Generic Medicine
Generic Medicine
ABSTRACT
After the expiry of patent or marketing rights of the patented drug, generic drugs are marketed.
Generic drugs are available at affordable prices with maintaining quality. These ‘Generic’
formulations balance public interest as critical disease like cancer, AIDS etc. In situations where
demand for medicines exceeds supply, criminally minded people tend to profit out of crime by
manufacturing and distributing counterfeit medicines as а substitute for genuine medicines
(branded and generic). India’s Pharmaceutical market grew at 15.7% during December 2011.
This paper presents various aspects of generic, branded and counterfeit drugs and their impact
on the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry.
Table 1: Top 20 Listed Indian Public Pharmaceutical companies (Rank wise 2010)6
Rank Indian Public Rank Indian Public
Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical companiey
companiey
1 Cilpa 11 Glaxo
2 Ranbaxy 12 IPCA Labs
3 Dr Reddy’s Labs 13 Wockhardt
4 Lupin 14 Torrent Pharma
5 Aurobindo Pharma 15 Sterling Bio
6 Dabur 16 Biocon
7 Sun Pharma 17 Orchid Chemicals & Pharma
8 Calida Healthcare 18 Alembic
9 Jubilant Life Sciences 19 Aventis Pharma
10 Piramal Healthcare 20 Glenmark Pharma
Over the next few years, an abnormally large are Blockbuster-brand products and offer
number of blockbuster drugs are scheduled tremendous scope to generic manufactures.
to lose their patent protection, opening the
doors to cheaper generic drugs. These drugs
In December’ 2011, Ranbaxy receives Bayer Corp. under the provisions of the
approval for the generic ‘Atorvastatin’ tablets section 84 of the Indian Patent Act 1970. It is
of the original brand name drug ‘Lipitor’ used for the treatment of Liver and Kidney
owned by Pfizer, Inc. cancer. Its price now Rs 8,800 for 120 tablets
In March 2012, Natco Pharma got compulsory (one months therapy) as against Rs. 2,84,428
License (CL) for ‘Sorafenib tosylate’ of the being the cost of ‘Nexavar’ sold by Bayer
original brand name drug ‘Nexavar’ owned by Corp.
Bioequivalence may be affected by the type of 10. The WHO Executive Board Meet
study; e.g. two brand name pharmaceutical The most controversial part of definition of
equivalents were each compared with a counterfeiting of drugs is that any ‘false
placebo in separate trials but were not representation’ in relation to ‘identity, history
compared with each other for bioequivalence. or source’. False representation of identity
Thus while each was effective, it cannot be and source applies not only to mere labeling
assumed that they produce the same clinical of the products, but also to container or other
effect. Bioequivalence studies are performed packaging’. Thus, false representation with
regard to any of these would make the Act, standardized U.S. procedures for
product ‘counterfeit within the scope of the recognition of generic drugs. An applicant
definition. The WHO Executive Board meeting files an Abbreviated New Drug Application
in Geneva in January 2009, India’s (ANDA) with the Food and Drug
suggestion’s were accepted and the word Administration (FDA), and seeks to
‘history’ was deleted and modify the present demonstrate therapeutic equivalence to a
defination.21 specified, previously approved “reference
India has stressed that a generic or branded listed drug”. When an ANDA is approved, the
medicine not registered in a particular FDA adds the drug to its Approved Drug
country, but available in that country is not Products list, also known as the Orange Book,
counterfeit, but simply an unregistered and annotates the list to show equivalence
product.22 between the references listed drug and the
approved generic. The FDA also recognizes
Patient Perspective drugs using the same ingredients with
• Cost and compliance. Theoretically, different bioavailability, and divides them
generic medications should improve into therapeutic equivalence groups. For
management and patient compliance because example, as of 2006, diltiazem hydrochloride
the obstacle of cost has been removed. had four equivalence groups, all using the
• Inferiority complex. Another potential same active ingredient, but considered
issue is that patients may be resistant to equivalent only within a group.23
going on a generic medication because they
perceive them as inferior to their branded 12. Patent System in the US
counterpart.22 Generics are often considered After getting the FDA approval for marketing,
second-rate medications due to perceived the drug innovator company may apply for
poor compliance with standard manufacturing process and grant of
manufacturing practices, lack of patient exclusively rights for about 20 years. The
knowledge about generics, and influence of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
the brand-name company.22, 23 We need to 2010 authorized FDA to approve generic
educate our patients so they can make an versions of biological manufacturers 12 years
informed decision about their treatment and of exclusive use before generics can be
be willing to try a generic medication if the developed. On the other hand, after January 1,
situation is appropriate. This is particularly 2005, India enacted an amendment to its
true in the elderly who may be on multiple patent law that reinstated product patents for
medications, as well as those with low the first time since 1972. The legislation took
socioeconomic status who could benefit from effect on the deadline set by WTO’s Trade
the savings. Related aspects of Intellectual Property Right
• Patient preferences. We often need to (TRIPs) agreement, which mandated patent
consider our patient’s personality and past protection on both product as-well-as
experience when deciding between generic processes for the period 20 years. Under this
and brand drugs as well. One important new law, India is forced to recognize not only
question to ask our patients is whether they new patents but also any patent filed after
have taken generics before and what the January 1, 1995.
outcome was. If the patient had a poor
experience, they may be biased towards 13. Challenging patents
branded medications and willing to pay the Brand-name drug companies have used a
higher price. number of strategies to extend the period of
11. U.S. generics approval process market exclusivity on their drugs, and
Enacted in 1984, the U.S. Drug Price prevent generic competition. This may
Competition and Patent Term Restoration involve aggressive litigation to preserve or
Act, informally known as the Hatch-Waxman extend patent protection on their medicines,
which is called ‘ever greening’ of patents. warning labels when significant new risks
Drug companies may seek new patents on the emerge. The financial and safety implications
production of specific forms of these from the court's ruling could prove decisive.
compounds, such as single enantiomers of
drugs which can exist in both “left-handed” 16. CONCLUSION
and “right-handed” forms,24 different inactive In situations where demand for medicines
components in a drug salt,25 or a specific exceeds supply, criminally minded people
hydrate form of the drug salt. 26 If granted, tend to profit out of crime by manufacturing
these patents ‘reset the clock’ on patent and distributing counterfeit medicines as а
expiration. These sorts of patents may later substitute for genuine medicines. Also,
be targeted for invalidation (“paragraph IV consumers who use medicines
certification”)27 by generic drug inappropriately generate demand for such
manufacturers.28-30 medicines, the sources of which may be
The USFDA offers 180 days exclusively period counterfeit. In many cases counterfeit drugs
to the first successful generic manufacture, have been found to be without active
who argues that a patent is invalid or dose ingredients, or with wrong ingredients or
not violate the production of the original with incorrect quantities of active
drug. After this exclusivity period, other ingredients. Treatment with ineffective
manufacturers can enter the market. As a counterfeit drugs such as antibiotics can lead
result that further lowers the price of the to the emergence of resistant organisms and
drug due to competition. may have а deleterious effect on а wide
section of the population. In extreme cases,
14. Prescription in the US counterfeit drugs may even cause death.
A pharmacist may legally fill a prescription in As а consequence of such damaging effects,
the United States with either the brand name counterfeit drugs may erode public
or a generic without consulting either the confidence in health care systems, health care
patient or the physician. A prescription may professionals, the suppliers and sellers of
not even be filled consistently with the same genuine drugs (branded or generic), the
generic. To assure continuity for the patient, pharmaceutical industry and national Drug
the physician should indicate on the Regulatory Authorities (DRAs). Incorrect
prescription no substitutions or dispense as labeling as to the source can also be
written. detrimental to the reputation and financial
It must keep in mind that it is not to assume standing of the original and/or current
that all drugs with the same generic title are manufacturer whose name has been
equal and will have the same clinical effect, fraudulently used. The consequence of this
even though many drug reps say they are will be infiltration of counterfeit medicines
equal. into national distribution channels.
There is no simple solution or remedy that
15. Litigation and U.S. Supreme Court can be applied to eliminate counterfeit
ruling medicines nor can the problem be solved by
Two women, who claimed to have suffered an individual company or government. The
severe medical complications from a generic problem has reached а global dimension and
drug, lost their Supreme Court appeal on needs а global approach. Governments need
Thursday, June 23, 2011, essentially ending to develop strategies to reduce corruption
their separate lawsuits against and powerful act counterfeiting legislation.
pharmaceutical manufacturers.
The justices in a 5-4 ruling said generic drug
companies do not share the same level of
responsibility as makers of brand-name
equivalents and do not have to update their