BAMIDELE OLUMILUWA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION,

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IKERE-EKITI.

(GROUP 4)

COURSE CODE: CSS 301

COURSE TITEL: COMMUNITY-BASED COREESTIONS

Question

With classical case studies in your community justify

the concept of CBC

Lecturer in charge
MR. FALUSI F.S
S/N NAME MATRIC NO:
1. OLUWAJERE STELLA
2. ANIETAN KOLAWOLE JOHN 5258
3. OLOWOFILA OLUWASEUN TEMITOPE 4404
4. AYENI AYOMIKUN OLUWAGBENGA 5267
5. DADA KOLADE AUGUSTINE 5292
6. OLATUNDE AYOBAMI ENIOLA 5389
7. ADENIYI RIDWAN AYOMIDE 5200
8. OWOEYE TOBILOOBA ABIODUN 5430
9. ODUNOWO OLAMILEKAN FARUQ 5357
10. KOLAWOLE IFEOLUWA 5342
11. LEVI BELIEVE SUCCESS 5347
12. KOMOLAFE BAMIDELE RICHARD 5345
13. ADEKUNLE OLALEKAN 5197
14. ADEJORO COVENANT MOBOLUWADADE 5194
15. OKE OLUWANIFEMI EMMANUEL 5376
16. DUROWAIYE MARYGOLD OLUWATOMIWA
17. AKINFOLARIN BLESSING FUNMILAYO 5240
18. AKINLOTAN DANIEL TEMITAYO 5243
19. OMOLOYE BOLUWATIFE EMMANUEL 5416
20. ADEWOLE SAMUEL OLUWASANMI 5212
21. ADANLAWO CHRISTIANAH MORAYO 5182
22. ADESIDA KEHINDE ADETOMIWA 5207
23. OLUYOMI EMMANUE AYOMIDE 5413
24. ADEJUMO BELOVED-JOHN AYOMIDE 5195
25. OLADELE DEBORAH ROLAKE 5379
26. ELUMADE PRECIUOS AYOMIDE 5299
27. OLOWOFELA ENIOALA OMOTAYO 5403
28. BABATUNDE SABITIYU ADIJAT 5281
29. AKOMOLAFE SOLOMON SEGUN 5249
30. ALADESUA PRECIOUS NIFEMI 5254
31. MAKANJUOLA HOPE GIFT 5348
32. KOLAPO FEYISETAN KOLAPO 5341
33. OMOTOSHO OLAYINKA EMMANUEL 5419

Using Funke Akindele's case as a case study

Background
1. COVID-19 Lockdown: In April 2020, Lagos State was under lockdown due
to the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Funke Akindele's Party: Funke Akindele, a popular Nigerian actress, hosted a
birthday party for her husband, JJC Skills, at their residence in Amen Estate,
Lagos.

Arrest and Charges

1. Arrest: Funke Akindele and her husband were arrested by the Lagos State
Police Command on April 5, 2020.
2. Charges: They were charged with violating the Lagos State Infectious
Diseases (Emergency Prevention) Regulations 2020.

Trial and Sentence

1. Trial: Funke Akindele and her husband were arraigned before the Lagos State
Magistrates' Court in Ogba.
2. Plea: They pleaded guilty to the charges.
3. Sentence: Funke Akindele was sentenced to 14 days of community service
and fined ₦100,000 (approximately $260 USD).
4. Husband's Sentence: JJC Skills was also sentenced to 14 days of community
service and fined ₦100,000.

Community Service
1. Community Service: Funke Akindele performed her community service by
cleaning the premises of the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja.

Conclusion
Funke Akindele's case highlights the importance of adhering to public health
guidelines and regulations during a pandemic. The case also demonstrates the
Nigerian government's commitment to enforcing laws and regulations aimed at
preventing the spread of infectious diseases.
Funke Akindele's case is a great study on the effectiveness of community
service as a punishment. In April 2020, Funke Akindele and her husband,
Abdulrasheed Bello, were sentenced to 14 days of community service for
violating COVID-19 social distancing laws in Lagos State ¹. They were also
fined N100,000 each and ordered to observe a 14-day isolation period.

As part of her community service, Funke Akindele was directed to sensitize

members of the public in ten major areas of the state about coronavirus ¹. This
helped spread awareness about the pandemic and encouraged people to take
necessary precautions. Her community service also set an example for others to
follow the rules and regulations put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-
19.

Key Takeaways from Funke Akindele's Case:

1. Community Service as a Deterrent: Funke Akindele's punishment served as a

deterrent to others, demonstrating the consequences of violating COVID-19
protocols.
2. Raising Awareness: Her community service helped raise awareness about
COVID-19 and encouraged people to take necessary precautions
3. Setting an Example: Funke Akindele's community service set an example for
others to follow the rules and regulations put in place to prevent the spread of
COVID-19.

Additionally, her community service, which involved working from 9 am to 12

pm each day, set an example for others to follow the rules and regulations put in
place to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

Overall, Funke Akindele's case demonstrates the effectiveness of community

service as a punishment and its potential to raise awareness and promote
compliance with public health protocols.
Funke Akindele, a prominent Nigeria actress producer and director can be
considered a relevant case study to illustrate the concept of community base
correction
Funke akindele gained frame through her acting and production work in Nigeria
entertainment industry, reaching a wide audience and garnering a significant .
Community base correction focus on rehabilitation and reintegration of
offenders back into society through programs and services within their
communities,
In this case of Funke Akindele, her contributions to society a d her personal
growth can showcase the effectiveness of community base correction i actions
Funke akindele face legal issues in the past including run-ins with the Law over
hosting a crowded party during a lockdown in Nigeria
Following the ancients, she publicly apologized and acknowledged her mistake,
demonstrating, accountability for her actions. Instead of facing punitive
measures alone,
Funke Akindele took steps to reconcile with her community and learn from her
errors

The Funke Akindele Case:

In April 2020, during a strict COVID-19 lockdown in Lagos, Nigeria, popular
actress Funke Akindele hosted a birthday party at her home, violating social
distancing regulations. She and her husband were arrested, charged, and
found guilty of violating the lockdown orders. They were sentenced to
community service and fined. The sentence of community service, in this case,
is a clear example of community-based correction. Instead of imprisonment,
they were required to perform actions that would benefit the community,
arguably making them more aware of the impact of their actions and
contributing positively.

The punishment seemed proportionate to the offense. While they violated the
law, imprisonment might have been considered too harsh, especially
considering the nature of the violation and the fact that it was during a public
health crisis where awareness was key.
 The case served as a deterrent to others. The high-profile nature of the case and
the media coverage it received made it clear that such violations would not be
taken lightly despite who you are and your social stuff.
Community service can be seen as a form of rehabilitation. It allowed Funke
Akindele and her husband to make amends for their actions and potentially
learn from their mistakes.

The public reaction was mixed. Some felt the punishment was too lenient, while
others believed it was appropriate. This highlights the complexities of
community-based correction and the need for public understanding and
acceptance.

While not ex-offenders in the traditional sense, the community service allowed
them to reintegrate into the community by contributing positively into the
community

By performing community service, they were arguably making restitution to

the community for violating the lockdown rules and potentially endangering
others because of the sensitivity of the time they chose to hold their party.
While not a direct root cause, the case highlighted the importance of public
awareness and adherence to health guidelines, which was a crucial factor in
managing the pandemic.
Limitations and Considerations:

Public Health Context: The unique context of a pandemic influenced the nature
of the offense and the chosen punishment.
The effectiveness of community-based correction relies heavily on
consistent and fair enforcement.

The Funke Akindele case, while controversial, offers a real-world example of

community-based correction in action. It demonstrates the potential of
alternatives to incarceration, especially in situations where the primary goal is
not just punishment but also public safety, deterrence, and rehabilitation. It also
highlights the importance of considering the specific context, the nature of the
offense, and the potential impact on the community when implementing such
measures.

It's important to note that community-based correction is a complex and

evolving field, and each case needs to be evaluated on its own merits. However,
the Funke Akindele case provides a valuable opportunity to discuss the
principles and challenges of this approach of justice

The punishment held her accountable for her actions and reinforced the
importance of following public health guidelines. It served as a public
acknowledgment that even prominent figures are not above the
Law
Community service, particularly the aspect of public sensitization on COVID-
19, could have provided an opportunity for her to learn more about the virus, its
impact, and the importance of preventive measures. This could lead to a genuine
change in behavior and a greater understanding of her role in promoting public
health.
By actively participating in community service and demonstrating remorse,
she had the chance to rebuild public trust and show that she was willing to make
amends for her mistake.

The high-profile nature of the case and the subsequent punishment served as a
strong deterrent to others who might have been tempted to violate lockdown
regulations. It sent a clear message that such actions would have consequences,
regardless of social status you will be punished
The community service component, where she was tasked with sensitizing
the public about COVID-19, directly contributed to raising awareness about the
pandemic and the importance of adhering to safety protocols. This could have
helped to prevent further spread of the virus.
The case reinforced the importance of collective responsibility and
adherence to rules for the greater good. It highlighted the idea that everyone has
a role to play in protecting public health and safety.
The case of Funke Akindele shows how community-based corrections can be a
better way of punishing minor offenders instead of sending them to prison. She
was found guilty of breaking COVID-19 lockdown rules by hosting a party and
was sentenced to 14 days of community service, a fine of N100,000, and a
public apology. Instead of putting her in jail, the court allowed her to give back
to society by cleaning public places and spreading awareness about COVID-19.
This kind of punishment helps in many ways. First, it prevents overcrowding in
prisons, which is a big problem in Nigeria. Many people are in prison for small
crimes, and adding more offenders only worsens the situation. Second, it
focuses on rehabilitation instead of punishment. Akindele was not a dangerous
criminal, and by doing community service, she learned from her mistake
without being exposed to hardened criminals in prison. Third, it saves the
government money because keeping people in prison is expensive, but
community service is a cheaper way to punish minor offenders.
Community-based corrections also help to prevent stigma. If Akindele had been
sent to prison, it could have damaged her career and reputation. Instead, she was
given a chance to correct her mistake without long-term negative effects. Also,
her punishment helped in educating the public, which is a key part of restorative
justice. Instead of just punishing her, the court used her to spread awareness and
prevent others from making the same mistake.
Her case also shows how the certainty of punishment is more important than the
severity of punishment in preventing crime. Many people saw that breaking
COVID-19 laws had consequences, even for celebrities. This acted as a warning
to others without using extreme punishments. Finally, this case proves that
alternative sentencing works well in Nigeria’s justice system. Instead of relying
only on prisons, courts can use community service and probation for minor
offenders.
In summary, Funke Akindele’s case is a good example of how community-
based corrections can be effective. It helps in rehabilitation, reducing prison
overcrowding, saving government costs, preventing stigma, and educating the
public. This approach ensures that punishment is fair and beneficial to both the
offender and society.
To justify the concept of Community-Based Conservation (CBC), I'll draw from
classical case studies. Since I'm a large language model, I don't have a specific
community, but I'll use well-known examples:

# Case Study 1: Annapurna Conservation Area Project (ACAP), Nepal

1. Context: The Annapurna range is home to diverse flora and fauna, as well as
several ethnic communities.
2. Problem: Over-tourism, deforestation, and habitat loss threatened the region's
biodiversity and local livelihoods.
3. CBC Approach: The ACAP project, launched in 1986, involved local
communities in conservation efforts. It established a network of conservation
areas, ecotourism initiatives, and sustainable livelihood programs.
4. Outcome: The project has successfully conserved biodiversity, improved
local livelihoods, and promoted sustainable tourism practices.

# Case Study 2: Maasai Wilderness Conservation Trust (MWCT), Kenya

1. Context: The Maasai people have traditionally coexisted with wildlife in the
Amboseli ecosystem.
2. Problem: Habitat loss, human-wildlife conflict, and poaching threatened the
region's biodiversity and Maasai livelihoods.
3. CBC Approach: The MWCT, established in 2000, works with local Maasai
communities to conserve wildlife and habitats. The trust supports ecotourism,
provides conservation education, and helps resolve human-wildlife conflicts.
4. Outcome: The MWCT has successfully reduced human-wildlife conflict,
increased conservation awareness, and supported sustainable livelihoods for
Maasai communities.

# Case Study 3: Chipko Movement, India

1. Context: The Chipko Movement emerged in the 1970s in the Reni village of
Uttarakhand, India.
2. Problem: Deforestation and logging threatened the region's forests,
biodiversity, and local livelihoods.
3. CBC Approach: Local women, led by Gaura Devi, organized a grassroots
movement to protect the forests. They used non-violent resistance, including
hugging trees to prevent logging.
4. Outcome: The Chipko Movement successfully halted deforestation, protected
local forests, and empowered local communities to manage their natural
resources.
These case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of Community-Based
Conservation (CBC) in:

1. Empowering local communities: CBC involves local communities in

conservation decision-making, ensuring their needs and concerns are addressed.
2. Conserving biodiversity: CBC helps protect and conserve local biodiversity,
including endangered species and ecosystems.
3. Promoting sustainable livelihoods: CBC supports sustainable livelihoods,
such as ecotourism, sustainable agriculture, and non-timber forest products.
4. Fostering coexistence: CBC promotes coexistence between humans and
wildlife, reducing human-wildlife conflict and promoting mutual benefits.

By involving local communities in conservation efforts, CBC can lead to more

effective, sustainable, and equitable conservation outcomes.
Funke Akindele's Case Study referring to her 2020 conviction for violating
COVID-19 lockdown rules in Nigeria

Funke Akindele's case provides a relevant example to illustrate CBC principles.

The Offense: Funke Akindele organized a birthday party during a government-

imposed lockdown to curb the spread of COVID-19. This violated the law and
created a public health risk.
The Sentence/Outcome: While the details of the sentence may vary depending
on the local context and the specific laws, let's consider scenarios that could be
applied to the situation.
Justification of CBC Using the Funke Akindele Case
Here's how the Funke Akindele case could be used to illustrate and justify CBC:
Rehabilitation and Education:
Instead of Imprisonment: A CBC approach could involve community service
(e.g., volunteering at a public health awareness campaign, creating public
service announcements about COVID-19 safety). The community service would
serve as a visible demonstration of her commitment to making amends and
contributing to the community.
Educational Component: A mandatory education program about public health,
infectious disease prevention, and the importance of following government
directives in times of crisis could be added.

Restorative Justice:
Apology and Reconciliation: Funke Akindele has already publicly apologized.
The CBC could require a formal acknowledgement of the harm done.

Community Engagement: She could participate in a community dialogue or

public forum to explain her actions, express her remorse, and encourage others
to adhere to public health guidelines.
Community Safety:

Supervision and Monitoring: A CBC might involve periodic reporting to a

community supervision officer.
Adherence to Rules: Ensuring she complies with any additional rules, like
public health advisories. This promotes community safety by setting an
example.
Cost-Effectiveness:

Resource Utilization: CBC interventions are often significantly less expensive

than imprisoning someone. They reduce the burden on the court system and
correctional facilities.
Avoidance of Costs of Incarceration: The cost of housing, feeding, and
providing medical care for someone in prison is substantial. CBC programs
redirect those resources to address underlying problems and improve the
offender's chances of success.
Reintegration:
Avoiding Stigma: Imprisonment can create a major barrier to finding work,
housing, and re-establishing social connections. CBC allows the offender to
maintain their employment and family relationships.
Maintaining Social Networks: The community-based nature of CBC helps to
avoid the isolation and disconnection that can occur in prisons.
Advantages of CBC in the Funke Akindele Case

Reduced Stigma: Funke Akindele, as a public figure, could be able to continue

working and contributing to her community.
Public Education: Her experience could be used to raise awareness about the
importance of following health guidelines and the consequences of violating the
law.
Positive Role Modeling: It could be demonstrated that celebrities, as well as
ordinary citizens, have the responsibility of upholding the law, and contributing
to the public good.
Disadvantages of Imprisonment in the Funke Akindele Case

Disproportionate Punishment: Imprisonment might seem disproportionate to the

offense of violating lockdown rules.

Negative Publicity: Although there would be public reaction irrespective of the

punishment, prison time would be difficult to forget and may affect the
offender's public perception.

Lost Contributions: Her creative output and potential economic contributions

could be lost to the community.
Overcrowding in Prison: Imprisonment could take up space in already
overcrowded prisons.

Conclusion
The case of Funke Akindele, and similar examples, demonstrates how CBC can
offer a fair, rehabilitative, and community-oriented approach to justice. CBC is
a powerful tool to address offenses without the negative consequences of
imprisonment, while holding offenders accountable and promoting public
safety.

The Funke Akindele Case:

In April 2020, during a strict COVID-19 lockdown in Lagos, Nigeria, popular
actress Funke Akindele hosted a birthday party at her home, violating social
distancing regulations. She and her husband were arrested, charged, and
found guilty of violating the lockdown orders. They were sentenced to
community service and fined.
The sentence of community service, in this case, is a clear example of
community-based correction.
The case served as a deterrent to others. The high-profile nature of the case
and the media coverage it received made it clear that such violations would not
be taken lightly despite who you are and your social stuff.

Community service can be seen as a form of rehabilitation. It allowed Funke

Akindele and her husband to make amends for their actions and potentially
learn from their mistakes.

The public reaction was mixed. Some felt the punishment was too lenient, while
others believed it was appropriate. This highlights the complexities of
community-based correction and the need for public understanding and
acceptance.

By performing community service, they were arguably making restitution to

the community for violating the lockdown rules and potentially endangering
others because of the sensitivity of the time they chose to hold their party.

Public Health Context: The unique context of a pandemic influenced the nature
of the offense and the chosen punishment.
The Funke Akindele case, while controversial, offers a real-world example of
community-based correction in action. It demonstrates the potential of
alternatives to incarceration, especially in situations where the primary goal is
not just punishment