Previewpdf
Previewpdf
The book analyses every aspect of the ease or otherwise of implementing the
FIDIC Yellow Book Conditions of Contract. On a clause-by-clause basis, it
highlights important structural features and suggests alternative text to avoid
problems with the contract. Written in a user-friendly manner by an expert user
of the FIDIC Suite of Contracts, who is a Member of the FIDIC President’s List
of Adjudicators, this book will be a vital reference point for contractors, lawyers,
engineers, arbitrators and all others concerned with the FIDIC contracts.
A C O M M E N TA RY
B EN B EAUMONT
First published 2019
by Informa Law from Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
Informa Law from Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
The right of Ben Beaumont to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in
accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form
or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission
in writing from the publishers.
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this book is correct,
neither the author nor Informa Law can accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions or any
consequences arising therefrom.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Acknowledgementsxv
Glossaryxvii
v
ta b l e o f c o n t e n t s
Index 373
vi
D E TA I L E D C O N TE NT S
Acknowledgementsxv
Glossaryxvii
vii
d e ta i l e d c o n t e n t s
viii
d e ta i l e d c o n t e n t s
ix
d e ta i l e d c o n t e n t s
x
d e ta i l e d c o n t e n t s
xi
d e ta i l e d c o n t e n t s
xii
d e ta i l e d c o n t e n t s
Index 373
xiii
A C K N O WL E D G E ME NT S
xv
G L O S S A RY
xvii
g l o s s a ry
xviii
g l o s s a ry
rate and amount (or price) for the work. Each amount is
a product of the quantity and the rate (in money per unit
quantities).
Build-Operate-Train-Transfer (BOTT). The procurement
procedure under which the concessionaire designs and
provides completely equipped Works ready for operation,
and then operates and maintains the Works during the
Concession Period. The Works are then taken over by the
project owner, whose operators will have previously been
trained by the Concessionaire.
Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT). The procurement
procedure under which the concessionaire designs and
provides completely equipped Works ready for operation,
and then operates and maintains the Works during the
concession period. The Works are then taken over by the
project owner.
Build-own-operate-transfer (BOOT). The procurement
procedure under which the Concessionaire designs and
provides completely equipped Works ready for operation,
and then owns, operates and maintains the Works during
the Concession Period. The Works then revert to the
project owner.
Client. The Party for whom the Consultant carries out the
Services under a Consultancy Agreement.
Commencement Date. The calendar date, of which the
Contractor is given Notice, and which is the first day of the
Time for Completion.
Concessionaire. Under BOT and similar procedures,
the Party whose Tender has been accepted, and who is
responsible for providing the Works and for operation and
maintenance during the concession period; and the
Concession period. Under the BOT and similar procedures,
the period during which the concessionaire operates and
maintains the Works, and receives the monies which are
typically intended cover the capital costs of providing the
Works and also the costs of operation and maintenance.
These monies may be based on the outcome of operation
xix
g l o s s a ry
xx
g l o s s a ry
xxi
g l o s s a ry
xxii
g l o s s a ry
xxiii
g l o s s a ry
xxiv
g l o s s a ry
xxv
g l o s s a ry
xxvi
g l o s s a ry
xxvii
g l o s s a ry
xxviii
g l o s s a ry
xxix
CHAPTER 1
1.1 Definitions
This definition is accurate providing that there were no Conditions imposed in the
Letter of Acceptance, which could or would vary the Accepted Contract Amount
should those Conditions take effect.
There are various steps, which must be complied with before the certificate can be
issued and these are set out in Sub-Clause 14.2.2 [Advance Payment Certificate].
1
clause 1 general provisions
1.1.4 “Base Date” means the date 28 days before the latest date
for the submission of the Tender.
It is important to note that it is implied that the Base Date can vary should the
Employer decide to extend either once or more than once the date for the sub-
mission of the Tender. The precise Determination of the Base Date can be critical
when taking into account regulations or legislation which come into force just
after the Base Date and which have therefore to be taken into account under the
Contractor’s obligations ensure that the Design and Execution of the Works and/
or Plant are fully compliant with all the Laws and regulations of the Country. On
occasions compliance with new legislation will engender variations which will
incur a cost to the Employer.
The use of the phrase an entitlement suggests a reward different from money. The
definition of Claim might be better phrased as follows:
“‘Claim’ means a request by one Party to the other Party for a monetary payment
and/or for an extension of time, where appropriate, or other relief of whatever nature
under any Clause of these Conditions or otherwise in connection with, or arising out
of, the Contract or the execution and operation of the Works and/or Plant.”
The amended definition allows for an explicit Claim to arise from the operation
of the Works or Plant and further specifically identifies that an area of Claim may
arise out of the operation of the Plant. That issue is not clear from the original
definition.
There may be occasions where a Letter of Acceptance has not been provided but
the Engineer has issued a Notice under Sub-Clause 8.1. In that event the Con-
tractor may safely proceed to commence operation under his obligations under
the Contract.
2
clause 1 general provisions
This definition is more loosely drafted than that provided in the definition stated
above and gives both Parties greater flexibility. It is very important that Documents
can be read in the alternative in order to provide an effective binding legal context.
3
clause 1 general provisions
As Sub-Clause 1.6 anticipates it is not essential for the Parties to enter into a
Contract agreement. The key document is the Letter of Acceptance.
There is no reason for the information which constitutes Contract Data should
be placed in a document entitled to Contract Data. Further “Contract Data” does
not mean the pages, it refers to the information provided by the Employer to the
Contractor and upon which the Contractor may well base the Contract amount.
Therefore, the importance placed upon carefully produced and detailed Contract
Data cannot be underestimated.
A better definition would be:
“Contract Data means that the relevant information provided by the Employer and
where appropriate the Contractor in written form whether entitled Contract Data or
not upon which the Contractor relies when determining the bid offer.”
This is self-explanatory.
This is self-explanatory.
Sub-Clause 5.2 does in fact not provide any detail of a definition of Contractor’s
Documents. The only question here is raised over the use of the word “supply”.
The word “supplying” implies a giving by someone to someone, i.e. the Employer
or where appropriate the Engineer. Questions are raised as to the situation at the
moment of the supply of the documents (during Tender or during realisation of
4
clause 1 general provisions
the Works), and what happens to these documents when approved or following
a non-objection notice: are they still documents upon which the Contactor relies
(only), or are may they become binding for the Employer also?
In fact, the items listed under this definition while fundamental to the con-
struction of the Permanent Works are not necessarily going to form part of the
Permanent Works. An alternative phrase might be more appropriate “prepared by
the Contractor for his use under the Contract.”
This definition should be loosened in order to allow for most possibilities as
follows:
“‘Contractor’s Documents’ means the Documents to be supplied by the Contractor
as described in Sub-Clause 5.2 Contractor’s Documents, and which may include:
calculations, digital files, Computer programs and other software, drawings, pro-
visional and final operational manuals, models, specifications and all other Docu-
ments whether of a technical nature or otherwise upon which the Contractor relies
in order to fulfil his obligations under the Contract.”
This definition has excluded any reference to remedying of the defects. Previ-
ously Contractor’s equipment was envisaged being used during the defects noti-
fication period. It is not clear why this period has been impliedly excluded.
The Reference to any other Personnel assisting the Contractor in the execution
of the Works shall include any independent personnel who assist the Contractor
before, during and/or after the execution of the Works.
5
clause 1 general provisions
This definition where stating a reference to an Implied Proposal which takes account
of the fact that on occasions Documents which should be entitled or headed in a
certain manner are not so headed or do not yet include the key information which
enable them to form part of the Contract and/or the Contractor’s Documents.
1.1.20 “Cost Plus Profit” means Cost plus the applicable per-
centage for profit stated in the Contract Data (if not stated, five
6
clause 1 general provisions
1.1.21 “Country” means the country in which the Site (or most
of it) is located, where the Permanent Works are to be executed.
This is not accurate. What is intended is that country where the Works and/or
Plant are located is to be identified. Therefore a better definition is:
“Country means the country where the Permanent Works and/or Plant is located.”
7
clause 1 general provisions
8
clause 1 general provisions
The deeming provision applies whether the taking over is of the Works, Sections
or Parts. Therefore the definition should reflect that fact.
9
clause 1 general provisions
In the first leg of the definition the explanatory Clause is placed after the word
Party instead of after the word “Claim”. Secondly, most participants involved in
these Conditions of Contract know what a Claim is. It is a request by Party A for
something from Party B. If there is a concession from Party B that the request is
justified there is no dispute. However, if the request is rejected wholly or in part
then there is a dispute as to the element rejected.
What this definition has done is to create a scenario where by Party B may, by
silence, indicate its rejection of the Claim. Without citing every instance there are
time limits, which apply within these Conditions of Contract as a result of which
deeming provision come into force if the responding Party is silent. The situation
described in this definition reverses that concept. As a result, a Contractor, and
it will usually be the Contractor, will be in the position of complete uncertainty
as to whether or not a Claim has been rejected. This is a most extraordinary
proposition.
Therefore, not only is this definition over complex but it has turned the Claim
process into a situation where an Employer, or Engineer, may by silence, which
is reasonable, reject the Claim. How can silence be reasonable?
The tried and tested formula for describing a dispute should be substituted for
this extraordinary conglomeration of words. Also, the addition of a claim that is
not a Claim to the concept is strange and should be avoided. Therefore:
“Dispute means:
Where one Party makes a Claim against the other Party;
as a result the other Party rejects the Claim wholly or in part in a timely matter as
set out in these Conditions of Contract, where appropriate; and
the Claiming Party does not accept the rejection as bringing an end to the matter.”
It may well be that person, Natural or otherwise, named in the Contract Data is
not the Party who is the Employer and therefore it is appropriate to look to the
person identified on the Letter of Acceptance or whichever other document rates
the highest in the priority list of documents as deciding the matter as to who is
the Employer.
10
clause 1 general provisions
It is not clear how the exclusion at the end of the definition assists the defini-
tion. Employer’s Equipment appears to refer to all items loaned or leased by the
Employer to the Contractor solely and simply for the purpose of executing the
Works. By its own definition it could not include Plant, which has been taken over
by the Employer and forms part of the Permanent Works. But it certainly could
include Plant, which belongs to the Employer and is either apparatus machinery
or vehicles. There is a difference between construction plant and Plant, which is
a defined term. Plant made available to the Contractor by the Employer is closer
to Material made available by the Employer to the Contractor than Equipment, as
it will form part of the Works. The definition is not very elegant but it is correct.
A slight comment to this definition would be to remove the comma after Employ-
er’s Personnel in the last line. The Notice requirement identified does not need to
be separated from the various Personnel identified as Employer’s Personnel but
needs to be linked to it without separation by a comma.
11
clause 1 general provisions
While there is no need for the document to be entitled or headed Employer’s Require-
ments, it would be preferable that the Employer’s Requirements (be wrapped up in
a document called “Employer’s Requirements”: this facilitates the Contractor’s task
and obliges the Employer to be a little orderly in his Tender docs. A special para-
graph about this should go into the Guidance on Preparation of Tender Documents.
What is vital is that there is a document, which describes exactly what the Employer
requires and how the Employer envisages that product being created.
Again, this Clause is self-explanatory save that the definition does not allow for
the Employer to appoint the Engineer after the Contract Data has been compiled.
It would be preferable to state:
“Engineer means the person named in the Contract Data and appointed by the
Employer to act as the Engineer for the purposes of the Contract or any replacement
appointed on the Sub-Clause 3.6 [Replacement of the Engineer].”
The comma after the word “Contract” in the second line has been removed in the
amended definition as the replacement option is meant to be read together with
the first part of the definition.
12
clause 1 general provisions
This is the first time that the concept of an extension of time has been formally
identified in the definition section of these Conditions.
This definition merely refers to the detail of the Sub-Clause, which addresses
procedure by which the Engineer is put in the position to issue the Final Payment
Certificate.
13
clause 1 general provisions
It is not clear why there is a need for a reference to the Currency being foreign.
It would be sufficient to refer to the Currency as being that in which part or all of
The Contract Price is payable but excluding the local Currency. Further it would
be better to refer to Currency as the Currencies, as opposed to any Currency, in
which part or all of the Contract Price is payable. It is a common occurrence for
the Agreed Contract Amount or and the Contract Price to be composed of a bas-
ket of Currencies. The definition as currently drafted raises issues as it refers to a
singular Currency instead of all possible Currencies.
It is not a clear definition. A better definition would be:
“Foreign Currency means any Currency other than the local Currency in which part
(or) of the Contract price is payable.”
It is not absolutely clear why the definition at 1.1.8 Conditions of Contract for these
Conditions is so very separate as to only represent General Conditions as described
in the previous definition which are amended by the particular Conditions.
14
clause 1 general provisions
This definition is self-explanatory and the comment made under 1.1.42 applies.
Here are general Conditions of Contract that are attempting to impose a generic
term of art being joint-venture, upon a variety of authorised and legal corporate
combinations which may not in fact be a joint-venture.
These definitions do not require that the JV, were it to exist, to disclose to the
Employer the terms of the JV. Person is not defined in these general Conditions
of Contract. It is clear that these Conditions anticipate that a person may be a
natural person or a body corporate. It would be more appropriate in this definition
to amend the second sentence as follows:
“This letter shall be signed by all the Representatives of the members of the JV and
shall be addressed to the Employer...”
15
clause 1 general provisions
The requirement for each member to be jointly and severally liable for this
to be carefully considered by any Contractor forming part of the joint-venture.
The reason is simple. Not all joint-venture partners are equal partners. And the
junior partners need to ensure that they are effectively and properly protected by
insurance and other contractual arrangements against wilful or other acts by the
predominant member or members of the joint-venture.
The next requirement is that the Undertaking must identify the leader and
rather baldly addresses authorisation of the leader of the JV.
The leader’s role may be practical or purely administrative. Some model
Contracts for joint-ventures anticipate that the leader shall be no more than
a mouthpiece and shall have virtually no power while other model Con-
tracts give the leader powers to bind other members of the consortium or
joint-venture.
It would be better for the Employer to state his requirements regarding
authority of the leader in his Tender Documents.
Finally, this definition requires that the Undertaking identifies the separate
scope of work or part of the work to be carried out by each member of the
Joint-Venture. That is a rational requirement and is a very important document
for future negotiation. As this identification of the different areas of operation
of the Joint-Venture Parties is key to a smooth running and effective Contract
management system.
The only issue with this definition is its excessive search for different words
meaning laws. It might be preferable to define laws as:
“Laws means national, state or provincial legislation or regulation of whatever
nature published by a legally constituted public authority.”
16
clause 1 general provisions
The use of the word “offer” is unhelpful. The offer consists of a series of doc-
uments, not only the financial terms. Maybe “proposal” would be better? Oth-
erwise the different documents forming the proposal (financial, technical etc)
should be specified. Also, there is no mention in this definition of a need for the
document to be headed or entitled letter of Tender.
There is no mention here of Materials which form part of the temporary or under-
ground Works. Thus in underground Works where the temporary ground support
17
clause 1 general provisions
may not be part of the Permanent Works (because the Design does not consider
it in the final stage), but cannot be compared to scaffolding or formwork because
they will remain anyway. Materials should be redefined as follows:
“Materials means things of all kinds (other than Plant), whether for use on the
Site or otherwise allocated to the Contract and intended to form or forming part
of the Permanent Works, but excluding such Materials as are incorporated in the
temporary Works, but including supply only Materials (if any) to be supplied by the
Contractor under the Contract.”
This definition as written is incorrect. The key element is the reference to the
Gregorian calendar therefore that should not be placed in brackets. In any event
this is a rather western way of seeing things, anyway. What about contracts in
Islamic countries, or other places with a different calendar?
This is one of the few occasions where it is essential for a document to be headed
or entitled “Notice”. It is difficult to understand why the definition refers to the
written communication as being identified as a Notice. Elsewhere in the defini-
tions Documents are “entitled” which, in fact, means “headed”. It is suggested
that the same phrase be used in this definition.
18
clause 1 general provisions
This definition is nonsensical. The separation of the Works or Section into parts
will have taken place at the outset of the execution of the Works. The description
is incorrect. A better definition would be:
“Part means a part of the Works or of a Section (as the case may be) which for con-
venience of the Engineer or Employer is separately identified for the purposes of the
execution of the Works or for early Taking Over by the Employer.”
19
clause 1 general provisions
The absent element is the requirement for the Employer and/or the Engineer to
serve a Notice upon the Contractor that the Contractor is in breach of the require-
ments of the Guaranteed Performances.
20
clause 1 general provisions
In this definition there is no need for the descriptors being “detailed time” pro-
gramme. There is only one programme and that is set out in Sub-Clause 8.3
program. It is only necessary to say:
“Programme means the programme prepared and submitted by the Contractor to
which the Engineer has given (or is deemed to have given) a Notice of No Objection
under Sub-Clause 8.3 [Programme]”
The definition should at least say that it is a sum to remunerate the execution of
any part etc.
21
clause 1 general provisions
Reasonable
It is suggested that within “other definitions” at 1.1.6 the bullet is bitten and a
definition of “reasonable” is provided. There are, as the drafters are aware, words
which have a vague interpretation. There are references to the words “immedi-
ately, prompt and promptly, as soon as practicable, as soon as reasonable” and
so on. It appears that the only way to remove doubt and avoid confusion is to
add a period of days so as to provide a clear sanction each time these phrases
are used. Thus, where there are situations where there is not any sanction then
that should be made clear. In the event that a deeming provision or any further
implied option to extend time is permitted and encouraged then those particular
situations should be made clear.
The process of review is very important within these Conditions of Contract and
it is essential that those reading the definitions easily understand the role and
position of the Engineer.
22
clause 1 general provisions
The key point is to recognise that these lists, however they may be composed, do not
need to be entitled Schedules providing on Face of the document it is obvious what it
is. There is an obsession throughout these definitions to have Documents entitled or
headed. The only document which requires to be immediately identified is a Notice.
However, it is vital that there is a procedure or formula for the Employer to trig-
ger in the event of a Failure in the performance of either the Works, any part of
the Works or indeed the Plant.
23
clause 1 general provisions
1.1.77 “Site” means the places where the Permanent Works are
to be executed and to which Plant and Materials are to be deliv-
ered, and any other places specified in the Contract as forming
part of the Site.
This definition would be assisted by stating that the Statement means a financial
document submitted by the Contractor in support of any application made for
payment under this Contract.
24
clause 1 general provisions
It is difficult to understand how the addition of the phrase in (other than Contrac-
tor’s equipment) assists the definition. Temporary Works are temporary Works.
The definition is too wide and too lacking in conditionality. A more practical
definition would be as follows:
“Tender means the letter of Tender, whether entitled or headed Tender or not, the
Contractor’s proposal, the JV Undertaking (if any is required) and any other Doc-
uments which the Contractor submitted with the letter of Tender as required in the
Instructions to Tenderers.”
The key place to find the Schedule of Documents required to be submitted should
be in the Employer’s Requirements. The identification of any other place is con-
fusing. There is no need to confuse the issue by requiring a Joint Venture Under-
taking where there may not be any Joint-Venture.
25
clause 1 general provisions
1.1.84 “Tests after Completion” means the tests (if any) which
are specified in the Employer’s Requirements and which are
carried out under Clause 12 [Tests after Completion] after the
Works or a Section (as the case may be) are taken over under
Clause 10 [Employer’s Taking Over].
The same concerns with this definition arose with the previous definitions. A con-
sistent redraft would be:
“Tests on Completion means the tests which are specified in the Employer’s Require-
ments or agreed by both Parties or instructed as a variation, and which are carried
out under Clause 9 [Tests on Completion] before the Works, a Section or a Part as
the case may be) are taken over by the Employer.”
Yet again a “part” of the Works is ignored. And a reference to the Employer’s
Requirements would be more relevant. Therefore a revised definition would be:
“Time for Completion means the time for Completing the Works, a Section or a
part (as the case may be) under Sub-Clause 8.2 [Time for Completion], as stated in
the Employer’s Requirements or Contract Data (or as may be extended under Sub-
Clause 8.5 [Extension of Time for Completion]), calculated from the Commence-
ment Date.”
26
clause 1 general provisions
The addition of the last few words is not helpful. There is a problem with the
lapse of time between the Base Date and the Date for Submission of the Tender:
in certain cases it is impossible for the Contractor to include information in his
tender that appears after base date (a striking example would be some Tsunami
on the day before the Date of Submission). This must be clarified, and the Date
for Submission is not appropriate.
Therefore the definition should be:
“Unforeseeable means not reasonably foreseeable by an experienced Contractor.”
1.2 Interpretation
27
clause 1 general provisions
This last is a new interpretation Clause and is useful because it removes any
doubt as to whether the word “May” is discretionary or mandatory. Most com-
mon sense interpretations indicate the word made to be discretionary but some
authoritative institutions consider context decides the meaning in spite of a clear
indication to the contrary. This is very much to be welcomed in this interpretation
description.
28
clause 1 general provisions
This interpretation is not helpful as at least two or three definitions refer to the
fact of a person being a natural person. Why is it necessary to define the person
as a natural person if the interpretation definition of person here is quite explicit?
Therefore, the definition is redundant.
Where the condition is included in the first line, which says “except where the
context requires otherwise”. This condition means that all the elements within
this Sub-Clause are subject to this condition. This cannot be right. Take as an
example the direction that all provisions that include the word “agree” etc., are
required to be recorded in writing, which means that the sentence in question
should be put at the beginning of Sub-Clause 1.2.
This condition described above appears to require the users of these Condi-
tions of Contractor consider every paragraph within every Sub-Clause in order
to decide whether Sub-Clause 1.2 applies “or whether the context requires
otherwise”.
As to the second direction stated in this Sub-Clause that the headings etc.,
shall not be taken into consideration in the interpretation of these Conditions this
direction should be re-phrased.
A proposal is:
“The headings set out in these Conditions of Contract are merely headings for the
provision of guidance and are not taken to have any critical impact upon the con-
tents of the Sub-Clause.”
29
clause 1 general provisions
30
clause 1 general provisions
This instruction does not mandate that the electronic transmission system shall
have within it software to record receipt and opening of communication. That
software is available and regularly used and should be part of the requirement as
to delivery set out in sub-paragraph (d).
There are no sanctions applied to situations where a Party has unreasonably with-
held or delayed such communication.
31
clause 1 general provisions
There could be situations where there is more than one original version of the
Contract each written in a different language. Concerns as to interpretation may
well arise when operating in a country such as the People’s Republic of China
where it is highly likely that the Employer will require and original Contract to
be written in mandarin side-by-side with are equally binding original Contract
written in English. Translations from English into Mandarin and vice a versa are
notoriously complex, thus great care must be exercised when operating in such
a situation.
Further uncertainty as to which would be the ruling language should be elimi-
nated in the Contract Data in any such situation.
32
clause 1 general provisions
There are two changes to the priority schedule in the original Yellow Book.
They referred to the Particular Conditions part A and part B. However, there is
a slight contradiction in separating the two for the purposes as a priority. Defi-
nition 1.1.61 refers to the Particular Conditions meaning the document entitled
Particular Conditions of Contract. While it is understood that singular means
plural and plural means singular and in places in the Conditions such as 1.1.61
it should be made quite clear that the document referred to means Document or
Documents.
The second change is in addition to the priority list being the joint-venture
Undertaking.
This should be redrafted as the intent of this addition is in the alternative not as
a unifying description. That’s the reference should be to:
“The JV Undertaking, if any (if the Contractor constitutes an unincorporated JV) and
(k) any other Documents forming part of the Contract.”
The addition of the alternative option at the end of the sentence makes it quite
clear what is required.
33
clause 1 general provisions
The original direction as to ambiguity was sparse in the extreme. The expanded
direction is helpful as it sets out the procedure to be followed. The only comment
as to the structure of the direction is that the Engineer might wish to issue a var-
iation, instruction or advice especially where there is a discrepancy. That option
is not available to the Engineer. In the last sentence there is a comment “if an
ambiguity or discrepancy is found in the Documents, the Engineer shall issue
any necessary clarification or instruction”. This instruction does not fall under
the heading of priority. It is sufficiently important to deserve its own Condition.
Further it should make clear that:
“where a Party considers that there is an ambiguity or discrepancy of any nature
within the Documents then the Party should serve a Notice on the Engineer seeking
clarification or instruction which shall be provided by the Engineer within 28 days of
receipt. If such a verification or instruction is not provided within the 28 day period
then the ambiguity or discrepancy shall be deemed to be found in favour of the Party
seeking clarification or instruction.”
The revised version of Clause 1.6 refers to the Parties signing a Contract agree-
ment. However, in the last sentence there is a reference to an entry into the Con-
tract Agreement. Therefore, it is suggested that there should be an amendment by
removing the words “with entry” and replacing it
“in connection with any signing of the Contract Agreement...”
In the second line of the definition there is a phrase “unless they agree other-
wise”. It appears that this alternative agreement refers only to the period of days.
In fact, it would be quite possible for the Parties to agree not to enter into a Con-
tract Agreement or merely to come to this agreement by implication. An alterna-
tive phraseology might be:
“unless they agree to vary the entire or any part of the procedure in any way and
confirm that variation in writing”.
34
clause 1 general provisions
1.7 Assignment
Neither Party shall assign the whole or any part of the Contract
or any benefit or interest in or under the Contract. However,
either Party:
(a) may assign the whole or any part of the Contract with
the prior agreement of the other Party, at the sole discre-
tion of such other Party; and
(b) may, as security in favour of a bank or financial insti-
tution, assign the Party’s right to any moneys due, or to
become due, under the Contract without the prior agree-
ment of the other Party
This definition has the usual prohibition against assignment. The prohibition is
mandatory and absolute. The definition should be amended by a “unless” provi-
sion. Thus
“unless the Parties have complied with the permissive Clause set out below”.
35
clause 1 general provisions
The Contractor shall keep at all times, on the Site, a copy of:
This set of directions as to the location of Documents is the same as that contained
in the original Yellow Book save that the right of access given to the Employer’s
Personnel has now been restricted to “all normal working hours” as opposed to
“at all reasonable times”.
36
clause 1 general provisions
This is sensible. There is also flexibility given to the Parties to agree times
outside normal working hours.
There are practical changes to this direction from the original Yellow Book. The
Engineer can now take the initiative. The error or defect can be technical or oth-
erwise which is very practical.
However, the last sentence is new. That sentence directs that the Contractor
shall rectify the error or defect at its own cost. This is reasonable as the errors
or defects were found in a document prepared by or on behalf of the Contractor.
The third paragraph addresses the key matter of communication of the nature
of an error or defect to the other Party. However, little urgency is given to this
instruction; the word used is that the communication must be prompt. There is
mention that Notice should be given, however no formality is given with respect
to the Notice. No format nor acknowledgement is required! Advice to both Par-
ties is that they should assume formality however laxly the direction is given.
This revised direction is a period of 42 days within which to give a Notice to the
Engineer. That was missing from the original direction. It now appears that for
reasons which are not clear the revised direction has separated the period into two
within which the Notice to be given. The first period is the period is the period
stated in the Contract Data calculated from the commencement date and the sec-
ond period as shall be seen in a moment is any time thereafter.
37