IQAC Handbook 2023-24
IQAC Handbook 2023-24
2023-24
IQAC - HANDBOOK
Mission
To develop as a benchmark University in emerging technologies.
To provide state of the art teaching learning process and R&D environment.
To harness human capital for sustainable competitive edge and social relevance.
Quality Policy
Towards achieving the vision of producing professionals who shall be leaders in innovation,
entrepreneurship, creativity and management, JIIT is committed to provide quality education, research,
training and consultancy. It is also our commitment for improving the effectiveness of management
practices toward knowledge, human capital for sustainable competitive edge and social relevance, to the
satisfaction of all stake holders.
This is accomplished through:
2
INDEX
3
1. INTRODUCTION
Higher education is the key driver for long term social development, technology development and
economic progress of a country, however, it is imperative to have higher education of top quality which
provides (social and/or technical) values to students and prepares them to take up future challenges. The
quality paradigm must be dynamic enough to accommodate changing environment and especially it must
Recognizing the need to establish and audit quality metrics in all academic and administrative processes,
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology (JIIT), Noida has established Internal Quality Assurance
Cell to audit and thereby improve the quality in academics and administration as well as in research
processes.
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) is responsible for the day to day administration of quality
*IQAP: Internal academic system; processes and procedures approved by the Academic Council of
the Institute for activities and discipline.
4
Mission
a. To promote and inculcate the culture of quality consciousness in all processes in the Institute.
b. To implement and administer the IQAP (Internal Quality Assurance Process)
c. To become the vehicle for quality improvement by regular reviews of audit reports.
Goals
To ensure, support and promote the quality of all its academic programmes and activities in conformity
with the vision of JIIT. Quality Assurance is also to provide greater acceptance of JIIT degrees at the
national and international level and for greater opportunities for student’s employment.
Responsibilities
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) is responsible for the implementation and administration of the
IQAP. It interacts and works with Dean(s) for Graduate and Post Graduate/Ph. D Programmes, Registrar,
Institute’s units (departments/centres/research groups) for new programmes approval and cyclic
programmes/courses reviews and also to support the implementation of review outcomes. IQAC is also
responsible for auditing academic and administrative activities and utilization of the Institute resources.
IQAC is considerate and respectful of the autonomy of the faculty and academic activities, in curricular
development, professional and R &D activities. The cell works both collaboratively and transparently and
provides guidelines for reports and outcomes.
5
2. Administration
Vice-Chancellor
The Vice-Chancellor (VC) is responsible for Quality Assurance, its implementation and administration
with the assistance from the Committee for the Internal Quality Assurance Cell, the Directors, Dean(s)
and Head of the Departments. VC monitors the progress of the implementation of recommendations
agreed to in the action plan.
The committee is responsible for ensuring the implementation of the Internal Quality Assurance Process
(IQAP) and quality auditing of academic and administrative activities. The committee through its
Coordinator, reports regularly to the Vice- Chancellor.
6
The process of feedback collection, its analysis, framing of Recommendations and overseeing its
compliance through Action Taken Report is very crucial to its functioning, as outlined by NAAC.
IQAC conducts all its functions through its four wings. The details of their functioning are given below:
7
Department Quality Assurance Committee(DQAC)
• Department Quality Assurance Committees (DQACs) of 3-4 members are constituted for all the
teaching departments every academic year by Hon’ble Vice Chancellor and Chairman of IQAC.
• It collects the data along with supporting document from the department and upkeeps the record
of Departmental data.
• Committee of each Criterion collects the data and relevant documents for data validation &
verification.
• The audit review is done by the members of IQAC and suggestions for improvement are
incorporated criterion-wise.
• The compilation, filing and submission of AQAR is done by AQAR committee and its coordinator
under the guidance of Coordinator and Chairman of IQAC every year.
Audit Committees
• Audit committees of 3 members are constituted every year for the audit of teaching and non-
teaching departments. All the committee members are from other departments. This year (2023-
24) Academic Audit Committee constitution has one External Member as Convener and one
Internal Professor ranked faculty member as Coordinator for conducting Audit of 2022-23
• The Audit committees give its review report for quality upgradation. Marks are awarded on the
basis of set guidelines.
8
Following is the Constitution of Committee for Internal Quality Assurance Cell (CIQAC) for 2023-
24:
Sl. No.
Department Phone Nos. E-mail ID
Name
98910 76842
br.mehta@jiit.ac.in
1 Prof. B. R. Mehta, Chairman, IQAC Vice-Chancellor
bhagwati.prasad@jiit.ac.in
2 Prof. B. P. Chamola, Coordinator, IQAC Maths 9971968349
9
31 Mr. Jaspreet Makkar (Alumni Visual AI and we do sky, Delhi 9958918797 Jaspreet.@visualai.in
& Industry)
32 Ms. Arushi Agarwal (Employer Talent Decrypt Pvt. Ltd., Delhi 7838334969 arushi@telentdecrypt.com
Rep.)
33 Mrs Anju Batra (Parent) Parent 9868287798 anjubatra.cbse@gmail.com
34 Barbie Aggarwal (Student) Student 8461001210 barbie.aggarwal@mail.jiit.ac.in
10
Sub-Committees of IQAC
11
Department Quality Assurance Cell for AY 2023-24
Dept. of ECE
(i) Dr. Garima Kapur
(ii) Dr Bhawna Gupta
(iii) Dr. Akansha Bansal
(iv) Dr. Neetu Joshi
Dept. of Biotechnology
(i) Prof. Sudha Srivastava
(ii) Dr. Vibha Gupta
(iii) Dr. Pooja Choudhary
Dept. of PMSE
(i) Dr. Amit Vema
(ii) Dr. Anuraj Panwar
(iii) Dr. Ashish Bhatnagar
(iv) Dr. Ravi Gupta
Dept. of Mathematics
(i) Prof. B. P. Chamola
(ii) Dr. Pankaj Srivastava
(iii) Dr. Dinesh C.S. Bisht
(iv) Dr. Neha Singhal
Dept. of HSS
(i) Dr. Amba Aggrawal
(ii) Dr. Namreeta Kumari
(iii) Dr. Amandeep Kaur
(iv) Dr. Deepak Verma
12
IQAC-AQAR Committee for AY 2023-24
CRITERION I
Dr Anshu Varshney, PMSE
Dr Prashant Chauhan, PMSE
Dr Amanpreet Kaur, CSE & IT
Dr Satyendra Kumar, ECE
CRITERION II
Prof Chetna Gupta, CSE & IT
Prof. Neetu Sardana, CSE & IT
Dr Rajnish Prakash Singh, Biotech
CRITERION III
Dr Pankaj Srivastava, Mathematics
Dr Dinesh C.S. Bisht, Mathematics
Dr Mohd. Sarfaraz, Mathematics
Dr Parmeet Kaur, CSE & IT
Dr Garima Kapur, ECE
CRITERION IV
Dr Juhi, ECE
Dr Ruby Beniwal, ECE
Dr Shivani Kapoor, JBS
CRITERION V
Prof Krishna Sundari, Biotech
Prof Sujata Mohanty, Biotech
Dr. Ritesh Kumar Sharma, ECE
CRITERION Vl
Prof Mukta Mani, HSS
Dr Monali Bhattacharya, HSS
Dr Alka Singhal, CSE & IT
CRITERION VII
Dr Archana Srivastava, JBS
Dr Sweta Goel, JBS
Dr Deepak Verma, HSS
13
Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Teaching Departments for the Year 2022-23
Sl. Department
Audit Team
No. to be Audited
14
23. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Non-Teaching Departments for the Session 2022-23
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
15
3. Sub-Committees and their calendar
The aim of the Academic (Teaching and Learning) subcommittee is to audit the teaching and learning
academic activities of the institute. The aim is to be achieved by taking several measures as mentioned
below:
(i) To develop expected outcomes and outputs of different programs considering national and
international scenario.
(ii) To oversee the development, establishment and revision of learning objectives and outcomes of
courses and programmes,
(iii) To oversee the feedback of students including pass-out students and their expectations from the
program/course.
(iv) To oversee the feedback of faculty in carrying out lecture/lab classes’ consideration learner centric
concept and outcomes of the program/course.
(v) To ensure that study material/course files are being maintained and updated.
For the above purpose various feedback forms have been developed. The details of the feedback forms
are as following.
Evaluation
Sl. No. Form No. Title Frequency
scale
1. QA-AC-1 Student feedback analysis 1 to 10 Once in a semester for
theory course every course
2. QA-AC-2 Student feedback analysis 1 to 10 Once in a semester for
laboratory course every course
3. QA-AC-3 Faculty feedback Once in a semester
16
Calendar for filling proformas
A sample copy of course proposal is placed in Annexure I. The procedural steps currently being followed
for introduction of new course and new program is described in Annexure II and Annexure III.
17
18
19
20
Form: QA-AC-4
Frequency- Yearly
Date -
Use of Equipments
1. Department__________________________________________________________________
Head of Department
21
Form: QA-AC-5
Frequency- Yearly
Date -
Feedback
22
Form: QA-AC-6
Frequency- Annual
Date:__________
University Name
National/International
Session (year of admission)
Duration of the Programme
Specialization Area
23
Annexure I
Detailed Syllabus
B. Tech. Course-Core
24
5. Statistical Maxwell-Boltzmann, Bose-Einstein
Distributions and and Fermi-Dirac distributions and
Lasers their applications. Principle and 11
working of laser, Einstein A and B
coefficients, Ruby Laser
Total number of Lectures 40
Recommended Reading material:
1. Ghatak, Optics, Tata McGrow Hill.
2. E. Hecht, Optics, Pearson Education.
3. F.A. Jenkins and H.E. White, Fundamentals of optics, Tata McGraw Hill .
4. R.S. Sirohi, Wave Optics, Orient and Longman.
5. Reshnick, Relativity, New Age.
6. A. Beiser, Concepts of Modern Physics, McGrow Hill International.
25
Annexure II
The department may call for expert opinion from industry or academia or may arrange a workshop
before course introduction and communicate minutes of BOS
The Course objective, detailed syllabus, importance of the course is deliberated between HOD and
Dean Academic & Research
Board of Studies (BoS) deliberates on the proposal and recommends the course to the Academic
Council
The course upon approval is implemented from subsequent semester (Even/Odd) as per the approved
proposal.
For major revision of the course in progress, the steps will all be similar to course introduction as
mentioned above, with an additional brainstorming session by the department where external
experts could be invited.
26
Annexure III
Consideration of the proposal and assessment of need and feasibility are deliberated between
departmental committee, HOD and Dean Academic & Research
The institute/department may call for expert opinion from industry or academia or may arrange a
workshop before moving ahead with the proposal for program introduction
Upon approval of Academic Council If the proposal is deemed fit, the proposal is
(AC), the proposal is placed before Board put up to the Academic Council (AC) with a
of Management (BoM) for approval request for approval through Dean Academic
& Research
The program proposal once approved by BoM for introduction moves to the departmental committee
for formulating the detailed course and syllabi, and subsequently placed before the Board of Studies
(BoS) with a request for approval through Dean A & R
Academic Council approves the Board of Studies (BoS) deliberates on the proposed
program. The proposal moves to program structure, courses, credit allocation, detailed
VC for administrative and syllabi and recommends the program to the Academic
executional approval Council
27
3.2 Academic (Research)
The teaching and research activities of any institution of higher learning are its backbone. While the
quality of teaching provided to its students helps them in achieving their desired goals and reflects in the
performance in their career, the research environment prevailing in the particular institute distinguishes it
from other such similar institutions. The aim of Academic (Research) sub-committee is to audit quality of
research in the Institute ensuring that faculty/students are cognizant and periodically made sensitive about
the issues of safety, environment, plagiarism and ethics while planning and performing research and
publishing thereafter.
1. Publications.
2. Sponsored R&D projects.
3. Master and Ph.D. degrees.
4. Patents.
5. Individual achievements/awards.
6. Review articles and books in developing areas.
7. Interdisciplinary Research.
8. Data Bases.
9. Benchmarking of academic units with other universities /Institutes.
For the above purpose, the ARC has proposed nine proformas (QA-AR 1-9). These are filled up by the
departments and the data thus obtained is analysed by the ARC. The methodology for awarding API score
is also suggested in each proforma.
28
Academic Research:
29
QA-AR-Form 1
Frequency- Semester wise
IQAC
Academic Research
Summary of Publications
S. Authors* Complete Reference Type of Impact Factor Indexing body H Index of Journal/Conference ISSN/ISBN
No. (IEEE Format) publication** (SCOPUS/SCI/GOOGLE proceeding (SJR:
Title, Journal, Vol., Issue, JCR SJR SNIP WEB OF SCIENCE) http://www.scimagojr.com )
page no. , year
S. Faculty No. of No. of No. of publications in No. of No. of other H Index of faculty API
No. Name publications publications in Indexed publications in categories Score***
in Journals journals having Conferences(Scopus/Web of non indexed publications
with IF/SCI, ISSS/ISBN Science) Google Scholar conference H- H-5 I-10
Scopus, /Web number but not proceedings index: index: index:
of science, indexed having Scopus Google Google
Google ISBN/ISSN Scholar Scholar
Scholar number
indexed
30
(***) (i) Refereed Journals: 15/Publication, (ii) Non refereed Journal but having ISBN/ISSN number:10/ Publication (iii) Conference
proceeding as a full paper per publication: International Conference (IC) 10, National Conference (NC):08, Regional Conference/Local
Conference (LC): 06, International/National Conference- Presented but not published (PN):04, Only abstract (OA) :02
31
QA-AR-Form 2
Frequency: Every Year
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Academic (Research)
Sponsored R&D Projects
Name of the Department: ----------------------------------
S.No. Title of the Principal Collaborative Cost of the Sponsoring Date of Duration % of Year
project investigator/ Institute.( If any) project Rs. Agency Start work wise
Co-Investigator (in Lakhs) Name (Type left money
Govt./Pvt./JIIT received
)
I II III
1
2
3
API Score to be entered directly for faculty as per criteria given
(a) 20 API points for each Sponsored Research Projects with grants of Rs. 10 lakhs or more; Rs. 3 lakhs in case of HSS & Management,.
(b) 15 API points for each Sponsored Research Projects with grants between Rs. 4 to 10 lakhs; Rs. 1 to 3 lakhs in case of HSS &
Management,
(c) 10 API points for each Sponsored Research Projects with grants between Rs. 0.5 to 4 lakhs, Rs. 0.25 to 1 lakhs in case of HSS &
Management,
(d) For Consultancy Projects apply (a), (b) & (c) above with amount and API points reduced to 50% level.
(e) In case of Joint projects API points will be shared as in case of jointly authored books (see form 7).
32
QA-AR-Form 3
Frequency: Every Semester
Date:___________________
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Academic (Research)
Master and Ph.D. Degrees
Name of the Department: ----------------------------------
.
S. No. Title of Project/ Student’s Name and Supervisor(s) Level Acad. Completed/
Dissertation/ Thesis Enrolment No. name(s) :(Master/Ph.D.) Year On-going
1
2
3
API Score to be awarded to faculty as per criteria given:
(*) (i) 5/ M.Tech degree awarded (ii) 10/ Ph.D. degree awarded (iii) 7/ Ph.D. thesis submitted (iv) 3/ Ongoing Ph.D. thesis of more than 6
months duration (v) In case of joint guidance , points to be shared as in the case of jointly authored books.(Form 7 )
33
QA-AR-Form 4
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Academic (Research)
Patents Registered by JIIT Faculty / Students
S. Name of faculty/student Title of Patent Country** Nature of patent Date of Status API *
No. (Specify applicant & co- the patent No. application filing (Filed / Score
applicant) (Provisional / /Granted Granted)
Full length,
National / PCT)
1
2
3
(*) 30 for each granted National Level Patent and 50 for each granted International Level Patent.
34
QA-AR-Form 5
Frequency: Every Year
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Academic (Research)
Awards & Achievements
Name of the Department: ----------------------------------
35
QA-AR-Form 6
Frequency: Every Year
Date:
S. No. Project Acad. Year Title of the Project Name & Enroll. no. Name(s) of faculty Publications if any
ID of the Student involved (nos.)
(Supervisor) IJ/NJ/IC/NC/No
1
2
3
4
IJ: International Journal; NJ: National Journal; IC: International Conference; NC: National Conference; No: None
36
QA-AR Form 7
Frequency: Every Year
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Academic (Research)
Summary of Review articles and Books, Book Chapters in Developing Areas
Name of the Department: ----------------------------------
S. No. Faculty Name (Author & Title Type (Book/Book ISBN No. Year Publisher
Co-authors*) Chapters/Article/Case
Study/Tech.
Report/Review)
1
2
3
(*) Complete affiliation of Co-author if other than JIIT
(i)Books Published by International Publisher after Peer Review: 50 per book (ii) Published by National Publisher with ISBN/ISSN number; 25
per book (iii) Published by Local Publisher with ISBN/ISSN number: 15 per book (iv) Chapter in any of the above categories: 20% of the
category per chapter
(a) Two Authors – 60% to First/Principal Author and remaining 40% to the other author.
(b) More than Two Authors - 40% to First/Principal Author and remaining 60% to be shared equally among all the
other authors.
37
QA-AR-Form 8
Frequency: Every Year
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Academic (Research)
Interdisciplinary Research
Name of the Department: -----------------------------------
38
IQAC QA-AR- Form-9
Academic Research
RESESRCH SCHOLARS FEEDBACK FORM
Based on your experience of working as a research scholar in this Institute, you are requested to give your
frank and unbiased feedback. You may rate the following on a scale of 5 to 1 (Outstanding, Very Good, Good,
Average, Poor).
Suggestions about any other matter which is important in your opinion and not covered above.
39
3.3 Stakeholder Relationship Committee
A stakeholder is any person, group or organization who can place a claim on an organization’s attention,
resources or output, or is affected by that output. Effective management of relationship with stakeholders is
crucial to resolve issues that organizations face from time to time. By using their influence, stakeholders hold
the key to the environment in which the Institute operates and the subsequent financial and operating
performance of the Institute. Through proper maintenance of stakeholder relations, the Institute can influence
stakeholder attitudes, decisions, and actions for mutual benefit.
The main steps of stakeholder relationship maintenance are: identification of stakeholders and engaging with
them. The Institute communicates with the stakeholders in a proactive and efficient manner. The
communication is both ways where each get regular status reports; messages etc. and get a forum to air their
concerns and grievances while having the comfort of knowing that they will get a response. The aim of
stakeholders’ relationship sub-committee is to oversee and analyse the feedbacks from various stakeholders
of the institute and prepare reports giving recommendation and suggestions.
1. Overseeing and analysis the feedback from external stockholders (Employers & Industry, parents,
regulators, Govt. and community, Alumni, professional institutions and suppliers) about the Institute and
programmes.
2. Overseeing and analysis the feedback of internal members (students, faculty, non-teaching employee and
trustees).
The stakeholders have been categorised as internal stakeholders and external stakeholders. The feedback of
stakeholders is taken from time to time. The feedback of faculty members, students, non-teaching staff,
corporate, parents, alumni and trustees are directly collected through filling of feedback forms. For this
purpose, various feedback forms have been developed. The details of the feedback forms are as follows:
40
Stakeholder Relationship:
The feedback of other stakeholders such as community and government organisations is collected indirectly.
The community feedback is indicated by the rating reports of the Institute published by rating agencies
(Annexure IV). The feedback of government organisations is reflected in the accreditation and assessment
reports and queries of government bodies.
41
Stakeholder Feedback Forms
1. Any other suggestion/comment for further improving online teaching from campus/ home____
43
Form: QA-SR – 2
Frequency- Annual
Date- _____________
2. Please give your opinion on the overall functioning of the program and any noteworthy changes that
you observed.
3. Your observations on the Institute in general and its success in terms of the output it is generating.
4. In your opinion, is the institute upholding its commitment to students and parents in terms of?
Imparting value education:
Maintaining student discipline:
Providing healthy academic environment:
5. Are you being actively communicated about various developments / initiatives taken by the institute
from time to time? Please provide your opinion.
Thank you
44
Form: QA-SR-3
Frequency- Annual
Date-_____________
Name of Department__________________________________________________________
45
(Updated in May 2021)
Form: QA-SR-4
Frequency- Annual
Date-_________________
Name of Department_________________________
Please give your feedback on the following points based on your Teaching and Learning in your program
in last academic year.
1 How much of the syllabus was 100 to 85% 85 to 70% 70 to 54% 54 to 30%
covered in the classes?
2 How well did the teachers prepare Perfectly Thoroughly Moderately Satisfactorily
for the classes?
3 How well were the teachers able to Always Fairly Sometimes Just satisfactorily
communicate? effective effective effective
4 The teacher’s approach to teaching Excellent Very good Good Fair
can best be described as
5 Fairness of the internal evaluation Always fair Usually fair Sometimes fair Occasionally fair
process by the teachers.
6 Was your performance in Every time Usually Sometimes Occasionally
assignments discussed with you?
7 The institute takes active interest in Regularly Often Sometimes Occasionally
promoting internship, student
exchange, field visit opportunities
for students.
8 The teaching and mentoring process Very Significantly Moderately Marginally
in your institution facilitates you in Significantly
cognitive, social and emotional
growth.
9 Teachers inform you about your Every time Usually Sometimes Occasionally
expected competencies, course
outcomes and programme
outcomes.
10 The teachers illustrate the concepts Every time Usually Sometimes Occasionally
through examples and applications.
46
11 The teachers identify your strengths Fully Reasonably Partially Slightly
and encourage you with providing
right level of
challenges.
12 Teachers are able to identify your Every time Usually Sometimes Occasionally
weaknesses and help you to
overcome them.
13 The institution makes effort to Strongly agree Agree Moderately Neutral
engage students in the monitoring, Agree
review, and continuous quality
improvement of the teaching
learning process.
14 The institute/ teachers use student Always To a great Moderate Some what
centric methods, such as extent
experiential learning, project-based
learning, participative learning, and
problem-solving methodologies for
enhancing learning experiences.
15 Teachers encourage you to Strongly agree Agree Moderately Neutral
participate in extracurricular Agree
activities.
16 Efforts are made by the institute/ Always To a great Moderate Some what
teachers to inculcate soft skills, life extent
skills and employability skills to
make you ready for the world of
work.
17 What percentage of teachers use Above 90% 90 – 70% 70 – 50% 50 – 30%
ICT tools such as LCD projector,
Multimedia, etc. while teaching?
18 The overall quality of teaching Strongly agree Agree Moderately Neutral
learning process in your institute is Agree
very good.
47
Please give your feedback on the following points based on Institutional facilities:
Very
S.No. Parameters Questions Outstanding Excellent Good Fair
Good
Give three observation / suggestions to improve the overall teaching – learning experience in your institution.
______________________________________________________________________________
48
(Updated in May 2020)
Form: QA-SR –5
Frequency- Annual
Date-______________
Thank you
49
(Updated in May 2020)
Form: QA-SR – 6
Frequency- Annual
Date- _____________
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Stakeholder Relationship
Parents Feedback Form
Name of the Ward (Optional): _____________________________
Program in which your ward is studying: _____________________
Year of admission_______________________________________
Rate the following statements on the basis of your experience with JIIT:
S.No. Statements Outstanding Excellent Very Good Fair
Good
1 Curriculum of the programme that your
ward is undergoing
2 Quality and relevance of the courses
included into the curriculum
3 Courses in terms of their relevance to the
latest and/or future technologies
4 Infrastructure of the institute for effective
delivery of curriculum
5 Availability of the text and reference books
in the library
6 Quality of the teaching in the Institution
7 Institute activities that help your ward in
getting jobs and placements
8 Transparency of the evaluation system in
the institute
9 Knowledge and skills acquired by your
ward from the course
10 Overall personality development of your
ward
11 Please rate the online teaching and learning
provided by the institute from April 2020
12 Please rate the online exams conducted by
the institute from April 2020.
1. Your suggestion/comment for best utilization student's time during Covid-19. ____________
2. Any other suggestions for the Improvement of the program __________________________
50
(Updated in May 2016)
Form: QA-SR-7
Frequency- Annual
Date-______________
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Stakeholder Relationship
Alumni Feedback Form
1. Name of the Alumni: _________________________________________________
2. Branch and Pass-out year: _____________________________________________
3. Contact Details: Email:______________________ Phone Number: _____________
4. Higher Studies Details (if any)
Course Name M.Tech M.S. MBA PhD Any
other
University Name
National/International
Session (if completed else
year of admission)
51
3.4 Professional and Social Activities Committee
The aim of Professional and Social Activities Sub-committee is to audit the quality of the professional
activities and social activities other than teaching and research being carried in the Institute. This includes
consulting projects, conferences, workshops and special courses. Social activities will include activities which
promote social harmony and awareness. The aim is to be achieved by taking several measures as mentioned
below:
1. Overseeing and analysis of the feedback from the organizers and participants of the Conferences/
Workshops/Courses.
2. Overseeing and analysis of the feedback of Institutional resources and support available.
3. Overseeing and analysis of the feedback from the industry regarding joint trainings/
Workshops/collaborative projects.
4. Overseeing and analysis of the feedback on social activities carried out by the faculty and/or students.
For above purpose various feedback forms have been developed. The details are as follows:
Form Number Title Evaluation Scale/Statement Frequency
Consulting Process Mapping Annually in May
QA-PSA-1A
Form
Consulting Process Mapping Outstanding – Fair and 1 – 5 Annually in May
QA-PSA-1B
Feedback Form point scale
Approval for Conducting Semester Wise in
QA-PSA-2A Workshops/courses/Guest Jan and July.
Lectures/FDP
Workshops/courses/Guest Outstanding – Fair and 1 – 5 Semester Wise in
QA-PSA-2B Lectures/FDP Feedback point scale Jan and July.
Form
Proforma for Approval of Annually in July
QA-PSA-3A
Conference
Budget Sheet for Proposed Annually in July
QA-PSA-3B
Conference
Feedback on Conference Outstanding – Fair and 1 – 5 Annually in July
QA-PSA-3C
point scale
Industrial Interactions Semester wise in
QA-PSA-4A
Jan. and July
Industrial Interactions Outstanding-Fair and 1 – 5 Semester wise in
QA-PSA-4B
Feedback Form point scale Jan. and July
QA-PSA-5 Social Activities Annually in July
Financial Assistance availed Annually in July
for attending
QA-PSA-6
workshop/conference/FDP
etc.
52
Form: QA-PSA-1A
Frequency – Annually in May
Date- _________________
1. Department: __________________________________________________
Project Project Client Faculty PI / Nature of Duration Start End Component Consulting
ID Title Organization ID Investigators Project Date Date Purchase Amount
53
2. Feedback
Project Project Client Interim Final Amount Date Institutional Institution Human Resource Revenue Sharing
ID Title Organization Feedback Feedback Used Facilities Support Requirements
used
1.
Outstanding
2. Excellent
3. Very
Good
4. Good
5. Fair
Approval:
a. Investigators:______________________________________
b. Head of Department:________________________________
c. Dean Academic & Research: _________________________
d. Vice Chancellor: ___________________________________
(Name and Signature)
54
Form: QA-PSA-1B
Frequency – Annually in May
Date- _________________
Project Project Date of Faculty PI / Amount Used Amount Account Feedback Feedback Achievements/ Feedback
ID Title Completion ID Investigators Received settled on on publications/ of
and institute Human Company
Institute Service utilization facilities Resources outcomes of
charges Tax certificate used used project
issued 5
(Highest)
1(Least)
Signature of PI ________________________________
Signature of HoD_______________________________
55
Form: QA-PSA-2A
Frequency – Every Semester Jan/July
Date-
Department_________________________________________________________
Workshop Workshop Co- Duration Start End Resource Person Tentative Target Audience
ID Title ordinator Date Date Budget
Name Affiliation/ Expertise
Designation
56
Form: QA-PSA-2B
Frequency – Every Semester Jan/July
Date- ______________
57
Form: QA-PSA-3A
Frequency – Annually in July
Date- ____________
Conferenc Conferenc Type Focu Objectiv Propose Duratio Star End Number of Details Details Are
e Acronym e Title (National/ s e d Budget n t Dat Participant of of tutorial
International Area Dat e s expected Keynote Invited planne
) e Speaker Speaker d with
s s conf.
Approved/Not Approved
Vice Chancellor
58
Form: QA-PSA-3B
Frequency – Annually in July
Date- ____________
HOD/Director
59
Form: QA-PSA-3C
Frequency – Annually in July
Date-
60
Form: QA-PSA-4A
Frequency – Every Semester Jan/July
Date-
Department_________________________________________________________
Interactio Nature of Guest Visit of Visit Lab Trainin Training at Fellowship Collaborativ Authorshi Industry
n ID Interactio Lecture Faculty of Establishment g at other s e Degree p of Joint Support for
n from to Studen / other JIIT organizatio Programmes Articles Conferences
Industr Industr t Facility n / Meetings
Consultin y y
g work
Signature of HoD
61
Form: QA-PSA-4B
Frequency – Every Semester Jan/July
Date-
Department_________________________________________________________
Signature of HoD
62
Form: QA-PSA-5
Social Financial Blood Eye Awareness Environment Educational Social Donations NSS / NCC
Activity Fellowships Donation Camp Camp Camps Camps Service in (Financial/ activity
ID provided to Camps case of Goods) organized in
needy Natural the Institute
students Calamity
63
Form: QA-PSA-6
64
c. Assistance received for attending FDP
S. No. Name of Department Name of FDP FDP attended (In JIIT/Outside JIIT) Address Dates Name of Agency If YES PAN
Faculty Attended of the (From- (JIIT/Sponsored then
Institute To) Project/Other) amount
where the provided any paid by
event held financial support to JIIT to
(If outside attend the attend
JIIT) Workshop outside (INR)/ If
JIIT NO write
NA
65
3.5 Student activities and placement
In the Institute, education goes well beyond course work, extracurricular activities form a vital
part of student experience, creating unique opportunities for friendship, overall development and
learning. The student activities complement the studies. There are various hubs under JYC to facilitate
students to participate in the extracurricular activities within the University and participate at
Regional/National/International level.
1. To oversee and analyse data/feedback received from JYC, various hubs and department
regarding student’s activities.
2. To oversee and analyse data/feedback received from Training and placement Cell, students,
employees and parents.
Evaluation
Form Number Title Frequency
Scale/Statement
QA-SAP - 1 Awards & Achievements Data/statements Every Sem.
QA- SAP - 2 HUB/Group Activities Data/statements Every Sem.
Institute, JYC Activities Data/statements Every Sem.
QA- SAP - 3
with Societal relevance
QA- SAP - 4 Job Placement Data/statements Every Year
Higher education, Data/statements Every Year
QA- SAP - 5
Entrepreneurship
Student Participation in Data/statements Every Year
Off-campus Competitive
QA- SAP - 6
events
66
QA-SAP-Form 1
Frequency: Every Semester
Date:______________
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Student Activities & Placement (SAP)
Awards & Achievements
Awards won during Technical Event, Competition / Cultural event, competition / Inter College fests / Specify if
Sports / On-line competitions (outside JIIT) online
(Y/N)
S. No. Name Enrl. Branc Details of the award Level of the Nature of the
of No. h event (Inter award(Cash/C
Stude College / ertificate /
nt Name of Organiz Date Venue Title of National / Medal/
Event ing Award Internation Memento etc.
body (I / II al/)
prize,
best
paper
etc)
S.No. Name JIIT Name of competitive exam Reg./Hall Organizing Year & Qualified Rank if
Enrl (NET; SET/SLET; GATE; ticket/admit body Months (Yes/No/ applicable
No. CAT;GRE; GMAT; IAS; IPS; card No. Of appeared Result
IFS; UPSC; Others) competitive awaited)
exam
1
2
Note: Scan copy of proof to be uploaded
67
QA-SAP-Form 2
Frequency: Every Semester
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Student Activities & Placement (SAP)
HUB/Group Activities
Name of the Hub: -----------------------------------
Name of Faculty Coordinators for the Hub:---------------------
68
QA-SAP-Form 3
Frequency: Every semester
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Student Activities & Placement (SAP)
Institute, JYC Activities with Societal relevance
Name of Faculty / Administrative Coordinators for the Activity: ---------------------
69
QA-SAP-Form 4
Frequency: Every Year
Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Student Activities & Placement (SAP)
Job Placement
Data to be procured from Institute Placement cell
S.N Name of Number of Detail of the student placed Nature of company Salary On
o. the offers Package* campus /
company made/ Name Enr Bra Progr MNC/Publ Large Off-
students oll nch am ic sector/ scale/Medium campus
placed No National/ scale/start-up
Pvt. Ltd.
/Any other
specify
1
Salary Package*: Specify if there is any difference with respect to package offered to different branches
70
QA-SAP-Form 5
Frequency: to be filled by every final year student on last day of his/her exam Date:
Institute Academic Quality Assurance Cell
Student Activities & Placement (SAP)
Higher education, Entrepreneurship
S. Name of JIIT Branch Name of Nationa Prospectiv Specializa Qualifying Fellowship( Year of
No. student Enrl. Institute, l/ e Degree tion exam Y/N) admission /
No. Organization Interna (M.Sc./ (area/bra (Yes/No) pass out
, University tional M.Tech/ nch/field) (If GATE,
and place MBA/ GRE, GMAT)
(where PHD, etc.)
secured
admission)
1
2
* Scan copy of proof to be uploaded
71
QA-SAP-Form 6
Frequency: Every Year
Organizing institute:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:--------------------
Place/Location:-----------------------------
Student Signature
Instructions: Every student who is intending to participate in any off campus event should fill the above
form and deposit with registry. In case the student wins an award upon participation, a copy of the
certificate won may be deposited at the same place. In case a student falls short of a marginal
percentage of attendance, this form submitted at registry may be considered as a supporting document
to authorise his/her leave of absence.
Note***: Photocopies of this blank form may be kept in the registry at a designated location and the
soft copy of the same may also be maintained in the study material folder ‘Notices by Registrar’. A
notice may be issued from the Registrar’s desk to students, and filling of this form be made mandatory.
72
QA-SAP-Form 7
Frequency: Every Year
Proforma for Mentor’s Report
Name of Faculty:
Department:
Mentee students detail (No. of students, Batch and Year):
Dates of meeting:
Note*: The rating provided against each row has to be the cumulative average of the entire batch of students allocated for
the mentor.
Note**: against each parameter, give a concise statement of any comments, concerns/issues raised or suggestions put forth.
Faculty mentors are to meet their mentee students periodically and by the time of End semester exams of every
semester, a report of their observations has to be made and submitted to Dean, with a copy marked to Convenor,
IQAC-SAP subcommittee.
73
4. Constitution of sub-committees for academic year 2016-17
74
5. Constitution of audit committees to audit departments for year 2015-16:
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
Dr. Shamim Akhtar, ECE Convener
5.1 Biotech Dr. Navendu Goswami, Physics Member
Mr. Himanshu Agarwal, CSE Member
Dr. R.K. Dwivedi, Physics Convener
5.2 CSE Dr. Vikram Karwal, ECE Member
Ms. Anshu Banwari, HSS Member
Prof. Amrish Agarwal, Math. Convener
5.3 ECE Dr. Vikash Saxena, CSE Member
Dr. Sandeep Chhokar, Physics Member
Dr. Rajnesh Mishra, JBS Convener
5.4 HSS Dr. Shikha Mehta, CSE Member
Dr. Bhartendu Chaturvedi, ECE Member
Dr. Badri Bajaj, HSS Convener
5.5 JBS Dr. Sangeeta Mittal, CSE Member
Dr. Akhilesh Kumar, Maths. Member
Dr. Sudha Srivastava, Biotech Convener
5.6 Maths Dr. Satish Chandra, CSE Member
Mr. Pushpendra Singh, ECE Member
Prof. Krishna Asawa, CSE Convener
5.7 Physics Dr. Vibha Gupta, Biotech Member
Dr. Vineet Khandelwal, CSE Member
75
6. Constitution of IQAC Sub-Committees for the Academic Year 2017-18
76
7. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Teaching Departments for the
Year 2016-17:
Department to be
Sl. No. Audit Team
Audited
Dr. Navendu Goswami, Physics Convener
77
8. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Non-Teaching Departments for
the Year 2016-17:
Sl. No. Departments to be Audited Audit Team
Dr. Shweta Dang, Biotech Convener
78
9. Constitution of IQAC Sub-Committees for the Academic Year 2018-19
79
10. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Teaching Departments for the
Year 2017-18
Department to be
Sl. No. Audit Team
Audited
80
11. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Non-Teaching Departments for
the Year 2017-18
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
Dr. Shweta Dang, Biotech Convener
81
12. Constitution of IQAC Sub-Committees for the Academic Year 2019-20
82
13. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Teaching Departments for the
Year 2018-19
Department to be
Sl. No. Audit Team
Audited
Dr. Vivek Sajal, Physics Convener
83
14. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Non-Teaching Departments for
the Year 2018-19
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
Dr. Shweta Dang, Biotech Convener
84
Dr Amba Agrawal, HSS Convener
85
15. Constitution of IQAC Sub-Committees for the Academic Year 2020-21
15.1 Academic (Teaching and Learning):
86
16. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Teaching Departments for
the Year 2019-20
Department to be
Sl. No. Audit Team
Audited
87
17. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Non-Teaching Departments
for the Year 2019-20
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
88
Dr Ruby Beniwal, ECE Convener
17.9
NSS Dr Ekta Srivastava, HSS Member
Dept. of ECE
(i) Dr. Garima Kapur
(ii) Dr. Parul Arora
(iii) Dr. Ajay Kumar
(iv) Ms. K. Nisha
Dept. of Biotechnology
(i) Prof.Krishna Sundari
(ii) Prof Sujata Mohanty
(iii) Dr. Rachana
(iv) Dr. Shalini Mani
JBS
(i) Prof. Rajnish Mishra
(ii) Dr Rahul Sharma
(iii) Dr Shriram Purankar
(iv) Dr Vishal Gupta
(v) Mr Ajit Kumar
Dept. of PMSE
(i) Professor R K Dwivedi
(ii) Dr. Anuraj Panwar
(iii) Dr. Ashish Bhatnagar
(iv) Dr. Manoj Tripathi
Dept. of Mathematics
(i) Prof. Amrish Agarwal
(ii) Dr. Pankaj Srivastava
(iii) Dr. Neha Singhal
Dept. of HSS
(i) Dr Shirin Alavi
(ii) Dr Badri Bajaj
(iii) Dr Deepak Kumar
(iv) Dr Chandrima Choudhary
90
20. AQAR committee 2021-22
AQAR Convener
CRITERION I
CRITERION II
CRITERION III
CRITERION IV
CRITERION V
CRITERION VI
CRITERION VII
91
21. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Teaching Departments for the
Year 2020-21
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
92
22. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Non-Teaching Departments
(Activities of Session 2020-2021)
Sl.
Department to be Audited Audit Team
No.
93
Dr. Satyendra Kumar ECE Member
94
23. Constitution of IQAC Sub-Committees for the Academic Year 2022-23
Academic (Teaching and Learning):
i) Prof. Navneet K Sharma - PMSE (Convener)
ii) Dr. Anshu D Varshney - PMSE (Co-convener)
iii) Prof. RC Mittal - Mathematics
iv) Dr Garima Srivastava - JBS
v) Dr Juhi Gupta - ECE
vi) Prof. Sudha Srivastava - Biotech
vii) Dr. Monali Bhattacharya - HSS
viii) Prof. Chetna Gupta - CSE
Academic (Research):
i) Prof. B.P.Chamola - Mathematics (Convener)
ii) Prof Jitendra Mohan - ECE
iii) Dr. Neetu Sardana - CSE
iv) Prof. Sujata Mohanty - Biotech
v) Dr. Kanupriya Misra Bakhru - HSS
vi) Dr. Prasant Chauhan - PMSE
vii) Dr. Archana Srivastava - JBS
Stakeholder Relationship:
95
24. Departmental Quality Assurance Cell (DQAC) 2022-23
Dept. of ECE
(i) Dr. Garima Kapur
(ii) Ms. Bhawna Gupta
(iii) Dr Akansha Bansal
(iv) Dr. Neetu Joshi
Dept. of Biotechnology
(i) Prof Sudha Srivastava
(ii) Dr. Vibha Gupta
(iii) Dr. Pooja Choudhary
JBS
(i) Dr Shriram Purankar
(ii) Dr Vishal Gupta
(iii) Dr Sweta Goel
Dept. of PMSE
(i) Dr. Anuraj Panwar
(ii) Dr. Ashish Bhatnagar
(iii) Dr. Amit Vema
(iv) Dr Ravi Gupta
Dept. of Mathematics
(i) Prof. B. P. Chamola
(ii) Dr. Pankaj Srivastava
(iii) Dr. Neha Singhal
Dept. of HSS
(i) Dr Amba Aggrawal
(ii) Dr Namreeta Kumari
(iii) Dr Amandeep Kaur
(iv) Dr Deepak Verma
96
25. AQAR committee 2022-23
AQAR Convener
CRITERION I
CRITERION II
CRITERION III
Dr Sarfaraz, Mathematics
CRITERION IV
CRITERION V
CRITERION VI
CRITERION VII
97
26 Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Teaching Departments for
the Year 2021-22
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
98
27. Constitution of Audit Committees to Audit Non-Teaching Departments for
the Session 2021-22
Sl. Department to be
Audit Team
No. Audited
Prof. Vibha Rani, Biotechnology Convener
Dr. Dinesh C S. Bisht, Maths Member
1 Account
Member
Shri Babu Ram Singh Gen. Admn.
Prof. Jitendra Mohan, ECE Convener
Dr. Prashant Chauhan, PMSE Member
2 Administration
Member
Mr. Rajbir Singh, LRC
Prof. Sudha Srivastava, Biotechnology Convener
Mr. Manas Ranjan Behera, HSS Member
3 Environment
Member
Dr. Kavita Pandey, CSE
Dr. Manoj Chauhan, PMSE Convener
Dr. Sangeeta Mittal, CSE & IT Member
4 JYC
Member
Sh. Shivaji Tyagi, ECE
Dr. Pankaj Srivastava, Maths Convener
Dr. Vinay Khare, ECE Member
5 IT
Member
Dr. Aman Preet Kaur, CSE & IT
Dr. Megha Agarwal, ECE Convener
Dr. Sujata Kapoor, JBS Member
6 Maintenance
Member
Mr. Baleshwar Tiwari ECE Lab.
Prof. Shweta Dang, Biotechnology Convener
Dr. Madhu Jain, ECE Member
7 Registry
Member
Sh. Vinod Kumar, T & P
Dr. Vibha Gupta, Biotechnology Convener
Dr. K. Rajalakshmi, CSE Member
8 Training and Placement
Member
Dr. Satyendra Kumar ECE
Dr. Ruby Beniwal, ECE Convener
9 NSS Dr. Ekta Srivastava, HSS Member
Dr. Raghvenda Singh, ECE Member
Prof. Charu Gandhi, CSE & IT Convener
10 Hostels' Administration Dr Juhi, ECE Member
Shri Mihir Jha, Deputy Registrar Member
99