85.7 % Hawasa 2008 full
85.7 % Hawasa 2008 full
BY
June 2008
Addis Ababa
ETHIOPIA
______________________________ __________________
_________________________________ ___________________
Advisor
________________________________ ___________________
Examiner
_______________________________ ___________________
Examiner
I would like to extend my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my advisor Dr. Dereje
Habte for his unreserved support and constructive comments throughout the preparation of
this thesis.
My gratitude also goes to the library staff of the School of Public Health and AIDS
Resource Center for their support in providing me the necessary references for the success
of this study.
My special appreciation also extends to those who participated in the study, Hawassa
Last, but not least my sincere thanks go to my lovely wife W/o Aynalem Demissie and my
daughter Ruth Taye who provided me support and enormous encouragement throughout
this work.
Page
Acknowledgment.........................................................................................................................I
Table of Content ........................................................................................................................ II
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................III
List of Figures ...........................................................................................................................IV
List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................................V
Abstract .....................................................................................................................................VI
1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................1
2. Literature Review ...................................................................................................................4
3. Objectives .............................................................................................................................13
4. Method and Materials...........................................................................................................14
4.1 Study design and period.................................................................................................14
4.2 Study area: ......................................................................................................................14
4.3 Source and Study population.........................................................................................14
4.4 Sample size determination.............................................................................................15
4.5 Sampling techniques ......................................................................................................15
4.6 Data collection................................................................................................................16
4.6.1 Data collection tools ...................................................................................................16
4.6.2 Data collection method ...............................................................................................16
4.6.3 Recruitment and training of data collectors...............................................................16
4.6.4 Data quality assurance ................................................................................................17
4.7 Data process and Analysis .............................................................................................17
4.8 Variables .........................................................................................................................18
4.9 Ethical Consideration.....................................................................................................19
4.10 Operational Definition .................................................................................................20
4.11 Dissemination of the result..........................................................................................20
5. Result.....................................................................................................................................21
6. Discussion .............................................................................................................................35
7. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................41
8. Recommendations ................................................................................................................42
9. References.............................................................................................................................43
Annex I: Map of SNNPR .........................................................................................................47
Annex II: Questionnaire English version................................................................................48
Annex III Questionnaire Amharic Version.............................................................................57
II
III
Fig. 1 Number of current sexual partners of women PLWHA attending ART clinic,
Fig. 2 First time HIV positive status disclosures of women PLWHA attending ART clinic,
IV
Background: Disclosure of HIV status may lead to increased opportunities for social
support, to discuss and implement HIV risk reduction with partners and improved access to
treatment. Thus, status disclosure is major public health goal for HIV prevention &
treatment
Objective: Determine the magnitude and determinants of HIV sero-status disclosure to
sexual partners among women people living with HIV/AIDS at Hawassa Referral Hospital,
SNNPR.
Method: A Cross sectional survey was conducted among 384 HIV positive women who
had sexual partner and age 18 years attending ART clinic from March to April 2008.
Using a structured and pre-tested questionnaire, data were collected through patient
interview consecutively until the required number reached over one month period. Ethical
clearance from concerned bodies and informed consent from participants was obtained.
X2 tests, odds ratios and logistic regression were done to explore associations between
different variables and status disclosure.
Result: Overall 85.7% the women had disclosed their HIV positive status to their sexual
partners. The common barriers reported for non disclosure of HIV status were fear of
abandonment; fear of break-up in relationship and fear of stigma. The negative partner
reaction reported by those women who disclosed to sexual partner in this study was found
to be high (59.3%). Majority (77.9%) had sexual intercourse in the past 6 month. 9.1% of
the women were pregnant since they tested for HIV and condom was inconsistently used
by most of the women. Being married, taking ARV treatment for more than one year and
knowing the HIV status of the sexual partner were predictors of HIV positive status
disclosure.
Conclusion: Even though, the magnitude of HIV positive status disclosure to sexual
partner in this study is encouraging, negative partner reactions following disclosure were
reported by large proportion of women. Follow up counselling, couple counselling and
testing, integrating ART service to reproductive health service particularly F/P should be
emphasized in order to facilitate safe status disclosure and to address the sexual and
reproductive health needs of PLWHA’s.
VI
The estimated number of people living with HIV worldwide in 2007 was 33.2 million, a
reduction of 16% compared with the estimate published in 2006 (39.5 million), and 2.5
Sub-Saharan Africa continues to be the region most affected by the AIDS pandemic. More
than two out of three (22.5 million) adults and nearly 90% of children infected with HIV
live in this region and 76% (1.6 million) AIDS deaths in 2007 occurred there, illustrating
the unmet need for antiretroviral treatment in Africa (1). Over and above the personal
suffering that accompanies HIV infection wherever it strikes; HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa
Through adjustments of the 2005 antenatal care site surveillance and DHS-Plus factors, in
Ethiopia 977,394 Peoples were living with HIV/AIDS. The overall adult HIV prevalence
rate was estimated to be 2.1 % (1.7% males and 2.6% females for 2007). The rural and
urban HIV prevalence was 0.9% and 7.7% respectively (2, 3).
The total number of PLWHA in SNNPR for 2007 was 132,410, of which majority (59%)
were females. The adult HIV prevalence was 1.4% (1.2% for male and 1.7% for female).
The total PLWHA in need of ART for the same year were 34, 254. According to the report
of MOH (2006), the total people involved in VCT in SNNPR were 75,562 (40,867 male
and 34,695 females) with sero positive status prevalence of 9%. The number of health
institutions providing VCT, ART and PMTCT in the region were 217, 36, and 58
The prevention and control of human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV) infection depends on
the success of strategies to prevent new infections and treat currently infected individuals.
HIV testing and counseling serves as both a critical prevention and treatment tool in the
control of the HIV epidemic. Within HIV testing and counseling (VCT) programmes,
emphasis is placed on the importance of HIV status disclosure among HIV infected clients,
Disclosure provides many important benefits to the infected individual and to the public.
First, disclosure may motivate sexual partners to seek testing, change behaviour and
ultimately decrease transmission of HIV. In addition, disclosure may facilitate other health
behaviors that may improve the management of HIV. For example, women who disclose
their status to partners may be more likely to participate in programmes for prevention of
Through disclosure of her status, a woman may receive support from her family or others
in her social network and may be able to access available support services. By adequately
addressing the emotional, social, and practical sequelae of her positive status, she may be
more willing to adopt and maintain health behaviour such as cessation of breastfeeding or
However, disclosure of HIV status may have potential risk for the infected women. These
relationship and so on. These risks may lead women not to disclose their sero-status, which
disclosure is a question of survival and thus the negative outcome of HIV positive status
disclosure is a serious concern. The absence of social security and health insurance in most
African countries also make women dependent on their partner and family for their health
care, therefore women may choose not to disclose their HIV status in order to benefit from
There are reports that indicate HIV infected pregnant women are not fully participating in
the PMTCT program. According to the Ethiopian DHS of 2005, to date only about 2% of
HIV positive pregnant women needing PMTCT have benefited from the services (31).
One of the reasons for low participation is that, non-disclosure of HIV test result to sexual
partners. The uptake and adherence to PMTCT is difficult for women whose partners are
Therefore, this study assessed the magnitude and determinant of HIV positive status
disclosure among women and may give recent valuable data that can be used to compare
with results of similar research in Ethiopia and other countries. Furthermore the finding
will be an input to the HIV prevention endeavor in devising evidence based intervention
Meta analysis conducted by WHO on HIV status disclosure showed that, for developed
countries the disclosure rate to sexual partners ranged from 42% to 100%, depending in
large part on the type of sexual partner to whom the person disclosed. Among the studies,
that reported disclosure rates to current and/or steady sexual partners the average rate of
disclosure was 79%. For developing countries, the rate of HIV status disclosure to sexual
partners ranged from 16.7% to 86%. Among the studies, that reported disclosure rates to
current and/or steady partners the average rate of disclosure was 49%, considerably less
than the average rate reported from studies conducted in the developed world (79%) (5).
A study done in southern USA showed that, majority of the women had disclosed to some
sex partners, close family and friends, and health care professionals. However, for 3.8% of
A study conducted in New York City, among 230 HIV positive women from out patient
clinic, 82% of the women disclosed their HIV positive status to sexual partner(9)
Even though, status disclosure is higher in developed countries, in some studies it was
found to be low. For instance, a study conducted on 2 sites; Boston City Hospital HIV
Diagnostic unit and Rhode Island Hospital HIV clinic showed, 60% of individuals had
disclosed their HIV status to all sexual partners and 40% had not disclosed (10).
A study carried out among hospital cases on French Antilles and French Guiana indicated
that, one third of PLWHA had kept their HIV status secret. Disclosure within a steady
partnership was less likely among non-French individuals (11). A research carried out on
Three month after voluntary counseling and testing, 64% of HIV positive women and
79.5% of HIV negative women reported that they had shared HIV test result with their
A study done in Nairobi, Kenya among HIV positive pregnant women attending antenatal
clinic, 65% of the women had informed partners their HIV status and 27% brought their
Relatively high (84.9%) disclosure rate two weeks after testing was reported from study
conducted on the pregnant women screened for HIV in Kigali, Rwanda (15).
The local study conducted in Gore and Mettu Towns, and St. Paul Hospital, Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia, showed HIV positive status disclosure rate of 69% and 92% respectively (16, 40)
A WHO cross country review of women sero positive status disclosure found that
HIV positive sero-status disclosure may be affected by many factors. These factors
include, socio-economic status, age, duration of relation with the partner, level of
education, culture, discussion on HIV and its test among the partners before the test,
number of partners and so on. In addition, variation in rates of HIV status disclosure to
sexual partners among different ethnic groups was also identified. This suggests that there
may be important cultural factors that influence the patterns of self-disclosure to sexual
partners. It is also indicated that, as the length of time since diagnosis increases the rate of
42.5% of the participants disclosed immediately, 21% waited one month, 24% waited more
than one year to disclose. Women disclosed immediately after learning status more often
The numbers of sexual partners affect status disclosure. Women who have fewer sexual
partners are more likely to disclose their HIV sero positive status than those with multiple
partners. From the Boston City Hospital HIV Diagnostic Evaluation Unit, and Rhode
Island Hospital HIV Clinic study, of those individuals with 1 partner, 21% had not
disclosed their sero-status; 58% of those with 2 or more partners had not informed all their
partners (10).
HIV sero-positive status disclosure depends on modes of transmission of the disease. From
one study in Taiwan, the rate of status disclosure was 36% in men having sex with men,
34% in heterosexuals, and 21% in injection drug users. Men having sex with men were
more likely than heterosexual men or male injection drug users to disclose their HIV status
Partner involvement in the pre-test counseling can determine the HIV sero-status
disclosure. A study done to evaluate the influence of partner participation in the mother
class to the PMTCT services in Cambodia, showed the acceptance rate to the pre-test
counseling as well as disclosure of their results to their partners is higher among those with
HIV related stigma and discrimination remains an enormous barrier to effectively fighting
HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa. Fear of discrimination often prevents people from being
tested, seeking treatment for AIDS or from admitting their HIV status publicly; which in
turn can have implications for health care and further HIV transmission (4).
and avoidance of breast-feeding, make it virtually impossible for HIV positive women to
keep their HIV infection a secret from their families and people in the wider community. It
is therefore essential to the safety and acceptability of MTCT interventions that effective
steps to be taken to combat rejection of PLWHA. Where women fear discrimination, and
fear of loss of economic support from a partner. In these settings where resources are
when deciding whether to share results or not. The absence of social security and health
insurance in most African countries also make women dependent on their partner and
family for their health care, therefore women may choose not to disclose their HIV status
In addition, the decision to disclose HIV status involves a cognitive appraisal of negative
HIV(8).
Fear of rejection and change in relationship were the main barriers reported by the
associated with misconceptions about HIV transmission and stigma. Stigma mediated the
relationship between misconceptions and willingness to disclose among women but not
men. The mediation effect of stigma suggests that stigmatization reduction would be an
participants had not disclosed to sexual partner; due to fear of losing economic support
Researches conducted in Zaire, Burkina Faso, Kenya, Thailand, Tanzania, and Rwanda
found that the reason for not sharing the HIV status to sexual partner were fear of being
unfaithful, fear of separation/divorce, fear of shaming their family, fear of being rejected or
A study conducted in "Khayelitsha MTCT Pilot Project”, South Africa; revealed that
women who had not disclosed raised the issue of fear of rejection, discrimination, verbal
with an accepting attitude towards PLWHA is low. This indicates the existence of
extensive HIV related stigma in the country, which can affect status disclosure (24, 25).
Most studies, both in developing and developed countries reported that positive outcomes
A study conducted on women receiving care at a clinic in London, UK, 57% of HIV
positive women disclosed their status to their parents and reported that their parents were
supportive (26).
Similarly 76% of HIV positive women in Baltimore, USA, reported acceptance, support,
More than two third of the women in Rwanda and Tanzania reported that their relationship
Disclosure was associated with less anxiety, fewer symptoms of depression, and increased
social support. The negative outcomes of disclosure reported by the respondents include
blame, abandonment, anger, violence, stigma, and depression. An important finding from
both developed and developing country studies is that disclosure was not associated with
the break-up of long-term relationships. Even if the fear of most women to disclose is
break-up of relations, disclosure was not associated with abandonment (5, 16).
A study conducted on HIV positive mothers attending an outpatient clinic in Cape Town,
South Africa, 27% of women reported at least one problem with disclosure, 13%
them, and 3% said they were forced to move away from their home (29). From the study in
Study done on HIV Voluntary Testing and Counselling Efficacy Trials in Tanzania,
break-up in the marriage and 4.5% reported physical abuse by a sexual partner (30).
Studies indicated that, many participants have specific criteria for deciding to whom to
disclose. These criteria were, based on one of three factors: their relation to the person
(health care provider, sexual partner or family member), the quality of their relationship
(accepting versus rejecting) and the perceived ability of the other person to keep the
information confidential. For many of the women, health care providers, or at least those
health care providers rendering direct care, represented a group that ‘needed to know’ (8).
Self-disclosure of HIV infection examined among 105 African-American men and 264
European-American men in Los Angeles showed that the African-Americans were less
likely to disclose their sero-status to intimate lovers, close friends, and family members or
A study done in Baltimore, Miami, Newark, USA, 89% of individuals had disclosed their
HIV status to at least one other person 6 to 24 months after being tested; 28% reported that
they had first disclosed to a sexual partner, 31% had first disclosed to a relative and 29%
reported they had first disclosed to neither a sexual partner nor a relative (32)
10
one person, including 62% to an immediate family member and 21% to friends.
Heterosexual men and male injection drug users often disclosed to their immediate
families a few days after obtaining an HIV diagnosis. Perceived consequences after
disclosure included: increased substantial support from family, assistance with medical and
contagion, and condemnation. In general most of the people disclose their HIV status to
their intimate family member or friend than their sexual partners (18).
Many researches found that condom use is more common among those women who
The finding from Boston City Hospital HIV Diagnostic Evaluation Unit and Rhode Island
Hospital HIV Clinic study showed, non-disclosers were less likely to regularly use
condoms than disclosers are; as a result, sexual partners of HIV-infected persons continue
A study conducted in South Africa found that, participants who had not disclosed to their
sex partners were significantly more likely to have multiple partners, HIV negative
partners, partners of unknown HIV status, and unprotected intercourse with non-
It was also indicated that sexual risk behavior is higher among HIV infected peoples on
preventive therapy than those on HAART. This may be due to repeated counseling of
patients on risk behavior during care provision. Study conducted in Mombassa, Kenya
11
percent of PLWHA did not know their regular partner’s HIV status and about 20 percent
did not disclose their own status to their regular partners. Lack of knowledge of partner’s
sero-status and low levels of disclosure of one’s own HIV status, coupled with inconsistent
condom use, sets the stage for HIV transmission to sero-discordant partners, especially
within regular partner relationships. Transmission of resistant viral strains and re-infection
with new strains are serious public health risks. Unprotected sex also carries the risk of
unwanted pregnancy and the subsequent risk of HIV transmission to the child (34).
12
Determine the magnitude and determinants of HIV sero-positive status disclosure to sexual
13
The study was conducted in Hawassa Referral Hospital, Hawassa town, which is the
capital city of South Nations and Nationality Peoples Region (SNNPR) and is located
Hawassa city has a total population of 200,000 (35). There are different levels of both
government and private health institutions offering health services in the city.
Hawassa Referral Hospital is the only Referral Hospital in the City as well in the region. It
(prevention, curative and teaching) including ART and PMTCT. The ART clinic was
established in June 2006GC. At the end of February 2008, 1110 cases were on ART and
731 cases were on pre-ART follow up in the clinic. Of those on ART (1110), the total
numbers of pediatric age groups were 56. The service is rendered by one physician, five
nurses, one laboratory technician, one pharmacy technician and one data clerk; who were
All PLWHA attending the ART clinic in the Hospital were source population. And women
who had sexual partner and attending ART clinic at Hawassa Referral Hospital were the
study subjects.
14
Exclusion: exclusion criteria were women whose age is less than 18 years old, absence of
The sample size required for this study was determined using the formula for estimating
single population proportion. The prevalence of HIV status disclosure from the previous
Using 5% level of significance and 5% margin of error (precision) the sample size was:
Z 1−α P()Τϕ
1− P /Φ3 15.406 Τφ 1 0 0 1 212.64 466.77 Τµ (
2
n= 2
d2
Where,
d= margin of error
1.96 × .49()Τϕ
1 − .49 /Φ3 15.328 Τφ 1 0 0 1 204.24 282.93 Τµ ()
n= 2
= 384
.05
Study subjects were selected using convenience sampling method. Patients came to ART
clinic and contact the data clerk. At this point women who had sexual partners were
identified by asking the respondents themselves. Based on the inclusion criteria all eligible
15
one month period, were interviewed consecutively until reaching the required sample size.
The questionnaire format was taken from the previous study done in Addis Ababa (40);
modified and additional questions were also added from other sources (16). Questions
were first prepared in English and then translated into Amharic and then back to English.
The information was collected from the 384 patients on follow up and ART. After the aim
of the study was clearly explained, informed consent obtained from the respondents and
Recruitment- Three data collectors were selected; all of them were female nurses who
were working in the ART clinic and one supervisor, who was in charge of the ART clinic
coordination.
Training- Training was given for the data collectors and the supervisor by the investigator
for two days, using lecture and role play method of training. The objective of the study,
method of interview, how to keep confidentiality, and way of handling and approaching
study subjects was given due attention during training. A manual on HIV status disclosure
to sexual partner (benefits, potential risks, and barriers) was given to each interviewer and
supervisor.
16
Questionnaire were formulated from previous studies and translated from English to
Amharic and back to English to assure consistency. Then, questionnaire was pre-tested
after which the relevant changes were made with the input from pre-testing.
Pre-testing
Before the actual data collection pre-test was carried out on 15 subjects, who were not
included in the proper study but were client of ART clinic, to check whether the data
collectors understood the questions in similar way and collect the intended information as
well evaluate the completeness and the consistency of the questionnaires. Then after, minor
The collected data were checked for completeness, accuracy, clarity and consistency by the
supervisor and principal investigator. Daily strict follow up and checking of the data
collected was done in order to manage any problem encountered. Timely feed back was
given for the data collectors and the supervisor through meeting that was held before the
Data was entered, edited, and coded in to EPI info version 2002 computer software, and
finally 10% of the data entered was cross checked. Minor discrepancies related to error in
data entry were found and rechecked from the original hard copy questionnaire and then
corrected.
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 12.1 and EPI info version 2002 software. Tables
were generated using cross tabulation comparing status disclosure with other variables.
Logistic regression analyses were done to identify the relation ship between sero-status
17
4.8 Variables
• Type of partnership
• Condom use
18
Ethical clearance for the proposal was obtained from the Research and publication
was obtained from, school of pubic health Addis Ababa University and Hawassa Referral
The aims, purpose, benefit and method of the study was clearly explained to the
participant. All of the study participants were informed that, their response will be kept
secret; and only health workers who were currently working in the ART clinic collected
the data. Finally, they were interviewed after informed consent was obtained. The
interview was conducted in a way that it would not violate their privacy and confidentiality
of information. Thus, name and address of the interviewees was not recorded in the
questionnaire.
The respondents were informed that they have the right to be involved or not to be
involved in the study, and that non-involvement otherwise will not affect the clinical care
they receive.
19
• Sexual partner: -is a person with whom one engages in sex acts.
• Regular partner -means spouse(s) or live-in sexual partners or regular boy friend
• Non-regular partner- Sexual partners that one is not married to and never lived
• Cohabiting partners -partners who are not married but living together
• HIV sero-positive status disclosure to sex partner - refers to the act of informing
the HIV sero-positive status of an infected person to sex partner by the person
herself.
• Chat/ khat: is a substance which is used by some one for stimulant purpose.
The study result will be disseminated to SPH, Medical Faculty of Addis Ababa University,
EPHA, SNNPR Health Bureau and Referral Hospital. Attempts will be made to publish the
20
Majority 348 (90.6%) of respondents were from urban area. The dominant ethnic groups
were Wolayta and Amhara, 116 (30.2%) and 109 (28.4%) respectively. More than half
(54.4%) of the women were Orthodox Christians. The age range of the study participant
was from 18 to 57 years and 293 (76.3%) of them were less than 35 years old with mean
One hundred and twenty (31.3%) have attended primary school, (39.6%) were house
wives, 247 (64.3%) were married and 215 (56%) had an average monthly income of less
than or equal to 250 Ethiopian birr. The average monthly income of the respondent’s
sexual partner was above 250 Ethiopian birr for half 201 (52.3%) of them (Table 1).
Two hundred seventy (70.6%) of them were not members of PLWHA association and two
hundred fifty seven (66.9%) of the women were taking ARV drugs and 127 (33.1%) were
The duration of diagnosis for the study subjects ranged from 1month to 84month. One
hundred fifty seven (43.3%) of the study participants had known their HIV status for less
than one year but the rest 206 (56.7%) of the women knew their positivity and lived with
21
22
study subjects
Three hunderad and sixty five (95.1%) of the respondents knew that they can transmit HIV
to their sexual partner but 16(4.2%) did not. 349(90.9%) of the respondents did know how
to protect their sexual partner from being infected with HIV. Of those who knew way of
prevention, 348(99.7%) reported condom use can prevent transmission of HIV to sexual
partner. Of the 348 women who did know condom use in HIV prevention, 12(3.4%) did
not know the place or person where they can get condom. 364(94.8%) of the respondents
never had alcohol in the last 30 days. Twenty (5.2%) and seventy (4.4%) of the study
subjects had alcohol and chat respectively once or more in the last 30 days prior to the
359 (93.5%) of the women had at least one sexual partner and 25 (6.5%) women did not have
sexual partner during the survey. Of all (384) women 346 (90.1%) of the women reported to
have regular sexual partner and the rest 38(9.9%) have non regular partners. 299(77.9%)
had sexual intercourse in the past 6 month. Thirty five (9.1%) of all women were pregnant
since they tested for HIV, of these 25(71.4%) gave birth, 10 (28.6%) were pregnant during
the study period. The pregnancies were not intentional in 9(25.7 %.) and also 5(20%) of
those women who gave birth did not have access to PMTCT services for last delivery
(Table 2).
The number of current sexual partners of the respondents were two for 12(3.1%) and three
23
used condom always since they knew their HIV positive sero status. Where as condom use
by the women the last time they had sexual intercourse with their partner was 67.9% for
The common reason for non use of condom as it was reported by the participants were;
partners objection (34.9% of regular and 60% of non regular), in order not to be suspected
by sexual partner (37.2% of regular and 40% of non regular), and being HIV positive
1.8%
3.1%
One
Two
95.1%
24
Characteristics Number %
Knowledge on transmission of HIV to sexual
partner (n=384)
Yes 365 95.1
No 3 0.8
Do not Know 16 4.2
Knowledge of protecting partner from HIV
(n=384)
Yes 349 90.9
No 35 9.1
Knowledge on condom use to prevent HIV
transmission to sexual partner (n=349)
Yes 348 99.7
No 1 0.3
Knowledge of source of condom(n=348)
Yes 336 96.6
No 12 3.4
Alcohol use in the past 30 days (n=384)
Never 364 94.8
Yes, once per month 7 1.8
Yes, once per week 12 3.1
Yes, daily 1 0.3
Chat use in the past 30 days (n=384)
Yes 17 4.4
Never 367 95.6
Pregnancy after HIV test (n=384)
Yes 35 9.1
No 349 90.9
Gave birth after positive HIV status (n=35)
Yes 25 71.4
No 10 28.6
Pregnancy intention (n=35)
Wanted 26 74.3
Unwanted 9 25.7
Access to PMTCT for last delivery (n=26)
Yes 21 80.7
No 5 19.3
25
5.3.1 Rates of HIV positive status disclosure among all study participants
Three hundred and fifty four (92.2%) of the respondents disclosed their HIV positive status
to anyone and 329(85.7%) disclosed to their sexual partner. However, for 55(14.3%) of the
women disclosure of HIV infection is a difficult issue to sexual partner. The rate of HIV
positive status disclosure varies by the type of sexual partners of the women. It was 71.1%
and 87.3% for non regular and regular sexual partner respectively.
The rate of disclosure to any one (92.2%) was achieved over a period of time. Two
hundred sixty two (68.2%) of the participants disclosed within one month, (15%) between
1month and 6month, 5.2% after 6month of diagnosis and the rest 3.1% did not remember.
As shown in figure 2, the first individual to whom the respondents disclosed their HIV
result was mainly to sexual partners 267(75.4%). More than half 219(57%) of them next
The main reasons for disclosure of HIV result to sexual partner in 347(98%) of the study
participants were felt responsibility, concern for not to risk others health, seeking social
support and in 89.5% of the participants to teach others about the disease.
26
250
200
Frequency
150
100
http://www.pdf4free.com
50
9.6% 8.8%
2% 3.4% 0.80%
0
Community
Relatives
Friends
Sibling
Parent
Partner
Members
Other
Preferred individuals
Fig. 2 First time HIV positive status disclosures of women PLWHA attending ART
clinic, Hawassa Referral Hospital, SNNPR, April 2008
PDF Creator - PDF4Free v2.0
27
5.3.2 HIV positive status disclosure among women having Regular sexual partners
Of the 346 women having regular sexual partners 87.3% disclosed their positive status to
their partners. The relation of respondents with their regular partner was 2years for
64(19.3%) and >2year for 267(80.7%) with mean (SD) 7.7(6.2) years.
Majority (70%) of the study participants reported that they did not discuss on HIV and
VCT issues with their partner prior to HIV test and the rest 30% discuss. Two hundred and
twenty one (63.9%) of the women did asked about the HIV status of most recent regular
partner and 203 (58.7%) of them knew the HIV status of their partners. Of those who knew
their recent regular partner’s HIV status, 187(92.1%) of the sexual partners were HIV
positive and 16(7.9%) were HIV negative. Condom use was higher among those who
disclosed their results (p<0.05). But discussion on HIV and VCT issues prior to the test
among the partners did not found to have association with status disclosure. The social
relation ship of the respondents with the partner prior to the HIV test was smooth in
28
29
partners
Thirty eight or 9.9 percent of the total (384) study participants had non regular sexual
partners. Of the 38 women having non regular sexual partner majority (65.8%) of them
discusses on HIV/AIDS issues and VCT with their partner before tested for HIV.
The duration of relation with the recent partner was 5month for 23(67.6%) and 6month
for11 (32.4%) of the respondents with mean and standard deviation of 5 and 3.6 months
respectively. Despite, 27(71.1%) of the women disclosed their HIV positive status to these
sexual partners, only 10(26.3%) of them knew the HIV status of the most recent regular
partner.
The most common barriers to disclose the test results as reported by the women were fear
of stigma and rejection 49(89.1%), client skill and psychological factors such as difficulty
of accepting the test result and didn't know how to tell the person about the diagnosis
30
Following disclosure of the HIV test result to their partners, the reaction was positive in
123(40.7%) of regular partner and 9(33.3%) of non regular partner. But the negative
reaction after status disclosure was 179(59.3%) for regular partners and 18 (66.7%) for non
regular partners.
Positive outcome following HIV positive sero status disclosure to sexual partner as
reported by the respondents were receiving kindness 132(40.1%), neutral 85(25.8%), and
The negative outcome commonly encountered following sero status disclosure were
31
32
Logistic regression for HIV positive status disclosure to regular sexual partner and other
variables were done and as shown in table six women who were cohabiting in marital
status were less likely to disclose HIV positive status to sexual partner [AOR=0.158(0.04-
0.598) ].
Positive statistical association found between status disclosure to regular sexual partner
and Knowledge of partner HIV status [AOR =0.016(0.003-0.08)]. Participants who did not
know the HIV status of their sexual partners were less likely to disclose their HIV positive
Women who had been on ARV treatment for more than one year were significantly more
likely to disclose the HIV positive status to their regular partner [AOR=8.62(1.347-55.22)].
Illiterate( do not read and write) in educational status, house wife in occupation and
smooth social relationship before HIV test were significantly more likely to disclose their
Participant with a monthly income of less than or equal to 250 Ethiopian Birr and those in
relation with their partner for more than two years were more likely to disclose their status
in bivariate analysis but this did not remain significant when controlled for other variables.
33
34
Overall 85.7% the participants reported that they had shared their HIV positive test result
with their partners. The meta-analysis studies by WHO for developing countries found
disclosure rate range 16.7% to 86%. From the studies conducted in Mettu and Gore towns
and Addis Ababa, St. Paul Hospital (MPH thesis 2007 unpublished) found disclosure rate
The rate of HIV positive status disclosure in this study was relatively higher than many
studies. This could be explained by first, more than 90% of the participants were from
urban area where access to HIV/AIDS information and services are abundant; the other
explanation could be the relatively longer duration of diagnosis of the participants, which
For 14.3% of the women in this study disclosure of HIV infection is a difficult issue. Like
many other studies both in developing and developed countries including local studies (5,
17), the main reasons for non disclosure reported in this study were fear of abandonment,
stigma and client psychological factor. Fear of abandonment can be explained by, in
settings where resources are extremely scarce and women's access to resources
partner is a major consideration when deciding whether to share results or not. The absence
of social security and health insurance also make women dependent on their partner and
family for their health care, therefore women may choose not to disclose HIV status in
35
social isolation and lack of support and fear of socioeconomic discrimination which may
lead to problems with jobs, housing, and other practical socioeconomic considerations(5 ).
In our study only 30.6% of the women used condom always since they learned their HIV
positive status and 67.9% of the respondents did used condom during most recent sexual
intercourse with their regular partner. From St. Paul Hospital, Addis Ababa study 65.2%
and 73.4% used condom always and during most recent sexual intercourse respectively
(40). Condom use in this study was relatively low; this could be explained by first, the
women might feel powerless to negotiate safer sex practices with their partner. Second,
the miss-understanding that once both the partners were HIV positive importance of
of condom or none disclosure of the status. So that those couples with none or inconsistent
condom use were at risk of HIV transmission of resistant viral strains and re-infection with
Unprotected sex also carries the risk of unwanted pregnancy and the subsequent risk of
HIV transmission to the child. This study showed considerable proportion of women get
pregnant since they learned their HIV positive status, of which one fourth of the
pregnancies were not intentional. This is an important reminder that emphasis should be
given to involve partners and educating clients on the use of Condom in the prevention of
36
disclosure. This finding is by far lower than other studies (5, 26, 27, 38).
From a study in Gore and Mettu towns and Addis Ababa, St. Paul Hospital found 75.9 %
and 90% of HIV positive women who disclosed their result reported positive partner’s
Most of the findings from both developed and developing country studies showed that
disclosure was not associated with the break-up of long-term relationships. Even if the fear
of most women to disclose is break-up of relations, disclosure was not associated with
Negative partner reaction following HIV status disclosure to sexual partner was reported
by considerable proportion of woman (59.3%) in this study. Even though blaming and
anger were the commonest reactions; abandonment, violation, stigma and break-up in
relationship was also common reactions reported by study participants which was again by
The study conducted in Gore and Mettu towns reported 24.1% negative outcomes
following status disclosure (13). Only 6.4% negative partner reaction following status
disclosure was reported from the study conducted in Addis Ababa, St. Paul Hospital (40).
Despite, most marriages survived disclosure in our study; significant number of the women
14.6% reported that disclosure ended up break in marriage and 11.1% break in sexual
37
and Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania 14.6% and 13% of violence following disclosure
respectively ( 36,37). Beside to this study conducted in Tanzania, Kenya, and Trinidad,
the marriage and 4.5% reported physical abuse by a sexual partner (30)
This implies with rapid scale up of VCT and PMTCT services in the region larger absolute
numbers of women would be at risk of experiencing abuse and even violence. So that,
mechanisms should be devised for identifying and supporting those women who are likely
to experience negative outcomes while scaling up VCT services. Researchers reported that
male involvement must be a key element in addressing and eliminating potential negative
relationships, and while many women would accept testing, they can return for the result,
in many cases, only after discussion with their partner. It was suggested that women should
their own and that they are left at a serious disadvantage disclosing their own sero-status
outcomes are grounded in reality or whether they can be overcome. This finding suggests
the need for encouraging disclosure when it is safe and feasible for the woman.
Additionally, whenever possible women should be encouraged to bring their partners with
them to voluntary counselling and testing clinics and the couples should be counselled
38
VCT issues prior to the study and knew their partners HIV status respectively.
The St. Paul Hospital study reported 95.8% discuss on HIV/VCT issues and 79.8% knew
Similar to other findings (40), in this study women who were married in marital status
were more likely to disclose HIV positive status to sexual partner. This could be due to
intimacy, strength of their relationship, strong confidence and might have chance to raise
Knowledge of partner HIV status was found to be predictor of HIV positive status
disclosure to regular sexual partner. However, more than 40% of the women did not know
Consistent with other studies women who had been on ARV treatment for more than one
year was significantly more likely to disclose the HIV positive status to their regular
partner. This could be explained by repeated counselling given for the patients in the ART
Unlike other studies (5, 17) no statistical association was observed between sex partners
who hold prior discussions about HIV/VCT issues, age, own income, duration of test,
There are reports that HIV status disclosure to sexual partner is affected by multiple factors
such as age, duration of relationship with sexual partner, education, socioeconomic status,
level of education, culture, ethnic group, discussion on HIV and VCT prior to test, number
39
• Female nurses working in the ART clinic were used to collect the data from all
• The principal investigator and supervisor were supervising the daily data collection
activity.
Limitation
• Qualitative methods were not used which could have enabled us to find out
• Social desirability bias due to sensitive and personal questions related to sexuality.
40
• The study showed that married by marital status, those who knew partner status and
took ARV drug for more than one year were predictors of HIV positive status
• Despite, the rate of HIV positive status disclosure to sexual partner in this study is
encouraging; still considerable proportion of women living with HIV/AIDS did not
• The main reasons for disclosure of HIV result by the study participants were felt
responsibility, concern for not to risk others health and seeking social support.
• The major barrier reported for not disclosing HIV positive result to sexual partners
was fear of negative partner reaction such as abandonment, stigma and rejection.
• Negative outcome following HIV positive status disclosure to sexual partner was
• Significant proportion of women PLWHA did not use condom always. The
common reasons reported for non use of condom were; partners objection, in order
• Majority of the women were sexually active and considerable proportion of women
• Discussion on HIV and VCT issues among partners prior to the test was uncommon
and many women still did not know their partner HIV status.
41
counselling programmes because it can assist women develop the skills they need to
2. Special attention should be given to the efforts to promote couple counselling and
testing that may help women to overcome the barriers to disclose their positive status and
either failed to disclose or faced negative outcome after disclosure and mechanisms should
also be devised for supporting those women who were experiencing negative outcomes.
4. ART clinics should be linked with Reproductive Health services to address the sexual
5. Further research is needed specially a qualitative study to explore the context before and
following disclosure is vital as input for future Behavior Change Communication (BCC)
42
43
44
behaviors among HIV Positive men and women HIV status disclosure to Sex
Partners and sexual in Cape Town, South Africa; 2006
34. Sarna A et al. “Does being treated with HAART affect the sexual risk behavior of
36. Kilewo C et al. HIV counselling and testing of pregnant women in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001; 28:458-462
45
46
SNNPR
47
Information sheet
Introduction
status disclosure rate, barriers and outcome at Awassa referral hospital in the ART clinic. The study
is run by AAU, School of Public Health, in collaboration with Awassa referral hospital.
Please remember that all your answers are confidential. On this questionnaire your name will
not be written and will not be linked to your name. This information will remain only with
The answer you give will be used to plan the ways to address women who have difficulty of
disclosing and help them in order to increase their full participation in the PMTCT and ART
program. Please do the best you can to answer all the questions. You do not have to answer, if you
do not wish to answer a question, even you may end this interview any time you want.
Your refusal to participate in this study does not affect the quality of service given to you by the
ART clinic. The time it will take for this interview is only 15-20 minutes.
Yes__________ No____________
Interviewer Signature_____________
48
49
50
I will now ask you some questions about your sexual history. Some of these questions may be
sensitive. Please remember that all your answers are confidential and will not be linked to
your name. This information will remain only with the research team.
51
311 What was the reaction from this Response Next 316
partner?
52
53
329 What was the reaction from this partner? Response Next 334
54
55
56
ƒ/u?ƒ
. . Õ . . /
c?„‹
SÓu=Á
’@ eT@ eJ” ›G<” ¾Uc^¨< . . / ¾ c?„‹
. . Õ uGªX ]/Jeú M ¾T>"H@É ¾Çcd
Ø“ƒ S[Í cwdu= J–@ ’¨<::
Ø“~ ¾T>"H@Ũ< ƒ/u?ƒ ŸGªX ]/Jeú M
uS}vu` ’¨<::
u²=I nK SÖÃp Là eV ›ÃéõU:: ¾T>cÖ<ƒ T”—¨<U ULi uT>eØ` ÃÖunM::
¾T>cÖ<ƒ ULi KT>Ÿ}K<ƒ ¾Ö?“ ›ÑMÓKA„‹ °pÉ ÁÓ³M::
1. ¾U`S^ ¨<Ö? †¨< ¾SÓKê ‹Ó` ÁKv†¨< c?„‹” KS`ǃ
2. u›? ›` +“ Ÿ“ƒ ¨Å ê”e ›?‹ ›Ã y= S}LKõ” KSŸLŸM uT>ÁÓ²<
–aÓ^V‹ LÃ ¾c?„‹” S<K< }dƒö KTdÅÓ
v¡ ” G<K<”U SÖÃp KSSKe ¾}‰KAƒ” G<K< uTÉ[Ó ÁÓ²<”::
nK SÖÃl” KSSKe vÃðMÑ<U J’ Ts[Ø u=ðMÑ< S<K< Swƒ ›KAƒ::
unK SÖÃl KSd}õ ðnÅ— vKSJ• U¡”Áƒ ¾T>Å[ÓKAƒ ¾¡K=’>Ÿ< ›ÑMÓKAƒ Ø^ƒ ›Ãk”eU::
eTTKG< ›MeTTU
________ _____________
__________ __________
¾nK p ›É^Ñ>¨< ò __________
¾c<ø`zò` eU ________________________
ò __________
I. TQu^©“ ›=¢•T>Á© :- ( /vÊ x ¨<” ÃS<K< )
QID
57
58
207 1.
2. 212
59
( )
-
1 2
1 2
-
1 2
K?L Öke________________
212 . . 1.
2. 214
213 1. ---------------
2. -------------
3.
214 ∏ . . 1.
2.
3.
215 1.
2.
3.
216 ∏ . . 1.
2. 219
¦
217
____________________ 219
218 1.
2.
219 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
220 1. 2. 3.
( 4. 5.
) 6. Mð 7.
60
:- III. N . . ∏
( / vÊ x ¨<” ÃS<K< )
QID
υ
301 __________
∏ -99
302 1.
2.
-99
∏
∏
∏ ∏ υ ∏ ¦ .
303 ∏ ( ) 1. -
2. 321
-99
304 ∏ 1. _________( )
2. ________( )
3.
305 . . uÅV ¨<eØ S•\” ŸT¨q 1. ueUU’ƒ ’u`
uòƒ Ÿ ∏ ¾’u[¨< Ó”–<<’ƒ 2. ›KSÓvvƒ’u`
G<’@ 3. K?L ÃÖke---------------
306 . . / 1.
2.
3.
∏ ¦
307 ∏ 1.
. 2.
-99
308 ∏ 1.
. . ¦ 2. 310
309 . . 1.
( h 2.
) -99
310 ∏ 1.
2. 312
316
(
311
)
61
1 1 2
2 1 2
:-
1
1 2
2 1 2
3 1 2
-
1
1 2
2
1 2
3
_____________________
-
62
- ¹ ( / vÊ x ¨<” ÃS<K< ) -
¹ - ¹
¹ šé ( ò )
321 ∏ 1.
2.
3. -99
63
324 ¹ 1. -
. . / 2.
3.
325 1.
¹ . . 2.
-99
326 1.
¹ . . 2. 328
¦ - 99
327 . . 1.
( h ) 2.
- 99
328 ¹ 1.
. . 2. 330
- 99
334
329 (
)
:- ’u`
1 1 2
2
1 2
3 1 2
4
1 2
5
___________________
:- ’u`
1 / ˜ 1 2
2 }q 1 2
3 1 2
4 ›ÑKK<˜ 1 2
5 / ˜ 1 2
6 }KÁ¾” (}ó ”) 1 2
64
1
1 2
2
1 2
:-
1
1 2
2 1 2
3 1 2
-
1
1 2
2 1 2
3
___________________
-
331 . . 1.
¹ 2. 333
65
333 ∏ 1. pò 5. pò
2. pò 6. Mð
( 3. ∏ ¤ 7.
) 4. ºî 8.
_______________
334 1.
uL ‹ ∏ 2. -
-99
335 1.
2. 338
3.
4.
-99
336 1. /
∏ 2.
3. 338
-99
337 2. 3.
338
1. . .
2. 1. 2.
3. 1. 2.
4. 1. 2.
5. 1. 2.
6. 1. 2.
7. ∏
8. 1. 2.
_______________ 1. 2.
66