher found that the average DRA score was right on grade level (28) for
students entering third grade while five students scored above grade level. This progress shows
the impact of the vocabulary instruction on the students’ overall comprehension scores.
The graph below shows how many times the students in the classroom used or found the
11
Student Word Usage
90 82 85
76
80 70
70
Times Used
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1st Week 2nd Week 3rd Week 4th Week
Word Lists
Figure 4. Student word usage (relating with pre and post tests).
The teacher tracked how many times the new words were used by students in the two
week period for each set of words. There is no data for how many times the students used these
words prior to instruction because students did not know these words well enough to apply them
in conversation. Therefore, the words were either not used at all or used very seldom in the
correct contexts. After instruction, students used the new words an average of 78 to 79 times in
these four vocabulary units. The teacher used the Word Winner chart (Appendix D, bottom) to
count how many times the class used the new words in writing, speaking, or found them in their
reading. Before this vocabulary instruction, students rarely used these words because they had
One student announced to the teacher that they would take the new vocabulary home with
them and share the words with their family since they did not know much English. This
comment made the researcher realize how important vocabulary is to our lives. Some of the
words learned can be applied to student conversations and schoolwork on a daily basis. The list
of words explicitly taught to students over the course of the year can be found in Appendix C.
12
The teacher also noticed that the students would apply these new words across the
curriculum. For example, when the class learned about weather the students used the new
vocabulary words, damp and drafty to describe the outside conditions. When the students
learned about animals; they stated that certain animals must adapt when the weather changes.
There were numerous examples of students applying their new vocabulary in the classroom as
well as many examples out of the classroom. Students’ writing improved greatly because of
their application of these new vocabulary words (Appendix E). Students in the cafeteria stated
that their lunch was scrumptious. One of the parents called the teacher and commented that their
child told them they were anticipating coming back to school on Monday. These specific
examples show that the students not only learned the words but they internalized them and made
Discussion
The researcher can clearly determine that this vocabulary instruction has increased the
scores on the post tests. Students were unfamiliar with the majority of the vocabulary words
before instruction. After instruction, students performed significantly higher on the test. In all of
the testing scenarios, students’ scores have increased by more than fifty percent. Students have
also increased their usage of the words in the classroom. Students used these new words less
than one percent of the time before explicit teaching and exposure to them. The researcher
charted the usage of the new words on a weekly basis and concluded that, after instruction, the
classroom students used an average of 78 to 79 times per two week period as discussed in the
procedures.
visualizations for the vocabulary causes students to internalize the meaning of new vocabulary.
13
This, in turn, leads to students implementing the new vocabulary in their everyday conversations
as well as in their daily writing. An increase in students’ DRA scores may be correlated with
students’ increased vocabulary knowledge from the instruction in this study. One limitation to
this study was that DRA scores are affected by many other classroom practices, which is why the
researcher can’t specifically link the increase in scores to this vocabulary instruction. However,
students’ vocabulary improvement likely contributes to their increases in the DRA scores.
Hassler and Wahl (2005), who found that the five aspects of reading; phonics, phonemic
awareness, fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary all play a crucial role in reading
development. Vocabulary is just one of the factors that need to be addressed in order to have
meaningful reading instruction. Another limitation of this study was that there was no
comparison group. In future studies concerning this topic, a comparison group of students who
do not receive this instruction, would be beneficial for statistical comparison. This would allow
researchers to determine how beneficial this vocabulary instruction is compared to not having it
at all.
was also proven by this study. Students in this study saw their comprehension scores increase as
well as their recognition and application of new vocabulary in different contexts. Vocabulary
knowledge helps students improve academically and feel more confident as learners because
vocabulary knowledge gives them more word choice when they are trying to express themselves.
Students in this class were enthusiastic about learning new vocabulary words and they
were determined to implement their new vocabulary in their everyday lives. Students were able
to apply the newly learned vocabulary words in their everyday lives as evident by the statements
14
made by students and parents regarding this project. Students made significant gains in
vocabulary shown by all of the data sources. Students’ understanding and comprehension of the
words increased as did their usage of the words. The researcher feels that by adding some of
these new words to their everyday conversations, students have been given new ways to describe
Reflections/Action Plan
elementary classroom. The action research pretests clearly showed a lack of student vocabulary
explicit instruction. The researcher will continue to teach vocabulary as described in the
methodology section. Students took pride in speaking and writing with more intelligent words
and knowledge and confidence are two key elements that will lead students down a successful
path. All students, ESL and special needs students included, benefited from explicit instruction
and visualizations. These teaching strategies were successfully applied to vocabulary instruction.
The challenge that lies ahead is incorporating these teaching methods into all curriculum areas.
References
Al Otaiba, S., Kosanovich-Grek, M. L., Torgesen , J. K., Hassler, L., & Wahl, M.
(2005,October). Reviewing core kindergarten and first grade reading programs in light of
no child left behind: An exploratory study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(4), 377-400.
Krashen, S. (2006, September). Free reading. School Library Journal, 52(9), 42-45.
Rupley, W. H. (2005, July). Vocabulary knowledge: Its contribution to reading growth and
15
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Ae-Hwa, K., & Cavanaugh, C. (2006, April-June). The effects of
Circle One
One who moves rocks all day or one who watched movies all day
A farmer discovering oil on his land or a farmer finding his crops he planted
16
Elephants or turkeys
4) Which is permanent?
True or False
True or False
8) It would be accidental if you didn’t mean to, but knocked a vase off the table?
True or False
True or False
True or False
True or False
True or False
17
14) Draw a visualization of the word labored.
18
13 44 100 44 100 28 100 39 100
14 39 100 44 94 50 100 61 100
15 44 94 33 89 50 94 44 100
16 50 100 33 94 44 94 67 100
17 44 100 50 100 56 100 28 89
18 56 100 44 94 50 100 61 94
19 33 89 44 100 28 94 28 94
Student Pretest 1 Postest 1 Pre 2 Post 2 Pre 3 Post 3 Pre 4 Post 4
Average 45.15789 97.31579 46.10526 94.89474 42.89474 97.21053 45.94737 96
19
Lesson 6: basking, dazzling, gazing, instead, anticipation, exhausted
Appendix D - Vocabulary Chart on Wall and Vocabulary usage Tracking Chart (Word
Winner portion)
20
Appendix E – Student Writing Samples from Morning Work
Student 1 (Words used: eavesdrop, suspicious, cautiously, assortment, scrumptious)
21
Student 2 (Words used: envy, assortment, scrumptious, privilege, abundance,
contributed)
22
23
Appendix F – Student Visualization (Quiz and Journal)
24
25
26
27