1 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

Lesson 2: The Stages of Moral Development

SPECIFIC LEARNING OUTCOMES

In this lesson, you should be able to:
1. describe each stage of moral development; and
2. evaluate one’s personal growth against the stages of personal development.

LLESSON MAP

Moral
Culture Development

AP

This map depicts the relationship of the two major and standard concepts.

CORE CONTENTS

ENGAGE: Cultural Moral Compass

Activity 1: Let’s Start!

Instruction: Answer the following.
1. If you found a wallet full of money on the street, what would you do?
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
2 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

EXPLORE: Playing the Concept

Activity 2: Exploring Time!

Instructions: Read each concept carefully. A box is provided for note taking.

The Stages of Moral Development

As previously explained, the moral agent, the human person, is a being capable of acting "with
reference to right and wrong," that is, one who is capable of being moral, having a moral character.

Social psychologists look at the moral agent as he is, where he is, in the society where he lives. From
birth, he/she is cared, nurtured and influenced by the world around him/her. He/she grows up in a family,
develops in a society, and thus he/she is exposed to all the do's and dont's of his/her family and his/her society.
His/her moral life, his/her norms and moral standards, are shaped by the prevalent cultural influences. In other
words, as disclosed and unveiled as he/she is, the moral agent undergoes development.

Moral development refers to the "process through which a human person gains his/her beliefs, skills
and dispositions that make him/her a morally mature person. William A. Kay (1970) has the following to say
regarding the nature of moral development.

Just as the pattern of intellectual growth can be simply described as passing through stages of animal
behavior, pre-logical thinking, thought governed by empirical logic and finally by formal logic, so morality can
be described as passing through stages of behavior controlled first, by taboo; then second, by law; third by
conscience (i.e. irrational, intrajected values); fourth, by reciprocity; fifth, by social consensus and finally by
personal moral principles, though not necessarily in that order. Stated differently, the five stages may be
reduced to three as follows:

 The amoral stage egocentric, hedonist and prudential considerations.

 The pre-moral stage authoritarian, ego-idealist, social and reciprocal considerations.
 The moral stage-personal, autonomous, altruistic, rational, independent and responsible considerations

Let’s analyze your answers in the Activity phase of this lesson. If your reasons to go to school are "I am
afraid to be dropped and fail" and "to show to my parents that I am a good student" you are in the a-moral's
ego- idealist stage. If you go to school everyday because "I promised to my parents I will never be absent" that
is William Kay's pre moral stage (social and reciprocal consideration.) If your reason is "it is the right thing to
do," you have reached Kay's moral stage personal, autonomous, rational, independent and rational
considerations.

Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development

3 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

Moral development refers to the "process through which a human person, gains his/her beliefs, skills
and dispositions that makes him/her a morally mature person". Kohlberg (2013) describes the stages of moral
development in 3 stages, namely: Level 1 - Preconventional morality, Level 2- Conventional morality, and Level
3 Post-Conventional morality. Each level has two stages each so that there are six stages of moral
development. They are described in detail below:

Level 1 - Pre-conventional morality

This is the lowest level of moral development in Kohlberg's theory. At the pre-conventional level children
don't have a personal code of morality. Instead, their moral code is controlled by the standards of adults and
the consequences of following or breaking adults' rules. Authority is outside the individual and reasoning is
based on the physical consequences of actions, There is no internalization of moral values.

 Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation. The child/individual does good in order to avoid being
punished. If he/she is punished, he/ she must have done wrong. Children obey because adults tell them
to obey. Moral decisions are based on fear of punishment. It is a matter of obey or you get punished.
e.g. Josef does not cheat because he is afraid of a punishment, a failing grade and "I go to school
because I am afraid to be dropped and fail.

 Stage 2: Instrumental Orientation. Right behavior is defined by whatever the individual believes to be
in his/her best interest. "What's in it for me?" In this stage there is limited interest in the needs of others,
only to the point where it might further the individual's own interests. It is a matter of "you scratch my
back, and I'll scratch yours"mentality. An example would be when a child is asked by his parents to do
a chore. The child asks "what's in it for me?" and the parents offer the child a reward by giving him a
treat.

In this stage, right involves equal exchange. e.g. Mario sees Juan get Miguel's pen. Soon he sees
Miguel retaliate by taking Juan's favorite pen. Mario does not report the incident to the teacher because they
involve equal exchanges.

Level 2: Conventional

Throughout the conventional level, a child's sense of morality is tied to personal and societal relationships.
Children continue to accept the rules of authority figures, but this is now due to their belief that this is necessary
to ensure positive relationships and societal order. Adherence to rules and conventions is somewhat rigid
during these stages and a rule's appropriateness or fairness is seldom questioned.

 Stage 3: "Good Boy, Nice Girl" Orientation

In stage 3, children want the approval of others and act in ways to avoid disapproval. Emphasis is
placed on good behavior and people being "nice" to others. The individual is good in order to be seen as being
4 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

a good person by others. Therefore, answers relate to the approval of others. The individual values caring and
loyalty to others as a basis for moral judgments. E.g. if a politician is around in times of calamities primarily
because he wants to appear "good boy" or "good girl" to electorates, he displays stage 3 moral developmental
stage. "To show to my parents and teachers that I am a good student" and "I promised by parents never to be
absent fall under this stage of good boy, nice girl orientation.

 Stage 4. Law and Order Orientation. The child/individual becomes aware of the wider rules of society,
so judgments concern obeying the rules in order to uphold the law and to avoid guilt. It is a matter of "I
have to do this because the law says so." It is still blind obedience to the law so morality still lacks
internalization. "It is the right thing to do; "school rules say so" as reasons for going to school are in
stage 4.

Level 3-Post-Conventional Morality

This is the level of full internalization. Morality is completely internalized and not based on external
standards. Individual judgment is based on self-chosen principles and moral reasoning is based on individual
rights and justice. According to Kohlberg this level of moral reasoning is as far as most people get.

 Stage 5. Social contract orientation

The child/individual becomes aware that while rules/laws might exist for the good of the greatest number, there
are times when they will work against the interest of particular individuals. In this level, individuals reason out
that values, rights and principles transcend the law. Laws are regarded as social contracts rather than rigid
orders. Those that do not promote the general welfare should be changed when necessary to meet the greatest
good for the greatest number of people.

 Stage 6. Universal, ethical, principle orientation. Individuals at this stage have developed their own set
of moral guidelines which may or may not fit the law. They have developed moral judgments that are
based on universal human rights. The principles apply to everyone e.g., human rights, justice, and
equality. The person will be prepared to act to defend these principles even if it means going against
the rest of society in the process and having to pay the consequences of disapproval and/or
imprisonment. When faced with a dilemma between law and conscience, the person follows his
conscience. Kohlberg doubted few people reached this stage. (McLeod, 2013)

Development of conscience-based moral decision

Moral development includes development of conscience-based moral decision. This is in the post-
conventional level of Kohlberg's stages of moral development. Panizo defines conscience as "an act of the
practical judgment of reason deciding upon an individual action as good and to be performed and as evil and
to be avoided." It is metaphorically referred to as the "inner or little voice of God." Panizo (1964) quotes St.
Thomas regarding the obligatory force of conscience: "Every conscience, whether right or erroneous, whether
5 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

with regard to acts which are evil in themselves or acts which are indifferent, is obligatory, so that he who acts
in opposition to his conscience, does wrong."

Rev. Thomas V. Berg, (2012) defines conscience as follows:

In the NL (natural law) tradition, conscience is understood to be a judgment emanating from human
reason about choices and actions to be made, or accomplished, or already opted for and performed...

Aquinas held that conscience, in the strict sense, was as an act of human reason-called a judgment-
following upon, and concluding, a time of deliberation. In this sense, conscience is the interior resounding of
reason. Conscience is reason's awareness of a choice, or an action's harmony or disharmony, with the kind of
behavior which truly leads to our genuine well-being, and flourishing.

If our choice or action is not in accord with the judgment of a rightly formed and active conscience, then
that judgment will linger in our conscious awareness, presenting itself as a felt disharmony between the choice,
and the moral norm (and corresponding virtue), being violated. While such felt disharmony is indeed of an
emotive nature (e.g. a healthy emotional guilt), the judgment of conscience remains something distinct and
irreducible to the negative feeling which happens to accompany it.

The formation of conscience

Corresponding therefore to the prior discussion on moral development is the formation of conscience.
What then is meant when it is said that the conscience must be "formed"?

First, conscience formation begins with the deep-seated decision to seek moral truth. One adopts, as
a way of life, the habit of seeking out answers to questions about right and wrong. persevering in that quest
until one arrives at a state of moral certainty, after having made the most reasonable effort possible to arrive
at those answers. Second, a sound conscience must stand on the firm foundation of integrity, sincerity and
forthrightness. Duplicity, personal inconsistency and dishonesty undermine any hope of forming a properly
functioning conscience. Third, conscience formation is sustained by the habit of consistently educating oneself
by exposure to objective moral norms and the rationale behind those norms.

Conscience needs a guide.... The Church's moral teaching, while certainly enlightened by divinely
revealed law, is, at its core, the application of what this tradition has discovered over the centuries about the
kinds of behavior that lead us to live genuinely fulfilling, human lives. You do not place yourself at odds with
such a tradition lightly.

Consequently, conscience formation requires a habit of on- going self-formation (what we might call
moral information gathering) through study, reading, and other types of inquiry. This includes consultation with
persons whose moral judgment we know to be sound and in accord with the Church's moral tradition. Finally,
conscience, if it is to be correct, needs the assistance of the virtue of prudence. By "prudence, "we mean the
6 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

virtue as understood within the NL (natural law) tradition. This should not be confused with timidity, "covering
one's back"or dissimulation (hiding the truth). Berg, 2012.

It may be added, as clarified in Fr. Vitaliano Gorospe (1974), that getting to the highest-level,
conscience-based moral decision can mean the widening human consciousness. It is a growth or development
from family consciousness to clan consciousness, community consciousness, town consciousness, provincial,
regional, national, and international or global consciousness. As one's consciousness widens, the moral
parameters or standards of one's decision making widens, one's moral conscience widens, one matures.

Write your notes here:

7 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

REFERENCES

Books

Barbour, I.G. (1971). Telhard process metaphysics. E. Cousins, Ed. New York: Newman Press.

Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Dover Publications.

Brinkerhoff, D. B. and White L.K. (1989), Essentials of sociology. New York: West Publishing Company

Buber, M. (1957). 1 and Thou, R. G. Smith (trans.) New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

Dubain, A. J. (2006). Essentials of management. Thomson: Southwestern.

Dy, M. J. (2001). Philosophy of man: Selected readings. Quezon City: Goodwill Trading Co., Inc.

Fletcher, J. (1966). Situation ethics. London: SCM Press.

Fletcher, J. (1967). Moral responsibility: Situation ethics at work. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.

Gadamer, H.G. (1966). Readings in philosophy of man, Vol. II, Ateneo de Manila University, Philosophy
Department

Garner, R.T. & Rosen, B. (1967). Moral philosophy: A systematic introduction to normative ethics and meta-
ethics. New York: MacMillan Publishers.

George, V. A. (2008). Paths to the divine: Ancient and indian. Washington DC: CRVP Press

Gorospe, V. (1974). The Filipino search for meaning: Moral philosophy in Philippine setting. Manila: Jesuit
Educational Association

Hornedo, F. (1972). The philosophy of freedom. Baguio City: St. Louis University Kay, W. (1970). Moral
development: A psychological study of moral growth and development from childhood to adolescence.
London: Allen and Unwin

Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco,
CA: Hargers & Row.

Mackinon, B. & Fiala, A. (2015). Ethics theory and contemporary issues. Stanford: Cengage Learning
8 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

Mercado, L. (1977). Elements of philosophy. Tacloban: Divine Word University Publication.

Rae, S., Scott, B and Wong, K. L. (1996). A model for moral decision-making. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan

Raths, L. Harmin, M & Shore, S. (1978). Values and teaching, Columbia, OH: Merril Sahakian, W. &
Sahakian, M. (1990). Realms of philosophy. Schenkman Publishing Co.

Sartre, J.P. (2007) Existentialism is humanism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Scholte, J. (2005), Globalization: A critical introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Taliaferro, C. (2009). Philosophy of religion. Minnesota, USA. Oneworld Publications

Tillich, P. (1952). The courage to be. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, Van Peurson, C.A.
(1972). Phenomenology and analytical philosophy. Pittsburgh, Pa: Duquesno University Press.

Yang, S.K. (). Is ethics possible without religion? https://aww.smalaysiakini.com

JOURNAL and e-References:

Adams, R. (1993). Moral arguments for theistic belief.

philosophy.faculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rameson/courses/adams.phil/reading.pdf.

Baverlain, M and Wallish, S. (2009), How the digitalize age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our
future. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 9(2) Berg, T. (2018) What is moral conscience?
Homilectic pastoral. Retrieved from https://www.hprweb.com/2012/01what-is-moral-conscience

Brabander, R. (1970), Christianity in the modern world. Sapientia Aedificat. Baguio City: St. Louis University.

Corpuz, B. (1986). The Filipino sense of right and wrong. St. Louis University Journal, XVIII (1) 1-18.

Fernandez, E. (1988). Sin viewed from the perspective of the fundamental option theory and fletcherian
situation ethics: Points of convergence and divergence.

Saint Louis University Research Journal, XIX (1)

Gorospe, Fr. Vitaliano S. The Filipino Norm of Morality, https://www.scribd.com/ document/48553093/THE-

FILIPINO-NORM-OF-MORALITY. Retrieved:2018-27-12.

Hiebert 1985, 213 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Guilt Shame Fear_spectrum_of_ cultures

9 Module 2 – The Moral Agent

McConnel, T. (2019). Moral dilemmas (Standford encyclopedia of philosophy)

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-dilemma

Purt, J. (2019), Defining moments: Share an experience that has shaped your values.
https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jenny-purt

Purt, Jenny, "Defining Moments: Share an Experience That Has Shaped Your Values," The Guardian.com.
Retrieved. 2019-01-12.

Rachela, James. (1990). Created from animals: The moral implications https:// philpapers.org/rec/RACCFA

Rae, S. (2009). Moral choices: https://philpapers.org/rec/RAEMCA

Rae, Scott, Moral Choices, Making Ethical Decisions. Retrieved 01/31/2019. See also Rac, Scott B., and
Kennan L. Wong, "A Model for Moral Decision Making" Chapter 16 in Beyond Integrity: A Judeo-Christian
Approach to Business Ethics Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996.

Rashdall, H. Sorley W.R; Tylor, AE. An exposition and critique of the moral argument for the existence of
God, https//www.worldcat.org/title/8527704