BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY

BAHIR DAR INSITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

DESIGN, MANUFACTURING, AND PERFORMANCE INVESTIGATION OF

ADVANCED BIOMASS COOKSTOVE FOR EFFICIENT ENERGY
UTILIZATION
By:

1. Afewerk Znabu

2. Asmera Abera

3. Temesgen Abayneh

Advisor: Mr. Mulat Shitaye

A final year project proposal submitted to the Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering at Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University in the
Mechanical Engineering Program

Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

February 2025

i
 Approval Page
The project proposal titled “Design, Manufacturing and Performance Investigation of
Advanced Biomass Cookstove for Efficient Energy Utilization” has been Submitted to
Bahir Dar Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for Mechanical
Engineering Final Year project.

We hereby certify That this Proposal has been Reviewed and Approved for Submission by
the undersigned.

Prepared by:

1. Afewerk Znabu ID No. 1313589

2. Asmera Abera ID No. 1308799

3. Temesgen Abayneh ID No. 1310351

Approved By:

Name Signature Date

1.Department Head
2.Advisor: Mr. Mulat Shtaye
3. Examiner
4. Chairperson

ii
 Table of Content

Approval Page ............................................................................................................................. ii

Table of Content ......................................................................................................................... iii
Table of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iv
Table of Tables ........................................................................................................................... iv
CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................. 1
1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Statement of The Problem ..................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 4
1.3.1 Main Objective: .............................................................................................................. 4
1.4 Expected Outcome ................................................................................................................ 5
1.5 Beneficiaries .......................................................................................................................... 6
1.6 Significance of The Project ................................................................................................... 7
1.7 Scope of the project ............................................................................................................... 7
CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................ 8
2. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................... 8
CHAPTER THREE .......................................................................................................... 12
3. METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 12
3.1 Materials .............................................................................................................................. 12
3.2 Tools and Equipment .......................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Machines ............................................................................................................................. 14
3.4 Software Tools .................................................................................................................... 14
3.5 Consumable Material .......................................................................................................... 14
3.6 Conceptual Design .............................................................................................................. 14
3.6. Design Methods.................................................................................................................. 15
CHAPTER FOUR ............................................................................................................. 17
4. WORK PLAN ............................................................................................................... 17
5. BUDGET PLAN ........................................................................................................... 19
Reference ................................................................................................................................... 20
iii
 Table of Figures
Figure 1: Three-stone fire stove ...................................................................................................... 1
Figure 2: U-shaped mud stove ........................................................................................................ 2
Figure 3: chimney-based cookstove................................................................................................ 2
Figure 4: household using cookstove .............................................................................................. 6
Figure 5: Conceptual design ......................................................................................................... 15

Table of Tables
Table 1: work plan ........................................................................................................................ 19
Table 2: budget plan...................................................................................................................... 19

iv
 CHAPTER ONE

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Cooking is an essential activity in households and commercial settings worldwide. In many

developing regions, traditional biomass fuels such as wood, charcoal, and agricultural
residues remain the primary energy sources for cooking. However, traditional open-fire
cooking methods and inefficient stoves contribute to several critical issues, including
indoor air pollution, deforestation, and health hazards from smoke inhalation. The need for
improved cooking solutions has led to the development of advanced biomass cookstoves
designed to enhance efficiency, reduce emissions, and promote sustainable energy
use.(Kumar et al., 2013)

The concept of biomass cookstoves has evolved significantly over the years, incorporating
advanced combustion techniques to optimize fuel usage and minimize environmental
impact. We can see different generations of biomass cookstoves to get efficient usage:

Origins and Evolution of Cookstoves: Transition from open to shielded fires (three-stone
fire → U-shaped mud stove). Development of traditional biomass cookstoves before the
17th century.(Regional Wood Energy Development, 1993)

Figure 1: Three-stone fire stove

1940s: First efforts to improve biomass cookstoves (India). To enhance the Transition from
open fires to shielded fires (three-stone fire → U-shaped mud stove) and the modern
biomass cook stove.(Anhalt & Holanda, 2009)

1
 Figure 2: U-shaped mud stove
1970s: Global focus on energy efficiency and smoke reduction due to the oil crisis.(Gill,
1987)

1980s–1990s: Shift toward research on indoor air pollution (IAP) and health effects
(respiratory diseases, carbon monoxide poisoning). Research more efficient designs,
including chimney-based cookstoves.(Hanbar & Karve, 2002)

Figure 3: chimney-based cookstove

1990s–2000s: Large-scale programs like China’s National Improved Stove Program (129
million stoves installed) and India’s National Program on Improved Chulhas (NPIC).
Challenges in adoption due to cost, cultural habits, and lack of awareness.(World bank,
2011)

All generations have different problems, such as consideration of affordability, combustion

efficiency, reduced emissions, and practicality. This project aims to design and develop a
charcoal-use, advanced biomass cookstove that enhances combustion efficiency, reduces
emissions, and meets user needs in terms of affordability and practicality.

2
1.2 Statement of The Problem

The primary issue with current biomass cookstoves is their inefficient combustion process,
which leads to significant indoor air pollution. When burning biomass fuels like Charcoal
or dung, these stoves produce high levels of particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon
monoxide, posing serious health risks. Women and children, who spend the most time near
these stoves, are particularly vulnerable to these harmful emissions.

Traditional biomass stoves have high emissions due to incomplete fuel combustion,
releasing large amounts of smoke and pollutants into the air. Prolonged exposure to this
smoke is associated with respiratory illnesses, lung diseases, and an increased risk of
cardiovascular conditions, especially for pregnant women and young children.
Additionally, these stoves operate with low efficiency, converting only a small portion of
the fuel’s energy into usable heat. As a result, large amounts of biomass are needed to cook
food, increasing fuel consumption. Furthermore, the heavy reliance on biomass fuels can
contribute to deforestation if not managed sustainably, exacerbating environmental
degradation.

Evidences that show how much this project is necessary

The basic evidence of this project's necessity is health concerns in developing countries;
for instance, we can see this in research data from researchers:

Worldwide, approximately 3 billion people cook using solid fuels (e.g., wood, coal),
producing household air pollution (HAP) that contributes to approximately 2.3– 3.8 million
getting different types of diseases, especially children less than 2 years old and pregnant
women, per year.(Abdo et al., 2021)

Household air pollution from biomass fuel burning in traditional cookstoves currently
appears as one of the most serious threats to public health, with a recent burden estimate
of 2.6 million premature deaths every year worldwide, ranking highest among
environmental risk factors and one of the major risk factors of any type globally.(Adane et
al., 2021)

3
 Potential Gaps

There are key areas in biomass cookstove research that require more attention to enhance
efficiency and sustainability. One major gap is the limited focus on heat transfer
mechanisms in cookstove design, which directly affects fuel combustion efficiency. While
some studies have explored heat transfer improvements, several critical factors remain
unexplored.

One such area is the impact of char combustion and molten ash particles on the post-
combustion process, which is not yet well understood. Additionally, optimizing air supply
during ignition by identifying proper air zones can significantly enhance combustion
efficiency. Another challenge is the frequent disruptions caused by wind, particularly in
outdoor cooking conditions, where further research is needed to improve cookstove
performance. Computational modeling is also an area with great potential, as numerical
techniques can help analyze and refine cookstove designs.

Addressing these research gaps will contribute to the development of more efficient,
sustainable, and environmentally friendly biomass cookstoves, ultimately improving
energy use and reducing emissions.

1.3 Objectives

1.3.1 Main Objective:

The general objective of this project is to design, manufacture, and investigate the
performance of advanced biomass cookstoves for efficient energy utilization.

1.3.2 Specific Objective

✓ To do Mathematical model design and analysis

✓ To develop prototype
✓ To experimentally evaluate the model developed
✓ To analyze the effect of emissions on biomass performance
✓ Develop a fan system for enhancing efficiency and thermal performance
✓ To assess the existing performance of biomass cookstoves

4
 1.4 Expected Outcome

1. Thermal Efficiency:

✓ 45–55% efficiency, higher than traditional charcoal stoves and firewood stoves and at least
10 - 20 % from improved ones.
✓ Better heat retention and controlled combustion for sustained cooking.

2. Fuel Consumption & Burn Rate:

✓ More efficient fuel use compared to raw briquettes due to reduced moisture content.

3. Emission Reduction:

✓ 80–90% less smoke than firewood due to charcoal’s lower volatile content from the
traditional one and at least 5 – 10% from the improved one.
✓ CO emissions reduced by 55–65%, depending on airflow control and insulation.
✓ Minimal particulate matter (PM) emissions.

4. Combustion Chamber & Heat Retention:

✓ Insulated ceramic or refractory-lined combustion chamber for maximum heat retention.

✓ High-temperature combustion (>800°C) to ensure complete carbon oxidation, reducing
pollutants.

5. Airflow & Secondary Combustion:

✓ Adjustable primary and secondary air inlets to optimize combustion.

✓ Improved secondary air supply to burn carbon monoxide (CO) and increase efficiency.

6. Durability & Portability:

✓ Stainless steel, clay, or refractory cement materials to withstand high heat.

✓ Portable design for home or commercial use.

7. Ease of Use & Maintenance:

✓ Removable ashtray for easy cleaning.

8. Heat Control & Cooking Versatility:

✓ The adjustable airflow allows users to control the heat for simmering, boiling, or frying.

5
 1.5 Beneficiaries

A. Primary Beneficiaries (Direct Users): These are individuals or groups who directly
use and benefit from biomass cookstoves in their daily lives.

✓ Households in Developing Countries and Low-Income Communities

Figure 4: household using cookstove

B. Secondary Beneficiaries (Indirect Beneficiaries): These are individuals or groups
who benefit indirectly from the adoption and promotion of biomass cookstoves.

✓ Environmental & Health Organizations: NGOs, policymakers, and public health groups
✓ Small-Scale Entrepreneurs & Local Manufacturers
✓ Governments & Policymakers: Supports national energy and sustainability goals.
✓ Educational & Research Institutions
o Universities and research centers improving cookstove technology.
o Innovation in clean cooking solutions for future applications.

6
1.6 Significance of The Project

The significance of the project is addressing the limitations of traditional biomass

cookstoves, such as low efficiency, high fuel consumption, and health risks from smoke
exposure. By improving combustion efficiency and reducing emissions, the advanced
cookstove will provide a cleaner, safer, and more sustainable cooking solution. This is
especially relevant for households relying on biomass fuels, as it enhances both
environmental and health outcomes.

1.7 Scope of the project

The scope of the project is to design, fabricate, and test an advanced biomass cookstove to
improve efficiency and reduce emissions. It includes material selection, combustion
enhancement, heat transfer analysis, and airflow improvement. A functional prototype will
be built and evaluated for thermal efficiency, fuel consumption, emissions, and durability.
However, the study does not extend to mass production, commercialization, or long-term
field testing. The goal is to develop an enhanced prototype with documented performance
data.

7
 CHAPTER TWO
2. LITERATURE REVIEW

This literature review aims to synthesize existing research on biomass cookstoves, focusing on
improving efficiency and emission control to investigate advanced biomass cookstoves with
improved energy efficiency and indoor air pollution.

The researcher's study investigates Improved Cook Stoves to Meet Sustainable Development
Goals in Ethiopia. It evaluates four Improved Cookstoves (ICSs)—EZY, Tikikkle, Lakech, and
Mirchaye against a Traditional Cookstove (TCS) using a Water Boiling Test (WBT) to assess fuel
consumption, cooking time, and emissions. Results show that the EZY stove outperforms others
with 56% fuel savings, 25% thermal efficiency, and the lowest CO₂ emissions (1.9 kg per cooking
period), while Tikikkle and Lakech stoves show moderate improvements but longer cooking times.
Despite ICS advantages, adoption remains low due to cost, lack of awareness, and user preference
for traditional cooking speed. Challenges such as poor manufacturing quality, low efficiency of
existing ICSs, and policy gaps hinder clean cooking transitions. The study recommends advancing
ICS technology to at least 40% efficiency, improving stove stability, increasing financial
incentives, and enhancing government support for R&D and awareness programs. If implemented
effectively, these solutions can help Ethiopia achieve Sustainable Development Goal 7 (clean
energy) and reduce the environmental and health impacts of biomass cooking.(Tesfay et al., 2024)

The researcher provides a comprehensive review of recent advancements and challenges in

biomass cookstove technology, focusing on improving efficiency and reducing emissions. It
discusses the classification of biomass cookstoves, from traditional three-stone fires to advanced
gasifier stoves, highlighting their efficiency levels and limitations. Key developments include the
use of ceramic materials for better insulation, swirl vanes for enhanced combustion, and hybrid air
injection systems to optimize airflow. The study identifies design limitations, maintenance issues,
and performance inconsistencies between lab and real-world conditions as major challenges. It
emphasizes the need for further research in areas such as complex heat transfer mechanisms, user
adaptability, and emission control strategies. The review also explores commercialized cookstove
technologies, such as the IITD model, Berkeley air injection stove, and ACE-1, which integrate
forced-draft systems and hybrid designs to maximize efficiency. The study concludes that despite

8
progress, gaps in knowledge persist, requiring innovative solutions to make biomass cooking more
sustainable, efficient, and accessible in developing regions. (Kumar et al., 2013)

The research study presents a user-centered, iterative engineering approach to designing and
developing advanced biomass cookstoves to address energy efficiency and indoor air pollution.
Traditional biomass cookstoves contribute to severe health risks and environmental pollution,
leading to the need for improved alternatives. The research focuses on semi-gasifier stoves, which
offer higher combustion efficiency and lower emissions. Through multiple design iterations, five
prototypes were developed and evaluated based on thermal efficiency, emissions reduction, and
user adaptability. Field testing in rural Chinese homes showed that the final prototype achieved
ISO Tier 3 efficiency and ISO Tier 4 pollutant emissions, demonstrating significant improvements
over traditional stoves. However, challenges in adoption, such as user preferences, maintenance
issues, and compatibility with local cooking practices, were identified. The study highlights the
importance of integrating technical performance with user needs, advocating for continued
innovation in biomass stove technology to ensure long-term acceptance and impact on public
health and the environment. (Shan et al.., 2017)

The researcher study "Improved Biomass Cookstoves for Sustainable Development" explores the
role of biomass cookstoves in providing clean and efficient cooking solutions, particularly in
developing countries where traditional biomass fuels like wood, crop residues, and dung cakes are
widely used. It discusses the environmental and health impacts of traditional cooking methods,
such as high emissions of greenhouse gases and indoor air pollution, which contribute to
respiratory diseases and deforestation. The paper reviews different types of improved cookstoves
(ICS), their classifications, testing protocols, and global adaptation efforts. It highlights the
potential of ICS in mitigating CO₂ emissions, enhancing thermal efficiency, and addressing socio-
economic barriers to widespread adoption. Additionally, the review presents recent advancements
in stove technology, economic assessments, and policy measures needed to promote clean cooking
solutions for sustainable development.(Mehetre et al., 2017)

The research study "Recent Developments and Challenges in Biomass Cookstoves" provides a
comprehensive review of advancements in biomass cookstove technology, focusing on efficiency
improvements, emission reductions, and design challenges. It explores various types of biomass
cookstoves, including traditional, improved, and advanced models, and highlights innovations

9
such as ceramic combustion chambers, swirl vanes, and hybrid air injection systems that enhance
fuel efficiency and minimize pollution. The study examines the socio-economic and environmental
impact of biomass cookstoves, emphasizing their role in reducing indoor air pollution and
mitigating climate change. It also discusses the limitations of current designs, including issues
related to fuel variability, maintenance, and real-world performance variations. Additionally, the
journal identifies key areas for future research, particularly in computational modeling, material
advancements, and the development of standardized testing protocols to enhance cookstove
adoption in developing regions. Despite significant progress, challenges such as inconsistent
performance in real-world conditions, difficulties in stove repair, and high production costs remain
barriers to widespread adoption. The review underscores the need for continued innovation to
create more sustainable and user-friendly biomass cookstove solutions.(Hayyat et al., 2024)

Easy and clear title, study focus, and research gaps of literature view.

Researcher(s) Title Study Focus Research Gaps

Tesfay, A., Kahsay, Improved Cook Evaluates four ICSs vs. Low adoption due to
M. B., & Geleta, A. Stoves for SDGs Traditional Cookstove cost, awareness, and
B. (2024). in Ethiopia (TCS) using WBT. policy gaps. Need for
Assesses fuel improved efficiency
consumption, cooking and support.
time, and emissions.

Kumar, M., Kumar, Recent Reviews advancements Gaps in heat transfer,

S., & Tyagi, S. K. Advancements in in efficiency, emissions, user adaptability, and
(2013). Biomass and design. Discusses real-world
Cookstoves innovations like ceramic performance.
insulation and hybrid air
systems.

Shan, M., Carter, E., User-Centered Develops and tests five Challenges in user
Baumgartner, J., Semi-Gasifier cookstove prototypes, adoption, maintenance,
Deng, M., Clark, S., Biomass achieving high and compatibility with
Schauer, J. J., Ezzati, Cookstoves cooking practices.

10
 M., Li, J., Fu, Y., & efficiency and low
Yang, X. (2017). emissions.

Mehetre, S. A., Biomass Reviews ICS impact on Socio-economic

Panwar, N. L., Cookstoves for health, environment, and barriers, need for
Sharma, D., & Sustainable efficiency. Discusses stronger policies and
Kumar, H. (2017). Development classification and global large-scale adaptation
adaptation efforts. research.

Hayyat, U., Usman, Recent Examines efficiency Issues in real-world

M., Farooq, M., Developments in improvements, performance, fuel
Sultan, M., Ahsan, Biomass emissions reduction, and variability,
M., Liu, G., Chunyu, Cookstoves design challenges. maintenance, and high
X., & Riaz, F. (2024). Highlights innovations costs. Need for
in material and material advancements
combustion technology. and standard testing.

From the identified research gaps, key improvements have been emphasized in the biomass
cookstove design, focusing on efficiency, affordability, and adaptability. To enhance combustion
efficiency, better insulation and optimized airflow are incorporated using a small fan and an
adjustable base. For cost-effectiveness, locally available, durable materials are used while
maintaining high performance. The stove is designed for easy maintenance and compatibility with
local cooking habits, encouraging adoption. Additionally, it supports multiple fuel types and
undergoes real-world testing to improve reliability. These solutions effectively address critical
research gaps, making the design efficient, user-friendly, and sustainable.

11
 CHAPTER THREE

3. METHODOLOGY

3.1 Materials

List of Materials that are used:

✓ Stainless steel
✓ Fiberglass
✓ Paint materials
✓ Aluminum

Properties of material and relevance to the project goals

A. Stainless steel:

✓ Corrosion Resistance
✓ High Temperature Resistance
✓ High Thermal Conductivity
✓ Oxidation Resistance
✓ Mechanical Strength and Durability
✓ Ease of Cleaning & Hygiene
✓ Lightweight Compared to Cast Iron
✓ Recyclability & Sustainability

Importance of Stainless Steel in Biomass Cookstoves

✓ Enhanced Durability
✓ Improved Heat Transfer Efficiency
✓ Reduction in Emissions
✓ Low Maintenance Costs
✓ User Safety
✓ Support for Modern Designs
✓ Sustainability and Energy Efficiency

B. Fiberglass

12
 ✓ High Thermal Insulation
✓ Lightweight
✓ High Heat Resistance
✓ Corrosion and Chemical Resistance
✓ Non-Combustible
✓ Durability and Strength
✓ Electrical Insulation

Importance of Fiberglass in Biomass Cookstoves

✓ Enhanced Thermal Efficiency.

✓ Reduced Heat Transfer to External Parts
✓ Minimization of Energy Waste
✓ Lightweight Construction
✓ Extended Stove Lifespan
✓ Improved Comfort and Safety

c. Aluminum

Properties of aluminum sheet metal:

✓ Low density
✓ High thermal conductivity
✓ Good electrical conductivity
✓ Malleability
✓ Ductility
✓ Corrosion resistance
✓ Reflective surface
✓ Non-magnetic
✓ Relatively low melting point

3.2 Tools and Equipment

1. Cutting Tools: sheet metal shears for shaping metal sheets.

2. Welding and Joining Tools: MIG/TIG welding machines for assembling metal
parts.
13
 3. Bending Tools: Hydraulic press brake for shaping metal sheets.
4. Measuring Instruments: Vernier calipers and micrometers for precise
measurements.
5. Testing Equipment: Thermocouples, airflow meters, and emissions analyzers for
performance evaluation.

3.3 Machines

✓ Cutting Machine: For cutting metal sheets.

✓ Welding Machine: For joining metal components.
✓ Lathe Machine: For fabricating cylindrical components.

3.4 Software Tools

✓ CAD Software (SolidWorks, AutoCAD, CATIA) → For 3D modeling and

technical drawing,
✓ Data Analysis (Excel) → For analyzing combustion efficiency and emissions data.

3.5 Consumable Material

✓ Electrode 2 packet
✓ Sheet metal 5 pieces
✓ Spray 8 pieces
✓ Screw 50 pieces
✓ Bole and Nut 50 pieces

3.6 Conceptual Design

As we know, most households in our country use traditional stoves (Mandeja) for cooking
food, particularly for coffee ceremonies. Our design concept originated from the challenges
our family faced while using this traditional stove, which is inefficient and produces high
CO2 emissions due to the incomplete combustion of charcoal. To address these issues, we
developed our project.
By modifying the traditional biomass stove, we incorporated several improvements. For
instance, we used fiberglass to reduce heat transfer to the outside, added a small fan to
ensure complete combustion of the charcoal, and adjusted the stove's base to allow air into
the combustion chamber. These enhancements increase efficiency and reduce CO2
emissions. Additionally, we included a small battery to power the fan and a controller. The
fan supplies air to the combustion chamber, specifically at the top of the charcoal or where
combustion occurs.
14
 Our advanced biomass stove is designed to be simple, portable, cost-effective, and user-
friendly, making it an innovative solution for everyday use.

Figure 5: Conceptual design

3.6. Design Methods

1. Identifying the problem

This involves recognizing the need for an improved biomass cookstove by assessing issues related
to energy efficiency, emissions, and user safety. Factors such as environmental impact, fuel
consumption, and cooking habits are analyzed to define the challenges faced by traditional
cookstoves.

2. Define the problem and gather information

The next step is to clearly define it by gathering relevant data. This includes studying existing
biomass cookstove technologies, reviewing user needs, analyzing fuel sources, and considering
15
regulatory and environmental guidelines. Literature reviews, field surveys, and expert
consultations help in formulating design objectives.

3. Material selection and design analysis

Choosing appropriate materials is crucial for durability, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Metals
with high thermal conductivity, ceramic insulations, and corrosion-resistant alloys are commonly
evaluated. Design analysis includes thermal simulations, structural integrity assessments, and
consideration of manufacturing feasibility.

4. Computer-Aided Design (CAD)

✓ Used SolidWorks or Catia to create 3D models of the biomass cookstove.

✓ Generate detailed technical drawings for fabrication.
✓ Ensure ergonomic design for user convenience.

5. Manufacturing Prototype

✓ Fabricate a prototype using cutting, bending, welding, and assembly processes.

✓ Integrate standard components such as bolts and insulation materials.

6. Experimental Testing

✓ Conduct thermal efficiency tests using thermocouples.

✓ Measured emission levels (CO, particulate matter) using gas analyzers.
✓ Perform durability testing by simulating extended usage.

7. Data Collection and Analysis

✓ Record fuel consumption, heat output, and emissions data.

✓ Used Excel to process and analyze efficiency results.
✓ Validate results through multiple testing iterations.

This structured approach ensures a systematic design, simulation, manufacturing, and testing
process for an advanced biomass cookstove.

16
 CHAPTER FOUR

4. WORK PLAN

Final Year Project Work Plan (Feb 24 – May 23, 2025)

Week Time Tasks

Range

Week 1 Feb 24 - Chapter 1: Introduction

Mar 2 - Finalize background, problem statement, and objectives.
- Draft scope and expected outcomes.
- Begin literature review.

Week 2 Mar 3 - Chapter 2: Literature Review

Mar 9 - Researched biomass cookstoves.
- Identify gaps in existing studies.
- Organize and summarize findings.

Week 3 Mar 10 - Chapter 2: Literature Review (continued)

Mar 16 - Finalize literature review.
- Start drafting methodology for Chapter 3.

Week 4 Mar 17 - Chapter 3: Materials and Methods

Mar 23 - Begin detailed calculations and design of biomass cookstove.
- Select materials for the prototype.
- Develop mathematical models.

Week 5 Mar 24 - Chapter 3: Materials and Methods (continued)

Mar 30 - Finalize design and calculations.
- Prepare for prototype development.
- Start drafting the results and discussion framework.

Week 6 Mar 31 - Chapter 4: Results and Discussion

Apr 6 - Begin experimental setup and prototype testing.

17
 - Collect preliminary data.
- Analyze initial results.

Week 7 Apr 7 - Chapter 4: Results and Discussion (continued)

Apr 13 - Continue testing and data collection.
- Analyze and interpret results.
- Compare with theoretical models.

Week 8 Apr 14 - Chapter 4: Results and Discussion (continued)

Apr 20 - Finalize data analysis.
- Draft discussion section.
- Prepare for progress presentation (Apr 28 - May 2).

Week 9 Apr 21 - Progress Presentation Preparation

Apr 27 - Prepare slides and materials.
- Rehearse the presentation.
- Address advisor feedback.

Week Apr 28 - Progress Presentation

10 May 2 - Present progress to the committee.
- Incorporate feedback into the thesis.
- Begin drafting Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendation.

Week May 5 - Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendation

11 May 9 - Summarize key findings.
- Provide recommendations for future work.
- Finalize the chapter.

Week May 12 Chapter 6: Prototype Development and Testing

12 - May - Finalize the prototype.
16 - Conduct final testing and evaluation.
- Document the process and results.

18
 Week May 19 Final Presentation Preparation
13 - May - Prepare slides and materials.
23 - Rehearse the presentation.
- Finalize the thesis document.

Week May 26 Final Presentation

14 - May - Present the final project to the committee.
28 - Submit the final thesis document.

Table 1: work plan

5. BUDGET PLAN

Materials Unit of Quantity Unit Price Total

measurement (ETB) Price
(ETB)
Sheat metal Pcs 2 2900 5800
(𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒎𝒎 ×
𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒎𝒎 ×
𝟏𝒎𝒎)
Fan 12V 1 400 400
Fiberglass Kg 2 400 800
Wood - - - -
Controller PWM 1 200 200
Battery Ah 1 1500 1500
Painting L - - 600
Total cost - - - 9300
Table 2: budget plan

19
 Reference

Abdo, M., Kanyomse, E., Alirigia, R., Coffey, E. R., Piedrahita, R., Diaz-Sanchez, D., Hagar, Y.,
Naumenko, D. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Hannigan, M. P., Oduro, A. R., & Dickinson, K. L. (2021).
Health impacts of a randomized biomass cookstove intervention in northern Ghana. BMC
Public Health, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12164-y

Adane, M. M., Alene, G. D., & Mereta, S. T. (2021). Biomass-fuelled improved cookstove
intervention to prevent household air pollution in Northwest Ethiopia: a cluster randomized
controlled trial. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 26(1), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00923-z

Anhalt, J., & Holanda, S. (2009). Implementation of a Dissemination Strategy for Efficient Cook
Stoves in Northeast Brazil. 10604030, 29. https://www.reeep.org/projects/implementation-
dissemination-strategy-efficient-cook-stoves-northeast-brazil

Gill, J. (1987). Improved stoves in developing countries. A critique. Energy Policy, 15(2), 135–
144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(87)90121-2

Hanbar, R. D., & Karve, P. (2002). National Programme on Improved Chulha (NPIC) of the
Government of India: An overview. Energy for Sustainable Development, 6(2), 49–55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60313-0

Hayyat, U., Usman, M., Farooq, M., Sultan, M., Ahsan, M., Liu, G., Chunyu, X., & Riaz, F. (2024).
Recent developments and challenges in biomass cookstoves. Energy Reports, 12(August),
2193–2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.08.016

Kumar, M., Kumar, S., & Tyagi, S. K. (2013). Design, development and technological
advancement in the biomass cookstoves : A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 26, 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.010

Mehetre, S. A., Panwar, N. L., Sharma, D., & Kumar, H. (2017). Improved biomass cookstoves
for sustainable development: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
73(February), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.150

Regional Wood Energy Development. (1993). Improved Solid Biomass Burning Cookstoves: a
Development Manual. 44, 125. http://www.rwedp.org

20
Shan, M., Carter, E., Baumgartner, J., Deng, M., Clark, S., Schauer, J. J., Ezzati, M., Li, J., Fu, Y.,
& Yang, X. (2017). A user-centered, iterative engineering approach for advanced biomass
cookstove design and development. Environmental Research Letters, 12(9).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa804f

Tesfay, A., Kahsay, M. B., & Geleta, A. B. (2024). Improved Cook Stoves to Meet Sustainable
Development Goal in Ethiopia. Energies, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051011

World bank. (2011). 632170WP0House00Box0361508B0PUBLIC0. The International Bank for

Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK.

21
 Project proposal evaluation
BAHIR DAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
BSC DEGREE: PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM
Name of the Candidate:

4. Afewerk Znabu ID No. 1313589

5. Asmera Abera ID No. 1308799
6. Temesgen Abayneh ID No. 1310351

Project Title:
Design, Manufacturing, and performance investigation of advanced biomass
cookstoves for efficient energy utilization

Evaluation Parameters/Criteria of the BSc Degree Final Year Project Proposal:

No Parameters Marking Score
1 Title (defining the project) 1%
2 Problem statement 3%
3 Objectives 2%
4 Significance and scope of the study 1%
5 Literature reviews 1%
6 Proposed methods 2%
Total 10%

Examining committee name signature

1. Advisor: Mr. Mulat Shtaye
2. Examiner
3. Chairperson

Signature of Evaluator Date

22