Scribd
Upload
6 views4 pages

Torts 2nd Exam

The document outlines the midterm coverage for Torts and Damages, focusing on quasi-delicts, their definitions, elements, and relevant case law. It also discusses justifications and defenses to avoid liability, as well as affirmative duties and miscellaneous activities related to various professions, including doctors and lawyers. Key cases are cited to illustrate principles and applications of tort law.

Uploaded by

JERU SHALLOM MANUEL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views4 pages

Torts 2nd Exam

The document outlines the midterm coverage for Torts and Damages, focusing on quasi-delicts, their definitions, elements, and relevant case law. It also discusses justifications and defenses to avoid liability, as well as affirmative duties and miscellaneous activities related to various professions, including doctors and lawyers. Key cases are cited to illustrate principles and applications of tort law.

Uploaded by

JERU SHALLOM MANUEL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

TORTS AND DAMAGES

Midterms Coverage
Atty. Ramon Khalil IV C. Erum

IV. QUASI-DELICTS

A. GENERAL CONCEPTS

a. Definition, (Art. 2176)


b. Elements
• Aleta v. Sofitel, G.R. No. 228150, 11 January 2023
• Dr. Huang v. Phil. Hoteliers Inc., et al., G.R. No. 180440, 05
December 2012

c. Crime or delict v. Quasi Delict (Art. 2177)


• Rafael Reyes Trucking Corporation v. People and Rosario
Dy, G.R. No. 129029, 03 April 2000
• Diana v. Batangas Transportation Co., G.R. No. L-4920, 29
June 1953

i. Civil Liability Arising from Delict (cf Articles 29, 30, 35 of NCC; Articles 100-114 of
the RPC Book One; Rule 111 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure)
• People v. Bayotas, G.R. No. 102007 02 September
1994

d. Application of provisions on contractual fault (Art. 2178, c.f. Article


1170, 2201)
• Spouses Estrada v. Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc., et al.,
G.R. No. 203902, 19 July 2017
• Light Rail Transit Authority, et al. v. Navidad, G.R. No.
145804, 06 February 2003
• Air France v. Carrascoso, G.R. No. L-21438, 28 September
1996
• Orient Freight International, Inc. v. Keihin-Everett Forwarding
Company. Inc., G.R. No. 191937, 09 August 2019

e. Concept of Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations


(Article 1314)
• Gilchrist v. Cuddy, G.R. No. 9356, 18 February 1915
• Analita P. Inocencio v. Hospicio de San Jose, G.R. No.
201787, 25 September 2013
B. JUSTIFICATION/DEFENSES TO AVOID LIABILITY

a. Prima Facie Tort


b. Mistake
c. Illegal Transaction
d. Necessity or Self-protection
e. Consent to the act
f. Practical jokes; horseplay
g. Plaintiff’s own negligence as the Proximate Cause (Art. 2179, NCC)
• PLDT v. Spouses Esteban, G.R. No. L-57079, 29 September
1989
• Teh Le Kim v. Philippine Aerial Taxi Co., G.R. No. L39309, 24
November 1933
• BJDC Construction v. Lanuzo, et al., G.R. No. 161151, 24
March 2014

h. Contributory Negligence

• Philippine Bank of Commerce v. CA, G.R. No. 97626, 14


March 1997
• Cangco v.Manila Railroad Co., G.R. No. 12191, 14 October
1918
• Larry Estacion v. Noe Bernardo, G.R. No. 144723, 27
February 2006

i. Last Clear Chance

• Sealoader Shipping Corporation v. Grand Cement


Manufacturing, G.R. No. 167363, 15 December 2010
• Allied Banking Corporation v. Bank of the Philippine Islands,
G.R. No. 188363, 27 February 2013
• Pantranco v. Baesa, G.R. Nos. 79050-51, 14 November 1989

j. Fortuitous Event (Article 1174, Article 2181 NCC)

• Southeastern College v. CA, G.R. No. 126389, 10 July 1998


• Gotesco Investment Corporation v. Chatto 210 SCRA 18
[1992]
• MIAA v. Ala Industries Corporation, G.R. No. 147349,
13 February 2004
• Sicam v. Jorge, et al., G.R. No. 159617, 08 August
2007
k. Assumption of Risk
• Rodrigueza v. Manila Railroad Company, G.R. No. L15688,
19 November 1921
• Luzon Stevedoring Corp. v. Reyes, et al., G.R. No. L43469,
30 June 1976
• Dioquino v. Laureano, G.R. No. L-25906, 28 May 1970

l. Effect of death
• Board of Liquidators v. Heirs of Kalaw, G.R. No. L18805, 14
August 1987
• Aguas et al., v. Llemos, et al., G.R. No. L-18107, 30
August 1962

m. Prescription
• Vicente G. Henson Jr. v. UCPB General Insurance Co, Inc.,
G.R. No. 223134, 14 August 2019

n. Emergency Rule
• Ma. Lourdes Valenzuela v. CA, G.R. No. 115024, 07
February 1996

o. Involuntariness
p. Immunities

C. AFFIRMATIVE DUTIES AND MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES


a. Duty to Rescue
b. Owners, Proprietors and Possessors
c. Employers and Employees
d. Banks
• Philippine Bank of Commerce v. Court of Appeals, 269
SCRA 695 [1997]
e. Common Carriers
f. Doctors and Medical Malpractice Cases
i.
• Dr. Victoria L. Batiquin and Allan Batiquin v. CA, et al., 258
SCRA 334 [1996]
• Dr. Pedro Dennis Cereno, et al. v. CA, et al., G.R. No. 167366,
26 September 2012
• Noel Casumpang, et al. v. Nelson Cortejo, G.R. No. 171127,
11 March 2015

ii. Standard of Care/Medical Malpractice Cases


• Reyes v. Sisters of Mercy Hospital, 341 SCRA 760, 769
[2000]
• Carlos Borromeo v. Family Care Hospital and Ramon Inso,
G.R. No. 191018, 25 January 2016
• Solidum v. People, G.R. No. 192123, 10 March 2014

iii. Captain of the Ship Doctrine


• Rogelio Ramos, et al. v. CA, et al., G.R. No. 124354, 29
December 1999
• Dr. Milagros L. Cantre v. Spouses Go, G.R. No.
160889, 27 April 2007

iv. Not Warrantors


v. Proof (Res ipsa loquitor in medical malpractice cases)
• Dr. Ninevetch Cruz v. CA, 282 SCRA 188 [1997]
• Reyes v. Sisters of Mercy Hospital, 341 SCRA 760, 769
[2000]
• Dr. Rubi Li v. Spouses Soliman, G.R. No. 165279, 07 June
2011

vi. Liability of Hospitals and Consultants; doctrine of corporate


negligence; doctrine of ostensible agency and respondeat
superior in medical malpractice cases
• Rogelio Ramos, et al. v. CA, et al., G.R. No. 124354, 11
December 2002
• Rogelio P. Nogales v. Capitol Medical Center, et al., G.R. No.
142625, 19 December 2006

g. Lawyers
• Adarne v. Aldaba, 83 SCRA 734, 739 [1978]
• Roque v. Gunigundo, 89 SCRA 178 [1979]

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy