Fire Sprinkler System Hydraulic Analysis 2.0
Fire Sprinkler System Hydraulic Analysis 2.0
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
Ø25
2 Ø25
Ø25
5 6
Ø25
3 10
4 8
Ø40 Ø25
Ø25
11
12 Ø50 9
7
Ø40
Ø40 Ø50
13
15
16 14
Ø65
Ø65 Ø65
17
Ø40
Ø100 Ø40
19
Ø65 20
Ø65
Ø65
18
Ø100
1
Q 2
P =
k
19.28 2
P =
5.6
P1 = 11.85psi
The minimum residual pressure for the most remote sprinkle is 7 psi as per NFPA. Thus resulting
pressure is higher and is therefore acceptable.
ft
Pe =
2.31
2
3.3 Equivalent Length of Pipe
To calculate the losses from valves and fittings, use the Equivalent Pipe Length chart.
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 3 1 in. 3(2) = 6 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
3
3.5 Pressure at Sprinkler Head 2 (Node 3)
The following are the known data:
• Protection area of coverage As = S × L = 2.3 × 3.2 = 7.36 m2 = 79.18f t2 (see NFPA 13,
8.5.2.1 for determining the protection area of coverage per sprinkler )
Q 2
P =
k
7.918 2
P =
5.6
P3 = 2.0 psi
The pressure does not meet the minimum 7 psi requirement. Therefore, we need to adjust the
flow by using the 7 psi minimum requirement. Hence,
P3 = 7 psi
p
Q3 = k P3
√
Q3 = 5.6 7
Q3 = 14.82 U Sgpm
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 1 1 in. 1(2) = 2 ft
Tee 1 1 in. 1(5)= 5 ft
4
Therefore,
Consequently,
Thus,
5
r
13.06
Qadj,3−2 = 14.82
7.386
Qadj,3−2 = 19.71 U Sgpm
We can accept the flow of 19.71 gpm as the flow to the branch or we can calculate further.
The adjusted pressure losses is given by
4.52(19.71)1.85
P =
(120)1.85 (1.049)4.87
P = 0.127 psi/f t
Q
k=√
P
19.71
k=√
12.06
k = 5.676
3.7.1 Iterations
The resulting k factor is a little bit higher than 5.6. Although we may accept this and move on
to the next segment, we can iterate further in order to arrive at a more accurate values.
Thus,
√
Qi = 5.6 12.06
Qi = 19.447 gpm
4.52(19.447)1.85
Pi =
(120)1.85 (1.049)4.87
Pi = 0.12355 psi/f t
6
P3−2,i = 0.12355(11.82) = 1.46 psi
r
13.06
Qii = 19.447
13.023
Qii = 19.475 U Sgpm
Then,
4.52(19.475)1.85
Pii =
(120)1.85 (1.049)4.87
Pii = 0.12388 psi/f t
19.475
k3,ii = √
12.093
k3,ii = 5.6
It is apparent that after some iterations, we have arrived at the desired k f actor of 5.6 at the
sprinkler and the pressure 13.06 psi at junction node 2. It can also be observed that the difference
between the flow of the last iteration, i.e., 19.475 gpm and the initially calculated adjusted flow,
i.e., 19.71 gpm, is not that large enough to be consequential. Therefore, one can accept the
initial adjusted flow value as the flow rate, without performing further iterations. The designer
decides whether to do further iterations or not.
7
3.8 Pressure Losses in Segment 2-5
From Node 2 to Node 5, we have the following data:
• Pipe nominal (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
Therefore,
Consequently,
Pe = 0 psi
• Protection area of coverage As = S × L = 2.65 × 3.0 = 7.95 m2 = 85.53f t2 (see NFPA 13,
8.5.2.1 for determining the protection area of coverage per sprinkler )
8
Q 2
P =
k
8.553 2
P =
5.6
P4 = 2.33 psi
The pressure does not meet the minimum 7 psi requirement. Therefore, we need to adjust the
flow by using the 7 psi minimum requirement. Hence,
P4 = 7 psi
p
Q4 = k P4
√
Q4 = 5.6 7
Q4 = 14.82 U Sgpm
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 1 1 in. 1(2) = 2 ft
Tee 1 1 in. 1(5) = 5 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
9
3.11 Balancing at Junction Node 5
The calculation from two branches that converged at node 5 resulted in different pressures. As
discussed in Section 3.7, since the pressure difference is large, we need to adjust the flow along
the branch 4-5. We use the following formula
s
PH
Qadj = QL
PL
Thus,
r
16.95
Qadj,4−5 = 14.82
7.487
Qadj,4−5 = 22.3 U Sgpm
4.52(22.3)1.85
P =
(120)1.85 (1.049)4.87
P = 0.159 psi/f t
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
Tee 1 1 in. 1(5) = 5 ft
10
Therefore,
Consequently,
Pe,5−6 = 0 psi
Q 2
P =
k
10.379 2
P =
5.6
P7 = 3.44 psi
The pressure does not meet the minimum 7 psi requirement. Therefore, we need to adjust the
flow by using the 7 psi minimum requirement. Hence,
11
P7 = 7 psi
p
Q7 = k P7
√
Q7 = 5.6 7
Q7 = 14.82 U Sgpm
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 2 1 in. 2(2) = 4 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
12
The flow through the sprinkler is given by
Q 2
P =
k
5.144 2
P =
5.6
P9 = 0.84 psi
The pressure does not meet the minimum 7 psi requirement. Therefore, we need to adjust the
flow by using the 7 psi minimum requirement. Hence,
P9 = 7 psi
p
Q9 = k P9
√
Q9 = 5.6 7
Q9 = 14.82 U Sgpm
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 1 1 in. 1(2) = 2 ft
Tee 1 1 in. 1(5) = 5 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
13
−0.35(3.28)
Pe,9−8 = = −0.497 psi
2.31
The pressure loss due to change in elevation is negative since the water flows from higher level
to lower level.
The pressure in node 8 is therefore
P8 = 7.55 psi
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
Tee 1 1 in. 1(5) = 5 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
Pe,8−6 = 0 psi
14
The pressure in node 6 is therefore
r
24.16
Qadj,8−6 = 29.64
11.839
Qadj,8−6 = 42.34 U Sgpm
Consequently,
Pe,8−6 = 0 psi
15
s
PH
Qadj = QL
PL
r
15.863
Qadj,9−8 = 14.82
7.22
Qadj,9−8 = 21.97 U Sgpm
Consequently,
Consequently,
16
−0.35(3.28)
Pe,7−8 = = −0.497 psi
2.31
The pressure loss due to change in elevation is negative since the water flows from higher level
to lower level.
The adjusted pressure in node 7 is therefore
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1-1/2 in (1.61 in i.d.)
• Fittings: No fittings
Therefore,
Consequently,
17
Q = density × protection area
Q = 0.10(135.6) = 13.56 gpm
Q 2
P =
k
13.56 2
P =
5.6
P11 = 5.86 psi
The pressure does not meet the minimum 7 psi requirement. Therefore, we need to adjust the
flow by using the 7 psi minimum requirement. Hence,
P11 = 7 psi
p
Q11 = k P9
√
Q11 = 5.6 7
Q11 = 14.82 U Sgpm
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
Tee 1 1 in. 1(5) = 5 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
18
The pressure loss due to change in elevation is negative since the water flows from higher level
to lower level.
The pressure in node 10 is therefore
r
25.61
Qadj,11−10 = 14.82
6.96
Qadj,11−10 = 28.43 U Sgpm
4.52(28.43)1.85
P =
(120)1.85 (1.049)4.87
P = 0.249 psi/f t
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1-1/2 in (1.61 in i.d.)
19
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 1 1-1/2 in. 1(4) = 4 ft
Tee 1 1-1/2 in. 1(8) = 8 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 1 2 in. 1(5) = 5 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
20
Pe,12−13 = 0
Q 2
P =
k
15.91 2
P =
5.6
P14 = 8.07 psi
The resulting pressure is greater than the 7 psi minimum; hence, it is acceptable.
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1in (1.049 in i.d.)
• Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 3 1 in. 3(2) = 6 ft
Tee 1 1 in. 1(5) = 5 ft
21
Therefore,
Consequently,
s
PH
Qadj = QL
PL
r
37.51
Qadj,14−13 = 15.91
8.07
Qadj,14−13 = 34.3 U Sgpm
4.52(34.3)1.85
P =
(120)1.85 (1.049)4.87
P = 0.353 psi/f t
22
3.29 Pressure Losses in Segment 13-15
From Node 13 to Node 15, we have the following data:
• Fittings: No fittings
Therefore,
Consequently,
Pe,13−15 = 0
From Node 15 to Node 16 (Fire Hose Station), we have the following data:
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1-1/2in (1.61 in i.d.)
1
See NFPA 13 (2013 edition), Section 12.8.4.
23
• Valves & Fittings:
Fittings Qty Diameter Total Equivalent Length
90 deg. elbows 3 1-1/2 in. 3(4) = 12 ft
Tee 1 1-1/2 in. 1(8) = 8 ft
Angle Valve 1 1-1/2 in. 1(22) = 22 ft
Therefore,
Consequently,
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 2-1/2in (2.469 in i.d.)
Therefore,
24
Consequently,
Pe,15−17 = 0
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 4 in. (4.026 in i.d.)
Therefore,
Consequently,
From Node 18 to Node 19 (Fire Hose Station), we have the following data:
25
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 2-1/2in (2.469 in i.d.)
Therefore,
Consequently,
Pe,18−19 = 0 psi
• Pipe (ASTM Std., Sch. 40) nominal diameter = 1-1/2in (1.61 in i.d.)
26
Therefore,
Consequently,
Consequently,
27
The pressure in node 21 is therefore
It is evident from the table that the applicable fire pump capacities are 200gpm to 250 gpm.
Choosing a fire pump near 150% of rated capacity does not allow for flexibility. Also, selecting
higher pump capacities, while sufficient to supply the fire sprinkler system, costs more. A good
judgment on the balance between cost and applicability is important. Based on the table, we
can choose a 250 gpm rated capacity fire pump for the system. With this selection, we can
determine the BHP from the pump curve. This BHP is the power required by the pump shaft,
and is therefore, the motor output required to run the pump.
The hydraulic analysis yielded a minimum requirement of 267 gpm and a total pressure of 70.83
psi. Depending on the designer’s discretion, an additional allowance may be included for the
unaccounted pressure losses.
2
NFPA 20 2019 edition
28
From the manufacturer’s pump curve, the fire pump specifications are:
• No. of Vanes: 6
• RPM: 3515
29