Nuremberg Vs Helsinki Comparison
Nuremberg Vs Helsinki Comparison
|--------|---------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Background | Created after WWII, in response to Nazi experiments during the Nuremberg Trials. | Issued by
| Legal Status | Not legally binding, but influential. | Not legally binding, but widely accepted. |
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------|
| Focus | Protection of human subjects. | Broader ethical principles for therapeutic and non-therapeutic
research. |
3. Informed Consent
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------|
| Consent | Absolute and voluntary. | Required, with allowance for proxy consent under ethical oversight. |
4. Risk-Benefit Analysis
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------|
| Risk vs Benefit | Avoid all unnecessary risks, justified by benefits. | Must balance risks and benefits with
oversight. |
Comparison between Nuremberg Code (1947) and Declaration of Helsinki (1964)
5. Ethical Review
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------|
6. Scientific Standards
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------|
| Scientific Validity | Based on prior studies and reasoning. | Must be scientifically and ethically justified. |
7. Vulnerable Groups
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------|
Summary Table
|----------|--------------------|---------------------------|