0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views16 pages

Lecture18 Ee689 RX Fir Ctle Eq

The document outlines Lecture 18 of ECEN689, focusing on RX FIR and CTLE Equalization techniques. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of RX FIR equalization, including noise enhancement issues, and introduces both passive and active Continuous-Time Linear Equalizers (CTLE). The lecture also covers practical examples and tuning methods for active CTLEs, setting the stage for future discussions on RX DFE and alternative approaches.

Uploaded by

rahulnikki09ec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views16 pages

Lecture18 Ee689 RX Fir Ctle Eq

The document outlines Lecture 18 of ECEN689, focusing on RX FIR and CTLE Equalization techniques. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of RX FIR equalization, including noise enhancement issues, and introduces both passive and active Continuous-Time Linear Equalizers (CTLE). The lecture also covers practical examples and tuning methods for active CTLEs, setting the stage for future discussions on RX DFE and alternative approaches.

Uploaded by

rahulnikki09ec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

ECEN689: Special Topics in High-Speed

Links Circuits and Systems


Spring 2010

Lecture 18: RX FIR & CTLE Equalization

Sam Palermo
Analog & Mixed-Signal Center
Texas A&M University
Announcements
• HW5 now due Friday (in class)
• Any issues?

• Reading
• Hanumolu equalization overview paper

2
Agenda
• RX FIR Equalization

• RX CTLE Equalization

3
Link with Equalization

TX FIR RX CTLE + DFE


Equalization Equalization

Deserializer
Channel
Serializer

Σ
DTX[N:0] DRX[N:0]

TX Clk f RX Clk
Generation Recovery
(PLL) (CDR/Fwd Clk)

4
TX FIR Equalization
• TX FIR filter pre-distorts transmitted pulse in order to invert channel
distortion at the cost of attenuated transmit signal (de-emphasis)
w-1

TX
z-1 w0
data

z-1 w1

z-1 w2

z-1 wn

5
RX FIR Equalization
• Delay analog input signal and
multiply by equalization
coefficients
• Pros
• With sufficient dynamic range, can
amplify high frequency content
(rather than attenuate low
frequencies)
• Can cancel ISI in pre-cursor and
beyond filter span
• Filter tap coefficients can be
adaptively tuned without any
back-channel
• Cons [Hall]
• Amplifies noise/crosstalk
• Implementation of analog delays
• Tap precision
6
RX Equalization Noise Enhancement
• Linear RX equalizers don’t discriminate between
signal, noise, and cross-talk
• While signal-to-distortion (ISI) ratio is improved, SNR
remains unchanged

[Hall]

7
Analog RX FIR Equalization Example
• 5-tap equalizer with tap spacing of Tb/2
3rd-order delay cell

1Gb/s experimental results

D. Hernandez-Garduno and J. Silva-Martinez, “A CMOS 1Gb/s 5-Tap Transversal Equalizer based on 3rd-Order Delay Cells,"
ISSCC, 2007. 8
Digital RX FIR Equalization
• Digitize the input signal with high-speed low/medium
resolution ADC and perform equalization in digital domain
• Digital delays, multipliers, adders
• Limited to ADC resolution
• Power can be high due to very fast ADC

[Hanumolu]

9
Digital RX FIR Equalization Example

• 12.5GS/s 4.5-bit Flash ADC in 65nm CMOS [Harwood ISSCC 2007]


• 2-tap FFE & 5-tap DFE
• XCVR power (inc. TX) = 330mW, Analog = 245mW, Digital = 85mW
10
RX Continuous-Time Linear Equalizer (CTLE)
• Passive R-C (or L) can implement
high-pass transfer function to
compensate for channel loss

• Cancel both precursor and long-tail


ISI

• Can be purely passive or combined


with an amplifier to provide gain

Passive CTLE Active CTLE

Vo+ Vo-

Din- Din+
[Hanumolu]

11
Passive CTLE
• Passive structures offer excellent linearity,
but no gain at Nyquist frequency

1 + R1C1s
H (s ) =
R2
R1 + R2 1 + R1 R2 (C + C )s
R1 + R2
1 2

1 1
ωz = , ωp =
R1C1 R1 R2
(C1 + C2 )
R1 + R2
R2 C1
[Hanumolu] DC gain = , HF gain =
R1 + R2 C1 + C2
HF gain ω p R1 + R2 C1
Peaking = = =
DC gain ω z R2 C1 + C2

12
Active CTLE
• Input amplifier with RC [Gondi JSSC 2007]
degeneration can provide
frequency peaking with gain
at Nyquist frequency
• Potentially limited by gain-
bandwidth of amplifier
1
s+
• Amplifier must be designed H (s ) = m
g RS CS
for input linear range C p  1 + g m RS 2 
 s +  s +
1 
 RS CS  RD C p 
• Often TX eq. provides some
1 + g m RS 2
low frequency attenuation ωz =
1
, ωp1 = , ωp2 =
1
RS CS RS CS RD C p
• Sensitive to PVT variations g m RD
DC gain = , Ideal peak gain = g m RD
and can be hard to tune 1 + g m RS 2
Ideal peak gain ω p1
• Generally limited to 1st-order Ideal Peaking =
DC gain
=
ωz
= 1 + g m RS 2

compensation 13
Active CTLE Example

Vo+ Vo-

Din- Din+

14
Active CTLE Tuning
• Tune degeneration resistor and capacitor
to adjust zero frequency and 1st pole which
sets peaking and DC gain
CS

1 1 + g m RS 2
ωz = , ωp1 =
RS CS RS CS

RS

15
Next Time
• RX DFE
• Alternate/Future Approaches

16

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy