Summary of Pages 61-91
Summary of Pages 61-91
broader implications. These pages discuss trade policy complications, member state interactions,
and how RIAs influence global economic and political systems. A summary is presented below.
RIAs are designed to achieve expansion in regional trade through the reduction of internal
barriers and establishing common external policies. They foster opportunities for growth by
production. However, these gains depend on how member states manage key trade-offs:
While RIAs can increase intra-bloc trade (trade creation), they might also divert trade to less
efficient member states from more efficient non-members, which could reduce global trade
efficiency. RIAs promote FDI through the creation of larger and integrated markets. Indeed, such
larger integrated markets are better for developing countries that wish to acquire technology
transfer and inflows of capital. These agreements can vary between shallow forms, as in the case
Deeper integration, for example, requires regulatory standard harmonization, common external
tariffs, and labor and capital mobility, which would lead to greatly increased benefits but demand
higher political commitment. The member countries also need to carefully balance internal
benefits of regional integration with open trade relations with the rest of the world. Custom
unions are also confronted by special problems in aligning external tariffs, which reduce the
Most countries have joined several RIAs, creating conflicts of obligations and inefficiencies.
Overlapping memberships in African and Latin American regions are enmeshing countries in a
domestic reforms, creating regional stability, and increasing collective bargaining power in
There is unequal distribution of benefits amongst members that heightens tensions. The richer
nations within the bloc often capture most of the benefits, as evident in South-South RIAs like
Central American Common Market (CACM) and Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS). RIAs can function as a commitment mechanism by binding the member states to
reforms due to the cost policy reversal may entail. For example, agreements such as
Developing nations face unique hurdles in maximizing RIA benefits. Limited infrastructure and
industrial capacity restrict the ability of the least developed members to seize the opportunities
fully opened by the trade. Poor governance and a lack of regulatory frameworks erode effective
of tariff barriers, comes at economic and social costs. To deal with these challenges, developing
nations are encouraged to focus on partnerships with developed countries, such as North-South
RIAs, that would help them gain access to new markets and technology while developing
institutions.
The paper discusses the position of RIAs in the international trading system with regard to their
potential as a source of both opportunity and risk. RIAs can also serve as stepping-stones to
broader global trade liberalization, providing an example for others of the gains from lower
barriers. If improperly managed, RIAs could also fragment the world trading system into isolated
blocs, particularly if external tariffs are increased or if non-members are denied trade benefits.
This strengthens the case for strengthening WTO rules to ensure that RIAs remain aligned with
global trade objectives and are more inclusive in their growth effects.
Pages 69–91 supports the multifaceted nature of RIAs, highlighting their potential to drive
regional development, stabilize political systems, and influence global trade. However, their
success hinges on equitable design, effective implementation, and alignment with broader
economic and political goals. Developing countries must address internal limitations and adopt