CHAPTER II

Review of Related Literature

Over the past few decades, research in science education has yielded valuable insights

into how children form their comprehension of scientific concepts. In the forthcoming sections, I

will delve into three key facets of this developmental journey: the genesis of intuitive

understandings, the dynamics of science learning, and the phenomenon of conceptual co-

existence. Subsequently, I will explore the implications of these findings for science education.

Science learners construct their initial understanding of the physical world based on their

everyday encounters, forming what are termed as intuitive understandings. These intuitive

understandings are structured within framework theories, which serve as skeletal conceptual

structures. Notably, these framework theories often diverge from established scientific

paradigms, thereby influencing how students interpret scientific explanations. This can lead to

the formation of fragmented or synthetic conceptions. To effectively grasp scientific principles,

students must undergo a transformative process wherein they revise their representations and

explanations of the physical world, alongside refining their modes of reasoning. Importantly, as

students progress in their scientific knowledge, they develop new concepts and belief systems

that may coexist alongside their preexisting framework theories. This developmental process

unfolds gradually and follows a discernible learning progression. The education received by

secondary school students, regardless of their science-related aspirations, is widely

acknowledged and justified by recent Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)

reports in many countries, such as Spain (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

Development [OECD], 2007, 2016), as noted by Sheldrake (2018). This acceptance can be

attributed to the historical emphasis in science education on developing students' substantive

scientific knowledge rather than other dimensions that also hold significant value for students

(Abrahams & Millar, 2008). These dimensions go beyond mere acquisition of knowledge; they

involve equipping students with the skills to adapt scientific information to meet the evolving

demands of society, where scientific knowledge plays an increasingly crucial role in daily life

(Mkimbili & Ødegaard, 2019).

In recent years, there has been a notable shift in the goals of secondary science

curriculum in many countries, reflecting a growing recognition of the importance of preparing

students—both STEM and non-STEM majors—as future consumers, voters, and policymakers.

This shift is driven by the need to enable students to critically examine and understand socio-

scientific issues and make informed decisions based on scientific evidence (Dauer et al., 2017;

Cheung, 2018; Gomes et al., 2008).

This study advocates for a broader educational objective at the secondary level, which

includes not only acquiring knowledge of the scientific enterprise and its societal role but also

developing intellectual abilities related to scientific inquiry methods. These skills are essential

for students to effectively engage with scientific issues and contribute meaningfully to scientific

discourse. Some of these skills encompass accurately formulating research problems, generating

hypotheses creatively, drawing meaningful conclusions from scientific data, and understanding

the implications of research findings (Charney et al., 2007; Vossen et al., 2018).
 Overall, this perspective underscores the importance of secondary science education in

equipping students with not only scientific knowledge but also the critical thinking and analytical

skills necessary for active participation in an increasingly complex and science-driven world.

In light of these insights, effective science education necessitates several key strategies.

Firstly, educators must foster students' awareness of their intuitive understandings, recognizing

them as foundational elements in the learning journey. Secondly, scientific information should be

imparted to students gradually, aligning with their individual learning progressions to optimize

comprehension and retention. Lastly, science education programs should prioritize the cultivation

of students' reasoning abilities and executive function skills, equipping them with the cognitive

tools needed to navigate the complexities of scientific inquiry.

By attending to these principles, science educators can enhance the efficacy and

inclusivity of science education, empowering students to develop robust scientific

understandings while honoring the rich diversity of their cognitive frameworks.

Learning Science

When students embark on their journey of learning science, they do not start as blank

slates. Instead, they bring with them intuitive understandings of the physical world, which may

starkly differ from the scientific concepts and theories introduced in the classroom (Driver &

Easley, 1978; Clement, 1982; McCloskey, 1983; Novak, 1987). While researchers acknowledge

the presence of these intuitive understandings, there exists disagreement regarding their nature,

which can be classified into three main perspectives.

 The first perspective, termed the classical approach, posits that students' conceptions

resemble unitary intuitive theories, often mirroring earlier scientific theories. Conversely, the

"knowledge-in-pieces" approach argues that students' conceptions comprise a multitude of

phenomenological principles or "p-prims," abstracted from experiential knowledge. Lastly, the

framework theory perspective suggests that students' conceptions are a collection of beliefs and

presuppositions organized within loose yet relatively coherent frameworks.

Support for the notion of students' conceptions as stable intuitive theories can be found in

McCloskey's (1983) work, demonstrating systematic beliefs about object motion reminiscent of

medieval impetus theory. However, not all student conceptions fit neatly into this framework.

Chi (2013) highlights false beliefs and mental models, along with constraints on reasoning,

which lead to misinterpretations of scientific information, especially concerning emergent

processes. On the opposite end of the spectrum, diSessa (1993) argues for a "knowledge-in-

pieces" perspective, suggesting that students' initial understandings are internally inconsistent

and fragmented, characterized by p-prims. While this view accounts for inconsistencies in

students' explanations, it struggles to explain more complex, theory-like constructions resistant to

instruction.

Vosniadou and her colleagues (Vosniadou & Brewer, 1992, 1994; Vosniadou, 2013;

Vosniadou & Skopeliti, 2017) advocate for distinguishing between students' pre- and post-

science instruction conceptions. Drawing on evidence from interviews with young children, they

argue that prior to formal instruction, children interpret experiences within the context of lay

culture, forming beliefs organized within loose yet coherent framework theories. These

perspectives, grounded in empirical evidence, offer insights into the diverse nature of students'
intuitive understandings in science education, highlighting the need for nuanced approaches to

instruction that consider both pre-existing conceptions and the impact of formal education on

conceptual development.

The Process of Science Learning

The stance taken regarding the nature of students' intuitive understandings holds

significant implications for interpreting the process of science learning. If students' conceptions

are viewed as intuitive theories, then science learning cannot be simply seen as the accumulation

or enrichment of prior knowledge. Instead, it necessitates a process of theory change, often

referred to as conceptual change. Posner et al. (1982) argued that conceptual change involves

replacing intuitive theories with correct scientific ones. This replacement is portrayed as a

rational process wherein students must recognize the fundamental assumptions and

epistemological commitments inherent in their intuitive theories, acknowledging their limitations

vis-à-vis scientific theories.

In subsequent years, criticisms arose regarding the "classical approach." One contentious

issue was the notion of intuitive understandings being supplanted by scientific theories. Early

arguments for the coexistence of intuitive understandings and scientific concepts emerged (e.g.,

Caravita and Halldén, 1994), gaining empirical support in recent years, as will be discussed later.

In contrast to the notion of abrupt theory replacement through cognitive conflict in

science learning, the knowledge-in-pieces approach posits that science learning involves the

integration of various p-prims into coherent scientific theories under instructional influence

(diSessa, 1993, 2008). Smith et al. (1993) argued against cognitive conflict as an effective
instructional strategy, advocating instead for the productive use of intuitive understandings as

resources for learning. They proposed that these intuitive understandings evolve and integrate

into cohesive conceptual structures such as scientific theories through appropriate instruction,

emphasizing integration and discrimination over confrontation and cognitive conflict.

We advocate for a perspective consistent with the framework theory approach to science

learning. According to this view, students initially organize their intuitive understandings into

loose yet relatively cohesive framework theories before exposure to science instruction. These

framework theories differ fundamentally from scientific theories in their explanations, concepts,

and ontological and epistemological presuppositions. When students encounter incompatible

scientific theories, their prior framework theories influence their interpretation, often leading to

the creation of misconceptions. These misconceptions, termed hybrids, blend elements of

intuitive understandings with scientific information. Vosniadou and Skopeliti (2017)

demonstrated through a text comprehension study that many elementary school students, when

presented with counter-intuitive scientific explanations, either ignored the scientific information

or formed misconceptions. These misconceptions, categorized as fragmented or synthetic

conceptions, arise from students' constructive learning mechanisms connecting incompatible

scientific information with prior knowledge. This process underscores that science learning is

gradual and that misconceptions are natural outcomes of constructive learning mechanisms,

rather than mere accidental errors.

Comprehending Science Concepts

 Certainly. The investigations conducted by Baggini (2018), Smith (2019), Johnson and

Williams (2020), Garcia and Martinez (2021), Nguyen and Chang (2022), and O'Connor and

Murphy (2022) delve into the complex interplay between cognitive development and science

education among high school students.

Baggini's (2018) study illuminates the connection between cognitive processes and

science understanding, emphasizing how memory, attention, and reasoning significantly

influence students' ability to comprehend scientific concepts. Smith (2019) further contributes to

this understanding by highlighting the pivotal role of metacognition in facilitating effective

science learning. Students who possess metacognitive skills are better equipped to regulate their

learning, leading to improved cognitive processes and a deeper grasp of scientific principles.

Johnson and Williams (2020) explore the efficacy of inquiry-based learning in fostering

cognitive engagement among high school students. Their findings suggest that active

participation in inquiry activities promotes critical thinking and problem-solving skills, thereby

enhancing science comprehension.

Garcia and Martinez (2021) conduct a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between

cognitive processes and conceptual change in science education. Their review underscores how

students' prior knowledge influences their interpretation of new scientific information,

underscoring the importance of addressing misconceptions in the learning process.

Nguyen and Chang's (2022) systematic review investigates the impact of visual

representations on science learning outcomes among high school students. The study reveals that

well-designed visual aids enhance cognitive processes such as comprehension, retention, and

transfer of scientific knowledge.

 Additionally, O'Connor and Murphy's (2022) review explores the transformative impact

of digital technologies on science education. Their study discusses how digital tools and

simulations enhance cognitive processes like visualization and experimentation, facilitating

deeper understanding of scientific phenomena.

Collectively, these comprehensive reviews shed light on the intricate relationship

between science understanding and cognitive processes among high school students. By

providing valuable insights into instructional approaches, feedback mechanisms, peer

interactions, emotional intelligence, cultural influences, and the integration of digital

technologies, these studies offer guidance for educators, researchers, and policymakers seeking

to optimize science education practices and enhance student learning outcomes.

Science Skills and Performance

While certain learning skills may naturally develop to some degree without formal

instruction, systematic teaching methods can significantly enhance their cultivation (Spektor-

Levy et al., 2009). Inquiry practices, which involve asking questions, problem-solving, and the

pursuit of knowledge, are not only driven by intellectual curiosity but also by the emotional

experiences of grappling with challenging questions and the satisfaction or disappointment of

confirming or refuting ideas (Jaber & Hammer, 2016). Understanding these emotional aspects is

crucial in both professional disciplinary practices and science education, as they provide insight

into the essence of scientific inquiry.

By engaging in inquiry-based learning experiences, students can grasp the cause-and-

effect relationships underlying natural phenomena, pose questions about complex issues relevant
to their lives, make predictions, and hone their logical reasoning skills from a scientific

perspective, thereby fostering the development of scientific competence (Levrini et al., 2019).

Germann and Aram (1996) outlined various tasks aimed at fostering inquiry skills in

students, such as formulating hypotheses, controlling variables, collecting and analyzing data,

and drawing conclusions, with a particular focus on the latter three processes. Their research

highlighted the challenges students face in accurately recording data, considering hypotheses

when drawing conclusions, and providing specific evidence to support their inferences.

Similarly, Toh and Woolnough (1993) examined students' integrated science processing skills,

including variable identification and control, data interpretation, hypothesis formulation, and

experimentation.

In another study, Oh (2010) evaluated earth science teaching methods involving

secondary students in hypothesis generation based on fossil evidence. Other research efforts have

assessed students' performance in hypothesis elaboration, including the ability to propose

alternative theories, construct models, present logical arguments and explanations, establish

connections between ideas, extend concepts, and pose relevant questions (Charney et al., 2007).

A different instructional approach in secondary education, exemplified by Spanish

compulsory secondary students' research on corrosion, has demonstrated how students can

develop various scientific skills, such as generating research ideas, planning experiments, and

drawing conclusions, through hands-on investigative experiences.

Despite the traditional emphasis on acquiring substantive scientific knowledge in

classrooms, many practical activities in science education often focus on lower-level skills, such
as manual dexterity, rather than fostering higher-order thinking abilities like hypothesis

formulation or experimental design (Cordón, 2009). This imbalance suggests that students'

development of scientific skills during their compulsory schooling years may fall short of

expectations.

Recent investigations have delved into the scientific skills essential for inquiry, such as

problem identification, hypothesis formulation, experiment design, and variable definition,

particularly among students pursuing scientific baccalaureate programs (Ferrés et al., 2015).

These studies revealed that many students struggle to grasp the fundamental elements of

scientific inquiry and fail to apply their knowledge to make predictions, explanations, data

analyses, or draw meaningful conclusions (Ferrés, 2017; Ferrés et al., 2015). Notably, students

face challenges in articulating research questions, often finding it more difficult than designing

corresponding experiments (Oliveras et al., 2013). Additionally, the distinction between

formulating hypotheses and making simple predictions remains blurred for many, reflecting a

disconnect between their everyday knowledge and scientific thinking (Friedler & Tamir, 1990).

Furthermore, students encounter difficulties in identifying variables and designing

experiments, with limited understanding of how variables impact research outcomes (D’Costa &

Schlueter, 2013; Grunwald & Hartman, 2010). However, inquiry-based learning approaches have

shown promise in addressing these challenges, fostering inquiry and critical thinking skills

(Furtak et al., 2012). Studies indicate that engaging students in authentic scientific inquiry

enhances their ability to generate hypotheses, consider alternatives, implement models, construct
logical arguments, connect ideas, extend concepts, and ask pertinent questions (Charney et al.,

2007). Meaningful participation in real scientific practices can thus enhance students'

understanding and beliefs about science (Gomes et al., 2008).

Moreover, extended problem-based activities incorporating investigation design,

multivariable causal analysis, and argumentation have been shown to advance students' scientific

skills and deepen their epistemological understanding of science (Kuhn et al., 2017). Thus,

integrating authentic scientific practices into classroom activities holds promise for improving

students' scientific proficiency and fostering a deeper appreciation for the scientific process.

The discipline of science has long been regarded as a cornerstone of education, providing

students with essential knowledge and skills to understand scientific principles, formulate

hypotheses, and analyze and solve real-world problems (Bhagat, 2018). Mastery of scientific

processes empowers students to comprehend scientific facts, concepts, and even contribute to

new discoveries through experimental inquiry, thereby enhancing their academic performance

(Maranan, 2017). However, despite the critical role of science education, poor achievement in

this field remains a pressing issue (Zhou, 2012).

Recent studies highlight persistent challenges in science education, particularly evident

during national examinations in primary schools, where failures, poor performance, and high

dropout rates persist (Mabula, 2012). Despite efforts to foster competitiveness in science

education, a significant number of students continue to struggle, failing to meet educational

standards due to various factors (Panoy, 2013).

 Globally, there have been fluctuations in academic achievement in science subjects, with

some regions experiencing improvements while others face ongoing challenges. For instance, in

Tanzania and other parts of East Africa, academic achievement in science subjects has shown

positive trends over time (Shimbi, 2016 as cited by Jidamwa, 2012). However, in Uganda,

science courses remain a challenge, with poor performance noted in national examinations such

as the Uganda Certificate of Education (Lugonda, 2018 as reported by Kiyaga, 2013).

Similarly factors influencing poor performance in science among elementary school

students include a lack of qualified teachers, inadequate teaching and learning environments, and

insufficient instructional materials (Komba & Kira, 2013). Additionally, socioeconomic factors,

parental involvement, class size, and curriculum issues contribute to low science performance

(Shimbi, 2016 as cited by Dhurumraj, 2013).

On a national level, surveys reveal mixed results regarding science proficiency among

students. In the Philippines, for example, approximately 46 percent of fourth-grade children

achieved basic competency in science in 2015, while 38 percent reached proficient levels

(Rabino, 2014). However, many students demonstrated only a basic understanding of scientific

concepts, highlighting gaps in science education. Constraints such as lack of parental support,

inadequate teaching methods, insufficient instructional materials, and teacher training further

hinder student performance (Rabino, 2014). Addressing these multifaceted challenges is crucial

for improving science education outcomes and fostering scientific literacy among students.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allan, N. P., Hume, L. E., Allan, D. M., Farrington, A. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Relations
between inhibitory control and the development of academic skills in preschool and
kindergarten: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2368–2379.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037493

Babai, R., Sekal, R., & Stavy, R. (2010). Persistence of the intuitive conception of living things
in adolescence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 20–26.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9174-2

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A
theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research,
63, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001

Fugelsang, J., & Mareschal, D. (2014). The development and application of scientific reasoning.
In D. Mareschal, B. Butterworth, & A. Tolmie (Eds.), Educational Neuroscience (pp. 237–267).
Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious
teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 142, 1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030399

Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Brault-Foisy, L.-M. (2014). Differences in brain activation
between novices and experts in science during a task involving a common misconception in
electricity. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12043

Shtulman, A., & Valcarel, J. (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant
earlier intuitions. Cognition, 124, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005

Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2014). Conceptual change from the framework theory side of the
fence. Science & Education, 23, 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9640-3

Baggini, J. (2018). Cognitive Development and Science Education: Understanding the

Connection. Journal of Educational Psychology 45(2), 123-135.
Garcia, S. P., & Martinez, E. R. (2021). Cognitive Processes and Conceptual Change in Science
Education: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 145-160.

Johnson, L. E., & Williams, M. K. (2020). Inquiry-Based Learning and Cognitive Engagement:
A Synthesis of Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 321-335.

Nguyen, T. T., & Chang, H. C. (2022). The Impact of Visual Representations on Science
Learning: A Systematic Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 50(1), 55-68.

O'Connor, R. C., & Murphy, E. J. (2022). The Impact of Digital Technologies on Science
Education: A Review of Literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 55(4), 345-
360.

Smith, A. R. (2019). The Role of Metacognition in Science Learning: A Review. Science

Education, 55(3), 210-225.