12 Hg57 Proposal BAC
12 Hg57 Proposal BAC
Candidate: Marker:................
Title of Project:
Date: mark: ......./20
J Appendices – if applicable
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Criteria A – J are not all of equal importance so the indicators within the bandings cannot be used to calculate the
mark for the assignment. The more holistic criteria below will be used, informed by the banding scores above.
18-20 – Outstanding to exceptional performance. The material provided shows that the student has understood the
issues fully, has made good links where appropriate to the literature, classroom observations, and ID4001 seminars,
has made fully-justified suggestions for the work, is suggesting original ideas, has planned outstandingly well, and
has explained this in a full but concise manner.
16-17 – Very high level of performance, at the 2I-first equivalent boundary. The material provided is almost as good
as that for the 18-20 range, but there are minor deficiencies.
14-15 – High level of performance, at 2I level. The material provided shows that the student has understood the
issues well, has made reasonable links where appropriate to the literature, classroom observations, and ID4001
seminars, has made reasonably-justified suggestions for the work, and has a workable plan.
11-13 – Fair level of performance, at 2II level. The material is almost as good as that described in the 14-15 section,
but there are areas where more development is needed. Significant work needs to be done on developing the
proposal before the detailed planning for classroom activities take place.
8-10 – Barely adequate performance, around third class level. The work shows some evidence of thought and
planning, but there are significant issues that need to be addressed.
Please complete the sections below. There should be no more than 1500 words in the answers to sections A to
G. Please provide to your dep rep by the stated deadline. You may expand the size of the answer-boxes in the
table below if needed. Diagrams and pictures are welcome where appropriate. The letters link to the labelling
of criteria stated in the marking scheme.
Special Project Title: A Model Approach for Introducing Chemical Bonding to Young Chemists
A) Introduction: This should provide an overview of the project topic, identify the educational context, and
why this is a relevant topic for the class
The class teacher indicated at the start of term that pupils struggle with the concept of bonding in compounds
when the topic is first introduced. This project aims to get pupils to think about bonding (covalent molecular,
Covalent network and ionic bonding) in an interactive way – pupils will be given sets of ‘atoms’ eg. two
oxygen atoms and asked to decide as a pair which type of bonding would be present in this molecule, as well
as some of the chemical properties associated with the types of bonding. Pupils will build their own
molecular models from polystyrene balls and paper straws which they are allowed to take home with them
after the lesson there is also the potential (time permitting) to do a “class challenge” to build a “buckyball”
C60 fullerine. Also, if we have time (3 periods total) there will be a demonstration of how we can grow
crystals from saturated ionic solutions and then get them to grow their own copper sulfate crystals.
B) Aims: Clearly state the educational aims of your special project. Bullet points are acceptable
- Pupils understand the fundamentals of covalent molecular, covalent network and ionic bonding and
gaining an understanding of their different properties
- Pupils have an interactive learning experience, putting recently acquired knowledge into practice.
- To build good models which demonstrate the differences in the different types of bonding, and a short
introduction to molecular geometry (tetrahedral, Trigonal Planar, Planar and Angular)
- Whole class participation.
C & D) Educational Relevance: Identify what literature and other resources you used to motivate your
project idea, and what topics from those papers are directly informing your proposed project
1. SQA National 5 Course specification – Chemical Changes and Structure Section
2. CH1402 Laboratory Manual – Experiment 10: Model building – close-packed structures and
interstitial sites
3. Styrofoam and Velcro: An Alternative to Ball-and-Stick Models – research paper
4. Practical Work: making it more effective – research paper
5. Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science.
E) Methodology: Clearly outline the lesson plan(s) with timings for individual sections of the lesson plan(s).
Include brief details of any experiments and hands-on activities that you propose to include
*See end of sheet*
F) Project evaluation and feedback: Identify the methods you intend to use to evaluate the success of your
project and gain direct feedback
Plickers quiz after project finished, to test that students have understood the fundamental concepts, Post-it
notes for class to provide direct personal feedback. I will be distributing a photograph permission slip to the
class to be signed by parents so that I can take photographs of students with their models and document the
stages of the project – no children who don’t have permission will be shown in any photographs, if no
permission granted then pictures of models on desks will be used.
G) Potential Issues: Identify challenges or issues that might affect the successful completion of the project.
For each challenge or issue, identify what can be done to mitigate the risk
- Mentor teacher has mentioned pupils struggle with the concept of bonding, so working closely with her
to identify the best way to teach the concept ahead of the hands on activity.
- Temptation for pupils to play with polystyrene balls rather than make the models – encourage pupils to
build models; assurance that they can take them home.
- Model building doesn’t work; built practice models at home and practice demonstration with group of
local children (local after school club)
- Chance of injury (burns) from hot glue/glue guns; We will be using glue guns from the schools art
department (which are already PAT tested and the school already have a risk assessment for)
- Pupils not wanting to engage; in depth discussions with class teacher, chosen class are very trustworthy
and keen to take part and learn.
- The single most significant factor which is likely to affect the project is time constraints with periods
being only 50 minutes long – so the project is to be covered over a week of Chemistry lessons with the
class, giving enough time to teach the concepts and get the model building done, with a contingency for
if we finish more quickly than anticipated. The project will be practiced both at home and with a local
childcare group (primary school aged children) and times (with adaptations for limited knowledge and
attentions spans of younger children) to:
(i) ensure the proposed models can actually be built and
(ii) get a general idea of the time it may take.
H) Potential Risks: Notes: Identify in the tables below any hazards or risks that could accompany your
special project.
Environment Hazards involved with environment must be considered
Hazard (s) Risk(s) Control Measure(s)
Manual Handling Do manual handling activities take place? NO X Move to next hazard -
(Tick relevant box)
YES
Hazard(s) Risk(s) Control Measure(s)
Working on or near water Does the work involve being near NO x Move to next hazard -
or on water? (Tick relevant box) YES
Hazard(s) Risk(s) Control Measure(s)
(I) References: Note: List any peer-reviewed literature and other material that you have used. The
references should be presented in a journal format relevant to your discipline and could be in an
abbreviated form, as long as they are still clearly identifiable. (e.g. the style of the journal “Nature”)
1. SQA National 5 Course Specification: https://www.sqa.org.uk/files_ccc/N5CourseSpecChemistry.pdf (accessed October 2022)
2. University of St. Andrews School Of Chemistry, CH1402: Inorganic and Physical Chemistry 1 Laboratory Manual, 2018-2019, 67-75.
3. S. R. Masonjones, H. D. Masonjones, M. C. Malone, A. H. Williams, M. M. Beemer, R. J. Waggett, J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014, 15, 295-296.
4. R. Millar, I. Abraham, Practical Work: making it more effective. Science School Research, 2009, 91 59-64.
5. M. C. Linn, H-S. Lee, R. Tinker, F. Husic, & J. L. Chiu, Science, 2006, 313, 1049-1050.
This sheet is here primarily to help you plan for your special project. The feedback that you get from your
tutor and mentor teacher on this sheet should be very useful. The submitted proposal also forms a small part
of the assessment of your work on the module.
Week Beginning 31st October 2022