Scribd
Upload
17 views6 pages

Ggm103 Assignment

The document discusses various legal theories, including Dworkin's communalist theory, which emphasizes judges' alignment with community values, and African theories of adjudication that prioritize restorative justice and social harmony. It also contrasts natural law theories—classical, religious, and modern—with a focus on human flourishing, and outlines legal positivism's core principles. Additionally, it addresses the constraints on judges and the counter-majoritarian dilemma, proposing Dworkin's interpretivism as a solution that balances judicial independence with democratic accountability.

Uploaded by

Syoks Chronicles
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views6 pages

Ggm103 Assignment

The document discusses various legal theories, including Dworkin's communalist theory, which emphasizes judges' alignment with community values, and African theories of adjudication that prioritize restorative justice and social harmony. It also contrasts natural law theories—classical, religious, and modern—with a focus on human flourishing, and outlines legal positivism's core principles. Additionally, it addresses the constraints on judges and the counter-majoritarian dilemma, proposing Dworkin's interpretivism as a solution that balances judicial independence with democratic accountability.

Uploaded by

Syoks Chronicles
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

ANSWERS 1

1. Difference Between Communalist Theory and African Theories of Adjudication

Communalist Theory (Dworkin):


Dworkin’s communalist theory is rooted in the idea that judges are part of an interpretive
community that shares a common understanding of legal principles, values, and history.
This community provides a framework for judges to interpret the law in a way that
maintains consistency and integrity. Judges are not free to impose their personal views
but must align their decisions with the community’s shared moral and legal principles.
This ensures that the law is seen as a coherent system rather than a collection of
arbitrary rules. Dworkin’s theory is abstract and universal, focusing on the idea of "law
as integrity," where judges strive to make decisions that fit within the broader narrative
of the legal system.

African Theories of Adjudication:


African theories of adjudication, such as those influenced by Ubuntu, emphasize
communal values, human dignity, and social harmony. Ubuntu, a Nguni term meaning "I
am because we are," reflects the interconnectedness of individuals within a community.
In adjudication, this means judges are expected to consider the impact of their decisions
on the community and prioritize restorative justice over punitive measures. African
theories are deeply rooted in cultural and social contexts, emphasizing reconciliation
and the restoration of relationships. Unlike Dworkin’s communalist theory, which is more
abstract, African theories are practical and context-specific, reflecting the unique values
and traditions of African societies.

Key Difference:
While both theories emphasize community and shared values, Dworkin’s communalist
theory is universal and abstract, focusing on legal principles and integrity. African
theories are culturally specific, emphasizing communal harmony, restorative justice, and
the practical impact of judicial decisions on society.
2. Dworkin’s Communalist Theory

Dworkin’s communalist theory is part of his broader philosophy of "law as integrity."


According to Dworkin, judges are not free to make decisions based on personal
preferences or arbitrary rules. Instead, they must interpret the law in a way that aligns
with the moral and legal principles of the community they serve. This interpretive
process involves two key steps:

1. Fit: The decision must fit within the existing legal framework, including statutes,
precedents, and constitutional principles.
2. Justification: The decision must be morally justified, reflecting the community’s
shared values and principles.

By following this approach, judges ensure that the law is seen as a coherent and
principled system. Dworkin’s theory emphasizes the importance of integrity in
adjudication, ensuring that legal decisions are consistent, predictable, and morally
sound.

3. Differences Between Natural Law Theories

Natural law theories can be divided into three main categories: classical, religious, and
modern natural law.

Classical Natural Law:

 Thinkers: Aristotle, Cicero, Aquinas.


 Core Idea: Law is derived from universal moral principles inherent in nature.
These principles are discoverable through reason and are binding on all human
beings.
 Focus: The connection between law and morality, with an emphasis on the
common good and justice.
Religious Natural Law:

 Thinkers: St. Augustine, Islamic jurists.


 Core Idea: Law is based on divine will or sacred texts. Moral principles are
derived from religious teachings and are considered absolute.
 Focus: The alignment of human law with divine law, ensuring that legal systems
reflect religious values.

Modern Natural Law:

 Thinkers: John Finnis, Lon Fuller.


 Core Idea: Law is based on practical reason and human flourishing. Finnis
identifies basic goods (e.g., life, knowledge, sociability) that are essential for
human well-being.
 Focus: The promotion of human dignity and well-being through legal systems
that respect fundamental rights and values.

Key Differences:

 Source of Authority: Classical natural law relies on reason and nature, religious
natural law on divine will, and modern natural law on practical reason and human
flourishing.
 Scope: Classical and religious natural law are more rigid and universal, while
modern natural law is more flexible and adaptable to contemporary legal
systems.

4. Most Convincing Natural Law Theory

Modern Natural Law (John Finnis):


I find modern natural law, particularly John Finnis’s theory, the most convincing because
it emphasizes human flourishing and practical reason. Finnis identifies basic goods
(e.g., life, knowledge, sociability) that are essential for human well-being and argues
that legal systems should promote these goods. This approach is flexible and
adaptable, making it applicable to diverse legal systems.

Why Not Classical or Religious Natural Law?


Classical natural law is too rigid and abstract, while religious natural law is often
dogmatic and incompatible with secular legal systems. Modern natural law strikes a
balance by focusing on universal human values without relying on divine authority or
abstract metaphysical principles.

Relevance to South African Law:


Modern natural law aligns well with South Africa’s constitutional values, particularly the
emphasis on human dignity, equality, and Ubuntu. Finnis’s focus on basic goods
resonates with the South African Constitution’s commitment to human rights and social
justice.

5. Three Basic Ideas of Legal Positivism

1. Separation Thesis: Law and morality are distinct. Legal validity does not depend
on the moral content of a law. For example, a law can be legally valid even if it is
morally unjust.
2. Social Fact Thesis: Law is based on social facts, such as legislation, customs,
or judicial decisions. The existence of law depends on its source, not its moral
justification.
3. Conventionality Thesis: Legal rules are grounded in social conventions and
practices. Law is a human creation, not a reflection of natural or divine principles.

Key Point: Legal positivism emphasizes the importance of clear, objective criteria for
determining what counts as law, separating legal analysis from moral or philosophical
debates.
6. Theories on What Constrains Judges

1. Formalism:
o Judges are constrained by strict rules, precedents, and legal texts.
o Focus: Predictability and consistency in legal decisions.
o Criticism: Too rigid and inflexible, ignoring the social context of cases.
2. Realism:
o Judges are influenced by personal beliefs, social context, and policy
considerations.
o Focus: The practical impact of judicial decisions.
o Criticism: Too subjective, leading to unpredictability in the law.
3. Interpretivism (Dworkin):
o Judges are constrained by principles and integrity within the legal system.
o Focus: Balancing rules with moral values to ensure coherence and justice.
o Criticism: Requires judges to engage in complex moral reasoning, which
may lead to disagreements.

Key Difference: Formalism emphasizes rigidity, realism emphasizes flexibility, and


interpretivism seeks a middle ground by combining rules with moral principles.

7. Counter-Majoritarian Dilemma and Solution

Counter-Majoritarian Dilemma:
This refers to the tension between judicial review and democracy. Unelected judges can
overturn laws passed by elected representatives, raising concerns about the legitimacy
of judicial power in a democratic system.

Solution (Dworkin’s Interpretivism):


Dworkin’s theory provides a solution by emphasizing that judges interpret the law in line
with the community’s moral principles. This ensures that judicial decisions reflect shared
values rather than personal preferences. By focusing on integrity and coherence, judges
can justify their decisions in a way that respects democratic principles while maintaining
the rule of law.

Why Interpretivism?
Interpretivism balances the need for judicial independence with the need for democratic
accountability. It ensures that judicial review is not arbitrary but is grounded in the
community’s moral and legal principles.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy