Lecture 3 Risk and Risk Allocation - 2025
Lecture 3 Risk and Risk Allocation - 2025
Allocation
International Commercial Law
Professor Joseph McCahery
1
Today’s Lecture
• Background
• Project Viability
• Project Risk
• Risk Allocation
• Risk Factors
• Risk Instruments
2
1. Background
▪ Risk
• Measurable probability that the actual outcome will deviate from
the expected outcome.
• Risk can be divided into two categories:
• Exposure
• Uncertainty
4
1. Background
• Project finance risks: carbon project
6
2. Project Viability
▪ Definition
Project viability is a process of determining the technical, financial
and economic viability of a proposed project
Appraising a project is based on:
• The project’s technical feasibility
• The economic viability
• If there is a surplus of inputs that cannot be traded out of the firm
• If inputs are reusable without reducing their value, e.g. know-how or
patent
• Whether the transaction costs of organizing multi-product operations are
less then the benefits
7
2. Project Viability
▪ Analyzing Project Viability
• Economic viability
• When the project’s expected net present value is positive
• Depends on marketability of the project’s output, ie, price and volume
8
2. Project Viability
▪ Analyzing Project Viability
• Creditworthiness
• Debt raising level function of capacity to service debt from project cash flow
• Measured by value of project assets, expected profitability, amount of equity sponsor’s
capital at risk plus any supplemental credit support by third parties)
9
2. Project Viability
▪ Five Case Model--UK
11
3. Project Risk
• Basic steps to risk identification analysis
• 1. Identify all project risks
• 2. Assess magnitude and probability of risks
• 3. Mitigate risks
• 4. Allocate risk to participants
• 5. Individual participant should further reduce allocated risk
spreading mechanism
12
3. Project Risk
• Preliminary risk analysis
14
3. Project Risk
• Basic steps to risk identification analysis
16
4. Risk Allocation
▪ Risk allocation: project risks should be borne by the most
suitable participant whose risk preference is higher
17
4. Risk Allocation
▪ Risk Evaluation and Allocation
Source: Escap 18
4. Risk Allocation
▪ Project risk analysis
• Main risk controller-–who can control the risk
• Cost control—party who can identify and manage risk at the lowest cost
19
4. Risk Allocation
▪ Project risk categories:
20
4. Risk Allocation
▪ Constraints on effective risk allocation
• Risk and Value for Money: ability to transfer risk to project company may
depend, in some cases, on creating large safety margin
• Risk and Lenders: sponsors and lenders have upsides and downsides
21
4. Risk Allocation
Source: KPMG-NZ
Road Map
• Background
• Project Viability
• Project Risk
• Risk Allocation
• Risk Factors
• Risk Instruments
23
5. Risk Factors
▪ Definitions
• Credit risk—risk of loss due to another party’s financial instability
to meet contractual obligations
• Counterparty risk—risk that other party fails to meet contractual
obligations for reasons other than inability to pay
• Interest rate risk—decline in value of asset over time due to
fluctuations in interest rates
• Revenue risk—risk that conditions adversely impact projects
future earnings
• Political risk—risk that government actions will affect project
24
5. Risk Factors
• Construction risk—risks associated with the design, financing,
construction and testing of the project faciltity
• Technology risk—risk in project that incorporates an unproven
technology that may have to be altered or modified
• Commodity price risk—risk due to increase/decrease in price of
commodity sold
• Operating risk—risk associated with project’s operational
limitations and reserves sufficient to cover maintenance costs, IP
and other sufficient rights to ensure daily operation of facility
25
5. Risk Factors
• Credit risk challenges
• Refinancing—increasingly common due to partially amortizing
debt and shorter contract terms.
• Three types of transactions likely to involve restructuring and
refinancing risk.
28
5. Risk Factors
▪ Merchant Risk in Power Plant Projects
29
5. Risk Factors
▪ Merchant Risk Mitigation in Power Plant Projects
30
5. Risk Factors
▪ Institutional Investors: Attractive risk-adjusted returns
35
5. Risk Factors
▪ Risk and Risk Mitigation
36
Road Map
• Background
• Project Viability
• Project Risk
• Risk Allocation
• Risk Factors
• Risk Instruments
37
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Mechanisms to mitigate investor risk
38
6. Risk Instruments
Instruments
Wrap insurance
2. Insurance (private sector) Technology guarantees
Warranties
Commercial and political risk insurance
39
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Guarantees
• Designed to shift risk to parties that prefer direct involvement in
project
• Example: New project technology may require long-term
guarantee by sponsors, cross-guaranteed by either contractor or
manufacturer.
Typically used by company with no little or no liquid collateral available
• Benefits
Mitigates credit risk (directly) and is liquid since it derives from a better rated
entity. Receiving party can substitute credit risk of guarantor to the credit risk of
the project company
40
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Transnational Guarantees
• Designed to meet condition of financing in international projects
• Concerns
• Legal certainty with respect to enforcement of terms
• Currency uncertainty (eg, enforcement actions against guarantor)
• Tax: need to consider gross up and other provisions if there is any uncertainty
regarding local laws
41
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Limited Guarantees
• Designed to supply minimum credit enhancement for some type
of projects
Hard budget constraint needed in some cases to avoid moral hazard problems
42
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Limited Guarantees
• Cash deficiency: mandates project sponsor supply cash to cure cash deficiency
of project company
43
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Indirect Guarantees are based on underlying credit of project
participant (ie, where revenue stream can be attached)
• Form:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1556766/000119312512
436698/d400066dex1032.htm
• Take and pay: offtaker pays only what he or she buys given
characteristics of the contract 44
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Insurance is needed to deal with risk that cannot be contracted
for at a reasonable price
▪ Ex: required if SPV’s cost of risk mitigation using insurance policies is less
than premium for risk expressed in interbank rates requested by banks if
no coverage exits
46
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Types of Insurance Policies
• Non-payment risk (policies covering damage for the SPV due to political or business
reasons; may deal with medium or long-term receivables)
• Investment risks (polices protect SPV for risks of currency incovertibility, etc)
• Collateral deprivation risks: (policies that protect against loss of assets and failure of
concession authority to repurchase the structure)
• Contractual frustration risks (policies calling of guarantees and failure to deliver parts of
pieces that are functional to project)
• Credit enhancement (insurance that can be required to guarantee a credit from a third
party)
• Transfer risk (policies used where there is little political stability to ensure against
failure of retransfer payments)
47
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Insurance
48
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Political Risk Insurance
49
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Political risk insurance is specialized form of insurance that deals
with political uncertainty or instability (Overseas Investment
Corporation, ADB, World Bank, etc)
▪ Contracts typically cover following issues:
• Confiscation, expropriation, nationalization
• Forced abandonment of venture
• Transfer risks
• Host government refusal to repurchase structure
• Unilateral contact rejection
• War, etc
50
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Hedging
• Forwards and futures contracts enable project sponsors to sell
their output for future delivery (ie, guaranteed a quantity and
price for commodity that can be sold on this basis)
• Forward contracts typically obligates seller to deliver:
• Specified quantity
• Particular commodity, currency or other item
• On specified future date
• At stated price
• Typically cancelled before delivery—out-of-the-money party pays
the in-the-money party the agreed amount
• Contracts are not freely transferable and may be cancelled prior to
delivery if both parties consent
51
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Hedging
• Futures contracts --standardized exchange traded contracts to
purchase or sell for fixed price a specific interest rate, index etc
Traded on organized exchange—party agrees to sell commodity (short
position) on a specific future date and other party agrees to accept delivery
and pay for the commodity on a specific future date (long position)
• Party required to pay small margin as good faith deposit
• Futures held to maturity are closed by delivery of underlying commodity
or cash settlement
52
6. Risk Instruments
▪ Fixed for Floating Price Swap between project company and
swap provider will be a swap of floating rate payment for fixed
priced payment obligation
• Project company makes floating price payments and swap provider to make fixed
payments (additional credit support needed for project company to support
floating rate payment to swap provider such as a letter of credit to swap provider)
55