Application of ANOVA and Chi
Application of ANOVA and Chi
Making.
Part 1: ANOVA
The null (Ho) hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the mean customer satisfaction
scores among the three training programs (Traditional, Online, and Blended). The alternative
(H1) hypothesis: At least one training program has significant statistical differences in its mean
satisfaction results.
ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) stands as the most appropriate statistical tool for determining
whether three or more distinct groups demonstrate different mean values. We have three training
programs namely Traditional, Online and Blended which we want to evaluate for differences in
customer satisfaction scores. ANOVA is appropriate because we have one independent variable
(training program) which contains three different levels (Traditional, Online, Blended). The
values. ANOVA enables researchers to confirm whether identified differences between means
ANOVA analysis has yielded a critical value of 3.0738 and a computed F-statistic of 7.8445 The
positive relationship between these values allows us to decline the H₀ null hypothesis. The
results show that the statistical analysis supports the hypothesis that a significant difference
exists between the satisfaction ratings of customers from all three training methods. Research
shows that a minimum of one instructional approach achieves better customer satisfaction than
because a meaningful difference has been detected. Blended training stands out as the preferred
The null (Ho) hypothesis: Customer preference for eco-friendly products is independent of age
group. The alternative (H1) hypothesis: Customer preference for eco-friendly products is
A Chi-Square test of independence helps determine whether two categorical variables show any
connection in their relationship. Two variables used in this analysis belong to categories: Age
Group includes the segments 18-34, 35-54 and 55+ while Product Preference contains Eco-
Friendly and Traditional options. The Chi-Square test proves to be suitable as the data exists in a
The calculation method for obtaining expected frequency values in a contingency table consists
of:
(100 ×150)
For 18-34 (Eco-Friendly): E= =50
300
(100 ×150)
For 18-34 (Traditional): E= =50
300
(100 ×150)
For 35-54 (Eco-Friendly): E= =50
300
(100 ×150)
For 35-54 (Traditional): E= =50
300
(100 ×150)
For 55+ (Eco-Friendly): E= =50
300
(100 ×150)
For 55+ (Traditional): E= =50
300
Using the Chi-Square table at ∝ = 0.05, the critical value for df = 2 is 5.991
Since 8 > 5.991, we reject the null hypothesis. The findings permit us to state that age group
influences how customers choose between eco-friendly and traditional products. Age functions
The company needs to direct its eco-friendly product marketing strategies toward the 18-34 age
demographic group that shows superior demand for sustainable items. Since customers above 55
prefer traditional products, the company should consider launching awareness campaigns to
explain eco-friendly option benefits. The company should develop sustainable product