Adobe Scan Feb 13, 2025
Adobe Scan Feb 13, 2025
10
UNDERGROUND MINING:
UNSUPPORTED METHODS
323
324 UNDERGROUND MINING UNSUPPORTED METHODs
classification, under
emplgoryoundthe
nethods, as discussed in Section 4.8.3. For our purpose, we wil
classification scheme outlined in Table 4.1. In that the
are considered unsupported methods:
fol owing
1. Room-and-pillar mining
2 Stope-and-pillar mining
3. Shrinkage stoping
4. Sublevel stoping
MAINS
TO PROPÉRTY NE
PANEL 3
RETREAT
UU
|
-2000-4000
C60-220m)
BLEEDER
ENTRIES
D001
DO
ON
ROOMS
BEEEE BARRIER
PILLAR
80
(24
a)
r40t112 m
-0(Jm)
401 2m,
0006 -20t1m)
|001!!
0011101 PANEL nn
8ARRIER PILLAR
FIGURE 10.1.
(After Stelanko Room-and-pillar
and Bise, 1983. mining, driving rooms on
By permission from the the retreat without plar recovery.
Exploration, Inc., Littleton, CO.) Society for Mining, Metallurgy. and
326 UNDERGROUNO NINING UNSUPORTED METHODS
being common. In the cuse of Figure 10.1, note that the panel pillars
mined. This is called pllariny or caviny. The normal practicc in are being
drive the rooms and crosscuts on advance (first mining) and to pillar
(second mining). The caved area then becomes known as the yob.
pil aring
on
is to
retrcat
not removed if the surface must be supported; pillaring is olten
other reasons as well.
Pillars for
are
omitted
Note that in rooM-and-pillar mining of coal and other soft
cOmmon variations are practiced. So-called conrentional miisnerals, two
mining
employing mobile nechanized equipment to carry out the cyclical,
production unit
operations. In underground coal mining, only about 5% of the coal is
in this fashion (Energy Information Administration, 2000). With mined
mining, separate unit operations of drilling. cutting, blasting, continuousare
and loading
replaced by a singie high-performance continuous miner. Approximately 48
of all underground coal in the United States is produccd by continuous
(Energy Information Administration, 2000). Where room-and-pillar mining
mining is
practiced in hard-rock formations, only conventional mining is utilized
cause of the inability of a contiauous miner to cut harder minera! deposits
Productivity in room-and-pillar mining has been interesting to follow. Priar
to the enactment of the Coal Mine Health and Safety Actof 1969,
had risen steadily since World War I. it then declined rather produclivity
(below 200 tons/shift or 180 tonnes,/shift), following which it began precipitously
rising again
Because of better equipment and management, productivity continues ite
upward ascent. Stefanko and Bise (1983) reported that productivity was about
500 tons/shift (460 tonnes/shift) during the last decade before their publication
but today most room-and-pillar mines produce 1000to 2000 tons/shift (900 to
1800 tonnes/shift). In stone and metal mining, productivity also continues to
increase. In thiscase, the improvements are due to better and larger equipment.
more automation. and improved management practices.
Rock mechanics in room-and-pillar mining is another topic of great con
cern. Fortunately, much is known, and excellent tools are available to the
mining engineer to contro! the roof and ribs in this method. Of particular
interest, Stefanko and Bise (1983) and Farmer (1992) provide much in the way
of background on the application of rock mechanics to room-and-pillar
mining.
LEGENO
- PEAMANENT STOPPING CONVEYOR PELT SPr PACK
-BRATTICE OR CHECK CURTAIN
X 0VEACAST
A- AEGULATOR aARRIEA
DIAECTION OP AIR FLOW
PILLAR
PREVIOus PANEL
(GAVED)
SECTION
ENTRIES
8ARR1ER
GO8 PILLAR
(CAVED
AREA)
ROOM ENTRIES
-PILLAR LINE
ENTRY NUMBE RS
FIGURE 10.2. Room-and-pilar mining system showing ail openings and the section pilar irne
room entries, room, and the associated crosscuts are mined on advance and
the pillars are mined on the retreat. This mining plan is what was once called
the Pittsburgh block section, common when room-and-pillar mining with
electric shuttle cars was practiced in the Pittsburgh seam. This or similar
systems are still utilized using continuous miners. but only ii a longwalI
operation is not feasible. Note also the numbering on the entries in the section
entry set. In coal mining, the entries in any set are numbered from left to righ:
as one looks inby (toward the faces and away from the outside of the mine).
Also note that if someone is looking at the face, that person is looking inby,
but if turned in the opposite direction and facing toward the outside of the
mine, that person is looking outby.
2"
"2
(C)
4 "3
(c)
numberedin.
AGURE 10.3. Dringand cutting patterms tor coal breakage. Holes are
frina. (a) Undercutting. (b) Center cutting. (c) Undercutung and center shearing. (d) Ton
and center shearing. (Ater Chironis, 1983.Copyrgnt (c) i303, MCGr§w-Hill, Inc., New Yore
Advantages
1. Moderately high productivity:; 3.5 tons (3.2 tonnes) per employee
average for U.S. mines using room-and-pillar continuous mining; hour
(2.6 tonnes) per employee hour is typical for conventional 2.9 ton
pillar mining (Energy Information Administration, 2000). room-and
2. Moderate mining cost (relative cost about 10 to 25%, depending
commodity; average is 20%).
3. Moderately high production rate.
4. Fair to good recovery with pillar extraction (70 to 90%).
5. Low to moderate dilution (0 to 40%).
6. Suitable to mechanization.
7. Concentrated operations (although multiple faces needed to make i
work).
8. Versatile for variety of roof conditions.
9. Ventilation enhanced with multiple openings.
Disadvantages
1. Caving and subsidence occur with pillar recovery.
2. Method inflexible and rigid in layout, not
selective without waste
disposal.
3. Poor recovery (40 to 60%) without pillar extraction.
4. Ground stress and support loads increase with depth.
5. Fairly high capital investment associated with mechanization.
6. Extensive development required in coal because of
7. Potential health and safety hazards exist,
multiple openings.
especially in coal mines.
10.2.2.6 Applications and Variations.
dominantly used in coal mining but finds someRoom-and-pillar mining is pre
use in many other commodities.
Descriptions of the method as used in coal can be
(1983) and Farmer (1992). In noncoal mining, therefound
are a
in Stefanko and Bise
of the room-and-pillar method. Bullock number of variations
and Mann (1982) and Hustrulid and
Bullock (2001) outline its application to a number of
commodities. Other authors outline the use of different mineral
(Suttill, 199la; Walker, 1992), trona (Brown, room-and-pillar
1995), and
mining in zinc
Watters, 1996). gold (Pease and
ETOPE-aNG-PILLAH teirti92 333
It is not surprising that there is confusion between the two methods, in that
they are rather similar. Adding to the confusion is the fact that three other
terms have been used over the years for stope-and-pillar mining: open stoping.
breast stoping, and bord-and-pillar mining. For students of mining engineering,
we suggest that the simplest rule is to use the term room-and-pillar when
referring to coal and stope-and-pillar when referring to noncoal mining. The
only exception would be noncoal mines with a very regular layout of openings
and a single level of mining within the deposit. These would be termed
room-and-pillar mines.
Stope-and-pillar mining has followed a number of mining plans, depending
on the shape and thickness of the deposit, the types of equipment used, and the
need for productivity. Figure 10.5 shows a stope-and-pillar mine using two
benches. The first level of mining is the upper level, which is mined using a
conventional cycle of operations. The first level of mining allows the crew close
inspection of the back for roof control purposes. When the second level of
mining is completed, the roof has been -carefully stabilized, reducing the
possibility of a roof fall from far above.
There are a number of variations of stope-and-pillarmining. In Figure 10.6,
three variations are shown, each utilizing two benches to mine the seam. In
thíck seams where the benches are greater in depth, it is common for the
blastholes to be drilled from above. Putting in vertical holes in this ashion
generally allows for larger-diameter holes and better blasting economics. This
method is shown in Figure 10.6(c). The stope-and-pillar mining method
334 INDERGROUND MI
CUPPORTED METHODS
FIGURE 10.5. Stope-and-pillar mining by benching. Large-scale method for flat deposit using
dril! igs, front-end loaders, and trucks. (After Hamrin, 1982. By permission from the Society for
Mining. Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Littleton, CO.)
provides many faces and method variations. For mining on a pitch, stope-and
pillar mining can be conducted using slushers for stope haulage. However, the
method is lacking in productivity and is avoided unless no other alternatives
exist.
There are several reasons that the anmount of development in stope-and
pillar mining is less than that in room-and-pillar. First, the strict laws requiring
multipie openings do not apply to hard-rock mining unless strata gases are
present. Second. the development openings must often be driven through
barren rock, increasing the cost of development and the desire to avoid
unnecessary openings. Consequently, fewer development openings are driven
and mining on the advance is both common and cost-elfective.
There isless tendency to recover any pillars in stope-and-pillar mining.
There are three reasons for this practice: (1) The pillars are relatively small and
more difficult to recover safely, (2) the pillars are irregular in size and do not
lend themselves to a systematic recovery operation, and (3) caving to the
surface would produce much in the way of damaging subsidence (Morrison
and Russell, 1973; Hamrin, 1982). Partial extraction of pillars (sometimes
DRILL JUMBO
BROKEN ORE
100
FEET
SCALE
(a)
-DRILL JUMBO
I00
FEET
SCALE
(b.
FIRST PASS
FULL FACE
BENCH
(c)
by stope-and-pillar mining. (a) Breast
FIGURE 10.6. Methods of exploiting thick deposits
stoping foilowed by benching: horizontal
stoping followed by overhand slabbing. (b) Breastpermission from the Society for Mining.
drilling. (After Lucas and Haycocks, 1973. By benching, vertica
stoping followed by
Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Littleton, CO.) (c) Breast
driling (Dravo Corporation, 1974).
Similar to those for room-and-pillar mines. The most important functions are
hcalth and safcty (dust control, ventilation, nO15e abatement), ground control
power supply and distribution. water handling. and Hood control
10.3.3 Conditions
The conditions listed here are derived from a number of sources, particularly
Morrison and Russcll (1973), Bullock (1982), Hartman (1987). and Haycocks
(1992):
10.3.4 Characteristics
Advantages
X. Moderate to high productivity (30 to 70 tons per employee-shift or 27
to 64 tonnes per employee-shift).
Moderate mining cost (relative mining cost about 10%).
Moderate to high production rate
4. High degree of flexibility. method easily modihed. operate several levels
at one time.
Disadvantages
1. Ground control requires continuous maintenance of back if
rock is not
strong: high buck difficult to scale and support; ground stress on pillars
and openings increases with depth.
2. Largc capital expenditure required for extensive mechanization.
3 Duicult to provide good ventilation because of large openings.
4 Some ore lost in pillars.
5. Recovery of pillars difhcult or impossible.
Unbroken
S t r o nO
g re
Broken
ore
RoiMonswe ay
CooWalnmgpinlelgent C o m p e t eF
ntootwall
Chutes
Drift
Rib pillar
Ore
Access
crosscut
Broken cre
Sil!
pillar
Siushertrench -4
Haulage PLAN
drift
FIGURE 10.8. Shrinkage stoping using a scraper and siusher drift. (After Henderson, 1982. By
permission from the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, inc., Litleton, CO)
The crew must work in the stope between the back and the broken muck.
In narrow stopes, this may require that they perform all drilling using handheld
drills, which willincrease the costs. In stopes with more space, the driling wil
preferably be completed by hydraulic drilling equipment for eficiency reaSOns.
After the holes are charged but prior to blasting, drawing of ore from the stope
should occur. Before reentering the stope area, any necessary ground control
operations are carried out. This usually consists of bolting or bolting with wire
mesh to increase the holding ability of the bolts.
Oporations in shrinkago stupes employ the following steps in tbe production
cycle:
Drilling: pneumatic airleg drill or stoper: small hydraulic drill jumbo
Blasting: ANFO, gels, or emulsions, charging by hand, pneumatic loader, or
pumping system; firing electrically or by dctonating cord
CACNOAINE UNSUPPORTED METHO0s
Ti(alsomberventilation)
ed maway
Ore le stoo
Drawonts
Haulage drif
FIGURE 10.9. Shrinkage stoping using drawpoints and loaders. (After Hamrin, 1982. By
and Exploration, Inc., Littleton., Co,
pemission from the Society for Mining, Metallurgy,
impact
Secondary breakage: drill and blast, packaged boulder charge,
hammer
overhead loader, slusber
Loaaina: gravity fiow, front-end loader, LHD,
Haulage: LHD, truck, rail
operations lor
10.4.2.2 Auxiliary Operations. The usual list of auxiliaryroom-and-pillar
underground mining pertains-see the complete list for
stope-and-pillar in Section
mining in Section 10.2 and the abbreviated list for
103
SHANKAGE STCPNG 343
10.4.3 Conditions
The following list is based pr1mar1ly on descriptions of shrinkage stoping
opcrations in Lyman (1982). Haptonstali (1992), and White (1992)
10.4.4 Characteristics
The following summary is based on general knowledge of shrinkage stoping
operations and specific information found in Hamrin (1982), Lyman (1982),
White (1992), and Haptonstall (1992).
Advantages
1. Small-l0-moderate-scale operation.
2. Ore is drawn down by gravity.
3. Method conceptualy simple, can be used for asmallmine.
4. Low capital investment, little equipment required for the basic method.
5. Little ground support is required in stope.
6. Stope development is moderate.
7. Works very well in veins with widths of <8ft (2.4 m).
8. Fairly good recovery (75 to 85%).
9. Low dilution (10 to 20%).
Disadvantages
1. Low to moderate productivity range.
2. Moderate to fairly high mining cost (relative cost about 45%).
3. Labor intensive; not easy to mechanize.
4. Rough footing in stope, dangerous working conditions.
5. Most of the ore (>60%) tied up in stope.
6. Ore is subject to oxidation, packing, and spontaneous combustion.
7. Selectivity is only fair.
344 UNDERGROUND MINING: UNSUPpORTED METHODS
Subievel
Ringdriling. longholes
Ore
Mamway
Stope Sublevel
Blasted ore
Haulage drit
FIGURE 10.10. Sublevel stoping (blasthole method) using ning drilling and biasting into a siot.
(After Hamin, 1982. By permission frem the Scciety for Mining, Metalurgy, and Expioraton,
Inc., Littleton, CO.)
sublevels within the ore block. Three different variations of sublevel stoping are
practiced. The irst and most traditional method, often called the blasthole
method, is shown in Figure 10.10. Using this variation, the miners must create
a vertical slot at one end of the stope. They then work in the subievels to drill
a radial pattern of drillholes. After a set of these holes are loaded, blocks of the
ore body are blasted into the open stope. The blast should be carefully planned,
as it is virtually impossible for miners to go into the stope to correct problems.
The second method of sublevel stoping, illustrated in Figure 10.!1, is often
referred to as the open-ending method. As in the blasthole method, a slot must
be developed at one end of the stope. Production is then achieved by driling
parallel holes from top to bottom of the designated stope using a sublevel at
the top of the stope that is the width of the stope. As in the blasthole method,
vertical slices of the ore are blasted into the open stope. This method generally
permits larger drillholes to be used and may be more efficient in terms of
explosives consumption.
METHODS
346 UNDERGROUNO MINING. UNSUPPORTED
Sublevel
Large hole
drilling
parallel
holes
Stope
Menway
Blasted ore
FiGURE 10.11. Sublevel stoping using parallel drilling and blasting into a slot. (After Hamrin
1982. By permission from the Society for Mining. Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Litteton
CO.)
Blast -
holes
Slice
Undercut
Haulage drift
FIGURE 10.12. Vertical crater retreat (VCR) version of sublevel stoping. Large parallel hoBes
are loaded with near-spherical explosive charges, and horizontal slices of ore are blasted into
the undercut. (After Green, 1976. By permission from National Mining Association, Washington,
DC.)
1991b). The sizes of the stopes that are possible are obviously dependent on
the strength of the rock. It should also be noted that many sublevel stoping
operations utilize pillar recovery nethods, often using cemented fil and
cut-and-fill methods to extract the pillars.