A

Project Report

On

ONLINE BANKING SYSTEM

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY

In

COMPUTER SCIENCE

By:

HIMANI (100210169)

Under the guidance of

ER. RITU SHARMA

(Assistant Professor, Computer Science)

NAAC A++ Accredited

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING

SIR CHHOTU RAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY, MEERUT
(December, 2024)

SIR CHHOTU RAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY CHAUDHARY

CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY MEERUT Approved by A.I.C.T.E., New Delhi
 NAAC A++ Accredited

DECLARATION

We declare that this project report titled “Web Based Crypto Wallet” submitted in partial fulfillment
of the degree of B. Tech. in Computer Science is a record of original work carried out by us under the
supervision of Er. Milind Singh, and has not formed the basis for the award of any other degree or
diploma, in this or any other Institution or University. In keeping with the ethical practice in reporting
scientific information, due acknowledgements have been made wherever the findings of others have
been cited.

<Signature> <Signature>
Shivam Kumar Himani
100210154 100210169
CS 7th Semester CS 7th Semester

<Signature>
Priyanshi Rai
100210143
CS 7th Semester

Place: Meerut
04 December 2024

ii

SIR CHHOTU RAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY

CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY MEERUT
 Approved by A.I.C.T.E., New Delhi

NAAC A++ Accredited

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the project report entitled “Online Banking System” submitted by Himani to the
Sir Chhotu Ram Institute of Engineering & Technology, Meerut in partial fulfillment for the award of
the degree of B. Tech in Computer Science is a bona fide record of project work carried out by
him/her under my/our supervision. The contents of this report, in full or in parts, have not been
submitted to any other Institution or University for the award of any degree or diploma.

<Signature> <Signature>

Er. Ritu Sharma Dr. Gaurav Tyagi

(Project Guide) (Project Coordinator)

Place: Meerut Counter signature of Coordinator with seal

December, 2024 Er. Milind Singh Phoughat
(Coordinator)

iii
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost, I bow my head in gratitude to the Almighty God for His countless blessings, and
strength that enabled me to successfully complete this project. His grace and mercy have been my
source of inspiration and perseverance throughout this journey.

I express my heartfelt gratitude to Prof. Sangeeta Shukla, Honorable Vice Chancellor of Chaudhary
Charan Singh University, for fostering an environment that encourages academic excellence and
innovation.

I am profoundly thankful to Prof. Sanjay Kumar Bhardwaj, Dean of Engineering & Technology, and Prof.
Niraj Singhal, Director of Sir Chhotu Ram Institute of Engineering & Technology, for their invaluable
support and for ensuring the smooth facilitation of resources and opportunities necessary for this work.

I extend my sincere appreciation to my supervisor, Er.Milind Singh, for their unwavering guidance,
insightful feedback, and encouragement, which have been the cornerstone of this project. Their
expertise and dedication have significantly enriched my learning experience.

I am deeply thankful to Dr. Gaurav Tyagi, Project Coordinator & Er. Milind, Coordinator of the
Department of Computer Science, for their continuous support and for providing me with the necessary
facilities and a conducive environment to carry out my work.

I also wish to acknowledge my peers and colleagues for their constructive discussions, moral support, and
teamwork, which have greatly contributed to the progress of this project.

Finally, I owe my deepest gratitude to my family and friends for their unconditional love, support, and
encouragement throughout this journey.

This project stands as a testament to the collective efforts, guidance, and blessings I have received, and I
am sincerely thankful to all who contributed to its success.

Shivam Kumar
1002101504
04 December 2024

iv
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER

DECLARATION ii
CERTIFICATE iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
1. INTRODUCTION 2
1.1. Introduction of the Project 2
1.2. Objective & Scope of the Project 3
1.3. Problem Solved 4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 5
3. PROPOSED SYSTEM 8
3.1. Existing System 8
3.2. Proposed system 8
3.3. System Workflow 9
3.4. Conclusion 9
4. SYSTEM ANALYSIS
4.1. Hardware & Software Requirements 8
4.2. Testing Technologies 9
4.3. Feasibility Report 11
4.4. Technology Used
5. OUTPUT SCREENSHOT
6. RESULT & CONCLUSION 10
6.1 Result 11
6.2 CONCLUSION 12
7. REFRENCES 15

v
 CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION

vi
 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT

The project involves the development of a web-based crypto wallet built using
Next.js, which supports two leading blockchain networks: Ethereum and Solana.
This wallet generates secure mnemonic phrases for account recovery and enables
users to create wallets, view balances, and perform transactions seamlessly. It
provides a non-custodial solution, ensuring users retain complete control over their
private keys and funds. The wallet leverages cutting-edge blockchain libraries like
ethers.js and @solana/web3.js to integrate the unique features of both blockchains
into a unified, user-friendly interface.

1.2 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE PROJECT

• Secure Wallet Creation: To implement BIP-39 mnemonic generation for
creating wallets with secure and easy recovery options.
• Real-Time Data Access: To enable users to fetch wallet balances and
transaction details in real time using blockchain APIs.
• Simplified User Experience: To design a user-friendly web interface that
makes blockchain interactions accessible for both beginners and advanced
users.
• Scalability and Extensibility: To build a scalable architecture using Next.js,
ensuring future enhancements like support for additional blockchains or
advanced features (e.g., staking, NFTs).
• Non-Custodial Solution: To ensure users retain full control over their private
keys and funds, enhancing security and decentralization.
• Multi-Blockchain Support: To develop a crypto wallet that seamlessly
supports both Ethereum and Solana blockchains.

Scope
• Wallet Creation: Allows users to securely create wallets with mnemonicbased
recovery options.

1
 • Real-Time Data: Fetches real-time balances and transaction statuses via
blockchain APIs.
• Scalability: Built using Next.js, the wallet is optimized for fast performance
and can scale with future enhancements like staking, token swaps, and NFT
management.
• User Accessibility: Aims to simplify blockchain interaction for both novice and
advanced users through an intuitive interface.
• Multi-Blockchain Support: Supports both Ethereum and Solana ecosystems,
enabling users to manage multiple assets in one place.

1.3 PROBLEM SOLVED

1. Fragmented Blockchain Wallets:
Existing wallets like MetaMask (Ethereum) and Phantom (Solana) are
restricted to individual blockchains. This wallet solves the problem of
fragmentation by supporting both Ethereum and Solana in a single interface.

2. Complex Wallet Recovery:

Many wallets lack straightforward recovery options, leading to a loss of funds.
This wallet uses the BIP-39 mnemonic standard, making it easier for users to
backup and restore their wallets securely.
3. Difficult User Experience:
Interacting with blockchain technologies can be intimidating for new users.
The project provides a streamlined and user-friendly interface to simplify
wallet operations like viewing balances and sending transactions.
4. Limited Customizability in Web Wallets:
Many existing web wallets are not easily extensible. This project is built with a
scalable architecture using Next.js, allowing for future integrations like
support for additional blockchains or advanced features.
5. Lack of Real-Time Interaction:
Ensures seamless access to blockchain data, such as real-time transaction
status and wallet balances, without delays, enhancing user experience.
 2

CHAPTER - 2 LITERATURE
REVIEW
 Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

This section provides an in-depth exploration of existing research and publications

that have significantly contributed to the development of Blockchain technologies,
Solana, and Etherium. These studies serve as the foundation for our project and
provide valuable insights into its implementation.

2.1 Blockchain technologies

• Nakamoto (2008) → Nakamoto introduced the concept of blockchain
technology in the Bitcoin whitepaper, presenting it as a decentralized, peerto-
peer system for secure financial transactions. The blockchain served as a
distributed ledger, ensuring transparency and trust without relying on
centralized authorities.

• Swan (2015) → Swan explored the potential applications of blockchain

technology beyond cryptocurrency in her book Blockchain: Blueprint for a
New Economy. She identified three categories: Blockchain 1.0 (currency),
Blockchain 2.0 (smart contracts), and Blockchain 3.0 (decentralized
applications for governance, health, and education).
• Wood (2015) → Gavin Wood proposed Ethereum as a blockchain platform
enabling smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps). This
innovation expanded blockchain's utility beyond financial transactions,
allowing programmable contracts to execute autonomously.
• Zheng et al. (2017) → Zheng and colleagues published a comprehensive
survey on blockchain technology, covering its structure, consensus
mechanisms (e.g., Proof-of-Work, Proof-of-Stake), and applications. They
emphasized blockchain’s strengths in security, transparency, and immutability
while addressing challenges like scalability and energy consumption.
• Nair and Sebastian (2017) → Nair and Sebastian highlighted blockchain's
potential to revolutionize supply chain management. They demonstrated how
blockchain could enhance traceability, reduce fraud, and improve efficiency in
global logistics.
• Buterin et al. (2018) → Buterin introduced the Plasma framework for scaling
Ethereum. This approach aimed to reduce congestion on the Ethereum
mainnet by creating "child chains" that could process transactions
independently while periodically reporting to the main blockchain.
• Puthal et al. (2018) → Puthal et al. discussed blockchain's potential for
securing data in the Internet of Things (IoT). They proposed blockchain as a

3
 solution for improving trust and authentication in IoT networks while
mitigating risks like data tampering and cyberattacks.
• Solana Labs (2020) → Solana Labs introduced the Solana blockchain,
emphasizing scalability and low transaction costs using a unique consensus
mechanism called Proof-of-History (PoH). This innovation addressed
blockchain's scalability problem by enabling thousands of transactions per
second.
• Johnson et al. (2021) → Johnson and colleagues analyzed the limitations of
existing blockchain interoperability. They suggested multi-chain solutions and
bridges to enable cross-chain communication, a critical step for the
blockchain ecosystem's growth.
• Kumar et al. (2023) → Kumar explored blockchain integration with modern
web technologies, focusing on building scalable, user-friendly interfaces for
blockchain-based applications. The study emphasized the role of frameworks
like Next.js in improving user experience while interacting with decentralized
systems.

2.2 Solana

• Yakovenko (2017) → Anatoly Yakovenko introduced the concept of Proof-

ofHistory (PoH), a novel consensus mechanism designed to improve the
scalability of blockchain systems. PoH uses a cryptographic timestamp to
create a historical record of events, enabling faster transaction processing and
reduced latency.

• Solana Labs (2020) → Solana Labs officially launched the Solana blockchain, a
high-performance, layer-1 blockchain capable of processing 65,000
transactions per second with minimal fees. Solana combined PoH with Proof-
of-Stake (PoS) to achieve scalability without compromising security or
decentralization.
• Bonafide (2021) → Bonafide published research comparing Solana’s PoH
mechanism with traditional consensus algorithms like Proof-of-Work (PoW)
and Proof-of-Stake (PoS). The study concluded that PoH significantly reduces
transaction confirmation times, making Solana suitable for decentralized
finance (DeFi) and gaming applications.
• Johnson et al. (2021) → Johnson and colleagues analyzed Solana’s growing
ecosystem, focusing on its ability to attract developers through high
throughput and low transaction costs. They highlighted the challenges of

4
 interoperability with other blockchains like Ethereum and proposed
crosschain bridges as a solution.
• Phantom Wallet (2021) → The release of the Phantom Wallet marked a
significant milestone in Solana’s ecosystem. Phantom provided users with a
non-custodial solution for managing Solana-based assets and interacting with
decentralized applications (dApps).
• Kowalski et al. (2022) → Kowalski explored the use of Solana in NFT
marketplaces, citing its low transaction fees and high-speed processing as key
advantages over Ethereum. The study noted that platforms like Magic Eden
on Solana had gained significant traction in the NFT community.
• Sharma et al. (2023) → Sharma evaluated Solana’s scalability for
enterpriselevel applications, identifying areas such as supply chain
management and real-time data streaming where Solana could outperform
other blockchains. The study also highlighted network outages as a limitation,
calling for infrastructure improvements.
• Kumar et al. (2024) → Kumar examined Solana’s role in advancing Web3
technologies, focusing on its integration with decentralized finance (DeFi)
protocols and cross-chain interoperability. The study emphasized the need for
multi-chain wallets to support Solana alongside other blockchains like
Ethereum.

2.3 Etherium

• Buterin (2013) → Vitalik Buterin proposed the concept of Ethereum, a

blockchain platform designed to go beyond cryptocurrency by enabling smart
contracts and decentralized applications (dApps). This marked a
revolutionary shift from Bitcoin's primary focus on digital currency.

• Ethereum Foundation (2015) → Ethereum's official launch introduced the

Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), a Turing-complete computational engine
that allows developers to execute smart contracts and build dApps. The
launch also introduced Ether (ETH) as its native cryptocurrency to power
network transactions.
• Wood (2015) → Gavin Wood published the Ethereum Yellow Paper, detailing
the technical specification of the EVM and the underlying architecture of
Ethereum. This document became the foundation for Ethereum’s continuous
development.

5
• Christidis and Devetsikiotis (2016) → Christidis and Devetsikiotis explored
the use of Ethereum for smart contracts in business automation. They
demonstrated its ability to remove intermediaries, enhance transparency, and
streamline processes like supply chain management and insurance claims.
• Zheng et al. (2017) → Zheng and colleagues highlighted Ethereum's
scalability challenges, particularly its reliance on Proof-of-Work (PoW). They
pointed out congestion issues during high-demand periods, such as the
CryptoKitties dApp craze, and emphasized the need for improvements in
consensus mechanisms.
• Buterin and Poon (2017) → Buterin and Joseph Poon introduced Plasma, a
layer-2 scaling solution for Ethereum. Plasma aimed to reduce congestion on
the main chain by processing transactions off-chain while maintaining
security through periodic commitments to the main blockchain.
• Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap (2019) → The Ethereum Foundation proposed
Ethereum 2.0, a multi-phase upgrade to transition from Proof-of-Work (PoW)
to Proof-of-Stake (PoS). This upgrade aimed to address scalability, security,
and energy efficiency issues.
• Beiko et al. (2021) → Tim Beiko and other developers implemented the EIP-
1559 upgrade, which introduced a new fee structure. This upgrade replaced
the traditional gas fee auction with a base fee mechanism, improving
transaction predictability and reducing Ether supply through fee burning.
• Sharma et al. (2022) → Sharma analyzed Ethereum’s dominance in the DeFi
(Decentralized Finance) ecosystem. The study attributed Ethereum’s success
to its robust developer community and compatibility with dApps, despite
challenges from emerging competitors like Solana and Avalanche.
• The Merge (2022) → Ethereum successfully transitioned to Proof-ofStake
through "The Merge," a historic upgrade that replaced PoW with PoS. This
reduced Ethereum’s energy consumption by over 99% and set the stage for
future scalability improvements.
• Kumar et al. (2024) → Kumar explored Ethereum’s advancements in multi-
chain interoperability and its integration with layer-2 solutions like Optimism
and Arbitrum. The study emphasized Ethereum’s pivotal role in the growth of
Web3 technologies and its ability to coexist with newer blockchains.

6
CHAPTER - 3 PROPOSED
SYSTEM
 Chapter 3 PROPOSED SYSTEM

The proposed system is a web-based crypto wallet designed to provide a seamless,

secure, and user-friendly experience for managing assets on both the Ethereum
and Solana blockchains. The system addresses key challenges in the blockchain
ecosystem, such as fragmentation between blockchains, wallet security, and user
accessibility.

Key Features of the Proposed System

1. Multi-Blockchain Support
• The wallet supports Ethereum and Solana, enabling users to manage
assets on both blockchains from a single interface.
2. Wallet Creation and Management
• Users can create wallets for both blockchains using secure BIP-39
mnemonic phrases, ensuring easy account recovery.
• The wallet stores keys securely on the client side, maintaining a
noncustodial approach.
3. Real-Time Balance and Transaction Tracking
• The system integrates blockchain APIs to fetch real-time wallet
balances and transaction statuses.
4. User-Friendly Interface
• A responsive and intuitive interface is built using Next.js, simplifying
complex blockchain operations for users.
5. Secure Transactions
• The wallet allows users to send and receive assets on both Ethereum
and Solana securely, with transaction signing performed locally on
the user's device.
6. Scalable and Extensible Architecture
• Designed to accommodate future enhancements like support for
additional blockchains, staking features, and NFT management.

6
Workflow of the Proposed System

1. User Registration: Users generate a new wallet with a unique 12-word

mnemonic phrase for recovery.
2. Wallet Integration: The system generates wallets for both Ethereum (using
ethers.js) and Solana (using @solana/web3.js).
3. Real-Time Updates: API calls to blockchain networks fetch balances and
transaction history for the user.
4. Transaction Handling: Users can send cryptocurrency by entering the
recipient's address, amount, and gas fees. Transactions are signed locally
and broadcasted to the blockchain.
5. Security Features: Private keys never leave the client device, and recovery
phrases ensure secure account recovery.

Benefits of the Proposed System

1. Simplified Multi-Chain Asset Management: Eliminates the need for

separate wallets for Ethereum and Solana.
2. Enhanced Security: A non-custodial approach ensures users maintain full
control of their funds.
3. Scalability: The system is designed to easily integrate new blockchains and
features in the future.
4. Accessibility: Provides a beginner-friendly interface while offering advanced
functionality for experienced users.
This system bridges the gap between fragmented blockchain wallets and ensures
secure and efficient asset management on multiple blockchains.
 7

CHAPTER - 4

SYSTEM ANALYSIS
 Chapter 4 SYSTEM ANALYSIS

The system analysis for the proposed web-based crypto wallet focuses on
understanding the requirements, identifying existing challenges, and detailing how
the system addresses these problems. It examines both the functional and
nonfunctional aspects of the system.

1. Existing Problems

The current landscape of blockchain wallets presents several challenges:

1. Fragmented Ecosystem:
• Most wallets are restricted to single blockchain ecosystems (e.g.,
MetaMask for Ethereum, Phantom for Solana).
• Users need multiple wallets to manage assets across different chains.
2. Complexity for New Users:
• Blockchain wallets are often intimidating for beginners due to
complex interfaces and processes like managing gas fees and private
keys.
3. Security Risks:
• Centralized wallets put user funds at risk of hacking or misuse.
• Improper private key or seed phrase management can result in
permanent asset loss.
4. Scalability and Speed Issues:
• Traditional wallets often suffer from delays in fetching real-time data
or handling high transaction loads.

2. Proposed Solution

The proposed system provides a unified, user-friendly, and secure wallet supporting
Ethereum and Solana blockchains. It simplifies wallet management while
maintaining a focus on decentralization and user control.

3. Functional Requirements

The system must:

8
 • Allow users to create and manage wallets for Ethereum and Solana.
• Generate secure BIP-39 mnemonics for wallet recovery.
• Enable real-time balance updates and transaction tracking.
• Facilitate asset transfers with secure, locally signed transactions.
• Provide an intuitive and responsive user interface for all operations.

4. Non-Functional Requirements

The system should:

• Ensure Security:
• Private keys and sensitive data must never leave the client-side
environment.
• Use industry-standard encryption for local storage (if applicable).
• Optimize Performance:
• Ensure fast load times and low latency for real-time data retrieval.
• Scalability:
• Support the addition of new blockchain networks and features like
staking or NFT management.
• Usability:
• Offer a clean, user-friendly interface that works seamlessly across
devices.
• Reliability:
• Guarantee consistent uptime and robust API integrations for
blockchain communication.

5. Feasibility Analysis

a. Technical Feasibility
• Tools like Next.js, ethers.js, and @solana/web3.js provide robust
frameworks for wallet creation, transaction handling, and blockchain
integration.
• The use of BIP-39 mnemonics ensures a secure and standardized recovery
process.
b. Operational Feasibility
• A beginner-friendly interface ensures accessibility for novice users, while
advanced features meet the needs of experienced users.
• Deployment using platforms like Vercel ensures ease of maintenance and
scalability.

9
c. Economic Feasibility
• As a web-based solution, the cost is primarily limited to development and
hosting, making it cost-effective compared to traditional app-based wallets.

6. SWOT Analysis

Strengths:
• Multi-chain support.
• High security with a non-custodial approach.
• Scalable and extensible architecture.
Weaknesses:
• Dependency on blockchain API reliability.
• Limited initial features compared to long-established wallets.
Opportunities:
• Expansion to other blockchains (e.g., Polygon, Avalanche).
• Addition of DeFi, staking, and NFT management features.
Threats:
• Competition from existing wallets like MetaMask and Phantom.
• Rapid changes in blockchain technology or standards.

Conclusion

The system analysis demonstrates that the proposed crypto wallet is technically
feasible, addresses existing challenges, and provides significant improvements in
multi-chain asset management. With its secure, scalable, and user-friendly design,
the system is well-positioned to cater to the needs of both novice and advanced
blockchain users.

10
11
 CHAPTER - 6

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

 Chapter 6 RESULTS & CONCLUSION

Result
The implementation of the web-based crypto wallet successfully achieved the
following outcomes:
1. Multi-Blockchain Functionality:
• The wallet supports Ethereum and Solana, enabling seamless
management of assets across both blockchains.
• Real-time balance fetching and transaction history retrieval were
successfully implemented using ethers.js and @solana/web3.js.
2. Secure Wallet Creation:
• The system generates secure wallets using BIP-39 mnemonics,
ensuring account recoverability while maintaining a non-custodial
approach.
3. User-Friendly Interface:
• A responsive and intuitive interface, built with Next.js, simplifies
wallet operations for users, making blockchain technology more
accessible.
4. Real-Time Data and Transactions:
• Users can securely send and receive assets on both blockchains.
Transactions are signed locally, ensuring security and privacy.
5. Scalability:
• The system's modular architecture supports future enhancements, such as
adding support for other blockchains, NFT integration, and staking features.

Conclusion

The crypto wallet project demonstrates how blockchain technology can be

simplified for end users while maintaining security and decentralization. By
providing a unified platform for managing assets on Ethereum and Solana, the
project addresses the fragmentation issue in the blockchain ecosystem.
Key advantages of the system include:
• Security: The non-custodial design ensures users have full control of their
funds and private keys.
• Ease of Use: A beginner-friendly interface lowers the barrier to entry for
blockchain adoption.

21
 • Flexibility: Multi-blockchain support and scalability make the wallet
futureproof for emerging technologies.
The project highlights the potential for improving blockchain adoption by addressing
user experience challenges and offering secure, accessible solutions. Future work
may include adding more blockchain integrations, advanced DeFi features, and
support for NFTs, ensuring the wallet remains competitive in the evolving Web3
space.

22
CHAPTER-5

OUTPUT

23
CHAPTER-5
OUTPUT

SNAPSHOTS

The following section contains visual representations of various functionalities and

workflows implemented in the system. These snapshots provide a clearer
understanding of how the system operates.

5.1 LANDING PAGE

Fig.4.1.

5.2 WARNING PAGE

24
 Fig.4.2.
5.3 SECRET PHRASE

Fig.4.3.

5.4 WALLET PAGE

25
 Fig.4.4.
5.4 CREATE WALLET

Fig.4.5.

26
 CHAPTER - 7
REFERENCES
Chapter 7 REFERENCES

1. Nakamoto, S. (2008) → Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved

from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

2. This foundational paper introduced the concept of blockchain technology, which

forms the basis for Ethereum and Solana.
3. Ethereum Foundation (2015) → Ethereum Whitepaper. Retrieved from
https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
4. The official whitepaper detailing the functionality and applications of Ethereum,
including smart contracts and dApps.
5. Yakovenko, A. (2017) → Proof-of-History: A Clock for Blockchain. Retrieved from
https://solana.com/
6. This paper introduced the Proof-of-History consensus mechanism, the
cornerstone of the Solana blockchain.
7. Wood, G. (2015) → Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction
Ledger. Retrieved from https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf
8. The Ethereum Yellow Paper, providing the technical specifications for the
Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM).
9. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017) → An Overview of
Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends. IEEE
International Congress on Big Data.
10. This paper provides a detailed analysis of blockchain architecture and its
applications.
11. Phantom Wallet (2021) → Phantom Wallet Documentation. Retrieved from
https://phantom.app/
12. Documentation and insights about Solana’s Phantom wallet, which inspired some
features of this project.
13. ethers.js (2024) → A Complete Ethereum Library and Wallet Toolkit. Retrieved
from https://docs.ethers.org/v6/
14. Official documentation of ethers.js, used in this project for Ethereum wallet
management and transactions.
15. @solana/web3.js (2024) → JavaScript API for Solana. Retrieved from
https://solana-labs.github.io/solana-web3.js/
16. Official documentation for @solana/web3.js, used in this project for Solana
wallet management and transactions.
17. Swan, M. (2015) → Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O'Reilly Media.

23

18. A comprehensive book exploring the applications of blockchain technology

beyond cryptocurrency.
19. Kumar, R., Sharma, V., & Singh, A. (2023) → Integration of Blockchain Wallets
with Modern Web Technologies. International Journal of Blockchain Applications.
20. This paper discusses using modern web frameworks like Next.js for blockchain
wallet development.

These references provide the theoretical and technical foundation for the project,
enabling the design and implementation of a secure, scalable, and user-friendly
crypto wallet.
23