The document outlines a project evaluation rubric that includes criteria for assessing various sections such as the topic, objectives, background, methodology, data presentation, conclusion, recommendations, bibliography, and overall presentation. Each section has specific requirements and marks allocated for clarity, relevance, and logical expression. The total marks for the project are also indicated, emphasizing the importance of thorough and well-structured content.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views3 pages
Cognate Markscheme
The document outlines a project evaluation rubric that includes criteria for assessing various sections such as the topic, objectives, background, methodology, data presentation, conclusion, recommendations, bibliography, and overall presentation. Each section has specific requirements and marks allocated for clarity, relevance, and logical expression. The total marks for the project are also indicated, emphasizing the importance of thorough and well-structured content.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
PROJECT AREAS PROFILE DISTRIBUTION TOTAL
Knowledge and Application Interpretation
Comprehension and Analysis
Table of contents
Table of contents accurately links pages to
content- 1 mark (KC)
Topic/ Issue/Problem
Topic/ Issue/Problem is clearly stated- 1 mark
(KC) Topic/ Issue/Problem accurately describes the project- 1 mark (KC)
Objectives
Objectives are clearly stated and linked to the
topic/issue/problem – 1 mark (A) Objectives are realistic- 1 mark (A)
Background/ Overview
Includes a description of the topic/ issue /
problem - Description includes the history – 1 mark (KC) - Description includes the development- 1 mark (KC)
Establishes the need for research
- Why/ how is the topic/ issue/ problem important to student – 1 mark (A) - Impact of the topic / issue/ problem on society – 1 mark (A)
Methodology
Data collection instrument clearly described –
1-2 marks (KC) Data collection instrument appropriate for type of data – 1 mark (A) Included at least two instrument of data collection- 1 mark (A) Method of data collection clearly described – 1- 2 marks (A) Method of data collection adequately justified – 1-2 marks (IA) Limitation of data collection method clearly stated – 1-2 marks (A) Presentation and Analysis of Data
Data is presented on appropriate form using
tables, charts, graphs – 1-2 marks (KC) Data presented are relevant to the objectives of the project – 1-2 marks (A) Data is adequately analysed- 1-2 marks (A) Data is analysed using appropriate statistic – mean, median, mode -1-2 marks (IA) Findings are consistent with the analyses – 1-2 marks (IA)
Conclusion
Conclusion succinctly summarises the project –
1-2 marks (A) Conclusion is logical and based on findings – 1- 2 marks (A)
Recommendation
Recommendations are realistic and informed by
findings – 1-2 marks (IA) Recommendations contribute to a better understanding of the topic/ issue/ problem -1-2 marks ((IA)
Bibliography
Bibliography contains names of authors, names
of publishers, names and dates of publications, and are written in alphabetical order – 1 mark (KC)
Overall presentation
Consistently uses correct spelling and grammar
– 1 mark (A) Expression of idea logical and unambiguous – 1 mark (A)