DM LN 9
DM LN 9
𝑝−𝑇 ¬𝑝 − 𝐹
∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 ∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 ⇒ ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥), ∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) can not be the
∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 or 𝐹 negation of each other.
∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) − 𝐹
(Necessary and Sufficient)
∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 ∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) − 𝐹 ⇒ ¬[∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥)
(Not necessary)
∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 or 𝐹 ⇒ ∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥), ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) can not be the
(Not sufficient) negation of each other.
∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) − 𝑇 ∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) − 𝐹 ⇒ ¬[∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥)
(Necessary and Sufficient)
Write a logical expression for the following statements.
1. Every student in this class has studied Mathematics.
Soln : 𝑥: a student in this class. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 has studied Mathematics.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is a person . 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 belongs to this class. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 has studied Mathematics.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) → 𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ For every person 𝑥, if 𝑥 is a student in this class, then 𝑥 has studied Mathematics.
2. Some students in this class has visited Mexico.
Soln : 𝑥: a student in this class. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 has visited Mexico.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is a person. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 belongs to this class. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 has visited Mexico.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) ∧ 𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ There is a person 𝑥 having the properties that 𝑥 is a student in this class and has visited Mexico.
3. Every student in this class has visited either Canada or Mexico.
Soln : 𝑥: a student in this class. 𝐶(𝑥): 𝑥 has visited Canada. 𝑀(𝑥): 𝑥 has visited Mexico.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 [𝐶(𝑥) ∨ 𝑀(𝑥)].
OR
𝑥: is a person. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 belongs to this class. 𝐶(𝑥): 𝑥 has visited Canada. 𝑀(𝑥): 𝑥 has visited Mexico.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 {𝑃(𝑥) → [𝐶(𝑥) ∨ 𝑀(𝑥)]}. ≡ For every person 𝑥 ,if 𝑥 is a student in this class, then 𝑥 has visited either Canada or Mexico.
4. All lions are fierce.
Soln : 𝑥: is a lion. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is fierce.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is an animal. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is a lion. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 is fierce.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) → 𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ For every animal 𝑥, if 𝑥 is a lion, then 𝑥 is fierce.
5. Some lions do not drink coffee.
Soln : 𝑥: is a lion. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 drinks coffee.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is an animal. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is a lion. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 drinks coffee.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) ∧ ¬𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ There is an animal 𝑥 having the properties that 𝑥 is a lion and does not drink coffee.
6. Some fierce creatures do not drink coffee.
Soln : 𝑥: is a fierce creature. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 drinks coffee.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is a creature. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is fierce. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 drinks coffee.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) ∧ ¬𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ There is a creature 𝑥 having the properties that 𝑥 is a lion and does not drink coffee.
7. All humming birds are richly colored.
Soln : 𝑥: is a humming bird. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is richly colored.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is a bird. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is a humming bird. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 is richly colored.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) → 𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ For every bird 𝑥, if 𝑥 is a humming bird, then 𝑥 is richly colored.
8. No large birds live on honey.
Soln : 𝑥: is a large bird. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 lives on honey.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is a bird. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is a large bird. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 lives on honey.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) → ¬𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ For every bird 𝑥, if 𝑥 is a large bird, then 𝑥 does not live on honey.
9. Birds that do not live on honey are dull in color.
Soln : 𝑥: is a bird. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 lives on honey. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 is dull in color.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 [¬𝑃(𝑥) → 𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ For every bird 𝑥, if 𝑥 lives on honey, then 𝑥 is dull in color.
OR
𝑥: is a creature. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is a bird. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 lives on honey. 𝑅(𝑥): 𝑥 is dull in color.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 {[𝑃(𝑥) ∧ ¬𝑄(𝑥)] → 𝑅(𝑥)}. ≡ For every creature 𝑥, if 𝑥 is a bird and do not live on honey, then 𝑥 is dull in color.
10. Humming birds are small.
Soln : 𝑥: is a humming bird. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is small.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
OR
𝑥: is a bird. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is a humming bird. 𝑄(𝑥): 𝑥 is small.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 [𝑃(𝑥) → 𝑄(𝑥)]. ≡ For every bird 𝑥, if 𝑥 is a humming bird, then 𝑥 is small.
Negate the following statements and express the negation in simple English.
1. All dogs have fleas.
Soln: 𝑥: is a dog. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 has fleas.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
There is a dog without fleas.
Negation: ¬[∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) ⇒ {
Some dogs are without fleas.
2. There is a rabbit that knows calculus.
Soln: 𝑥: is a rabbit. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 knows calculus.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
Negation: ¬[∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) ⇒ No rabbit knows calculus.
3. Not everyone in your class has an internet connection. ≡ All students in your class do not have an internet connection.
Soln: 𝑥: is a student in your class. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 has an internet connection.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥).
All students in your class have an internet connection.
Negation: ¬[∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) ⇒ {
Everyone in your class has an internet connection.
4. No monkey can speak French.
Soln: 𝑥: is a monkey. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 can speak French.
Logical expression: ∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥).
There is a monkey that can speak French.
Negation: ¬[∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) ⇒ {
Some monkeys can speak French.
5. Some students are asking doubts.
Soln: 𝑥: is a student. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is asking doubts.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥).
Negation: ¬[∃𝑥 𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∀𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥) ⇒ No student is asking doubts.
6. Some students are not asking doubts.
Soln: 𝑥: is a student. 𝑃(𝑥): 𝑥 is asking doubts.
Logical expression: ∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥).
Negation: ¬[∃𝑥 ¬𝑃(𝑥)] ≡ ∀𝑥 𝑃(𝑥) ⇒ All students are asking doubts.
(For practice, refer Exercise problems 𝟏 – 𝟑𝟕, section 1.3, page nos : 𝟒𝟔 – 𝟒𝟗.)
Dr. SKS