0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views1 page

PageSpeed Insights

The PageSpeed Insights report for the Etsy shop 'Forest Knitting Toys' indicates that the site passed the Core Web Vitals assessment with a Largest Contentful Paint of 2.1 seconds and a Cumulative Layout Shift of 0. The performance score is 40, with notable areas for improvement including reducing JavaScript execution time and minimizing main-thread work. Accessibility and SEO scores are 67 and 92 respectively, highlighting opportunities for enhancing user experience and search engine visibility.

Uploaded by

henry5calvin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views1 page

PageSpeed Insights

The PageSpeed Insights report for the Etsy shop 'Forest Knitting Toys' indicates that the site passed the Core Web Vitals assessment with a Largest Contentful Paint of 2.1 seconds and a Cumulative Layout Shift of 0. The performance score is 40, with notable areas for improvement including reducing JavaScript execution time and minimizing main-thread work. Accessibility and SEO scores are 67 and 92 respectively, highlighting opportunities for enhancing user experience and search engine visibility.

Uploaded by

henry5calvin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PageSpeed Insights Copy Link Docs

Report from Mar 19, 2024, 11:09:33 PM

https://www.etsy.com/shop/ForestKnittingToys?fbclid=PAAaYdq09hRzuZaHxmLa-4OaOvPozpxn_VoR3j_DeT9
Analyze

! Mobile
" Desktop

Discover what your real users are experiencing This URL Origin

Core Web Vitals Assessment: Passed

Expand view

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) Interaction to Next Paint (INP)

2.1 s 157 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)

OTHER NOTABLE METRICS

First Contentful Paint (FCP) First Input Delay (FID)


1.6 s 19 ms

Time to First Byte (TTFB)

1.1 s

Latest 28-day collection period Various mobile devices Many samples (Chrome UX Report)

Full visit durations Various network connections All Chrome versions

Diagnose performance issues

40 67 100 92

Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO

SI FCP
+1 +8

40
CLS LCP
+25 +1

+5
TBT

Performance
Values are estimated and may vary. The performance score is
calculated directly from these metrics. See calculator.

0–49 50–89 90–100

METRICS Expand view

First Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint

2.2 s 7.1 s
Total Blocking Time Cumulative Layout Shift

1,300 ms 0.028
Speed Index

9.4 s
Captured at Mar 19, 2024 at 11:09 PM Emulated Moto G Power with Single page session

GMT+1 Lighthouse 11.5.0

Initial page load Slow 4G throttling Using HeadlessChromium

122.0.6261.94 with lr

View Treemap

Show audits relevant to: All FCP LCP TBT CLS

DIAGNOSTICS

Reduce JavaScript execution time — 3.7 s

Minimize main-thread work — 9.4 s

Largest Contentful Paint element — 7,140 ms

Reduce the impact of third-party code — Third-party code blocked the main thread for 1,060 ms

Eliminate render-blocking resources — Potential savings of 560 ms

Reduce unused CSS — Potential savings of 100 KiB

Reduce unused JavaScript — Potential savings of 574 KiB

Avoid an excessive DOM size — 4,343 elements

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy — 15 resources found

Does not use passive listeners to improve scrolling performance

Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers — Potential savings of 18 KiB

Avoid long main-thread tasks — 20 long tasks found

Initial server response time was short — Root document took 430 ms

Avoid large layout shifts — 2 layout shifts found

User Timing marks and measures — 5 user timings

Avoid non-composited animations — 2 animated elements found

Avoids enormous network payloads — Total size was 2,010 KiB

Avoid chaining critical requests — 5 chains found

More information about the performance of your application. These numbers don't directly affect the Performance score.

PASSED AUDITS (19) Show

67
Accessibility
These checks highlight opportunities to improve the accessibility of your
web app. Automatic detection can only detect a subset of issues and does
not guarantee the accessibility of your web app, so manual testing is also
encouraged.

ARIA

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

ARIA IDs are unique

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology,
like a screen reader.

NAMES AND LABELS

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive
technology, like a screen reader.

CONTRAST

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

TABLES AND LISTS

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

NAVIGATION

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO MANUALLY CHECK (10) Show

These items address areas which an automated testing tool cannot cover. Learn more in our guide on conducting an accessibility review.

PASSED AUDITS (17) Show

NOT APPLICABLE (31) Show

100
Best Practices

TRUST AND SAFETY

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

GENERAL

Detected JavaScript libraries

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

PASSED AUDITS (13) Show

NOT APPLICABLE (1) Show

92
SEO
These checks ensure that your page is following basic search engine
optimization advice. There are many additional factors Lighthouse does not
score here that may affect your search ranking, including performance on
Core Web Vitals. Learn more about Google Search Essentials.

CRAWLING AND INDEXING

Links are not crawlable

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

MOBILE FRIENDLY

Tap targets are not sized appropriately — 94% appropriately sized tap targets

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. Learn how to make pages
mobile-friendly.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO MANUALLY CHECK (1) Show

Run these additional validators on your site to check additional SEO best practices.

PASSED AUDITS (12) Show

More on PageSpeed Insights Related Content Connect


What's new Updates Twitter

Documentation Web Fundamentals Youtube

Learn about Web Performance Case Studies

Ask questions on Stack Overflow Podcasts

Mailing list

Chrome Firebase All products

Terms and Privacy Policy

For details, see the Google Developers Site Policies.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy