0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views1 page

Kho V Republic GR 187462

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of petitioner Raquel G. Kho, declaring her marriage to Veronica B. Kho void ab initio due to the absence of a marriage license, which is a requisite under the Civil Code. The Court found that the respondent failed to provide evidence to support her claim of a valid marriage license, thus overcoming the presumption of validity. The decision reversed the appellate court's ruling, affirming the lower court's finding of nullity.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views1 page

Kho V Republic GR 187462

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of petitioner Raquel G. Kho, declaring her marriage to Veronica B. Kho void ab initio due to the absence of a marriage license, which is a requisite under the Civil Code. The Court found that the respondent failed to provide evidence to support her claim of a valid marriage license, thus overcoming the presumption of validity. The decision reversed the appellate court's ruling, affirming the lower court's finding of nullity.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Title Kho V.

Republic

Petitioners: Raquel G. Kho

Respondents: Republic of the PH and Veronica B. Kho

GR NO. G.R. No. 187462

Date Decided June 1, 2016

Topic/ Doctrine CC Art.4. The absence of any of the essential or formal requisites shall render the
marriage void ab initio, except as stated in Art 35

Facts of the Petitioner filed before the RTC a petition for the declaration of nullity of marriage on the
Case ground that their marriage was solemnized without the requisite marriage license. On
May 31, 1972, petitioner’s parents summoned one Eusebio Colongon, a clerk in the
office of the municipal treasurer, instructing him to arrange and prepare whatever
necessary papers were required for the intended marriage between the petitioner and
respondent. The actual marriage ceremony took place before dawn on June 1, 1972.
Petitioner has never gone to the office of the Local Civil Registrar to apply for a
marriage license. Due to the shortness of the period of time to obtain the pertinent
papers, the marriage was still solemnized even without the required marriage license.

Issue/s Whether or not the petition for nullity of marriage must be granted

Lower Court RTC rendered its decision granting the petition, finding petitioner to have sufficiently
Decision established the absence of the requisite marriage license when their marriage was
solemnized.

Appellate Court On appeal, the CA reversed the RTC’s decision, holding that there is a presumption a
Decision marriage was issued in the absence of any indication in the marriage certificate on the
contrary.

Supreme Court Contrary to the ruling of the CA, the Court agrees with petitioner and finds no doubt to
Decision be resolved as the evidence is clearly in his favor. Petitioner was able to present a
Certification issued by the Municipal Civil Registrar of Arteche, Eastern Samar attesting
that the Office of the Local Civil Registrar "has no record nor copy of any marriage
license ever issued in favor of Raquel G. Kho. Thus, on the basis of such Certification,
the presumed validity of the marriage of petitioner and respondent has been overcome
and it becomes the burden of respondent to prove that their marriage is valid as it is
she who alleges such validity. As found by the RTC, the respondent was not able to
discharge that burden. Despite respondent's categorical claim that she and petitioner
were able to obtain a marriage license, she failed to present evidence to prove such
allegation. It is a settled rule that one who alleges a fact has the burden of proving it
and a mere allegation is not evidence. The law must be applied. As the marriage
license, an essential requisite under the Civil Code, is clearly absent, the marriage of
petitioner and respondent is void ab initio.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy