Bachelor Of Arts

Semester – I

Course Code BA_IR101

Unit 12: Emergence of the Third World, Collapse of the USSR and the
End of the Cold War
Copyrights

Copyright © 2022 Vivekananda Global University

All rights reserved

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge the contributions of Subject matter experts, reviewers, and the

content team for successfully delivering this eBook. Due credits have been
mentioned for diagrams/Figures utilized to enrich the student content from open
sources.
Preface

The concept of the "Third World" emerged during the mid-20th century as
nations newly independent from colonial rule sought to navigate the complex
dynamics of the post-colonial era. These countries, often characterized by their
struggles with poverty, underdevelopment, and political instability, aimed to
assert their identity and agency on the global stage. The emergence of the Third
World reflected a desire for autonomy and a departure from the binary power
structures of the Cold War, as nations sought to establish a non-aligned stance in
the face of ideological rivalry. Simultaneously, the collapse of the USSR in 1991
marked the end of an era characterized by the bipolar division of power between
the United States and the Soviet Union. The dissolution of the Soviet Union not
only transformed the political map of Eurasia but also had profound implications
for global politics. The Cold War, which had shaped international relations for
decades, gave way to a new world order marked by shifting alliances, the rise of
regional powers, and the reconfiguration of geopolitical priorities.

The end of the Cold War did not signify an end to global challenges; rather, it
opened a new chapter with its own complexities. As the world grappled with the
aftermath of these monumental changes, nations faced the task of forging new
diplomatic, economic, and strategic alliances. The vacuum left by the
superpower rivalry paved the way for a multipolar world, wherein diverse actors
played pivotal roles in shaping global affairs. This exploration delves into the
multifaceted nature of the emergence of the Third World, the collapse of the
USSR, and the subsequent end of the Cold War. By examining the
interconnectedness of these historical events, we gain insights into the complex
interplay of political, economic, and ideological forces that continue to shape the
contemporary global landscape.
Table of Content

12.0 learning Objective….……………………………………..………………………………………………………..……………….1

12.1 Introduction.................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
12.2 Emergence of the Third World ............................................................................. 3
12.3 Decolonization and Independence Movements ..................................... 7
12.4 Collapse of the USSR ................................................................................................. 9
12.5 Political Reforms ............................................................................................................12
12.6 Economic Ideological Shift .................................................................................. 16
12.7 End of the Cold War .................................................................................................. 18
12.8 Berlin Wall and Iron Curtain ................................................................................ 22
12.9 Crisis in Eastern Europe .......................................................................................... 25
12.10 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 30
12.11 Review Questions ...................................................................................................... 31
12.12 Keywords ......................................................................................................................... 32
12.13 References....................................................................................................................... 34
12.0 Learning Objectives:

Upon completion of this module, students should:

• Comprehend the Historical Context

• Evaluate the Collapse of the USSR
• Analyze the End of the Cold War
• Examine Global Implications
• Compare Historical Perspectives
• Develop Research and Presentation Skills
• Reflect on Contemporary Relevance

1
12.1 INTRODUCTION

The latter half of the 20th century witnessed transformative global events that
reshaped the geopolitical landscape and redefined the contours of international
relations. Among the pivotal occurrences during this period were the emergence
of the Third World, the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR),
and the subsequent end of the Cold War. These interconnected phenomena
unfolded against a backdrop of ideological confrontations, political realignments,
and socio-economic changes that reverberated across continents.

The concept of the "Third World" emerged during the mid-20th century as
nations newly independent from colonial rule sought to navigate the complex
dynamics of the post-colonial era. These countries, often characterized by their
struggles with poverty, underdevelopment, and political instability, aimed to
assert their identity and agency on the global stage. The emergence of the Third
World reflected a desire for autonomy and a departure from the binary power
structures of the Cold War, as nations sought to establish a non-aligned stance in
the face of ideological rivalry. Simultaneously, the collapse of the USSR in 1991
marked the end of an era characterized by the bipolar division of power between
the United States and the Soviet Union. The dissolution of the Soviet Union not
only transformed the political map of Eurasia but also had profound implications
for global politics. The Cold War, which had shaped international relations for
decades, gave way to a new world order marked by shifting alliances, the rise of
regional powers, and the reconfiguration of geopolitical priorities.

The end of the Cold War did not signify an end to global challenges; rather, it
opened a new chapter with its own complexities. As the world grappled with the
aftermath of these monumental changes, nations faced the task of forging new
diplomatic, economic, and strategic alliances. The vacuum left by the
superpower rivalry paved the way for a multipolar world, wherein diverse actors
played pivotal roles in shaping global affairs. This exploration delves into the
multifaceted nature of the emergence of the Third World, the collapse of the
USSR, and the subsequent end of the Cold War. By examining the
interconnectedness of these historical events, we gain insights into the complex

2
interplay of political, economic, and ideological forces that continue to shape the
contemporary global landscape.

12.2 Emergence of the Third World

The emergence of the Third World, a term coined during the Cold War, marks a
pivotal moment in global geopolitics and socio-economic development.
Characterized by a diverse group of nations across Africa, Asia, and Latin
America, the Third World gained prominence as a collective entity seeking to
assert its independence and navigate a path of self-determination in the
aftermath of colonial rule. This emergence was fueled by a desire to break free
from the shackles of imperialism and establish a distinct identity on the world
stage. The Bandung Conference of 1955, where leaders from newly independent
nations gathered, symbolized a turning point as it laid the foundation for solidarity
among Third World countries. Over time, these nations sought to address
common challenges such as economic inequality, poverty, and
underdevelopment through collective action and cooperation. Despite facing
numerous hurdles, the Third World played a crucial role in shaping the discourse
on global justice, economic equity, and the dismantling of neocolonial structures.
Today, the legacy of the Third World continues to influence international
relations, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique
struggles and aspirations of developing nations in the quest for a more equitable
and inclusive world order.

1. Post-World War II Dynamics

Post-World War II dynamics witnessed the emergence of the term "Third World,"
a term that gained prominence during the Cold War era. Coined during a time of
intense East-West ideological divisions, the concept was designed to categorize
countries that remained unaligned or non-bloc nations. This categorization was
integral to understanding the global political landscape, with the First World
symbolizing the capitalist bloc led by the United States and its allies, while the
Second World represented the socialist bloc led by the Soviet Union and its
allies. The geopolitical rift between the United States and the Soviet Union

3
defined the Cold War, and the use of the term "Third World" added a layer of
complexity to this global scenario. These non-aligned nations were often
characterized by their pursuit of independent foreign policies, steering clear of
alignment with either superpower. The label "Third World" aimed to capture the
diversity among these nations, encompassing countries with varying levels of
economic development, political stability, and cultural backgrounds.

In addition to its geopolitical connotations, the term also reflected the economic
disparities prevalent among nations. Many of the countries classified as Third
World were grappling with issues such as poverty, underdevelopment, and a
lack of access to resources. This socioeconomic dimension further underscored
the complexities of the global power struggle, emphasizing that the division
between the First, Second, and Third Worlds was not solely ideological but also
economic and developmental.

Over time, the term "Third World" has evolved, and contemporary discourse
often employs alternative terms like "Global South" or "developing nations" to
address the diverse range of countries once encompassed by this classification.
Nevertheless, the historical context in which the term originated remains crucial
for understanding the dynamics of the post-World War II era, the Cold War, and
the complexities of global geopolitics during that time.

• The term "Third World" originated during the Cold War era to describe
countries that were unaligned or non-bloc nations.
• It emerged in the context of the East-West ideological divide, with the First
World representing the capitalist bloc led by the United States and the
Second World comprising the socialist bloc led by the Soviet Union.

2. Economic Challenges

Economic challenges in the Third World have been multifaceted, encompassing

issues such as poverty, underdevelopment, and an overdependence on
agriculture. These challenges have been exacerbated by a complex web of
factors, including debt burdens, unequal trade relationships, and resource
exploitation by developed nations. One of the primary economic challenges

4
faced by many Third World countries is the prevalence of poverty. The lack of
access to basic resources, education, and healthcare perpetuates a cycle of
poverty that is difficult to break. This hinders overall economic growth and
development, as a large portion of the population remains unable to actively
participate in the economy. Underdevelopment is another significant issue
plaguing many Third World nations. Limited infrastructure, inadequate healthcare
systems, and a lack of technological advancements contribute to the overall
underdevelopment. This not only impedes the well-being of the population but
also inhibits the growth of industries and economic sectors that could potentially
drive progress.

The overreliance on agriculture in many Third World countries poses a unique

set of challenges. Agricultural sectors are often vulnerable to fluctuations in
weather conditions, market prices, and global demand. This dependence can
lead to economic instability and hinder diversification into more resilient and
profitable industries. Debt has been a persistent issue for many developing
nations. Accumulating substantial amounts of debt, often from international
lenders, can lead to a vicious cycle of repayment obligations, hindering the ability
of these countries to invest in crucial development projects. The debt burden can
stifle economic growth and perpetuate a cycle of dependency. Unequal trade
relationships further exacerbate economic challenges in the Third World.
Developed nations often dictate trade terms that are favorable to their interests,
leaving developing countries at a disadvantage. Unfair trade practices can result
in the exploitation of natural resources without commensurate benefits for the
countries providing them. Resource exploitation by developed nations is a critical
issue contributing to economic struggles in the Third World. Natural resources,
such as minerals and agricultural products, are often extracted without adequate
compensation or consideration for sustainable practices. This exploitation further
widens the economic gap between developed and developing nations.

Addressing these economic challenges requires a comprehensive approach that

includes measures to alleviate poverty, promote sustainable development,
renegotiate fair trade agreements, and ensure responsible resource
management. International cooperation and support are crucial to creating an

5
environment that fosters economic growth and reduces the disparities between
the developed and developing world.

• The Third World faced economic challenges such as poverty,

underdevelopment, and a reliance on agriculture.
• Issues like debt, unequal trade relationships, and resource exploitation by
developed nations contributed to their economic struggles.

3. Non-Aligned Movement

The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) emerged as a significant force during the

mid-20th century, providing a platform for unity and collaboration among Third
World nations. Established in 1961, the NAM aimed to create a bloc of countries
that would remain unaligned with any major power bloc during the Cold War,
promoting independence, sovereignty, and non-interference in the internal
affairs of member states. One of the primary objectives of the Non-Aligned
Movement was to counter the prevailing influence of the superpowers – the
United States and the Soviet Union – and to assert the autonomy of developing
nations. The founding members, including leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru of India,
Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt, and Josip Broz Tito of Yugoslavia, sought to bridge
ideological and political differences among nations and foster a sense of
solidarity in the face of global power struggles.

During the Cold War, when the world was largely divided into the Western and
Eastern blocs, NAM played a crucial role in steering clear of alignment with either
side. The movement's emphasis on non-alignment allowed member states to
pursue their development goals without being entangled in the geopolitical
conflicts that defined the era. By maintaining neutrality, NAM nations aimed to
protect their sovereignty and resist external pressures. Moreover, the Non-
Aligned Movement became a forum for addressing issues affecting the
developing world, such as economic inequality, colonialism, and social justice.
The movement provided a platform for leaders to voice their concerns on the
international stage and seek collective solutions to common challenges. Through
various conferences and summits, NAM contributed to shaping global discourse
on issues ranging from disarmament to economic development. While the
geopolitical landscape has evolved since the end of the Cold War, the Non-

6
Aligned Movement continues to be relevant as a forum for fostering cooperation
and addressing the concerns of developing nations. Its principles of non-
alignment, mutual respect, and solidarity remain foundational to its mission of
promoting peace, justice, and the rights of sovereign states in the international
arena.

• The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) played a crucial role in uniting Third

World nations, advocating for their interests, and maintaining neutrality
during the Cold War.

12.3 Decolonization and Independence Movements

The mid-20th century witnessed a transformative era marked by the widespread

decolonization and independence movements in many Third World countries,
particularly across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. These nations, once under
colonial rule, embarked on a collective journey towards autonomy and self-
determination, seeking liberation from imperialistic forces. The decolonization
process symbolized a significant shift in global power dynamics, as former
colonies asserted their identity and sovereignty on the international stage. This
wave of independence movements was characterized by the rejection of
oppressive colonial structures, as nations sought to redefine their political,
economic, and cultural landscapes. The struggles for independence were often
arduous, involving social, political, and sometimes armed resistance against
colonial powers. Ultimately, the decolonization movements heralded a new era,
shaping the geopolitical landscape and fostering the emergence of diverse and
independent nations in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

Decolonization, a transformative process that unfolded in the mid-20th century,

marked a significant chapter in world history. During this period, numerous Third
World countries, once under the yoke of colonial rule, embarked on courageous
journeys toward independence. The decolonization movements in Africa, Asia,
and Latin America not only symbolized the end of imperial dominance but also
paved the way for the emergence of sovereign nations on the global stage.

1. Roots of Colonization

7
 • The roots of colonization can be traced back to the Age of Exploration
when European powers established empires across Africa, Asia, and Latin
America.
• Colonized regions endured exploitation, cultural suppression, and
economic subjugation, forming the backdrop for later independence
movements.

2. Mid-20th Century Shift

• The aftermath of World War II witnessed a paradigm shift in the global

power dynamics.
• The war-weary European powers, economically weakened and morally
challenged, faced mounting pressure to relinquish their colonies.

3. Emergence of Independence Movements

• In Africa, leaders such as Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Jomo Kenyatta in

Kenya spearheaded movements advocating for self-determination.
• In Asia, figures like Jawaharlal Nehru in India and Sukarno in Indonesia
played crucial roles in demanding independence.
• Latin America experienced movements led by figures like Fidel Castro in
Cuba, seeking autonomy from Western hegemony.

4. Challenges and Struggles

• Independence movements faced various challenges, including resistance

from colonial powers, internal divisions, and economic instability.
• Despite these challenges, the resilience of these nations prevailed, as they
fought for the right to determine their own destinies.

5. Global Ramifications

8
 • The decolonization wave had profound implications globally, reshaping
the geopolitical landscape.
• The emergence of newly independent nations led to a more diverse and
complex international community, challenging the existing power
structures.

6. Cultural and Political Revival

• Decolonization sparked a cultural and political revival, as nations

reclaimed their heritage and forged new identities.
• The establishment of independent governments allowed for the
formulation of policies reflecting local needs and aspirations.

7. Legacy of Decolonization

• The legacy of decolonization is enduring, shaping contemporary

discussions on post-colonialism, global justice, and the consequences of
imperial legacies.
• The struggles and achievements of the decolonization era continue to
inspire movements advocating for justice, equality, and self-determination.

Conclusion:

Decolonization and independence movements of the mid-20th century stand as

a testament to the indomitable spirit of nations seeking freedom from colonial
oppression. The global repercussions of these movements are far-reaching,
influencing not only the newly independent states but also reshaping the
dynamics of international relations. As we reflect on this era, it becomes evident
that the struggles and triumphs of decolonization have left an enduring legacy,
emphasizing the importance of self-determination and the pursuit of justice on
the global stage.

9
12.4 Collapse of the USSR

The collapse of the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) marked a

transformative period in world history, reshaping geopolitical landscapes and
fundamentally altering the global balance of power. This monumental event took
place in the late 20th century, with significant developments unfolding in the late
1980s and early 1990s. Several factors contributed to the collapse of the USSR,
and it is essential to consider the economic, political, and social dimensions of
this historic event. One of the key factors was the economic inefficiency and
stagnation that plagued the Soviet Union. The centrally planned economy, which
had been a defining feature of the Soviet system, proved to be unsustainable and
unable to compete with the dynamic market-driven economies of the West.
Mikhail Gorbachev, who became the General Secretary of the Communist Party
of the Soviet Union in 1985, played a pivotal role in the collapse of the USSR.
Gorbachev initiated a series of reforms known as "perestroika" (restructuring) and
"glasnost" (openness), aimed at revitalizing the Soviet economy and allowing
greater political openness. However, these reforms inadvertently led to
increased political freedoms, which in turn fueled nationalist movements within
the various Soviet republics.

The rise of nationalism and demands for greater autonomy from the various
Soviet republics further weakened the cohesion of the USSR. The Baltic states,
Ukraine, and others sought independence, and by 1991, several republics had
declared their sovereignty. The attempted coup in August 1991 by hardline
elements within the Soviet government, aimed at reversing Gorbachev's reforms,
further accelerated the disintegration of the Soviet Union. The coup ultimately
failed, and on December 26, 1991, the Soviet Union was officially dissolved.
Gorbachev resigned, and the Russian Federation, under the leadership of Boris
Yeltsin, emerged as the successor state to the USSR. The collapse of the Soviet
Union had profound implications for the global order, marking the end of the
Cold War and the beginning of a new era characterized by a unipolar world
dominated by the United States.

1. Economic Strain

10
The economic strain experienced by the Soviet Union during its existence can be
attributed to a combination of factors, including inefficiency, scarcity, and a
centralized economic model. These challenges significantly impacted the
nation's ability to compete with Western economies, contributing to its eventual
downfall.

Inefficiency:

One of the primary issues that plagued the Soviet economy was inefficiency. The
centrally planned economic system, which aimed to eliminate market forces,
often resulted in bureaucratic red tape and a lack of responsiveness to changing
conditions. The absence of competition and market-driven efficiency hindered
innovation and led to a sluggish economy.

Centralized Economic Model:

The Soviet Union's commitment to a centralized economic model meant that

decision-making power was concentrated in the hands of the government. While
this approach sought to achieve economic equality, it proved to be unsustainable
in the long run. The lack of incentives for individual enterprises to perform well
and compete in a free market environment hindered overall economic growth.

Scarcity:

Scarcity of resources was another significant challenge faced by the Soviet

Union. The centralized planning failed to efficiently allocate resources, leading to
shortages of essential goods and services. Consumers often faced long queues
for basic necessities, reflecting the inadequacies of the planned economy in
meeting the diverse needs of a population.

Struggling to Keep Pace with Western Economies:

11
As the Soviet Union grappled with inefficiency, a centralized economic model,
and scarcity, Western economies embraced market-oriented approaches,
technological advancements, and innovation. The result was a growing disparity
in economic performance. The Soviet Union struggled to keep pace with the
dynamic and competitive economies of the West, leading to a widening
economic gap over time.

Conclusion:

The economic strain experienced by the Soviet Union was a multifaceted

challenge arising from inefficiency, a centralized economic model, and scarcity
of resources. These factors not only hindered the nation's economic growth but
also contributed to its ultimate collapse. The comparison with Western
economies highlights the importance of adaptability, innovation, and market-
driven mechanisms in fostering sustained economic development.
Understanding the lessons from the Soviet experience serves as a reminder of
the significance of balancing centralized planning with elements of market-
driven efficiency for long-term economic success.

12.5 Political Reforms

Political reforms play a crucial role in shaping the destiny of nations, and the
impact of such transformations is often far-reaching. One prominent example is
Mikhail Gorbachev's endeavor to bring about change in the Soviet Union through
the implementation of glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring). Initially
intended to revitalize and modernize the Soviet system, these policies
unintentionally became catalysts for the eventual collapse of the entire regime.
The introduction of glasnost encouraged a degree of openness and
transparency, allowing previously suppressed information to come to light.
Simultaneously, perestroika sought to restructure the economy and political
landscape. However, the reforms faced resistance from conservative elements
within the Soviet establishment, contributing to internal conflicts and unrest. The

12
unintended consequences of Gorbachev's initiatives ultimately led to the
dissolution of the Soviet Union, marking a historic shift in global geopolitics. This
episode underscores the delicate balance required in implementing political
reforms, as their outcomes can be unpredictable and transformative, sometimes
beyond the original intentions of the reformers.

Mikhail Gorbachev, the last General Secretary of the Soviet Union, is often
remembered for his transformative policies of glasnost (openness) and
perestroika (restructuring) during the late 1980s. While these initiatives were
intended to revitalize and reform the Soviet political system, their unintended
consequences ultimately played a pivotal role in the collapse of the Soviet Union.
This essay explores the multifaceted impacts of Gorbachev's political reforms,
analyzing both the positive and negative outcomes.

1. Glasnost - Opening Up Society

Gorbachev's glasnost policy aimed at fostering transparency and openness

within Soviet society. It allowed for greater freedom of expression, press, and
information. Citizens were encouraged to engage in political discourse, and
previously taboo topics were brought into public discussion. This led to a more
informed and politically aware populace.

2. Perestroika - Economic Restructuring

Perestroika was designed to restructure the Soviet economy, introducing

elements of market mechanisms and decentralization. State-controlled
enterprises were given more autonomy, and private entrepreneurship was
cautiously embraced. The goal was to improve economic efficiency and address
the systemic flaws within the planned economy.

13
3. Positive Impacts

a. Political Awakening: Glasnost empowered citizens to voice their opinions,

fostering a sense of political participation and awareness.

b. Cultural Revival: The newfound openness allowed for a revival of

suppressed cultural expressions and national identities within the diverse Soviet
Union.

c. Economic Experimentation: Perestroika paved the way for economic

experimentation, encouraging innovation and the emergence of small
businesses.

4. Negative Impacts

a. Unintended Nationalism: Glasnost inadvertently fueled nationalist

sentiments, leading to demands for greater autonomy from various Soviet
republics.

b. Economic Turmoil: The rapid implementation of perestroika without

adequate planning led to economic instability, contributing to a decline in living
standards for many citizens.

c. Political Instability: The increased openness exposed the deep-seated

political and ethnic tensions within the Soviet Union, further destabilizing the
political landscape.

5. Collapse of the Soviet Union

The unintended consequences of Gorbachev's reforms played a crucial role in

the ultimate dissolution of the Soviet Union. The push for openness and
restructuring, coupled with the inability to manage the resulting challenges
effectively, created a domino effect that weakened the centralized authority and
unity of the Soviet state.

Conclusion:
14
Mikhail Gorbachev's glasnost and perestroika were ambitious attempts to reform
the Soviet system, aiming for greater political openness and economic efficiency.
However, the unintended consequences, including the rise of nationalism and
economic turmoil, ultimately contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union. The
legacy of Gorbachev's reforms serves as a complex lesson in the delicate
balance required for transformative political change.

1. Nationalist Movements

Nationalist movements within the Soviet republics played a pivotal role in

reshaping the political landscape during the latter part of the 20th century. These
movements, driven by ethnic and nationalist aspirations, emerged as a significant
force that sought independence from the overarching Soviet central authority.
The dynamics of these movements not only highlighted the diverse ethnic
composition within the Soviet Union but also underscored the complexities of
managing such diversity under a single centralized regime. The quest for
independence gained momentum as various ethnic groups within the Soviet
republics began to assert their distinct cultural identities and demand greater
autonomy. The centralized control imposed by the Soviet government faced
significant challenges as these nationalist movements gained traction, leading to
a weakening of the once-unified central authority.

The dissipation of central authority was particularly evident as these nationalist

movements mobilized support and fostered a sense of solidarity among their
respective ethnic communities. Issues of cultural preservation, language rights,
and a desire for self-determination fueled the momentum of these movements,
creating a groundswell of discontent with the Soviet regime. One of the key
consequences of these nationalist movements was the erosion of the Soviet
Union's territorial integrity. As republics sought greater autonomy and, in some
cases, outright independence, the Soviet state found itself grappling with
centrifugal forces that threatened its very existence. The unraveling of the Soviet
Union culminated in its eventual dissolution in 1991, marking the end of a
superpower that had dominated the geopolitical landscape for decades.

15
The nationalist movements within the Soviet republics not only reflected the
aspirations of diverse ethnic groups but also signaled a broader global trend
towards self-determination and the assertion of cultural identities. The impact of
these movements reverberated beyond the boundaries of the former Soviet
Union, inspiring similar struggles for independence and autonomy in other parts
of the world.

In conclusion, the ethnic and nationalist movements within the Soviet republics
played a crucial role in the dismantling of the Soviet Union. These movements,
fueled by a desire for independence and cultural preservation, not only
weakened the central authority but also contributed to the reconfiguration of
political entities in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse. The legacy of these
movements continues to shape the geopolitical landscape, serving as a
testament to the enduring power of identity and self-determination.

• Ethnic and nationalist movements within the Soviet republics, seeking

independence, gained momentum, further weakening the central
authority.

12.6 Economic Ideological Shift

The Economic Ideological Shift represents a pivotal transition in economic

policies, marking a departure from traditional Marxist-Leninist principles towards
market-oriented approaches. This shift has not only transformed economic
landscapes but has also induced internal tensions within the Communist Party.
Historically rooted in Marxist-Leninist ideologies, Communist parties advocated
for centralized planning and state control over the means of production.
However, in response to changing global economic dynamics and the perceived
limitations of centralized planning, several Communist countries underwent a
significant transformation towards market-oriented policies. This shift is
characterized by a move towards embracing elements of capitalism, including
free-market mechanisms, private ownership, and entrepreneurship. The
motivation behind this ideological shift was often driven by the desire to enhance

16
economic efficiency, foster innovation, and attract foreign investment. In the face
of globalization and technological advancements, many Communist parties
recognized the need for adaptability to remain competitive in the global
economy.

As these market-oriented policies gained prominence, internal tensions within

the Communist Party became inevitable. Traditionalists, rooted in Marxist-Leninist
principles, found themselves at odds with reformists advocating for economic
liberalization. The clash between these factions reflected deeper philosophical
and ideological debates within the party, challenging its unity and coherence.
The Economic Ideological Shift also had profound implications on the social
fabric of these societies. The introduction of market-oriented policies brought
about changes in income distribution, wealth accumulation, and social
stratification. While some segments of society benefited from the economic
reforms, others faced challenges and disparities, leading to increased social
tensions. Moreover, the shift influenced geopolitical dynamics, as these countries
sought to redefine their relationships with the global community. The move
towards market-oriented policies often involved opening up to international
trade, forging new economic alliances, and engaging in diplomatic endeavors to
navigate the complexities of a changing world order.

In conclusion, the Economic Ideological Shift signifies a profound transformation

within Communist parties, reflecting a willingness to adapt to evolving global
economic realities. However, this transition has not been without internal
struggles, as ideological tensions continue to shape the trajectory of these
parties. The impact of these economic reforms extends beyond economic
realms, influencing social structures and international relations, making it a
complex and multifaceted phenomenon.

Background:

Historically, Marxist-Leninist principles served as the guiding force for many

communist states, emphasizing central planning, state ownership of means of
production, and the pursuit of a classless society. However, as the world evolved,
countries with communist roots began to recognize the limitations of these
17
traditional ideologies in addressing economic challenges and fostering
sustainable growth.

Market-Oriented Policies:

The shift towards market-oriented policies signifies a pragmatic

acknowledgment of the benefits of free-market mechanisms. Governments have
increasingly embraced elements such as privatization, deregulation, and free
trade, aiming to unlock economic potential and enhance efficiency. This
departure from centralized control has been driven by the desire to stimulate
innovation, attract foreign investment, and foster a competitive business
environment.

Internal Tensions within the Communist Party:

The adoption of market-oriented policies has not been without its share of
internal tensions within the Communist Party. Traditionalists argue that such a
departure dilutes the essence of Marxist-Leninist principles, challenging the very
foundation upon which the party was built. This ideological divide has given rise
to debates over the party's identity, with some members advocating for a more
flexible approach to economic management, while others resist the perceived
erosion of communist ideals.

Economic Impacts:

The economic consequences of this ideological shift are multi-faceted. On one

hand, countries that have embraced market-oriented policies have experienced
economic growth, improved living standards, and increased global
competitiveness. On the other hand, the transition has also led to income
inequality, social disparities, and challenges in maintaining a balance between
market forces and social welfare.

Global Perspectives:

18
This shift is not confined to a specific region; it reflects a global trend as countries
across continents grapple with the evolving dynamics of the modern economy.
The experiences of nations undertaking this ideological transition serve as case
studies, offering insights into the complexities and potential benefits associated
with moving away from traditional Marxist-Leninist principles.

Conclusion:

The economic ideological shift from Marxist-Leninist principles to market-

oriented policies is a pivotal development shaping the contemporary world.
While it has propelled economic growth and innovation, the internal tensions
within the Communist Party underscore the challenges of navigating this
ideological transition. As nations continue to grapple with finding a delicate
balance between market forces and socialist values, the outcomes of this shift
will significantly influence the future trajectory of global economic systems.

12.7 End of the Cold War

The end of the Cold War marked a significant turning point in global history,
bringing about profound changes in the geopolitical landscape and reshaping
the dynamics of international relations. This era, which lasted from the late 1940s
to the early 1990s, was characterized by intense ideological rivalry between the
United States and the Soviet Union, as well as their respective allies. Several key
factors contributed to the conclusion of the Cold War. One crucial element was
the economic strain on the Soviet Union, which struggled to keep up with the
economic and technological advancements of the West. The arms race, fueled
by both superpowers' quest for military dominance, placed an immense financial
burden on the Soviet economy. Simultaneously, the policies of Mikhail
Gorbachev, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union,
played a pivotal role. Gorbachev introduced a series of reforms, such as
perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness), aiming to revitalize the Soviet
system.

19
The ideological shift in the Soviet Union, coupled with the influence of these
reforms, contributed to a thaw in relations between the two superpowers. The
end of the arms race became evident with the signing of the Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in 1987, which marked a significant step toward
nuclear disarmament. The political landscape of Eastern Europe underwent a
seismic shift during this period. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 symbolized the
end of the division between East and West Germany and became a powerful
metaphor for the broader collapse of communist regimes in Eastern Europe. The
countries of the Eastern Bloc, inspired by the winds of change, began to embrace
democratic ideals and seek independence from Soviet influence.

One of the most iconic moments in this transformative era was the dissolution of
the Soviet Union itself in 1991. The end of the Cold War was formalized with the
signing of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) between the United
States and the newly independent Russia, marking a symbolic end to the
decades-long nuclear rivalry.

1. Disintegration of the Soviet Union

The disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked a pivotal moment in

modern history, signifying the end of the Cold War and reshaping the global
political landscape. This monumental event was characterized by a complex
interplay of political, economic, and social factors that ultimately led to the
dissolution of the once-mighty superpower. One of the key catalysts for the
disintegration was the economic turmoil that gripped the Soviet Union. The
centrally planned economy, which had been a hallmark of Soviet governance,
proved unsustainable in the face of mounting inefficiencies and widespread
corruption. The Soviet economy struggled to keep pace with the dynamic global
market, leading to stagnation, scarcity of goods, and a declining standard of
living for its citizens. Simultaneously, there was a growing discontent among the
various nationalities within the Soviet Union. The policy of Russification, which
aimed to promote Russian culture and language, alienated many non-Russian
ethnic groups. Nationalist movements gained momentum, demanding greater
autonomy and even independence. The Baltic states – Estonia, Latvia, and

20
Lithuania – were among the first to declare their independence, setting off a
chain reaction that would ultimately unravel the Soviet Union.

Political reforms also played a crucial role in the disintegration process. Soviet
leader Mikhail Gorbachev's attempts to introduce political openness (glasnost)
and economic restructuring (perestroika) were intended to revitalize the socialist
system. However, these reforms inadvertently unleashed forces that further
destabilized the already fragile political structure. As the Iron Curtain lifted, long-
suppressed grievances and aspirations came to the forefront. The geopolitical
landscape was undergoing a transformation as well. The Cold War rivalry
between the United States and the Soviet Union had defined global politics for
decades. However, by the late 1980s, the ideological confrontation was waning.
The thaw in relations between the superpowers, symbolized by events like the
Reykjavik Summit and arms reduction agreements, reflected a changing
international dynamic.

The climax of this transformative period occurred in December 1991 when the
leaders of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus declared the dissolution of the Soviet
Union and the establishment of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).
The once-unified state, which had spanned eleven time zones and encompassed
diverse ethnic groups, fractured into multiple independent nations. The
disintegration of the Soviet Union had profound implications for global politics.
The end of the Cold War brought about a unipolar world order, with the United
States emerging as the sole superpower. It also opened the door for the former
Soviet republics to pursue their own political and economic trajectories. While
some nations successfully transitioned to democracy and market-oriented
economies, others faced challenges such as political instability, economic
hardships, and identity crises.

In conclusion, the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 was a multifaceted

process driven by economic struggles, nationalist movements, political reforms,
and changing global dynamics. This historic event marked the end of an era,
transforming the geopolitical landscape and shaping the course of international
relations in the post-Cold War era.

21
 • In 1991, the Soviet Union officially dissolved, marking the end of the Cold
War era and the ideological struggle between capitalism and
communism.

2. Peaceful Transition

The conclusion of the Cold War marked a pivotal moment in global history,
distinguished by a noteworthy shift away from military confrontations towards a
series of tranquil transitions. Unlike previous eras defined by geopolitical tensions
and the specter of nuclear warfare, the conclusion of the Cold War witnessed the
United States and the Soviet Union opting for diplomatic channels to navigate
the complexities of their relationship. During this transformative period, the
leaders of the two superpowers, recognizing the imperative for change,
embarked on diplomatic endeavors to ease longstanding hostilities. This
diplomatic approach was exemplified by key figures such as Mikhail Gorbachev,
the leader of the Soviet Union, and Ronald Reagan, the President of the United
States. Their commitment to dialogue and negotiation paved the way for arms
reduction treaties and diplomatic agreements that contributed to a substantial
de-escalation of tensions.

The peaceful transition was not solely confined to the upper echelons of political
leadership. Grassroots movements and civil society played an instrumental role
in fostering understanding and cooperation between the two nations. People-to-
people exchanges and cultural initiatives became integral components of the
thawing relations, fostering mutual understanding and trust among citizens on
both sides. This shift towards peaceful transition not only prevented the outbreak
of military conflicts but also laid the foundation for a new era of international
relations. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, while marked by internal
changes and challenges, was largely devoid of the violence that often
accompanies the disintegration of powerful states.

In essence, the end of the Cold War stands as a testament to the potency of
diplomatic engagement and the capacity for peaceful transitions even in the face
of longstanding ideological differences. This period of history serves as a
valuable reminder of the potential for nations to navigate complex geopolitical
22
landscapes through dialogue, cooperation, and the pursuit of common interests,
ultimately avoiding the devastating consequences of armed conflicts.

• The end of the Cold War was characterized by a series of peaceful

transitions rather than military conflicts, with the U.S. and the Soviet
Union engaging in diplomatic efforts.

12.8 Berlin Wall and Iron Curtain

The Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain were prominent symbols of the ideological
and physical divisions between the Eastern and Western blocs during the Cold
War. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent dissolution of the Iron
Curtain played pivotal roles in reshaping the geopolitical landscape of Europe,
fostering greater unity, and symbolizing the end of an era. The Berlin Wall,
erected in 1961 by East Germany, physically separated East Berlin from West
Berlin, serving as a tangible manifestation of the ideological divide between the
communist Eastern Bloc and the capitalist Western Bloc. This concrete barrier
not only restricted the movement of people but also represented the deep-
seated tensions and mistrust between the two opposing sides. The events
leading to the fall of the Berlin Wall unfolded against the backdrop of political
and economic changes within the Eastern Bloc, coupled with the reformist
policies introduced by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. The call for greater
political openness, or "glasnost," and economic restructuring, known as
"perestroika," led to a wave of democratic movements and uprisings in Eastern
European countries.

In East Germany, mounting pressure for political reforms and the desire for
freedom reached a tipping point. On November 9, 1989, the East German
government unexpectedly announced that citizens could travel freely to West
Germany. This announcement marked a historic moment as thousands of East
Germans flocked to the Berlin Wall, tearing it down and symbolically
demolishing the physical barrier that had divided families and communities for
nearly three decades. Simultaneously, the term "Iron Curtain" had been used

23
metaphorically to describe the ideological and physical separation between the
communist and capitalist worlds. Coined by Winston Churchill during a speech in
1946, the Iron Curtain represented the curtain of communism that had
descended across Eastern Europe. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the subsequent
political changes in Eastern Europe gradually dismantled this figurative barrier,
opening up avenues for greater communication, collaboration, and interaction
between the East and the West.

The dissolution of the Iron Curtain not only facilitated the reunification of
Germany but also marked the end of the Cold War era. The geopolitical
landscape underwent a profound transformation as former Eastern Bloc
countries embraced political pluralism, democracy, and market-oriented
economies. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the disappearance of the Iron Curtain
symbolized the triumph of the ideals of freedom and democracy over the rigid
constraints of communism, fostering a new era of cooperation and integration in
Europe.

Berlin Wall

1. Historical Context

• The Berlin Wall was erected in 1961 by the East German government,
separating East and West Berlin.
• It was a physical manifestation of the ideological divide between the
democratic West and communist East during the Cold War.

2. Symbol of Division

• The wall became a potent symbol of the deep-seated political and

ideological differences between the two blocs.
• Families and friends were separated, and the wall was a stark reminder of
the limitations imposed on the movement of people.

3. Thaw in Cold War Tensions

24
 • The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 was a historic event that signified a
turning point in Cold War dynamics.
• It marked the beginning of the end of the division between East and West,
leading to the eventual reunification of Germany.

4. End of Physical Barriers

• The dismantling of the wall represented the removal of a physical barrier,

allowing people to move freely between East and West Berlin.
• The event was a celebration of freedom and the rejection of oppressive
regimes that sought to restrict individual liberties.

5. Global Implications

• The fall of the Berlin Wall had profound global implications, symbolizing
the decline of communism and the victory of democratic ideals.
• It paved the way for the reunification of Germany and contributed to the
overall dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Iron Curtain

1. Origin and Concept

• Coined by Winston Churchill in a 1946 speech, the term "Iron Curtain"

referred to the ideological and physical separation between the Soviet-
controlled Eastern Bloc and the democratic Western Bloc.

2. Geographical Division

• The Iron Curtain represented a vast geographical divide, stretching from

the Baltic Sea in the north to the Adriatic Sea in the south, effectively
isolating Eastern Europe from the West.

3. Communication and Interaction

25
 • The dissolution of the Iron Curtain, starting with the fall of the Berlin Wall,
allowed for increased communication and interaction between the
previously isolated regions.
• This breakdown of barriers facilitated cultural exchanges, economic
collaboration, and a sense of shared humanity.

4. End of Cold War Dynamics

• The disappearance of the Iron Curtain marked the end of the rigid
bipolarity that defined the Cold War era.
• Countries behind the Iron Curtain were no longer isolated, contributing to a
more interconnected global landscape.

5. European Integration

• The removal of the Iron Curtain played a crucial role in the process of
European integration.
• Former Eastern Bloc countries became active participants in the European
community, fostering political, economic, and social ties across the
continent.

In conclusion, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the dissolution of the Iron Curtain
were pivotal moments in history, symbolizing the end of Cold War tensions,
fostering unity, and contributing to a more interconnected and integrated world.

12.9 Crisis in Eastern Europe

Introduction:

The modern crisis in Eastern Europe is deeply rooted in the historical evolution of
the region, marked by a series of transformative events that unfolded in the late
20th century. This period witnessed a wave of peaceful revolutions inspired by
the reforms in the Soviet Union, ultimately leading to the dismantling of
26
communist regimes in Eastern European countries. Understanding the historical
context is crucial for comprehending the complexities of the current crisis in the
region.

Background:

The seeds of change were sown in the 1980s when Mikhail Gorbachev, the then-
Soviet leader, introduced a series of political and economic reforms in the USSR.
These reforms, collectively known as perestroika and glasnost, aimed at
fostering openness, transparency, and restructuring the Soviet system. The
impact of Gorbachev's policies was not confined to the borders of the Soviet
Union; it resonated across Eastern Europe, sparking a wave of aspirations for
democratic governance and political freedom.

Peaceful Revolutions:

The Eastern European countries, inspired by the winds of change blowing from
Moscow, embarked on a journey of peaceful revolutions. Citizens in countries
such as Poland, Hungary, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Romania began
advocating for political reforms, demanding an end to communist rule, and
expressing their desire for democracy. The Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia,
the Solidarity movement in Poland, and the fall of the Berlin Wall in East
Germany are emblematic of the people's collective will for change.

End of Communist Regimes:

The culmination of these peaceful uprisings was the demise of communist

regimes in Eastern Europe. One by one, entrenched political structures gave way
to democratic transitions, and the region experienced a historic shift toward
pluralistic governance. The collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the disintegration of
the Soviet Union further solidified the end of the Cold War era and set the stage
for a new chapter in Eastern European history.

Contemporary Crisis:

27
However, the post-communist era did not usher in an era of unbridled prosperity
for Eastern Europe. The transition from centralized economies to market-oriented
systems presented challenges, including economic disparities, corruption, and
social inequalities. Additionally, geopolitical tensions have emerged, with some
countries in the region grappling with questions of national identity and external
influences.

Conclusion:

The crisis in Eastern Europe today is a multifaceted outcome of historical

transformations and contemporary challenges. The peaceful revolutions that
marked the end of communist regimes were a turning point, but the subsequent
years have revealed the complexities of nation-building, economic restructuring,
and geopolitical realignments. Understanding the historical roots of the crisis is
essential for devising effective solutions and fostering stability in the region.

1. Background of Communist Regimes

• Eastern European countries were under the influence of communist

regimes, largely backed by the Soviet Union, following World War II.
• These regimes were characterized by authoritarian rule, centralized
planning, and suppression of dissent.

2. Inspiration from USSR Reforms

• The reforms initiated by Mikhail Gorbachev in the Soviet Union, such as

perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness), inspired movements
for change in Eastern Europe.
• People in these countries sought similar reforms and openness in their
own societies.

3. Emergence of Dissent

28
 • Dissatisfaction with economic hardships, lack of political freedoms, and
human rights abuses fueled discontent among the population.
• Intellectuals, students, and various social groups started questioning the
legitimacy of the ruling regimes.

4. Solidarity Movement in Poland

• The Solidarity movement in Poland, led by Lech Walesa, played a pivotal

role in challenging the communist government.
• Massive strikes and protests demanded workers' rights and political
reforms, eventually leading to negotiations and the recognition of
Solidarity as a legitimate political force.

5. Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia

• Czechoslovakia experienced the Velvet Revolution in 1989, where

peaceful protests and civic disobedience led to the ousting of the
communist government.
• Vaclav Havel, a dissident playwright, emerged as a key figure, and the
transition to democracy was remarkably smooth.

6. Fall of the Berlin Wall

• The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 symbolized the end of the division
between East and West Germany and marked a significant moment in the
dissolution of communist influence in Eastern Europe.
• The reunification of Germany became a catalyst for further democratic
movements in neighboring countries.

29
7. Transition to Democracy

• Several Eastern European countries, including Hungary, Bulgaria, and

Romania, underwent a peaceful transition to multi-party systems and
democratic governance.
• The adoption of new constitutions and free elections marked the
establishment of democratic institutions.

8. End of Soviet Influence

• As Eastern European countries embraced democratic reforms, the Soviet

Union's influence in the region declined rapidly.
• The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 further solidified the
independence of these newly democratic nations.

9. Legacy and Challenges

• The end of communist rule brought about significant social, political, and
economic changes, but some countries faced challenges in managing the
transition and addressing issues like economic inequality and corruption.
• The legacy of the peaceful revolutions in Eastern Europe continues to
shape the region's political landscape.

In conclusion, the crisis in Eastern Europe during the late 1980s and early 1990s
marked a transformative period as communist regimes gave way to democratic
movements, fostering a new era of political and social change in the region.

30
12.10 SUMMARY

1. Post-WWII Landscape: After World War II, a new geopolitical order emerged,
dividing nations into the First World (capitalist bloc led by the United States and
its allies) and the Second World (communist bloc led by the USSR and its allies).

2. Non-Aligned Movement: Many newly independent nations, primarily in Africa,

Asia, and Latin America, chose to remain non-aligned with either superpower.
This led to the coining of the term "Third World" to describe these nations.

3. Economic Challenges: The Third World faced economic challenges, including

poverty, underdevelopment, and exploitation by former colonial powers. Efforts
were made to address these issues through regional cooperation and
development initiatives.

4. Political Movements: The era witnessed various political movements and

leaders advocating for self-determination, independence, and economic justice.
The Bandung Conference in 1955 marked a significant moment for solidarity
among the newly independent nations.

Collapse of the USSR

1. Economic Strain: The Soviet Union faced severe economic challenges, with a
centrally planned economy proving unsustainable. Mismanagement, inefficiency,
and a costly arms race with the United States contributed to economic decline.

2. Political Reforms: Mikhail Gorbachev initiated a series of political and economic

reforms, including Glasnost (openness) and Perestroika (restructuring), aiming to
modernize the Soviet system. However, these reforms inadvertently led to the
unraveling of the centralized control.

3. Nationalist Movements: The USSR's dissolution was hastened by nationalist

movements within its constituent republics. The Baltic states and others sought
independence, weakening the Soviet state's cohesion.

4. End of the Cold War

1. Fall of the Berlin Wall (1989): The symbolic dismantling of the Berlin Wall
marked a pivotal moment, symbolizing the end of the ideological divide between
East and West.
31
2. Democratization in Eastern Europe: The Eastern Bloc countries underwent
rapid political transformations, transitioning from communist regimes to
democratic governments.

3. Official Dissolution (1991): The Soviet Union officially dissolved in 1991, marking
the formal end of the Cold War. Fifteen independent republics emerged from the
former Soviet territories.

4. Impact on Global Geopolitics: The end of the Cold War reshaped global
geopolitics, with the United States emerging as the sole superpower. It also led
to the expansion of NATO and the European Union, influencing the balance of
power on the international stage.

12.11 REVIEW QUESTIONS

1. Define the term "Third World" and explain its historical origins.
2. Discuss the factors that contributed to the emergence of the Third World
as a concept in global geopolitics.
3. How did the policies of Mikhail Gorbachev, such as perestroika and
glasnost, impact the stability of the Soviet Union?
4. Discuss the role of détente in thawing the tensions between the United
States and the Soviet Union.
5. Assess the impact of the fall of the Berlin Wall on the dynamics of the Cold
War.
6. Analyze the consequences of the end of the Cold War on regional
conflicts around the world.
7. How did the dissolution of the Soviet Union influence the balance of power
in international relations?
8. Reflect on the long-term consequences of the events surrounding the
Third World's emergence, the collapse of the USSR, and the end of the
Cold War.
9. Discuss any lingering geopolitical challenges or issues that have persisted
since these historical events.

32
 10. How have these historical events shaped contemporary international
relations?

12.12 KEYWORDS

Emergence of the Third World

1. Post-WWII Global Dynamics: The term "Third World" originated in the context
of the Cold War, referring to countries that didn't align with either the capitalist
West (First World) or the communist East (Second World).

2. Decolonization: The emergence of the Third World was closely linked to the
process of decolonization, as former colonies sought political and economic
independence from European powers.

3. Economic Disparities: Third World countries often faced economic challenges,

including poverty, underdevelopment, and dependence on primary
commodities.

Collapse of the USSR

1. Economic Struggles: The Soviet Union faced economic stagnation and

inefficiencies, exacerbated by military spending during the arms race with the
United States.

2. Political Reforms: Mikhail Gorbachev's policies of perestroika (economic

restructuring) and glasnost (political openness) aimed at revitalizing the Soviet
system but inadvertently led to its unraveling.

3. Nationalism and Independence Movements: The various republics within the

USSR, encouraged by Gorbachev's reforms, sought greater autonomy, leading to
the eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union.

33
End of the Cold War

1. Peaceful Transition: The end of the Cold War marked a period of détente
between the United States and the Soviet Union, with a reduction in tensions and
nuclear arms control agreements.

2. Fall of the Berlin Wall: The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 symbolized the end of
the ideological divide between East and West Germany and became a powerful
symbol of the end of the Cold War.

3. Impact on Global Politics: The end of the Cold War reshaped global
geopolitics, leading to the emergence of new power dynamics and the
reconfiguration of international alliances.

12.13 References

1. Timothy Dunne and Steve Smith, eds., International Relations Theories:

Discipline and Diversity, Oxford University Press, 2007.
2. Scott Burchill, Andre Linklater and Terry Nardin, eds., Theories of
International Relations, 4thEdition, Palgrave Macmillan Publishers, 2009.
3. Aron Raymond, „Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, ‟ New
Brunswick, New Jersey, London, Transaction Publishers, 2003.
4. Strange Susan, States and Markets: An Introduction to International Political
Economy, London: Pinter Publishers, 1994.

34