1.

Political Contributions of the Aligarh Movement in Shaping Muslim Nationalism

1.1 Background of the Aligarh Movement

The Aligarh Movement emerged in the aftermath of the 1857 War of Independence when Muslims were
politically and economically marginalized. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan initiated the movement to revive the
socio-political and educational status of Muslims in British India.

1.2 Role of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was the key figure behind the movement. He emphasized the importance of
modern education, scientific knowledge, and rational thinking. He aimed to bridge the gap between
Muslims and the British rulers.

1.3 Establishment of Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College

In 1875, Sir Syed established the MAO College in Aligarh to impart Western education to Muslims. It later
became Aligarh Muslim University. The institution became the center of Muslim intellectual and political
revival.

1.4 Promotion of Urdu Language

The movement emphasized Urdu as the lingua franca of Indian Muslims. Sir Syed viewed Urdu as a
unifying cultural force and promoted it through educational institutions and publications.

1.5 Separation from Indian National Congress

Sir Syed discouraged Muslims from joining the Indian National Congress, arguing that it represented
Hindu interests. He believed Muslims should focus on education before political activism.

1.6 Political Awakening among Muslims

The Aligarh Movement fostered political awareness among Muslims. It led to the realization that they
needed a separate political identity to safeguard their rights.

1.7 Influence on Future Muslim Leaders

Many leaders of the Pakistan Movement, including Liaquat Ali Khan and Mohammad Ali Jinnah, were
influenced by the ideas and educational model of Aligarh. The movement laid the foundation for future
Muslim leadership.
1.8 Contribution to Muslim Nationalism

The Aligarh Movement instilled a sense of distinct Muslim identity and nationalism. It contributed to the
development of the Two-Nation Theory and the eventual demand for a separate homeland—Pakistan.

---

2. Formation of the All India Muslim League and Its Impact on Muslim Political Struggle

2.1 Historical Context

In the early 20th century, Muslims were politically marginalized in British India. The annulment of the
Partition of Bengal and increasing Hindu dominance in the Indian National Congress alarmed Muslim
leaders.

2.2 Founding of the Muslim League

The All India Muslim League was founded on December 30, 1906, in Dhaka. It was established to protect
Muslim political rights and promote their interests in British India.

2.3 Objectives of the League

The initial objectives were to promote loyalty to the British, protect Muslim rights, and promote mutual
understanding with other communities without sacrificing Muslim interests.

2.4 Response to Congress Dominance

The League was formed as an alternative to the Indian National Congress, which Muslims felt
represented Hindu interests. The League gave Muslims a separate political platform.

2.5 Demand for Separate Electorates

The League's early success came with the Minto-Morley Reforms of 1909, which accepted the Muslim
demand for separate electorates, recognizing Muslims as a distinct political entity.
2.6 Role in Political Mobilization

The League helped politically mobilize Muslims and created awareness about their rights and role in
governance. It laid the foundation for Muslim political identity.

2.7 Evolution of the League’s Role

From a loyalist body, the League evolved into a mass political party advocating for Muslim autonomy.
Under Jinnah’s leadership, it became the voice of Muslim nationalism.

2.8 Impact on Pakistan Movement

The League’s demand for Muslim autonomy eventually led to the Lahore Resolution in 1940 and the
creation of Pakistan in 1947. It played a central role in shaping Muslim political destiny.

---

3. Objectives, Significance, and Effects of the Khilafat Movement (1918–1924)

The Khilafat Movement (1918–1924)

Background Context

• Indian Muslims were deeply attached to the Ottoman Caliphate, which they saw as a
symbol of global Muslim unity and power.
• During most of British rule, Britain and Turkey were allies, which helped Muslims
reconcile with British dominance in India.
• However, World War I changed this:
o Turkey allied with Germany (against Britain).
o After Germany's defeat, the Treaty of Sèvres (1920) proposed to dismantle the
Ottoman Empire, threatening the Caliphate.
o Indian Muslims reacted strongly, leading to the Khilafat agitation.

Role of Key Leaders

Gandhi:
 • Supported the Khilafat Movement, aligning with Muslim sentiment.
• Saw it as a chance to unify Hindus and Muslims and boost the Non-Cooperation
Movement.
• Took a religious angle, which alarmed some secular leaders.

Jinnah:

• Opposed mixing religion with politics.

• Warned Gandhi against using religious emotions to mobilize masses.
• Advocated focusing on purely Indian issues.
• His opposition to the Congress-Khilafat strategy led to his resignation from Congress in
1920.

Key Events
• March 20, 1919: Khilafat Committee formed in Bombay.
• Nov 23, 1919: All-India Khilafat Conference held in Delhi.
• Gandhi elected leader of the joint Hindu-Muslim Committee.
• Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement was launched, including:
o Boycott of British institutions, goods, titles, law courts.
o Surrender of British honors.
• Jinnah supported mild non-cooperation but opposed extreme steps like boycotting
schools and law courts.

High Points & Setbacks

✨ High Points:

• Ali Brothers (Maulana Mohammad Ali and Maulana Shaukat Ali) were symbolic
leaders.
• Bi Amman, their mother, rallied women — a rare moment of female political
participation.
• Hindu-Muslim unity reached a high point.
• Ulema and other religious figures mobilized masses.

❌ Setbacks:

1. Moplah Rebellion (1921):

o In Kerala, Moplah Muslims revolted against Hindu landlords, hurting Hindu-
Muslim unity.
 2. Chauri Chaura Incident (1922):
o Protesters killed 22 policemen.
o Gandhi, disturbed by the violence, called off the Non-Cooperation Movement.
3. Abolition of the Caliphate (1924):
o Turkey's new republican government under Atatürk abolished the Caliphate.
o Indian Muslim leaders, including Maulana Azad, accepted the Turkish decision.
o It rendered the Khilafat Movement meaningless.

Consequences
❌ Negative:

• Hijrat Movement (Migration to Afghanistan) failed badly.

• Muslims who sold property to migrate were left destitute.
• All-India Muslim League was weakened.
• Lucknow Pact (1916) and separate electorates were criticized and weakened.
• Hindu-Muslim unity didn’t last long.

✅ Positive:

• Experience in mass mobilization, protests, and political activism.

• Built a generation of politically trained Muslims, crucial for future struggles.
• Laid the groundwork for the Pakistan Movement later.

---

4. Causes and Consequences of the War of Independence (1857)

• TERMINOLOGY & HISTORICAL DEBATE

• KNOWN AS SEPOY MUTINY BY THE BRITISH (PRE-1947) AND FIRST WAR OF INDEPENDENCE BY
MOST SOUTH ASIANS (POST-1947).
• GEOGRAPHICAL SPREAD & SUPPORT
• PUNJAB AND DECCAN DID NOT FULLY SUPPORT BUT ATTEMPTED TO JOIN.
• NWFP SAW MUTINY ATTEMPTS AT NOWSHERA AND MARDAN (MAY 21–22, 1857).
• JULLUNDHAR REVOLUTIONARIES MARCHED TO DELHI.
• AURANGABAD (DECCAN) HAD A PARTIAL MUTINY (JUNE 13, 1857).
• RELIGIOUS & SOCIAL ASPECTS
• BOTH HINDUS AND MUSLIMS PARTICIPATED AND SUFFERED.
• MUSLIMS WERE TARGETED MORE FOR PUNISHMENT DUE TO A SHARED MISCONCEPTION:
• MUSLIMS FELT BITTER AS THEY LOST POWER TO THE BRITISH.
• HINDUS WERE LUKEWARM SINCE ONLY THE RULING CLASS CHANGED.
• THE BRITISH STRUGGLED MORE AGAINST THE MARATHAS THAN THE MUGHALS TO GAIN
POWER IN INDIA.
• THE MUTINEERS MADE BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR THE SYMBOLIC LEADER TO COUNTER BRITISH
RULE.
• THE PROCLAMATION OF BAHADUR SHAH II AS EMPEROR BY A HINDU-MAJORITY REBEL FORCE
SHOWED HINDU-MUSLIM UNITY.
• UNITY WAS TEMPORARY, AS NOT ALL INDIANS WERE COMMITTED TO REMOVING BRITISH
RULE.
• Economic Causes:
• Unequal pay: European soldiers were paid more than Indian sepoys.
• Pensions & land grants for sepoys were controlled by the British, causing resentment.
• Religious & Social Causes:
• British social reforms (abolition of sati, child marriage, widow remarriage) raised
suspicions.
• 1850 Law (Lord Canning) allowed converts to inherit family property, fueling fears of
forced conversions.
• Sepoys were made to sign contracts:
• Refusing to cross the seas was not allowed.
• Removing earrings in uniform was enforced.
• Immediate Cause (Military Issue):
• Introduction of greased Enfield rifle cartridges triggered the mutiny.
• Rumors spread that the cartridges were coated with pig and cow fat, offending both
Hindus and Muslims.
• The British denied the rumors and canceled the policy, but distrust had already
spread.
• Over time, British high-handedness worsened sepoy resentment.
• Political Effects:
• End of the East India Company – The British Crown took direct control of India in
1858.
• British Raj Established – The Government of India Act 1858 transferred rule to the
British monarchy.
• End of Mughal Rule – Bahadur Shah Zafar II was exiled to Burma, marking the end
of the Mughal dynasty.
• Administrative Changes:
• Viceroy Replaced Governor-General – Lord Canning became the first Viceroy of
India.
• Reforms in the British Administration – Policies became more cautious to prevent
future uprisings.
 6. Military Reforms
7. REORGANIZATION OF THE ARMY –
6. MORE BRITISH SOLDIERS WERE STATIONED IN INDIA.
7. INDIAN SOLDIERS’ RATIO WAS REDUCED IN THE BRITISH ARMY.
8. INDIANS WERE DIVIDED BASED ON CASTE, REGION, AND RELIGION TO PREVENT
UNITY.
• SOCIAL & ECONOMIC EFFECTS:
7. INCREASED RACIAL DISCRIMINATION – BRITISH BECAME MORE DISTRUSTFUL OF INDIANS.
8. RELIGIOUS & CULTURAL SENSITIVITY – BRITISH STOPPED INTERFERING IN RELIGIOUS MATTERS
TO AVOID PROVOKING INDIANS.
9. STRONGER DIVIDE-AND-RULE POLICY – BRITISH ENCOURAGED HINDU-MUSLIM DIVISIONS TO
WEAKEN FUTURE UPRISINGS.
10. MORE ECONOMIC EXPLOITATION – HEAVY TAXES, LAND GRABS, AND ECONOMIC POLICIES
FURTHER EXPLOITED INDIA.
• NATIONALISM & FUTURE MOVEMENTS:
11. RISE OF NATIONALISM – THE REVOLT INSPIRED LATER FREEDOM MOVEMENTS LIKE THE
INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS (1885).
12. NEW LEADERSHIP EMERGED – INDIAN LEADERS LIKE RANI LAKSHMI BAI, NANA SAHIB, AND
TATYA TOPE BECAME NATIONAL HEROES.
•
---

5. Allama Iqbal’s Allahabad Address (1930) and Its Role in Shaping Pakistan Ideology

5.1 Background of the Address

Allama Iqbal delivered his famous address at the All India Muslim League session in Allahabad in 1930,
during a period of rising communal tensions in India.

5.2 Emphasis on Muslim Identity

Iqbal emphasized that Muslims were a distinct nation with their own religion, culture, and traditions. He
rejected the idea of a single Indian nation.

5.3 Demand for Political Autonomy

Iqbal proposed the creation of a separate Muslim state in north-western India to ensure political
autonomy and religious freedom.
5.4 Islamic Values and Governance

He envisioned a state based on Islamic principles of justice, equality, and morality, where Muslims could
live according to their faith.

5.5 Rejection of Western Secularism

Iqbal criticized Western secularism and materialism. He believed that Islam provided a complete code of
life and should be the foundation of Muslim society.

5.6 Intellectual Influence

Iqbal's ideas inspired Muslim youth and leaders. His philosophical and political thoughts laid the
intellectual groundwork for the Pakistan Movement.

5.7 Impact on Jinnah and Muslim League

Iqbal’s address influenced Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who later translated Iqbal’s vision into the Pakistan
Resolution of 1940.

5.8 Legacy of the Address

The Allahabad Address is considered the ideological foundation of Pakistan. It provided a clear vision for
a separate Muslim homeland.

---

6. Round Table Conferences (1930–1932): Objectives, Outcomes, and Reasons for Failure

6.1 Historical Background

The Round Table Conferences were convened in response to growing nationalist demands and the
recommendations of the Simon Commission.

6.2 Objectives of the Conferences

The primary aim was to discuss constitutional reforms and the future political structure of British India
with Indian leaders and British officials.

6.3 First Round Table Conference (1930)

Held without Congress participation, this conference included princes and minority groups. It
discussed federal structure and minority rights but made limited progress. Location:

• London, United Kingdom, at the House of Lords

Purpose:

• To discuss and plan constitutional reforms in India, following the Simon Commission
Report.
• Aimed to bring Indian leaders and British officials to the table for negotiations.

Participants:

• British Government: Led by Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald.

• Indian Princes: Represented through the Chamber of Princes.
• Political Representatives from India, including:
o Hindu Mahasabha
o Muslim League
o Sikh representatives
o Indian Liberal Party
o Depressed Classes (represented by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar)
o Others (Parsis, Anglo-Indians, women representatives)

Notably Absent:

• Indian National Congress did not participate, as they were engaged in the Civil
Disobedience Movement led by Mahatma Gandhi.

Outcome:

• Not much concrete progress was made.

 • Discussions laid groundwork for further dialogues.
• Emphasis on Dominion Status was made, but there was no consensus.

6.4 Second Round Table Conference (1931)

Attended by Gandhi as the sole Congress representative, it focused on minority representation,

which led to intense debates and disagreements. Location:

• London, United Kingdom

Purpose:

• To continue discussions from the First Conference and move toward a constitutional
agreement for India.
• This time, Indian National Congress participated — a major difference from the first
one.

Key Participants:

🇮🇳 From India:

• Indian National Congress was represented by Mahatma Gandhi, who was the sole
representative of the Congress.
• Other Indian participants:
o Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (Depressed Classes)
o Muhammad Ali Jinnah (Muslim League)
o Tej Bahadur Sapru, Sarojini Naidu, M. C. Chagla
o Representatives from the Sikh community, Anglo-Indians, Indian Princes,
women, business, and labor groups

🇬🇧 British Side:

• Led again by Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald

• British political leaders and officials from different parties

Major Issues Discussed:

 • Representation of minorities (especially Dalits, Muslims, Sikhs, and others)
• Separate electorates — a hot-button issue
• Federal structure and autonomy
• Role and power of Indian provinces

Key Highlights:

• Gandhi's Position: Represented Congress and claimed to speak for all of India,
including minorities — which was strongly challenged by other groups.
• Ambedkar vs. Gandhi Clash: Over the issue of separate electorates for Dalits (which
later led to the Poona Pact in 1932).
• Failure to reach consensus on minority representation and communal electorates.

Outcome:

• No major agreement was reached.

• Discussions exposed deep divisions, especially on communal representation.
• The British promised to issue a Communal Award (which they did in 1932).
• Paved the way for the Third Round Table Conference, though Congress boycotted that
one again.

6.5 Third Roundz Table Conference (1932)

Poorly attended and lacking Congress participation, this session failed to achieve any significant
breakthroughs. Location:

• London, United Kingdom

Key Participants:

Notably Absent:

• Indian National Congress boycotted the conference again.

(They were protesting the Communal Award and were back in civil disobedience
mode.)
🇮🇳 Indian Representatives Included:

• Indian Princes
• Some Liberals
• Representatives from:
o Muslim League
o Depressed Classes (again led by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar)
o Sikhs, Anglo-Indians, Europeans, and other minority groups

🇬🇧 British Representatives:

• British government officials and political leaders, again led by Prime Minister Ramsay
MacDonald

Topics Discussed:

• Implementation of federal structure in India

• Status of minorities and separate electorates (still very controversial)
• Further defining the Government of India Act, which would be passed in 1935

Outcome:

• With Congress absent, the conference lacked strong Indian nationalist representation.
• Little progress was made.
• However, the discussions contributed directly to the drafting of the Government of
India Act, 1935, which:
o Proposed federalism
o Expanded provincial autonomy
o Introduced bicameral legislature at the center
o Continued communal electorates

6.6 Outcomes of the Conferences

The conferences resulted in the Government of India Act 1935, which introduced provincial autonomy
and extended the electorate.

6.7 Communal Award and Separate Electorates

The Communal Award of 1932 granted separate electorates to minorities, including Muslims, Sikhs, and
Dalits, reinforcing communal divisions.

6.8 Reasons for Failure

The conferences failed due to lack of consensus, deep communal divides, and the British government’s
reluctance to grant real autonomy. They highlighted the need for a separate Muslim political solution.