Sample Problems 3.3 Irrigation Effieciencies
Sample Problems 3.3 Irrigation Effieciencies
b. Alfalfa
1m 10000m
2
Vused (1.0ha)(15cm) 1500m 3
100cm ha
60 min 1m
3
Vadded (70 furrow)(27lit / min/ furrow)(24hours) 2722m 3
hr 1000lit
1500
E a 100 55.1%
2722
c. Alfalfa
480 1500
E a 100 57.7%
711 2722
EXAMPLE 3.5 Overall Irrigation Efficiency for the Farm irrigation System in Examples 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4
Given:
Er, Ec and Ea, values from Examples 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4
Required:
Et, for farm
Solution:
90.5 90.0 57.7
Et (100) 47.0%
100 100 100
Thus, 47.0 percent of the water delivered to the reservoir is beneficially used by the crop.
EXAMPLE 3.6
Calculation of Irrigation Demand at the Field
For a 1 ha field of maize in a large field on heavy soils irrigated by furrow irrigation:
depth of water needed to fill the root zone = 75 mm;
application efficiency = 0.70;
distribution efficiency = 0.6;
Total depth of application = 75/0.70 = 107 mm;
Flow required to irrigate 1 ha in 1 day = 107 × 0.1157a = 12.4 l/s;
Requirement at tertiary unit intake = 12.4/0.6 = 20.63 l/s.
aNote: An irrigation depth of 1 mm applied in 1 day (24 h) = 0.1157 l/s/ha.
Sample problems
1. 6500 lit/min is diverted from a stream to irrigate a 25-ha hay field. It takes a week to irrigate the entire field. The readily
available water holding capacity of the soil for hay is 15 cm. Estimate the overall irrigation efficiency.
2. A 0.5-ha portion of a corn field is irrigated once a week with a sprinkle irrigation system for 12 hours. Water is applied at a
rate of 1000 lit/min. There is no runoff. The readily available water holding capacity of the soil for corn is 10 cm. Determine
the overall irrigation efficiency.
3. In order to evaluate irrigation system performance, an irrigator used a neutron probe to measure the water content of the
soil before and after irrigation. Sampling sites were located in a 100-m-square grid throughout the field. The data in the
following table are the average water contents of the top 100 cm of soil in percent by volume. The water content when the
soil is at field capacity is 30 percent by volume.
Soil water content before irrigation
14.3 16.1 15.2 13.3 14.8 15.5
15.2 15.4 13.6 15.8 14.3 15.5
16.2 14.9 15.4 13.8 14.5 15.0
12.9 14.2 15.0 16.4 17.1 16.2
14.9 15.3 14.8 15.9 14.2 15.3
Soil water content after irrigation
30.2 29.8 31.5 32.0 31.5 29.8
30.5 30.4 31.2 31.6 31.8 32.1
29.4 28.5 31.0 31.2 29.9 30.5
30.6 31.2 31.5 30.1 29.5 30.8
31.0 31.4 30.6 29.8 32.5 32.0
Determine:
a) the uniformity of application,
b) the distribution uniformity, and
c) the storage efficiency.
Principal Data Needed for Farm Irrigation System Design
Data Specific Requirements
Climate Several years of temperature, relative humidity, wind, or solar radiation data for estimating daily irrigation
requirements for each crop (Precise climatic requirements depend on the ET method used)
Crop Areal distributioh and amount (area) of each crop to be grown; suitability of each crop to climate, soils,
farming practices, markets, etc.; Kc values, planting dates, etc., for each crop to be grown over the
expected life of the project
Soils Areal distribution of soils; water holding and infiltration characteristics, depth, drainage requirements,
salinity, erodibility of each soil.
Water supply Location of water source; water surface elevation; hydrologic and water quality information for assessing
the availability and suitability of the water for irrigation; water right information
Energy source Location, availability, and type of source(s); cost information
Capital and labor Capital available for system development and availability, level of technical skill, and cost of labor
Other Topographic map showing location of roads, buildings, drainways, and other physical features that
influence design; financial situation of farmer, farmer preferences.